Optimizing cosmogenic burial isochrons using muon-inclusive simple burial dating
Isochron burial dating with cosmogenic nuclides presents new opportunities for determining the deposition age of Plio-Pleistocene gravels. The method uses paired measurements of 26 Al and 10 Be from individual clasts and is able to generate ages even if burial histories are complex and poorly constrained. Critical to the isochron method is the assumption that gravel is deposited with a predictable 26 Al/ 10 Be ratio, based on near-surface production rates, that then decreases due to radioactive decay after burial. If all clasts are collected from the same depth in a deposit, they share the same history of post-burial production and decay. Because decay constants are known, a line regressed through a bivariate plot of 26 Al and 10 Be concentrations represents an isochron, the slope of which is related to burial duration. The method is ideal when samples are numerous (≥ 5 data points) and yield a spread of concentrations such that linear regression can resolve a meaningful slope, but logistics, costs, and site geology can preclude such ideal datasets. Additionally, it can be difficult to identify and reject samples that may have been deposited with nuclide ratios resulting from prior burial that have the potential to contaminate isochron age estimates. Here we present a methodology for checking the integrity of small isochron datasets (≤4 samples) by co-applying a muon-inclusive simple burial dating algorithm that scales muogenic production with shielding mass (cover density * depth). This analysis uses the same 26 Al and 10 Be concentrations as the isochron method, but incorporates assumptions based on site geology to independently validate and inform isochron results. We use two examples to demonstrate how these burial calculations can increase confidence in isochron results, show when the isochron method is inappropriately applied, and provide criteria for rejection of data points in isochrons.