Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Tabulation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1961

Quantum Mechanical Study of Atoms and Molecules

This paper, following a brief introduction, is divided into five parts. Part I outlines the theory of the molecular orbital method for the ground, ionized and excited states of molecules. Part II gives a brief summary of the interaction integrals and their tabulation. Part III outlines an automatic program designed for the computation of various states of molecules. Part IV gives examples of the study of ground, ionized and excited states of CO, BH and N2 where the program of automatic computation and molecular integrals have been utilized. Part V enlists some special problems of Molecular Quantum Mechanics are being tackled at New York University.

QUANTUM MECHANICS↗
NASA NTRS1961

A Study of the Positions and Velocities of a Space Station and a Ferry Vehicle During Rendezvous and Return

A study is made of the families of non-thrusting ascent trajectories of a ferry vehicle during rendezvous with an orbiting body, referred to as a space station. It is shown that these trajectories may also be interpreted as descent trajectories of the ferry from the station to the earth. The rendezvous trajectories start at the end of the boost period (assumed to be 60 miles) and terminate at the station. The equations of motion are derived and results are shown for two typical orbits of the station: a 300-mile cir­cular orbit and a 100-to-500-mile elliptical orbit. Trajectories are described in terms of a rotating co­ordinate system fixed in the station and launch con­ditions are tabulated in terms of non-rotating inertial coordinates. Boundaries are given in terms of launch (at time of booster burnout) and rendezvous conditions for the example cases. The considerations used to calculate these boundaries and the significance of some of the trends are discussed.

TRAJECTORY↗
NASA NTRS1962

Thermodynamic and Transport Property Correlation Formulas for Equilibrium Air from 1,000 Degrees Kelvin to 15,000 Degrees Kelvin

The thermodynamic properties, density and temperature, as well as transport property parameters involving viscosity, Prandtl number (including diffusion effects), and gaseous radiation absorption coefficients have been correlated as a function of enthalpy at four pressure levels (10 (sup -1), 10 (sup 0), 10, and 10 (sup 2) atmospheres). The correlation formulas are written in a generalized form for which coefficients for a particular property and pressure level are tabulated. The correlation formulas are useful in digital computer programs for non-adiabatic viscous flow problems.

AIR↗
NASA NTRS1962

Pressure Distribution Induced on a Flat Plate at a Free-Stream Mach Number of 1.39 by Rockets Exhausting Upstream and Downstream

An experimental investigation was made of the pressures induced on a flat plate at a free-stream Mach number of 1.39 by a supersonic rocket jet exhausting upstream and downstream. Measurements of the pressure distribution on a flat plate were made at zero angle of attack for 11 different locations of the jet exhaust nozzle beneath the wing. Measurements were made at ratios of rocket-exit total pressure to freestream static pressure from 6 to 60 and at a Reynolds number per foot of approximately 10 x 10 6 . The rocket when exhausted upstream produced a strong shock that moved further upstream with increasing rocket-exit total-pressure ratio. Positive incremental normal-force coefficients were obtained at all test positions. Data at 11 test positions are tabulated for rocket-on and rocket-off pressure coefficients as well as for incremental pressure coefficients for the 48 orifices of the flat plate for the range of ratio of rocket-exit total pressure to free-stream static pressure of the investigation. Changing the location of the model with respect to the plate had a negligible effect when the rocket was varied in the chordwise direction, but the pressure coefficients were reduced as the rocket was lowered away from the flat-plate wing.

Supersonic jet↗
NASA NTRS1962

Tables of Aerodynamic Coefficients Obtained from Developed Newtonian Expressions for Complete and Partial Conic and Spheric Bodies at Combined Angles of Attack and Sideslip with Some Comparisons with Hypersonic Experimental Data

Closed-form expressions and tables composed from these expressions are presented for complete and partial conic and spheric bodies at combined angles of attack and sideslip in Newtonian flow. Aerodynamic coefficients of these bodies are tabulated for various body segments over a range of angles of attack from 1 deg to 85 deg and angles of sideslip from 0 deg to 15 deg. Some comparisons between Newtonian predictions and hypersonic experimental aerodynamic characteristics were made for conic bodies hawing various surface slopes, nose bluntnesses, and body cross sections to indicate the range of validity of the theory. In general, the theory is shown to agree quite well with experimental results for sharp-nose complete cones and for configurations hawing large blunted noses and steep surface slopes. However, agreement between theory and experiment generally is poor for the more slender, slightly blunted complete or half conic bodies and also for sharp-nose half conic bodies where real-flow phenomena such as forebody interference, viscous forces, leeward surface contributions, or leading-edge pressure reductions may have significant effect. The agreement between theory and experiment for the bodies considered can be improved by using the stagnation pressure coefficient behind a normal shock rather than 2 as the Newtonian coefficient, although for the sharp-nose half conic bodies there i s no theoretical justification for this modification.

Armstrong, William O.↗
NASA NTRS1963

Space Flight Handbooks. Volume 3- Planetary Flight Handbook: Supplementary Trajectory Data: Venus to Earth and Mars to Earth - Part 2

Parts 2 and 3 present tabulations of trajectory data for scheduling flights to and from Venus and Mars during the period 1960-2000. Part 2 contains information for outbound flights to these planets; Part 3 contains information for trajectories returning from the planets to Earth. Each Part contains data for single-plane transfers, as well as for broken-plane transfers which employ a midcourse plane-change to eliminate the high speed "ridges." The mathematical analyses employed for all calculations are described in Part 1 of this handbook. To facilitate the construction of round-trip trajectories, the date at the target planet is held fixed while the trip duration is varied in 10-day increments from zero days to the length of that planet's synodic period with Earth. Dates of arrival at the target planet are presented in the extreme right-hand column of Part 2, and dates of departure from the target planet are presented in the extreme left-hand column of Part 3. Thus, by holding Part 2 directly to the left of Part 3, the analyst may easily and rapidly scan all trip possibilities which involve any desired stopover time at the target planet. Within approximately 200 days of each conjunction or opposition, data are presented in 10-day increments at the target planet. Only those trips are listed for which the hyperbolic excess speeds at either or both ends of the trajectory do not exceed 0.6 EMOS (Earth Mean Orbital Speed). For the remaining mission regions, the requirements are so smoothly varying that a 50-day interval in dates at the target planet may be employed; the 10-day interval in trip times is, however, preserved here. In these regions, only those trips are listed for which either or both speeds do not exceed 0.3 EMOS.

INTERPLANETARY FLIGHT↗
NASA NTRS1964

Tables for Supersonic Flow Around Right Circular Cones at Small Angle of Attack

The solution of supersonic flow fields by the method of characteristics requires that starting conditions be known. Ferri, in reference 1, developed a method-of-characteristics solution for axially symmetric bodies of revolution at small angles of attack. With computing machinery that is now available, this has become a feasible method for computing the aerodynamic characteristics of bodies near zero angle of attack. For sharp-nosed bodies of revolution, the required starting line may be obtained by computing the flow field about a cone at a small angle of attack. This calculation is readily performed using Stone's theory in reference 2. Some solutions of this theory are available in reference 3. However, the manner in which these results are presented, namely in a wind-fixed coordinate system, makes their use somewhat cumbersome. Additionally, as pointed out in reference 4, the flow component perpendicular to the meridian planes was computed incorrectly. The results contained herein have been computed in the same basic manner as those of reference 3 with the correct velocity normal to the meridian planes. Also, all results have been transferred into the body-fixed coordinate system. Therefore, the values tabulated herein may be used, in conjunction with the respective zero-angle-of-attack results of reference 5, as starting conditions for the method-of-characteristics solution of the flow field about axially symmetric bodies of revolution at small angles of attack. As in the zero-angle-of-attack case (ref. 5) the present results have been computed using the ideal gas value of 1.4 for the ratio of the specific heats of air. Solutions are given for cone angles from 2.5 deg to 30 deg in increments of 2.5 deg. For each cone angle, results were computed for a constant series of free-stream Mach numbers from 1.5 to 20. In addition, a solution was computed which yielded the minimum free-stream Mach number for a completely supersonic conical flow field. For cone angles of 27.5 deg and 30 deg, this minimum free-stream Mach number was above 1.5. Consequently, solutions at this Mach number were not computed for these two cone angles.

SUPERSONIC FLOW↗