Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Trusses”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing using Physics-Based Models

Economic and environmental forces have placed pressure on the aviation industry to produce future aircraft designs with substantial improvements over those flying today. In order to meet these ambitious goals, new concepts such as the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) are being considered which diverge from the traditional tube-and-wing design. While this concept offers potential performance benefits over its traditional counterpart, it also features more coupling between various physics disciplines that must be considered during the design of the concept. This unique challenge provides a ripe opportunity for the application of multidisciplinary design optimization tool sets. The final work will couple together the mission analysis capability of Aviary with OpenAeroStruct for aerodynamic analysis and TACS for structural analysis. Using these tools we will preform a design optimization on the TTBW concept minimizing design fuel burn. The optimization will include design variables for mission trajectory, wing geometry, and structural sizing variables.

mbsae↗

Quantification of Design Trade-Offs When Comparing Transonic Truss-Braced Wing to Advanced Tube and Wing Aircraft

Interest in novel aircraft configurations has continued to grow in response to increasing demand for improved fuel efficiency. One such configuration of interest is the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW). Because the improvement of the TTBW comes from increased efficiency during cruise, it offers increasing returns as the mission distance increases. As a result, there is often a crossover point which represents the minimum mission range where the TTBW will offer a fuel burn reduction relative to a similar Tube and Wing aircraft with similar component technology levels. Aircraft rarely fly missions at their maximum range, so it is important to investigate not only the maximum benefit, but also the most likely benefit. Design decisions and analysis assumptions that significantly impact this crossover point include whether to put fuel in body tanks, how weight build-up estimation is calibrated, engine technology selection, and flight Mach number. This study, conducted under NASA’s Sustainable Flight Demonstration project and inspired by differing assumptions made by different research teams, details the impacts of changing these design decisions and assumptions.

Carl J Recine↗

Quantification of Design Trade-Offs When Comparing Transonic Truss-Braced Wing to Advanced Tube and Wing Aircraft

Interest in novel aircraft configurations has continued to grow in response to increasing demand for improved fuel efficiency. One such configuration of interest is the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW). Because the improvement of the TTBW comes from increased efficiency during cruise, it offers increasing returns as the mission distance increases. As a result, there is often a crossover point which represents the minimum mission range where the TTBW will offer a fuel burn reduction relative to a similar Tube and Wing aircraft with similar component technology levels. Aircraft rarely fly missions at their maximum range, so it is important to investigate not only the maximum benefit, but also the most likely benefit. Design decisions and analysis assumptions that significantly impact this crossover point include whether to put fuel in body tanks, how weight build-up estimation is calibrated, engine technology selection, and flight Mach number. This study, conducted under NASA’s Sustainable Flight Demonstration project and inspired by differing assumptions made by different research teams, details the impacts of changing these design decisions and assumptions.

Carl J Recine↗

A combination interferometric and morphological image processing approach to rapid quality assessment of additively manufactured cellular truss core components

Advanced manufacturing (AM) processes such as laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) are increasingly capable of fabricating components with useful and unprecedented mechanical properties by incorporating complex internal bracing structures. From the standpoint of quality control and assessment, however, internally complex assemblies present significant build-verification challenges. Here we propose a hybrid approach to the inspection involving the application of computer-aided speckle interferometry (CASI) and morphological image processing as a rapid, inexpensive, and facile method for AM quality control. The described methodology has low capital equipment costs, is full-field and non-contact, can be used in an industrial setting, and has very low requirements in terms of operator training and expertise. Consisting primarily of the combination of image processing software with a simple optical system of variable sensitivity, the method is shown to be effective for inspection of a titanium honeycomb component subjected to differential pressure. Results are compared to those achieved with computed tomography (CT), immersion ultrasound testing (UT), and optical holographic interferometry. Here we propose several possible processing strategies for automated quality assessment based on this powerful hybrid approach.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

External merology truss technology demonstration (KITE)

To achieve micro-arcsecond astrometry, SIM's external metrology system must track the relative changes of three baseline vectors with a precision of tens of picometers over a one-hour time scale.

metrology interferometry corner cube truss picomet↗

Adaptive Adjustment of a Precision Truss Structure: Experimental Validation

Previous analytical studies have shown the feasibility of using a limited number of active members to adaptively alter the structural shape or behavior to other desired states. As a demonstration of this concept, this paper describes the results of a sequence of validation tests, their correlation with the analytical results, and the problems encountered.

Precision↗

Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research: Phase IV Final Report – Volume I Mach 0.80 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing High-Speed Design Report

This design report summarizes work performed by the Boeing Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) team from December 2016 through June 2018. In Phase IV of the SUGAR program, Boeing is working to improve the productivity of a TTBW configuration by updating the Mach 0.745 vehicle concept to operate efficiently at Mach 0.80. Due to the aerodynamic and structural design challenges associated with adapting the design to a higher speed, design tasks have been broken into several subtasks. The information in this report (Volume I) documents the development of a Mach 0.80 vehicle outer mold line, maturation of TTBW structural concepts, and presents a preliminary high-liftsystem assessment. Results from these studies were integrated into an aircraft-level performance code that estimates the benefits of TTBW technology, both on its own and as a part of the SUGAR integrated technology suite. The aerodynamic performance results presented herein detail the high cruise efficiency of the TTBW concept operating at M=0.80. Results from the RANS code OVERFLOW indicate that the TTBW is aerodynamically well suited for operation at the design M=0.80 transonic cruise Mach number. Aircraft-level performance predictions show that the TTBW offers a 7.2% improvement in fuel burn (per seat) for an economic mission of 900nm, and a 9.0% improvement in fuel burn (per seat) for a 3500nm mission with full passenger payload, relative to an aspect ratio 13 conventional tube and wing configuration of equivalent technology. Integration of the TTBW performance benefits into the SUGAR technology suite shows a 55.9% reduction in fuel burn (for the economic mission) relative to the reference (SUGAR Free) aircraft, which is a consistently sized traditional cantilever wing, single-aisle transport typical of the 2008 fleet. This benefit does not include the performance improvement potential of hybrid-electric systems studied in earlier phases of the SUGAR program Structural concept development work completed in Phase IV has identified several strut attachment concepts that are worth additional development activity – an inboard strut attachment swivel joint concept (which enables the strut to carry axial loads while avoiding strut bending induced by wing twist during flight) significantly simplifies the construction of the main strut. An outboard offset strut attachment concept holds significant potential for further reductions in wing-strut interference drag. Based on work performed to date on Phase IV and the previous phases of the SUGAR program, the TTBW concept continues to remain a viable concept for significantly improving the performance of future aircraft. High-fidelity aerodynamic analysis of the Mach 0.80 TTBW aircraft has shown fuel burn improvement that has exceeded initial expectations despite the increase in cruise Mach number. Structural concept maturation has continued to refine the TTBW structure, and has found no obvious ‘show-stoppers’ to date. Therefore, the potential benefit of improved performance through the use of a very high aspect ratio strut-braced wing continues to warrant additional study

SUGAR↗

Exploratory Contrail Studies: Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) Contrail Assessment & National Airspace System (NAS) Impacts from Contrail Avoidance

Aviation is projected to become an increasingly large contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Condensation trails (contrails) are visible cloud trails of water vapor made from aircraft engine exhaust. One study estimated that persistent contrails have contributed about 57% of total Effective Radiative Forcing from aviation operations. Airspace management can reduce persistent contrails and related climate change impacts. NAS Digital Twin simulation capability and Autoresolver conflict management service can be utilized to investigate persistent contrail formation avoidance. On three of the four days analyzed, TTBW persistent contrail formation length was about 10 percentage points less than Boeing 737-800 (around 3% vs 13%). On average, altitude change maneuvers in simulation reduced persistent contrail formation length by 69.8% for 0.4% increase in fuel burn and 1.2% increase in flight duration.

persistent contrails↗