Results for “thread parallelism” — Page 23

DOE OSTI2014

Evaluation of Low Power ARM Processors for Monte Carlo Particle Transport: MCNP6 on the ARM Cortex-A8 - Paper 83

In the push towards exascale computing, the limiting factors are power requirements and heat dissipation. Using current technology, the power required to drive an exascale supercomputer would near 400-MW. Clearly, future computing hardware will have to be more energy efficient in order to achieve exascale performance. Most of the current research in advanced computing architectures is in the use of standard CPUs with accelerators. However, these accelerators are not generally supported by the traditional scientific programming languages (C, C++, and Fortran) and the scientific software must be tailored specifically to take advantage of the accelerators. Large scale scientific software (hundreds-of-thousand to millions of lines of code) can not be easily ported to the computing platform du jour. The widespread use of low power ARM based processors in the mobile computing market offer a low power alternative to accelerators that are also supported by the traditional scientific programming languages and programming paradigms such as MPI and OpenMP. Computing architectures for scientific computing are often assessed using standard benchmarks such as LINPACK benchmark or using suites of mini-applications that are greatly simplified stand-ins for scientific software. Often the real applications that will deployed on the scientific supercomputers are not ported or tested until delivery of the machines. In order to evaluate the use of ARM processors for scientific computing the Monte Carlo particle transport code, MCNP version 6 was compiled on the ARM Cortex-A8 and a set of benchmark problems were used to assess performance in comparison to an Intel Xeon E5-2670 and the low power Intel Atom N270. MCNP is a continuous energy Monte Carlo particle transport code in development at Los Alamos National Laboratory since 1977. MCNP is used to transport neutrons, photon, electrons, and charged particles using continuous energy interaction data. It is commonly used in fields of nuclear power, nuclear medicine, radiation protection, and high-energy physics through-out the world. MCNP version 6 is approximately 450 thousand lines of code, written primary in Fortran90, with some C and C++. MCNP supports distributed multiprocessing using MPI and threading with OpenMP. The ARM Cortex-A8 executes MCNP6 using about twice as much power as the Intel Xeon E5-2670 and about the same amount of power as the Intel Atom N270. However, these results are encouraging for the use of low-power ARM chips in future supercomputers. The ARM Cortex-A8 is a 32-bit CPU and it's NEON general-purpose SIMD (single-instruction multiple data) engine does not support double-precision floating-point arithmetic. More recent ARM processors (ARM Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57) support 64-bit addressing and have NEON co-processors that support double-precision floating-point arithmetic. ARM claims that the A50 series delivers a performance increase of 15 times the Cortex-A8 performance for similar power usage. (authors)

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗

DOE OSTI2024

Developing And Scaling an OpenFOAM Model to Study Turbulent Flow in a HFIR Coolant Channel

Improving the understanding of how computational fluid dynamics (CFD) direct numerical simulations (DNS) of flows in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) perform when run in parallel using the high performance computing (HPC) platform Summit at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF) is of particular importance to boost the computational tools used to support HFIR conversion to low enriched fuel (LEU). Evaluation of scaling performance was driven by the increasing importance of graphics processing unit (GPU) usage in HPC, which is becoming the standard for modern supercomputers such as Summit. The desired results are to obtain a strong positive correlation between the computational resources dedicated to a problem and the relative speed-up of the simulation in comparison to a benchmark. This capability will allow substantially improvement in HFIR flow analytical capabilities, specifically when predicting turbulence properties at high Reynolds numbers. The study leverages previous simulation results performed with code PHASTA (finite element) on HPC platforms Cori (NERSC) and Theta (ALCF) [1] with computing options provided in the computing platform OpenFOAM (finite volume) at OLCF. Transitioning from PHASTA to OpenFOAM will (1) eliminate dependence on third-party software for mesh generation and manipulation, (2) reduce resource needs by employing modern architectures, and (3) build expertise for future modeling of HFIR-specific problems like heat transfer in involute geometry, entrance effects, flow structure in channel corners, and so on—all important issues when defining the available thermal margins in the transition to LEU. CPUs and GPUs differ significantly in their architecture and utilization, as discussed in the literature [2]. The most important differences are in the approach to computations and their memory. A single GPU contains a large quantity of cores, enabling it to perform with a much higher throughput than a CPU, but execution requires a different approach. GPU codes execute instructions using the Single-Instruction Multiple-Thread (SIMT) approach in which a single instruction is used for groups of threads called warps. A warp typically consists of 32 threads which must execute the same set of instructions, although on separate threads. Alternately, a CPU has far fewer cores that are much more flexible in their operation, excelling at quickly performing more complex serial computations. This is why GPUs have greater throughput when properly utilized. The second important difference is seen when comparing their memory spaces. Limited memory allocations and CPU–GPU communications cause a significant bottleneck in GPU-accelerated programs. Further study was required to properly take advantage of GPU resources. A comprehensive analysis of code performance and the model-specific features of turbulence constitutes the core of this work. In this study, a DNS simulation of HFIR channel turbulence was performed with the finite volume CFD code OpenFOAM v2112 and CUDA v11.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux v8.2. The OpenFOAM installation had AMGx integrated to enable GPU acceleration and utilizes the PETSc4FOAM library. The computational resources and the problem size were scaled on CPU and CPU + GPU architectures to gain a better understanding of the performance of a DNS problem on modern computing hardware. The study aimed to analyze the scaling of the code exclusively on CPUs and then to examine the scaling of the codes with GPU acceleration enabled. Scaling studies included CPU and GPU acceleration on a mesh of varying resolution to analyze the impact of problem size relative to computational resources. In the course of preparing the GPU configuration on Summit, mainly using the AMGX solvers, difficulties were encountered stemming from constant changes resulting from extensive ongoing development activities and the changing environment. This resulted in the inability to complete the GPU portion of the work. The code was compiled and tested, but production runs to assess acceleration were not performed because the used discretional compute time allocation expired as year-end approached. The Summit HPC platform is scheduled for decommissioning in 2024, making it unattractive for future use with Nvidia-based GPUs. Therefore, the work will be moved onto NERSC machines in FY24. An application was prepared and submitted, and sufficient node-hours were awarded to continue the research in the next calendar year. This report summarizes work performed thus far, which mostly focused on CPU OpenFOAM computing.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗