Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Nuclear data”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Bayesian Monte-Carlo Evaluation Framework for Imperfect Nuclear Data [Slides]

BMC evaluation is a tool used to address imperfect data and models, non-linear models, and non-normal PDFs. ENDF-6 format does not allow non-normal parameter PDFs. Storing posterior sets allows for variance, covariance, skewness, etc. To better predict criticality, we should document non-normal parameter PDFs (i.e. asymmetric uncertainty) and consider non-linear sensitivity of $k_{\text{eff}}$ to resonance parameters.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Continuous energy cross section adjustment: a new method to generalize nuclear data assimilation for a wider range of applications.

This work presents a new method to perform continuous-energy cross section adjustment. The proposed method is based on recently developed Monte Carlo perturbation capabilities with continuous-energy sensitivity functions implemented in an extended Serpent version. The generation of continuous energy basis functions aseigendecomposition of the covariance matrices and the Generalized Least Squares method applied to these functions are described. The new approach is verified against standard, multi-group adjustment methodologies in a case study involving four different response functions in Jezebel. The results obtained by the two approaches for the selected case study are presented and compared in term of adjusted cross sections, adjusted covariance matrices, and uncertainty reduction.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Effects of Hydrogen Bonding on Nuclear Data Development of Liquid Anhydrous HF

Anhydrous Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) at high temperatures and pressures is used to process and manufacture nuclear fuel. As HF is often used directly with uranium, correct neutron thermal scattering cross sections are crucial to criticality safety applications. Classical molecular dynamics (CMD) simulation of the flexible HF system was used to create the thermal scattering law (TSL) and cross sections. The initial 2-site model is used in LAMMPS, and it can not capture the H-bond. To correctly represent the H-bond effects, a second, 3-site model was constructed in GROMACS. The 3-site model handled H-bonds by connecting a massless charge to the molecule. Key model parameters were compared to experimental data to verify the approach and models. To get the normalized VACF, the model was compared using hydrogen and fluorine bond length, density, potential energy, and diffusion coefficient. The phonon DOSs for both models were derived from the normalized VACF. DOSs were used to estimate the TSL ( S ( α, β )) and neutron thermal scattering cross sections for hydrogen in HF. The TSLs were evaluated using the FLASSH code with the Schofield diffusion model. It was observed that the representation of the hydrogen bonding changes the TSL's diffusional contributions. This is represented in the low energy scattering cross section, where intermolecular binding effects shift the cross section.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Nuclear Data Sheets for A=23

Evaluated spectroscopic data and level schemes from radioactive decay and nuclear reaction studies are presented for 23 N, 23 O, 23 F, 23 Ne, 23 Na, 23 Mg, 23 Al, and 23 Si. Here, this evaluation for A=23 supersedes the earlier one by R. B. Firestone (2007Fi02).

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Nuclear Data Sheets for A=24

Here, evaluated spectroscopic data and level schemes from radioactive decay and nuclear reaction studies are presented for 24 N, 24 O, 24 F, 24 Ne, 24 Na, 24 Mg, 24 Al, and 24 Si. This evaluation for A=24 supersedes the earlier one by R. B. Firestone (2007Fi14). Highlights of this evaluation are the following: In 24 O, the 7.4- and 7.65-MeV groups reported in 1 H( 24 O,p') (2012Ts03) and 9 Be( 26 F,nX) (2011Ho05), respectively, are considered as separate states in this evaluation, since the former one was observed to decay by only one neutron emission to 23 O, while the latter one by two sequential neutrons to 22 O. Based on assigned configurations, the 7.4- and 7.6-MeV groups are tentatively assigned negative and positive parities, respectively. Additional study would be useful to determine if these states are same or different. In 24 Na, 2014Fi01 (n,γ) proposed Jπ=(0,1,2) - for 4048.8 keV level based on weaker population from the capture state (J π =1 + ,2 + ) and mentioned to reexamine the J π =0 + assignment, suggested in earlier evaluations (1990En08, 2007Fi02). This evaluation includes the first observation of E0 transition, strength ρ 2 (E0)=0.380 70, for the 6432 keV transition from 0 + state at 6432 to 0 + g.s. in 24 Mg reported in 2020Do10. Authors proposed the first-excited 0+ state of 24 Mg to be superdeformed. In 24 Al, the excited level energies deduced from ( 3 He,t) measurements reported by different research groups vary significantly and it was not clear if some of those levels were same or different. Additional measurements are needed.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nuclear Data Needs for Human Space Radiation Shielding

Protecting astronauts from the harmful effects of space radiation is a high priority for NASA. Space radiation transport codes utilize particle production cross sections describing the interactions of incident radiation with matter. The availability of measured nuclear cross section data needed for these studies will be reviewed. The energy range of interest for space radiation protection is approximately 100 MeV/n to 10 GeV/n. The majority of data are for projectile fragmentation partial and total cross sections, including both charge changing and isotopic cross sections. Cross section data are organized into categories which include charge changing, elemental, isotopic for total, single and double differential with respect to momentum, energy and angle. This plenary talk will discuss gaps in the data relevant to space radiation protection and recommendations for future experiments will be made. Double differential cross section data for light ion production will be emphasized.

John W Norbury↗
DOE OSTI2014

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 210

Evaluated spectroscopic data for {sup 210}Au, {sup 210}Hg, {sup 210}Tl, {sup 210}Pb, {sup 210}Bi, {sup 210}Po, {sup 210}At, {sup 210}Rn, {sup 210}Fr, {sup 210}Ra, {sup 210}Ac, and {sup 210}Th and corresponding level schemes from radioactive decay and reaction studies are presented. This evaluation supersedes the previous evaluation by E. Browne (2003Br13). Highlights of this publication are the identification of new μs isomers of {sup 210}Hg by 2013Go10 and measurement of an excited level energy at 1709 keV 30 of {sup 210}Rn from {sup 214}Rn α decay: 68.6 μs by 2006Ku26 denoted as x+1664.6 in the Adopted Levels. Earlier experimental limits for x≤50 keV was proposed in 1979Po19 and 1982Po03 – (HI,xnγ)

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Nuclear Data Matters - The obvious case of a bad mixing ratio for 58 Co

We present results of modeled cross sections for neutron- and proton-induced reactions leading to the final product nucleus 58 Co. In each case the gamma-cascade branching ratios given in the ENSDF database circa 2014 predict modeled nuclear cross sections leading to the ground and first excited metastable state that are incompatible with measured cross sections found in the NNDC experimental cross section database EXFOR. We show that exploring the uncertainty in the mixing ratio used to calculate the gamma-cascade branching ratios for the 53.15 keV 2 nd excited state leads to changes in the predicted partial cross sections by amounts that give good agreement with measured data.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Nucleus++ : a new tool bridging AME and NUBASE for advancing nuclear data analysis

The newly developed software, Nucleus++ , is an advanced tool for displaying basic nuclear physics properties from NUBASE and integrating comprehensive mass information for each nuclide from Atomic Mass Evaluation. Additionally, it allows users to compare experimental nuclear masses with predictions from different mass models. Building on the success and learning experiences of its predecessor, Nucleus , this enhanced tool introduces improved functionality and compatibility. With its user-friendly interface, Nucleus++ was designed as a valuable tool for scholars and practitioners in the field of nuclear science. Finally, this article offers an in-depth description of Nucleus++ , highlighting its main features and anticipated impacts on nuclear science research.

AME↗
DOE OSTI2021

Whisper Use of Nuclear Data Covariances [Slides]

Whisper is statistical analysis code using sensitivity/uncertainty-based methods to determine baseline upper subcritical limit (USL) for nuclear criticality safety. Features of Whisper 1.1 include: GLLS method implemented to compute adjusted covariance based on current benchmark suite (1,100+ ICSBEP models), BLO “low-fidelity” covariance data used (44 energy groups), adjusted covariance is pre-computed and saved, and adjusted cross sections are NOT computed. Potential future efforts include: an extension to include angular distributions in benchmark selection and in GLLS adjustment, a move toward more modern covariance data (ENDF/B-VIII.0) and different group structure, and compute and store adjusted cross sections (trivial).

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗