DOE OSTI2015
For materials slightly contaminated by fissile nuclides (such as radioactive sludge), it could be useful to take into account the low fissile density in order to define the nuclear criticality safety limits (mass, volume,...) when this density is lower than the one of the optimally moderated fissile-water mixture (e.g. 30 g/dm{sup 3} for {sup 239}Pu). In such a case, if the material is modelled by the usual fissile-water mixture only, the fissile medium still contains a void fraction when the optimal moderation ratio is reached. Then, the question is to know whether modeling the other elements of the material can impact the nuclear criticality safety limits, in particular when they are good scattering elements. This paper aims at studying the impact of replacing the void fraction in plutonium fissile media, with various apparent densities, by different kinds of matrix containing scattering elements. Minimum critical values (mass, volume, diameter and thickness) have been determined for plutonium media, composed of 100 % {sup 239}Pu, with densities of 2, 5.8 and 7.3 g/dm{sup 3} in different kinds of matrix containing scattering elements (graphite, carbon, alumina, silica, magnesia, fluorite and calcium oxide). Different contents of the aforementioned scattering elements in the fissile media were studied and additional moderation was ensured by water. The results highlight that minimum critical values are lower when considering a fissile medium containing graphite, carbon, silica, alumina and magnesia with additional water moderation, compared to plutonium-water mixture only with the same low fissile apparent density. However, there is still a benefit of crediting density (critical values for a low fissile density are still higher than critical values without a density control). (authors)
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗