Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “CaS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

404 records · Page 23

Conceptual Design of the Hybrid-Electric Subsonic Single Aft Engine (SUSAN) Electrofan Transport Aircraft

This paper presents an update to the conceptual design of NASA’s Subsonic Single Aft Engine (SUSAN) Electrofan transport aircraft—a 180 passenger, Mach 0.785 hybrid-electric regional jet with an economy range of 750 nmi and a design range of 2,500 nmi. The concept employs a series hybrid-electric powertrain driven by a fuel-burning aft fuselage propulsor that is connected to Megawatt-class power generators to convert additional mechanical shaft power to electric power. This electric power is used to support wing-mounted electric propulsors. The aft fuselage turbofan leverages boundary layer ingestion (BLI) and is designed to deliver 35% of the total aircraft thrust, while the wing propulsors assume underwing distributed electric propulsion (DEP) arrangements and are responsible for the remaining 65% thrust. Investigated in this work is the fuel burn performance of the SUSAN Electrofan when incorporating new weight and efficiency estimates for the power, battery, and thermal systems. An updated unified engine deck is also included, which accounts for the high effective bypass ratio made possible by the DEP systems and turbofan BLI effects to first order. Multidisciplinary design analysis and optimization (MDAO) is performed through an updated conceptual design environment, and comparisons are made to a Boeing 737 MAX 8-like reference aircraft performing similar missions, as well as a variant resized for 2,500 nmi.

CAS↗

Towards Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Immersed Boundary Overset Grid Method

Traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes grid methods applied to aerodynamic shapeoptimization can struggle with the deformation of surface and volume grids at componentintersections, such as at wing-fuselage junctions. To overcome this, we propose an approachwhich utilizes curvilinear overset grids for the discretization of the domain, with the presenceof the body modeled using an immersed boundary method. This approach handles complexgeometries without the need for their explicit integration into the grid. The goal of this approachis to reduce grid generation time and allow for greater geometric freedom for component-basedaerodynamic shape optimization. Two different methods are presented: a source-term-basedand a ghost-node-based immersed boundary method. Flow analyses and adjoint solutionsobtained using the proposed methods show promising comparisons with standard body-fittedgrid methods. Preliminary aerodynamic shape optimization results obtained using one of theimmersed boundary methods are also presented.

TTT↗

High-Fidelity Aeropropulsive Assessment of Distributed Electric Propulsion and Boundary Layer Ingestion for the SUSAN Electrofan

This paper presents a high-fidelity aeropropulsive assessment of the SUSAN Electrofan’s distributed electric propulsion (DEP) and boundary layer ingestion (BLI) aft fuselage turbofan technologies. This is achieved through the application of computational tools for aerodynamic and aeropropulsive design and analysis based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. Representative aircraft models are first developed in 3D for the SUSAN Electrofan concept, a non-DEP variant, and a year 2020 technology level reference aircraft based on the Boeing 737-8. These include airframes developed through the application of RANS-based aerodynamic shape optimization, with the objective of drag minimization at cruise while subject to constant lift and zero pitching moment constraints. Wing propulsors are also included and modeled as free-flying ducted fans. These are developed through RANS-based aeropropulsive shape optimization, with the objective of shaft power minimization while subject to constant net thrust and maximum fan face Mach number constraints. An iterative power balance method is then used to trim each of the decoupled aircraft configurations, providing estimates of relative aerodynamic performance, shaft power, and range efficiency. Results also include power on and off analyses, which indicate reduced thrust-induced drag for the SUSAN Electrofan’s DEP and BLI aft fuselage turbofan propulsors when compared to those of the Boeing 737-8-like reference aircraft.

CAS↗

High-Fidelity Aeropropulsive Optimization of a Mail-Slot Distributed Electric Propulsion System for the SUSAN Electrofan

Hybrid- and all-electric aircraft concepts use electric motors for power rather than a conventional jet engine. Electric propulsors open the door to new ways to synergistically integrate the propulsion system with the airframe. For example, many small electric propulsors can be distributed along the wing to increase the effective bypass ratio for better overall efficiency. Furthermore, these propulsors can be attached to the wing surface for boundary layer ingestion(BLI) to further the efficiency gains. However, these novel methods of aeropropulsive integration also create challenges such as nonuniform inflow and complex nacelle geometries. Here we use gradient-based aerodynamic shape optimization to address the design challenges of the wing-mounted distributed electric propulsion system of the Subsonic Single Aft Engine (SUSAN)concept. In doing so, we aim to more accurately benchmark the flow power of SUSAN’s mail slot propulsors relative to a conventional propulsion system in both an isolated and BLI configuration. Our preliminary results found relative to an optimized podded propulsor the optimized mailslot and BLI mailslot design required 8% and 17% more flow power respectively.The methods and key design insights also apply to other aircraft concepts that utilize distributed electric propulsion and boundary layer ingestion.

CAS↗