More is definitely different: the zebrafish as witness: Comment on ”Structure and function in artificial, zebrafish and human neural networks” by Peng Ji et al.
We report half a century ago, in his foundation paper More is different, Anderson stated the relevance of including multiple scales of interaction, instead of trying to reduce everything to fundamental principles. By doing so, one may witness phenomena that were not expected by looking at each individual components separately. This idea finds indeed numerous realizations such as the synchronization phenomenon, where a multitude of dynamical systems suddenly start to behave coherently together, or the spreading of diseases over entire populations, to name only two examples. But if one would have to give a single example of a system where the multiplicity of interaction scales is of utmost importance, it would probably be the brain. In their review, Ji et al. give a comprehensive overview of the multiple scales of science required in the investigation of structural and functional brain networks, as well as their interplay.