DOE OSTI2016
Cold neutrons have kinetic energies less than 5 meV and wavelengths greater than 4 Α. They can be transported over tens of meters through super-reflecting neutron guides with minimal losses. Cold neutrons are used to investigate the structure of larger molecular systems such as biological materials, polymers and aggregates, due to their preferential interaction with light elements and general ignorance towards heavy ones. Intense beams of cold neutrons are obtained from slowing down a source of thermal energy neutrons - which may be from either a research reactor or spallation neutron source - through some cryogenic moderator such as liquid hydrogen or deuterium. The present reactor at the NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR) - NBSR - is such a cold neutron source (CNS) facility which provides cold neutron beams for over 2,000 scientists performing various experiments annually. Feasibility studies on a replacement reactor for the NBSR are underway at NCNR with the primary purpose of optimized cold neutron production. Low enriched uranium (LEU) fuel is required for the new reactor to conform to nuclear non-proliferation agreements. The low thermal power rate of 20 MW is taken as a priority with a fuel cycle length designated as 30 days. A horizontal split compact core with a large D{sub 2}O reflector tank is currently proposed and studied, with the expectation of achieving much better cold neutron performance than the present NIST reactor (NBSR). A preliminary core design has been completed using MCNP6 modeling and simulation. The physics performance characteristics of the proposed new core indicate that the new design is competitive with the most notable existing advanced cold neutron sources. In previous studies, only rectangular shaped fuel elements were considered because they have similar external dimensions as the NBSR fuel elements. However, from a compact core standpoint, a square lattice is not the most effective geometry for a tight configuration. Moreover, the previous studies also showed that the square lattice of the fuel elements left little room to accommodate vertical insertion blade-type control elements. As a result, all control blades had to reside in the D{sub 2}O reflector, which made the design cumbersome (in that case the control blades must penetrate the reflector tank) and neutronically uneconomical. In this summary, a preliminary feasibility study on a hexagonal core lattice is performed to render an alternative geometry for the new reactor (HEX core) to provide sufficient space for the control elements. The identical LEU fuel (U{sub 3}Si{sub 2}/Al) with U-235 enrichment 19.75% is used in the new design. The maximum thermal power and fuel management scheme remain the same as the previous investigations (three 30-day cycled batches for each batch of three fuel elements). The horizontal split compact core concept is also applied in the hexagonal lattice core design, with the objective of creating maximum thermal flux traps between the split core halves. A detailed description of the model for the hexagonal lattice core is presented in the following section. The HEX core design achieves a number of successes over the previous split-core design. Given that much of the motivation of this work was based on implementation of control blades into a concept which lacked them, it is notable that neutron economy was well-preserved in the process of achieving conservatively effective reactivity control; start-up k{sub eff} was in fact increased by 0.23% and peak thermal flux increased by ∼25%. A useful metric in determining the efficacy of resources towards creating an environment for the production of cold neutrons - dubbed the 'quality factor' (QF) - is the ratio of peak thermal neutron flux in a system to the total thermal power produced. Because HEX core's objectives are very focused in comparison to existing research reactors, it is fitting to pursue a design which out-performs all others in terms of some specific performance metric, namely this QF term. While HFIR remains the greatest cold neutron source in the world, it does so through use of HEU fuel (which will be replaced with LEU in the near future), and suffers a greater level of fast neutron contamination that is expected from the HEX design. The new core design achieves these successes due to the hexagonal lattice fuel arrangement, a 13.5% reduction in cladding mass, and a 13.1% reduction in fuel element volume. In spite of a 5.5% reduction in fuel mass, no compromises in reactor performance were noted. Provided the favorable characteristics shown of the control blade design, refueling intervals longer than the prescribed 30 days may be considered. It can be speculated that with these quantitative benefits, the overall capital and continuous costs of the HEX core design will be less than the previously proposed split-core concept.
07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗