Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “progress”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23

Progress in Defining the UK Highly Active Storage Tanks POCO Strategy - 16134

In the UK Highly Active (HA) waste is stored in stainless steel tanks prior to encapsulation in glass in one of three operating vitrification plants. Significant progress has been made in recent years towards the reduction in the volume of HA Liquor (HAL) stored in these tanks and a number of the tanks are now operating at heel levels. As a result, a strategy is being developed to carry out Post Operational Clean Out (POCO) of some tanks while reprocessing operations continue, thus enabling accelerated and more cost effective clean-up of these HA facilities. This paper, and subsequent conference presentation, will highlight some of the key aspects of this strategy, including a description of the challenges and progress made so far to help facilitate the clean-up mission without having a detrimental effect on ongoing reprocessing operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Progress on Resuming Full Construction on the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant's High-Level Waste Facility - 16283

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) restricted certain engineering, procurement and construction work on the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant's (WTP) High-Level Waste (HLW) Facility in 2012 and early 2013 because of unresolved technical issues, and a need to align the nuclear safety basis with the design as the HLW Facility technical issues were resolved. The DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) needed a way to minimize the government's risk exposure, while continuing limited critical path construction work and resolving the technical and safety basis issues. ORP issued the Plan for Evaluation and Decision to Proceed for the High-Level Waste Facility in October 2013 to establish the process to evaluate the WTP contractor's progress on resolving the issues and to identify actions and deliverables needed to facilitate an ORP decision to resume production activities. This process provided for a phased resumption of HLW engineering, procurement and construction activities, with two decision points: Decision 1: Authorization to resume design/production engineering along with limited procurements and construction ramp-up. Decision 2: Full authorization to resume engineering, procurement and construction. In August 2014, ORP provided authorization for the WTP contractor to resume all engineering work necessary to finalize the design of the HLW Facility. The decision to proceed with production engineering in the HLW Facility was based on significant progress in resolving technical issues and improving work processes to align the HLW design and safety basis. ORP is working closely with the WTP contractor to facilitate decisions for resuming procurement of HLW Facility equipment with safety functions, and resuming full construction in the most complex process cells in the Facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Progress on Resolution of Technical Issues at the Hanford Waste Treatment And Immobilization Plant Project - 16285

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Pretreatment (PT) Facility has a number of first-of-a-kind technical challenges that have required additional expert analysis and testing activities to resolve. In 2006 an External Flowsheet Review Team identified 28 technical vulnerabilities with the plant design or future operability. Over a period of three months starting in September 2012, a number of top scientists and engineers conducted a review of the major technical issues associated with the design and operability of the WTP. These experts also provided independent advice on some of the broader challenges associated with completing the Hanford tank waste mission - highlighting the linkage between the physical and chemical properties of the tank waste and the PT Facility technical issues. In 2012 and early 2013 DOE's Office of River Protection (ORP) directed the WTP contractor to suspend production work on the Pretreatment Facility until the outstanding technical issues could be resolved and the nuclear safety basis could be updated and brought into alignment with any updates to the facility design and/or process flowsheet. Specific plans for resolving each the technical issues have been developed and significant progress has been made over the past year in identifying solution sets for each of the issues. The eight remaining technical issues (referred to as T1 to T8) are as follows: (T1) Hydrogen Gas Release from Vessel Solids; (T2) Potential Criticality in Pretreatment Facility Vessels; (T3) Hydrogen in Piping and Ancillary Vessels; (T4) Pulse-Jet Mixing and Control; (T5) Erosion and Localized Corrosion in WTP Vessels and Piping; (T6) Design Redundancy in Black Cells/In-Service Inspection; (T7) Black Cell Vessel Structural Integrity; (T8) Facility Ventilation. This paper provides a synopsis of the progress that has been made on resolving the Pretreatment technical issues over the past year, and how resolution of the issues will enable DOE to make an informed decision to resume design and production engineering for the Pretreatment Facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Progress Updates for the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project - 18327

The Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Project is vital to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) mission to cleanup radioactive waste at the Hanford Site, located in southeastern Washington State. The overall WTP Project objective is to design, build, and commission the facilities and systems that will treat and immobilize approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste stored in Hanford's 177 underground storage tanks. The combination of technologies in the WTP makes it a first-of-a-kind facility at a scale larger than ever, built for radioactive waste processing. DOE is proceeding with its approach to complete the WTP Project in phases, which includes the following principal actions: - Completing construction of the Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility, Balance of Facilities (BOF), and Analytical Laboratory (LAB) (collectively referred to as LBL); - Implementing a direct-feed low-activity waste (DFLAW) process to treat low-activity waste independent of the Pretreatment (PT) Facility; - Resolving the technical issues associated with primarily the PT Facility; - Completing the design and construction of the High-Level Waste (HLW) and PT facilities to enable integrated WTP operations. In March 2016, a federal judge amended the 2010 Consent Decree 1 completion milestones for the Hanford WTP, which generally aligns with DOE's plans for completing the WTP facilities in sequence: - Complete LAW Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2023; - Complete HLW Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2033; - Complete PT Facility hot commissioning: December 31, 2033; - Achieve initial plant operations for the WTP: December 31, 2036. Having established milestones for completing the WTP facilities has enabled DOE to formally implement its plans for completing the WTP facilities in sequence, starting with the LAW Facility. In December 2016, DOE executed a contract modification and approved a change to the project's performance baseline to complete the LBL facilities and incorporate modifications needed to allow direct feed of low-activity waste to the LAW Facility. Significant progress has been made toward completing the design, construction, and planning for commissioning of the facilities needed to enable the DFLAW operations to commence as early as January 2022. In 2012, DOE partially suspended production work on the WTP's PT Facility and to a lesser degree the HLW Facility because of unresolved technical issues associated with those facilities. In September 2017, DOE acknowledged the WTP contractor had met all the criteria for full resumption of engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) activities for the HLW Facility. By December 2017, DOE had completed the actions needed to resolve the six of the eight primary technical issues associated with the PT Facility, with the remaining two issues expected to be resolved in the first quarter of 2018. Although significant progress has been made to prepare for resuming production activities for the HLW and PT facilities, DOE has made the decision to constrain EPC work on those facilities in the near term based on DOE's higher priority of completing the WTP facilities needed to begin DFLAW operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Potential Impact of Cladding Wettability on LWR Transient Progression

The US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) is working closely with the nuclear industry to develop fuel and cladding candidates with potentially enhanced accident tolerance. This type of fuel is also known as accident tolerant fuel (ATF). Two promising cladding material candidates with potentially enhanced accident tolerance are silicon carbide (SiC) and an iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) alloy. The FeCrAl alloy features significantly enhanced oxidation resistance versus the Zr-based alloys currently used in state-of-the-art light water reactors (LWRs). Thermal-fluid characteristics are a vital element of a holistic engineering evaluation of ATF concepts. One characteristic related to boiling heat transfer is the critical heat flux (CHF). At CHF, the efficacy of heat transfer rapidly degrades and components can heat up rapidly. CHF is the heat flux at which the departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) occurs in PWRs. DNB is directly relevant to the departure from nuclear boiling ratio (DNBR), which is the ratio between the critical heat flux and the actual heat flux. Surface wettability is an important factor that influences CHF. CHF plays a significant role in determining safety margins during normal operation and also in the progression of potential transient or accident scenarios. Significant changes in CHF properties and boiling heat transfer characteristics will impact the progression of transient and accident events and reactor safety characteristics. Additionally, the behavior of the candidate cladding materials post-CHF impacts reactor safety. A brief description of the relationship between cladding material properties and CHF is provided, followed by an analysis of two hypothetical transient scenarios: a super-prompt reactivity-initiated accident (RIA) and an anticipated transient without scram with instability (ATWS-I). The analysis illustrates the potential impact of cladding material properties on safety margins via direct alteration of calculated CHF values. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

MCNP Progress for the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program

The DOE/NNSA Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) supports research, development, maintenance, and verification and validation of the MCNP{sup R} Monte Carlo radiation transport software package for nuclear criticality safety (NCS) customers within DOE/NNSA. The MCNP Monte Carlo code has been used for high-fidelity analyses of criticality safety problems since the 1970's. This paper summarizes MCNP progress during FY 2015 and early FY 2016. Activities and accomplishments are summarized in five major areas: - MCNP6 status, - Whisper status, - Verification and validation testing, - User support and training, - Work in progress. (authors)

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Progress and Challenges in Traveling-Wave SRF cavity development at Fermilab

Traveling-wave (TW) technology can push the accelerator field gradient of niobium SRF cavity to 70MV/m or higher beyond the limit of 50~60MV/m in Standing-wave (SW) technology. The early stages of TW SRF cavity developments had been funded by several SBIR grants to Euclid Techlabs and completed in collaboration with Fermilab through a 1-cell prototype and a proof-of-principle 3-cell TW cavity. The TW resonance excitation in the 3-cell TW cavity at 2K was demonstrated through the low power RF test in early 2024. A high-power test of the 3-cell in TW mode being prepared. To advance a design and technology to fabricate a novel high gradient TW SRF cavity, FNAL proposed a half-meter TW RF design and R&Ds to realize that are in progress. Here we will report the recent progress in the 3-cell TW cavity and the challenges towards a half-meter scale TW cavity.

Furuta, F.↗

SAF Grand Challenge: October 2021 – September 2024 Progress Report Fact Sheet

An interagency team led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and other federal agencies including the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative have made important progress on accelerating acceptance and growth of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) as a primary strategy in aviation decarbonization. The progress made by these federal agencies supports the interagency SAF Grand Challenge, including new funding opportunities and initiatives aligned with the SAF Grand Challenge Roadmap; providing expertise and technical assistance to industry; increasing interagency collaboration; and providing data, modeling, and analysis to decision makers.

Sustainable Aviation Fuel Aviation SAF↗

Pinellas County, Florida Site Environmental Restoration Project Semiannual Progress Report for the 4.5 Acre Site June through November 2016 January 2017

This Pinellas County, Florida, Site Environmental Restoration Project Semiannual Progress Report for the 4.5 Acre Site describes environmental restoration activities for the 4.5 Acre Site located in Pinellas County, Largo, Florida (Figure 1). The former U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Pinellas Plant facility consisted of the 4.5 Acre Site and what is now the STAR Center (Young - Rainey Science, Technology, and Research Center). Both the 4.5 Acre Site and the STAR Center are part of the overall Pinellas County, Florida, Site (Figure 2). The 4.5 Acre Site is located immediately northwest of the STAR Center, in the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 30 South, Range 15 East. DOE owned this parcel from 1957 to 1972, at which time it was sold to a private landowner. During the period of DOE ownership, the property was used for the disposal of drums of waste resins and solvents. As a result of this practice, the surficial aquifer was impacted by volatile organic compounds (VOCs)—trichloroethene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cDCE), trans-1,2-dichloroethene (tDCE), vinyl chloride (VC), and benzene. Detailed background information for the site is contained in the Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan for the Pinellas Site (DOE 2016). That document and other site-related documents can be accessed at this website: http://www.lm.doe.gov/Pinellas/Sites.aspx. Recent remediation activities consist of the injection of emulsified soybean oil and the microorganism Dehalococcoides mccartyi (formerly known as Dehalococcoides ethenogenes) into the subsurface in February 2010 and again in July 2013 to enhance contaminant biodegradation (hereafter described as bioinjection). Monitoring the performance of these actions, in the form of monitoring well sampling, is ongoing.

2016 Pinellas County↗

Working in Partnership for a Resilient and Innovative Energy Future (Progress Report 2020)

This annual report from the Better Buildings Initiative contains information about partner projects, energy and cost savings, and new program initiatives. The 2020 Progress Report also recognizes the latest group of Better Buildings Goal Achievers - organizations who have met their energy, water, and/or financing commitments under the Better Buildings or Better Plants Challenge.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Progress Report 2019: Working Toward a More Innovative, Affordable, and Energy Efficient Future

This annual report from the Better Buildings Initiative contains information about partner projects, energy and cost savings, and new program initiatives. The 2019 Progress Report also recognizes the latest group of Better Buildings Goal Achievers - organizations who have met their energy, water, and/or financing commitments under the Better Buildings or Better Plants Challenge.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Progress Report 2018: Innovation Through Collaboration - Securing a More Affordable and Reliable Energy Future

This annual report from the Better Buildings Initiative contains information about partner projects, energy and cost savings, and new program initiatives. The 2018 Progress Report also recognizes the latest group of Better Buildings Goal Achievers - organizations who have met their energy, water, and/or financing commitments under the Better Buildings or Better Plants Challenge.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Better Buildings Progress Report 2015

This report from the Better Buildings Challenge contains information about partner projects, energy and cost savings, and new program initiatives. The 2015 Progress Report also recognizes the latest group of Better Buildings Goal Achievers - organizations who have met their energy, water, and/or financing commitments under the Better Buildings or Better Plants Challenge.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Better Buildings Challenge: Progress Update: Spring 2014

This report from the Better Buildings Challenge contains information about partner projects, energy and cost savings, and new program initiatives. The 2014 Progress Report also recognizes the latest group of Better Buildings Goal Achievers - organizations who have met their energy, water, and/or financing commitments under the Better Buildings or Better Plants Challenge.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Progress Report 2017: Successful Strategies Driving Innovation & Results

This annual report from the Better Buildings Initiative contains information about partner projects, energy and cost savings, and new program initiatives. The 2017 Progress Report also recognizes the latest group of Better Buildings Goal Achievers - organizations who have met their energy, water, and/or financing commitments under the Better Buildings or Better Plants Challenge.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Progress Report 2016: Moving Our Nation Forward, Faster

This annual report from the Better Buildings Initiative contains information about partner projects, energy and cost savings, and new program initiatives. The 2016 Progress Report also recognizes the latest group of Better Buildings Goal Achievers - organizations who have met their energy, water, and/or financing commitments under the Better Buildings or Better Plants Challenge.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Winter 2016 Progress Update: Better Buildings Alliance

From 2013-2016, the Better Buildings Alliance published an update each winter on the previous year's activities, including partner projects, sector priorities, technology teams, and market solutions efforts. This report covers activities from calendar year 2015. It is also the final report, as going forward the Better Buildings Alliance activities were included in the annual Better Buildings Progress Report.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Partnering for the Future: Leadership, Innovation, and Proven Solutions (Progress Report 2021)

This annual report from the Better Buildings Initiative contains information about partner projects, energy and cost savings, and new program initiatives. The 2021 Progress Report also recognizes the latest group of Better Buildings Goal Achievers - organizations who have met their energy, water, and/or financing commitments under the Better Buildings or Better Plants Challenge.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗