Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Human System”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Landing System

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Kent Chojnacki↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Landing System

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Laura Means↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Landing System

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Kent Chojnacki↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Landing System

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Tara Polsgrove↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of the Approach Direction of the Human Landing System to a South Pole Landing Site Subject to Lighting and Communication Constraints

The NRHO used as the staging orbit for crewed missions to the lunar surface by the HLS remains nearly perpendicular to the Earth-Moon line of sight, however, due to the libration of the Moon the location of the South Pole is ever shifting beneath it. DTE communication as well as ground illumination conditions near the South Pole coincide with lunar libration, with approximately 2-week cycles of DTE communication and solar availability. Additionally, the constant shifting of the South Pole region with respect to the NRHO leads to variations in the nominal HLS approach path to the surface in order to maintain near in-plane alignment of the NRHO, LLO, and approach phase. Making adjustments to the nominal approach path to achieve desired communication and lighting conditions quickly raises in-space ∆V. This analysis compares the ∆V impact of several trajectory strategies that could be used to alter the HLS approach path.

HLS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Landing System

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Logan Kennedy↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Utilizing Gaps and Performance Measures to Inform NASA Environmental Control and Life Support Systems and Human Health and Performance Capability Technology Decisions

Human spaceflight is a complex endeavor requiring multiple capabilities for transportation, crew health, scientific goals, and safe return to Earth. The difference between spaceflight proven capabilities and those needed for future exploration architectures is defined as a capability gap. Capability gaps are not technology specific. Each capability gap may be closed with a wide array of technologies that have unique benefits and challenges. Determining what a capability’s relevant and distinguishing key performance parameters (KPPs) are for a mission is critical. Mass, power, and volume are always constrained and important, but defining these in a way normalized by performance is very important. KPP definition for reliability, dormancy, and integration needs are hard to define but critical. Outside of technical considerations, the programmatic factors of the estimated time to develop the technology and how the technology validation objectives are matured are strong considerations in which technologies should be pursued and how they should leverage earlier mission elements. The Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLSS) and Crew Health and Performance (CHP) capability areas are decomposed to high level gaps. While KPPs should be technology agnostic, they can be used to both compare technologies and measure progress of technology development over time. KPPs help define when the gap is closed, and the core mission objectives can be accomplished. Proposed technology improvements to enhance a capability should balance improved KPPs and against investments in other capabilities that are not yet closed. A selection of gaps, KPPs, and validation objectives and their formulation, current state, and how they inform capability roadmap planning are discussed.

Life Support↗