Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “SUPERSONIC FLIGHT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25

Longitudinal Handling Qualities of the Tu-144LL Airplane and Comparisons With Other Large, Supersonic Aircraft

Four flights have been conducted using the Tu-144LL supersonic transport aircraft with the dedicated objective of collecting quantitative data and qualitative pilot comments. These data are compared with the following longitudinal flying qualities criteria: Neal-Smith, short-period damping, time delay, control anticipation parameter, phase delay (omega(sp)*T(theta(2))), pitch bandwidth as a function of time delay, and flight path as a function of pitch bandwidth. Determining the applicability of these criteria and gaining insight into the flying qualities of a large, supersonic aircraft are attempted. Where appropriate, YF-12, XB-70, and SR-71 pilot ratings are compared with the Tu-144LL results to aid in the interpretation of the Tu-144LL data and to gain insight into the application of criteria. The data show that approach and landing requirements appear to be applicable to the precision flightpath control required for up-and-away flight of large, supersonic aircraft. The Neal-Smith, control anticipation parameter, and pitch-bandwidth criteria tend to correlate with the pilot comments better than the phase delay criterion, omega(sp)*T(theta(2)). The data indicate that the detrimental flying qualities implication of decoupled pitch-attitude and flightpath responses occurring for high-speed flight may be mitigated by requiring the pilot to close the loop on flightpath or vertical speed.

Cox, Timothy H.↗

Supersonic Crossflow Transition Control in Ground and Flight Tests

This paper describes the use of distributed-roughness-element (DRE) patterns along a Mach 2 design swept-wing leading edge to increase the laminar flow extent and thereby reduce drag. One swept-wing model was tested in a supersonic wind tunnel as well as beneath a supersonic flight vehicle. Wing model surface data acquired during these tests included pressures, temperatures, and boundary-layer transition locations. Similarities and differences in experimental results are discussed. While wind tunnel and flight results show some differences, the wind tunnel results still provide key insights necessary for understanding how to design effective DRE patterns for use in flight applications. Experimental results demonstrate a DRE flow control effect observed in flight similar to that observed in the wind tunnel. Finally, a different perspective is discussed concerning what flow control role RE patterns might perform in any future swept-wing laminar flow control applications.

Owens, Lewis R.↗

Numerical prediction of transition of the F-16 wing at supersonic speeds

This work is part of the high speed research program currently underway at NASA. This project has the goal of gaining understanding of the technical requirements for supersonic-hypersonic flight. Specifically, this research is part of a continuing project to study the laminar flow over swept wings at high speeds and involves the numerical prediction of the flow about the F-16XL wing. The research uses the CNS/ARC3D codes and the resulting crossflow velocity components in order to estimate transition locations on the wing. Effects of angle of attack on the extent of laminar flows was found to be minimal. This result can be attributed to the fact that a laminar flow airfoil was used in this study, which has a continuous favorable pressure gradient over approximately the first 20 percent of the chord for angles of attacks up to 10 degrees. It should also be noted that even after 20 percent chord the pressure gradient either slowly continued to increase, but never decreased before 90 percent chord, except for the higher swept cases when separation occurs. Angles of attack greater than 10 degrees were not considered since this study assumes natural laminar flow for normal supersonic cruise flight conditions.

Cummings, Russell M.↗

High Speed Inlet Distortion Test for the X 59 Low Boom Flight Demonstrator in the NASA Glenn 8-by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel

The Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD) High Speed Inlet Distortion Test (HSIDT) was completed in the NASA Glenn Research Center 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel (8x6 SWT) using a 9.5 percent-scale propulsion model of the X–59 to evaluate the compatibility and operability of the inlet and engine integration, focusing on the inlet dynamic effects at the engine face. The model was instrumented with steady-state and high-response total pressure probes in the conventional 40-point, equal-area array at the aerodynamic interface plane (AIP). The HSIDT successfully collected high response distortion data points for the X–59 from Mach = 0 to 1.55 for a wide range of angle-of-attack, angle-of-sideslip, and inlet flow. Analyses showed that inlet dynamic distortion and inlet planar wave (or inlet buzz) were within engine limits through most of the flight envelope. The test data showed that inlet planar wave was present at Mach 1.35 and above, at airflows between idle and maximum engine airflow. Engine throttle back will need to be limited when decelerating from supersonic flight Mach to avoid these regions of inlet planar wave. The HSIDT data was also used to compare the metric SUM40, computed from the 40 high-response AIP total pressure probes, with the metric SUM4, computed from four high-response inlet static pressure probes. The data showed that SUM4 can be used as a surrogate for SUM40 during the X–59 flight test to detect inlet planar wave.

X-59↗

Shock noise from supersonic jets in simulated flight to Mach 0.4

Simulated flight experiments to Mach 0.4 on underexpanded jets show that flight has only minor effects on both the shock structure and shock associated noise. Although screech modes that do not exist statically become dominant at the higher flight speeds, the screech amplitudes and directivity as well as the broadband shock noise amplitudes remain relatively constant as the forward speed is increased. The change in wavelength due to flight on both shock noise components are predicted well from existing theories of shock noise.

Norum, T. D.↗

Shock structure and noise of supersonic jets in simulated flight to Mach 0.4

Measured jet plume static pressure distributions and far-field acoustic spectra are presented for underexpanded jets in simulated flight up to a Mach number of 0.4. A gradual stretching of the downstream shock cells is found as the Mach number increases, with no perceptible change in the shock strength. There appears to be little effect of flight on the broadband shock noise amplitudes, and the small changes in its peak frequency for the same emission angle are correlated with the slightly longer shock cells in flight. The larger changes in the broadband peak frequency found at the same angle in wind tunnel coordinates are attributable to convection. Jet mixing noise production decreases significantly with increasing flight speed.

Norum, Thomas D.↗