SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Samples”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2020

UFCC Calibration Measurements for UO2 Samples

The uranium UF 6 coincidence counter (UFCC) was designed to measure 5A/B cylinders containing UF6 in the passive neutron self-interrogation mode. The purpose of the present report is to extend the UFCC capability to other sample types such as oxides and liquids that might be found during verification activities. A 252 Cf source was introduced into the detector to make the active mode measurements possible, because only the UF 6 samples have adequate neutron emission for self-interrogation. A customized HDPE insert was designed to position the 252 Cf source under the UO 2 sample cans. The sample enrichments varied from depleted to 93% to establish the shape of the calibration curve and the measurement uncertainties.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2020

Sample problems for Section III, Division 5 design by inelastic analysis of Grade 91 components

This report works through two sample design analyses of representative Grade 91 components using the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 5, Appendix HBB-T rules for the strain and deformation and creep-fatigue design criteria using a design by inelastic analysis approach. The component geometries and loadings were selected to span a wide variety of potential applications. The sample components are an endplate geometry, which is fairly representative of typical pressure vessel construction, and a core block, representing a critical component in a heat pipe microreactor, which has a complicated geometry and complex thermal stress history. These sample problems serve several functions. First, they are complete worked examples of how to apply the current design by inelastic analysis rules. Second, they serve as test cases to evaluate the current rules and provide feedback on how they could be optimized to deal with complicated component geometries or to be better automated in modern finite element analysis software. Finally, the analysis here uses an inelastic constitutive model for Grade 91 developed by Argonne National Laboratory and proposed for inclusion in the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 5 rules as a reference constitutive model. Using this constitutive model in the sample problem analyses tests the model in the context of the ASME Code rules. The final conclusions of this report are that the material model and the current Code rules are satisfactory, but that the Code rules could be optimized to simplify automation and reduce over conservatism. Future work should address the specific optimization topics discussed in this report.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

COMBLE-Isotopic Links to Atmospheric Water’s Sources (ISLAS) Snow Sampling 2020 Field Campaign Report

Within the European Research Council (ERC)-funded project entitled Isotopic Links to Atmospheric Water’s Sources (ISLAS), researchers from the University of Bergen, Norway, used the stable isotope composition of atmospheric water vapor and precipitation to obtain information about the sources and transport processes of water vapor within arctic weather systems. In particular, during cold-air outbreak conditions, evaporation and precipitation occur in close proximity within the study area. With evaporation studied at a single location (Ny-Ålesund), ISLAS researchers wanted to be able to sample the resulting precipitation at several downstream locations. The U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment (COMBLE) site was one of those locations, included in an entire network of precipitation sampling stations reaching from Ny-Ålesund, where water vapor isotope measurements are conducted near the surface, to Longyearbyen, Tromsø, Andenes, Ålesund, and Bergen. Daily precipitation samples, enhanced by more frequent sampling during intense operational periods (IOPs), were conducted during four weeks from 20 February to 20 March 2020. The contribution from the ARM mobile facility (AMF) observatory, deployed at ANX (Andenes, Norway) during COMBLE, was valuable to understand the spatial coherence of water isotope signals from arctic and extratropical weather systems.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2020

Determination of Total, Organic, and Inorganic Carbon in Biological Cultures and Liquid Fraction Process Samples

This procedure describes a method for analyzing dissolved and suspended total carbon, in organic and inorganic form in biological cultures, in the presence or absence of cells, and liquid fraction conversion process samples. This method calculates total organic carbon by subtraction of inorganic carbon, derived from sample acidification, from total dissolved carbon by combustion at 680°C with detection of derived gaseous CO 2 by a non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) sensor. The inclusion of details on a process step of heat treating biologically active samples before analysis can potentially halt biological activity, preserving carbon stores and allowing for accurate quantification of the carbon content at the time of sample collection.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2021

Design of Sample Holder for Plutonium Coupon Studies

In order to gain better understanding of the plutonium (Pu) corrosion behaviors and reaction kinetics, it is imperative that coupon experiments must be performed on well-defined surfaces. The reactions at the samples’ surfaces have to be properly monitored in terms of reactive gaseous pressures and temperatures. The pressure can be measured by using a pressure gauge, the temperature can be detected with calibrated thermal couples and/or pyrometric camera. These devices do not interfere with the chemistry of the surface reaction. However, to obtain information from the surface reaction, the aggressively machined edge and the back side of the Pu coupons need to be shielded from the applied gases. The coupons are typically made to 5/8 inch in diameter and 0.065 inch in thickness. To this end, a sample holder was designed which can seal the machined edge and the back side of coupons from the exposed gases, thus allowing proper surface reaction. The holder design was fabricated and had been tested with several coupon samples. We have achieved perfect sealing of the machined edge and the back side of the coupons, even when the coupons’ thicknesses are vastly different than the nominal thickness for which the sample holders were fabricated for. This write-up is to document the design of the holder and provide a description of the procedures to properly put the components together.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

DOE OSTI2021

Characterization results for the 2020 tank farm 2H and 3H evaporator overhead samples

The 2020 annual 2H and 3H Evaporator overhead samples were received at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) on December 22, 2020. The delivered samples were analyzed for concentration of cesium-137 ( 137 Cs), strontium-90 (90 Sr) and iodine-129 ( 129 I) to validate compliance with the Effluent Treatment Project Waste Acceptance Criteria (ETP WAC, Rev. 7). The concentration of all three radionuclides, 137 Cs, 90 Sr, and 129 I, in the 2H Evaporator overhead sample were found to be less than the corresponding ETP WAC limits. Radiochemical analysis of the 3H Evaporator overhead sample indicated a 137 Cs content about an order of magnitude higher than the acceptable threshold value, and 90 Sr and 129 I concentrations within the acceptance limits.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Solvent Hold Tank Sample Results for MCU-20-32-33-34 (Quarterly Report, September 2020)

In late FY13, MCU implemented the Next Generation Solvent (NGS) flow sheet. Facility personnel added a non-radioactive, NGS “cocktail” containing the new Extractant (MaxCalix) and a new Suppressor (TiDG) to the SHT heel to implement the NGS flow sheet. The resulting “blend” solvent (“NGS blend solvent”) is essentially NGS with residual amounts of calix[4]arene-bis(tert-octylbenzo-crown-6) (BOBCalixC6) and trioctylamine (TOA). For process monitoring, SHT samples are sent to Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to examine solvent composition changes over time. With the exception of Isopar™ L which is regularly added to the SHT due to its high vapor pressure, this report shows the cumulative chemical composition data, including impurities like mercury, of the September 2020 (MCU-20-32-33-34) solvent SHT sample. A summary report of the September SHT solvent sample was issued earlier. This report examines the cumulative results from these and several past monthly reports. These samples are intended to verify that the solvent is within the specified composition range. A baseline “scratch” solvent - a scratch solvent is a preparation of all 6 solvent components (this includes the old extractant BoBCalix and the old suppressor TrioctylAmine that remained when solvent was converted to Next Generation Solvent [NGS]) of the composition that approximates the blend of cocktail and heel solvent - was prepared in the lab (September 2018) and used for comparison and evaluation. The results from the analyses are presented in this document. This report is the last characterization analysis of the SHT solvent. MCU entered a lay-up state and about 128 gallons of the SHT solvent were pumped into 55 gallons drums for future disposal.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Analysis of Dust Samples Collected from an Inland ISFSI Site (''Site B'').

In October of 2020, dust samples were collected from the surface of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) dry storage canisters during an inspection at an inland Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, the second inland site at which surface deposits have been sampled. The purpose of the sampling was to assess the composition and abundance of the soluble salts present on the canister surface, information which provides a metric for potential corrosion risks. The samples were delivered to Sandia National laboratories for analysis. At Sandia, the soluble salts were leached from the dust and quantified by ion chromatography. In addition, subsamples of the dust were taken for scanning electron microscopy to determine the texture and mineralogy of the dust and salts. The results of those analyses are presented in this report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Tank 50 Salt Solution Sample (2QCY21)

In this Technical Report, the chemical and radionuclide contaminant results from the Second Quarter Calendar Year 2021 (CY21) sample of Tank 50 salt solution are presented in tabulated form. The information from this characterization will be used by Savannah River Remediation (SRR) for the transfer of aqueous waste from Tank 50 to the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF), where the waste will be treated and disposed in the Saltstone Disposal Facility. This Technical Report compares results, where applicable, to SPF Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) Limits and Targets that were established at the time the Tank 50 sample was obtained. The chemical and radionuclide contaminant results from the characterization of the Second Quarter CY21 sampling of Tank 50 were requested by SRR personnel via a Task Technical Request (TTR) and details of the testing are presented in the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP). This Technical Report is part of Deliverable 2 relating to Task 1 from the SRR request. Data pertaining to the regulatory limits for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals per Task 2 from the SRR request, will be obtained semi-annually for the 1QCY21 and 3QCY21 Tank 50 samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Results for the Third Quarter Calendar Year 2021 Tank 50 Salt Solution Sample

In this Technical Report, the chemical and radionuclide contaminant results from the Third Quarter Calendar Year 2021 (CY21) sample of Tank 50 salt solution are presented in tabulated form. The information from this characterization will be used by Savannah River Remediation (SRR) for the transfer of aqueous waste from Tank 50 to the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF), where the waste will be treated and disposed in the Saltstone Disposal Facility. This Technical Report compares results, where applicable, to SPF Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) Limits and Targets that were established at the time the Tank 50 sample was obtained. The chemical and radionuclide contaminant results from the characterization of the Third Quarter CY21 sampling of Tank 50 were requested by SRR personnel via a Task Technical Request (TTR) and details of the testing are presented in the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP). This Technical Report is part of Deliverable 2 relating to Task 1 from the SRR request. Data pertaining to the regulatory limits for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals per Task 2 from the SRR request, will be obtained semi-annually for the 1QCY21 and 3QCY21 Tank 50 samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Results for the Second Quarter Calendar Year 2021 Tank 50 Salt Solution Sample

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of SDU 6 Sump Water Samples

This report details results from characterization of the Saltstone Disposal Unit 6 (SDU 6) East Sump water samples. In March of 2022, Saltstone Radiation Protection Department (RPD) personnel reported SDU 6 East Sump beta/gamma radiation levels at ~ 33 dpm/mL (~ 15 pCi/mL) beta/gamma in excess of the water sampling limit of 16 dpm/mL (7.2 pCi/mL). Replicate samples obtained from the SDU 6 East Sump were sent to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) for analysis to include pH, limited anions, toxic metals and radionuclides. Subsequent sump samples associated with SDU 7 that has not yet been filled with any radioactive material were also analyzed at SRNL for both nitrate and nitrite.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Results for the January 2022 Semiannual Tank 50 Salt Solution Sample

In this Technical Report, the chemical and radionuclide contaminant results from the January 2022 Semiannual sample of Tank 50 salt solution are presented in tabulated form. The information from this characterization will be used by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) for the transfer of aqueous waste from Tank 50 to the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF), where the waste will be treated and disposed in the Saltstone Disposal Facility. This Technical Report compares results, where applicable, to SPF Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) LIMITS and TARGETS that were established at the time the Tank 50 sample was obtained. The chemical and radionuclide contaminant results from the characterization of the January 2022 semiannual sampling of Tank 50 were requested by SRMC personnel via a Task Technical Request (TTR) and details of the testing are presented in the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP). This Technical Report is part of Deliverable 2 relating to Task 1 from the SRMC request. Data pertaining to the regulatory limits for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals per Task 2 from the RMC request, will be obtained semiannually for the January 2022 and July 2022 Tank 50 samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of DWPF Sludge Batch 6 (Macrobatch 7) Pour Stream Glass Samples

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) began processing Sludge Batch 6 (SB6), also referred to as Macrobatch 7 (MB7), in June 2010. SB6 is a blend of the heel of Tank 40 from Sludge Batch 5 (SB5), H-Canyon Np transfers and SB6 that was transferred to Tank 40 from Tank 51. SB6 was processed using Frit 418. During processing of each sludge batch, the DWPF is required to take at least one glass sample to meet the objectives of the Glass Product Control Program and to complete the necessary Production Records so that the final glass product may be disposed of at a Federal Repository. Four pour stream glass samples and two Melter Feed Tank (MFT) slurry samples were collected while processing SB6. The samples were transferred to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) where they were analyzed.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Results for the July 2022 Semiannual Tank 50 Salt Solution Sample

In this Technical Report, the chemical and radionuclide contaminant results from the July 2022 Semiannual sample of Tank 50 salt solution are presented in tabulated form. The information from this characterization will be used by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) for the transfer of aqueous waste from Tank 50 to the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF), where the waste will be treated and disposed in the Saltstone Disposal Facility. This Technical Report compares results, where applicable, to SPF Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) LIMITS and TARGETS that were established at the time the Tank 50 sample was obtained. The chemical and radionuclide contaminant results from the characterization of the July 2022 semiannual sampling of Tank 50 were requested by SRMC personnel via a Task Technical Request (TTR) and details of the testing are presented in the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP). This Technical Report is part of Deliverable 2 relating to Task 1 from the SRMC request. Data pertaining to the regulatory limits for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals per Task 2 from the SRMC request, will be obtained semiannually for the January 2022 and July 2022 Tank 50 samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Evaluation of Minimum Detectable Activities for Stack Sample Analyses

The Rad-NESHAP program takes samples at major point sources to track how much of select nuclides are being emitted out of the stack. Samples are taken at the site where the radiological operations are being performed. The samples are then sent to analytical laboratories for analysis to determine what nuclides exist in the sample. However, due to the sensitivity of the instruments, false positives are often reported. To reduce the number of false positives, the results reported from the analytical labs are compared to set detection limits. Anything below the set detection limit is considered part of the background while anything above the limit is considered a positive hit. Therefore, the detection limit must be set low enough that any false negatives do not result in a significant dose missed at the end of the year but high enough that there are not enough false positives to skew the annual dose being reported. All detection limits listed in this section for the analyses below were designed to meet the stated equivalent emissions rate and subsequent off-site doses. These minimum detectable activities (MDAs) were developed in the 1990s and documented in the memo cited for each analysis below. These limits and memos are all currently referenced in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for the Rad-NESHAP Compliance Task, which is being updated to a Project Implementation Plan (PIP) concurrently with this document. As part of this update process, the original MDAs defined in this section needed to be verified that they were still conservative and meet the off-site dose levels stated.

2019 MDA↗

DOE OSTI2023

Characterization of Salt Waste Processing Facility August 2022 Tank 201 sample

Two Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Tank 201 samples were collected from the replacement of the decontaminated salt solution (DSS) coalescer at different times; one in December of 2021 and the other in August 2022. The December 2021 sample was collected after nitric and water flushing of the DSS Coalescer. The Aug 2022 sample was collected after water flushing only. The December 2021 Tank 201 solids were previously characterized and documented. SWPF requested the characterization of the August 2022 Tank 201 sample, and the comparison of the characterization results for these two Tank 201 solids collected at different dates.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Chemical Characterization Results for Tank 40 Sludge Batch 10 Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (WAPS) Sample

A 3-L sample (HTF-40-23-24) obtained from Tank 40 following transfer of Tank 51 to achieve the final Sludge Batch 10 processing composition was received by Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). SRNL was tasked with characterization of the sample in accordance with requirements for reporting the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications. A representative subsample, approximately 500 mL, was prepared by continuously agitating the 3-L sample via a mixing blade inserted into the bottle. This subsample was then used for the chemical and physical characterization reported here. This characterization includes the following: (1) Supernate and slurry density; (2) Weight percent solids; (3) Mercury Analysis (supernate and slurry); (4) Anions; (5) Total Organic/Inorganic Carbon; (6) Free Hydroxide; (7) Other Base; (8) Elementals; (9) Volatile Organic Analysis and Semi-volatile Organic Analysis; and (10) Fissile Radionuclides and Uranium Enrichment. The results of this physical and chemical characterization of the sample are documented in this report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗