Numerical solutions for the complete shock wave structure behind supersonic edge delta wings
Computerized simulation of shock waves and flow fields behind supersonic edge delta wings and wing-body combinations
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Computerized simulation of shock waves and flow fields behind supersonic edge delta wings and wing-body combinations
Proton fluxes at 300 keV associated with propagating interplanetary shock waves, noting alpha particle enhancement
Low energy cosmic ray intensity increase at propagating interplanetary shock wave front, discussing one dimensional model with particles undergoing convection and diffusion
Pioneer 11 observations of energetic proton acceleration in interplanetary shocks are in good agreement with the predictions of the Vector-V x Vector-B electric field model of shock acceleration. The Vector-V x Vector-B model predicts that relativistic particles are accelerated by a factor of 2-15 in kinetic energy during a single encounter with a quasi-perpendicular (not less than 70 deg) supernova shock wave, and that the post-encounter pitch angle distributions are very anisotropic.
Wall shear stress measurements beneath crossing-shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions have been made for three interactions of different strengths. The interactions are generated by two sharp fins at symetric angles of attack mounted on a flat plate. The shear stress measurements were made for fin angles of 7 and 11 deg at Mach 3 and 15 deg at Mach 3.85. The measurements were made using a laser interferometer skin-friction meter, a device that determines the wall shear by optically measuring the time rate of thinning of an oil film placed on the test model surface. Results of the measurements reveal high skin-friction coefficients in the vicinity of the fin/plate junction and the presence of quasi-two-dimensional flow separation on the interaction center line. Additionally, two Navier-Stokes computations, one using a Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model and one using a k-epsilon model, are compared with the experimental results for the Mach 3.85, 15-deg interaction case. Although the k-epsilon model did a reasonable job of predicting the overall trend in portions of the skin-friction distribution, neither computation fully captured the physics of the near-surface flow in this complex interaction.
The shock-wave patterns of a complex configuration with cranked cruciform wings and a cone-cylinder body were examined to determine the interaction of the body bow wave with the flow field about the wing. Also of interest, was the interaction of the forward (760 sweptback) wing leading-edge wave with the rear (600 sweptback) wing leading-edge wave. The shadowgraph pictures of the model in free flight at a Mach number of 4.9, although not definitive, appear to indicate that the body bow wave crosses the outer wing panel after first being refracted either by the leading-edge wave of the 600 sweptback wing or by pressure fields in the flow crossing the wing.
The new unique isotopic anomalous coponent of Xe(XeX) was found in the carbonaceous chondrites. It is enriched in light shielded isotopes (124Xe and 126Xe) and in heavy nonshielded isotopes (134Xe and 136Xe. All characteristics of Xe-X can be explained by a model of nucleosynthesis of the Xe isotopes in shock wave front passed through the He envelope during supernova events. The light isotopes are created by p process and the heavy isotopes are created by n process (slow r process). They were captured with high temperature carbon grains condensing by supernova shock waves.
Formation rate of atomic hydrogen behind shock waves in hydrogen-argon mixtures
In the flow about a body with large subsonic velocity if the velocity of the approaching flow is sufficiently large, regions of local supersonic velocities are formed about the body. It is known from experiment that these regions downstream of the flow are always bounded by shock waves; a continuous transition of the supersonic velocity to the subsonic under the conditions indicated has never been observed. A similar phenomenon occurs in pipes. If at two cross sections of the pipe the velocity is subsonic and between these sections regions of local supersonic velocity are formed without completely occupying a single cross section, these regions are always bounded by shock waves.
In the largest solar energetic particle (SEP) events, acceleration occurs at shock waves driven out from the Sun by coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Peak particle intensities are a strong function of CME speed, although the intensities, spectra, and angular distributions of particles escaping the shock are highly modified by scattering on Alfven waves produced by the streaming particles themselves. Element abundances vary in complex ways because ions with different values of Q/A resonate with different parts of the wave spectrum, which varies with space and time. Just recently, we have begun to model these systematic variations theoretically and to explore other consequences of proton-generated waves.
Finite difference method to obtain numerical results on normal shock wave diffraction by sphere and subsequent transient flow
Ground measurements of shock wave pressure for fighter aircraft at very low altitudes
This review discusses the observations and theoretical models of interstellar shock waves, in both diffuse cloud and molecular cloud environments. It summarizes the relevant gas dynamics, atomic, molecular and grain processes, radiative transfer, and physics of radiative and magnetic precursors in shock models. It then describes the importance of shocks for observations, diagnostics, and global interstellar dynamics. It concludes with current research problems and data needs for atomic, molecular and grain physics.
Chemical system and reaction rates behind strong shock waves in mixtures of carbon dioxide and nitrogen used to study entry conditions into Mars atmosphere
Preliminary results of an experimental investigation of a Mach 2.5 two-dimensional axisymmetric shock-wave/ boundary-layer interaction (SWBLI) are presented. The purpose of the investigation is to create a SWBLI dataset specifically for CFD validation purposes. Presented herein are the details of the facility and preliminary measurements characterizing the facility and interaction region. These results will serve to define the region of interest where more detailed mean and turbulence measurements will be made.
In-flight shock wave pressure measurements above and below bomber aircraft at mach 1.42 to 1.69
Ground measurements of shock-wave pressure for two supersonic low-flying fighter aircraft
The profiles and thicknesses of normal shock waves in argon at Mach numbers of 1.335, 1.454, 1.576, and 1-713 were determined experimentally by means of a free-molecule probe whose equilibrium temperature is related by kinetic theory to the local flow properties and their gradients. Comparisons were made between the experimental shock profiles and the theoretical profiles calculated from the Navier-Stokes equations, the Grad 13-moment equations, and the Burnett equations. New, very accurate numerical integrations of the Burnett equations were obtained for this purpose with results quite different from those found by Zoller, to whom the solution of this problem is frequently attributed. The experimental shock profiles were predicted with approximately equal success by the Navier-Stokes and Burnett theories, while the 13-moment method was definitely less satisfactory. A surprising feature of the theoretical results is the relatively small difference in predictions between the Navier-Stokes and Burnett theories in the present range of shock strengths and the contrastingly large difference between predictions of Burnett and the 13-moment theories. It is concluded that the Navier-Stokes equations are correct for weak shocks and that within the present shock strength range the Burnett equations make no improvement which merits the trouble of solving them. For shocks of noticeably greater strength, say with a shock Mach number of more than 2.5, it remains fundamentally doubtful that any of these theories can be correct.