Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “interplanetary magnetic fields”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Modeling the Effect of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field on Cosmic Ray Muon Shadows

Cosmic ray (CR) muon shadows were located using muon data from the MINOS Far Detector in Northern Minnesota. The shadows were located independently across 3 time periods; near solar minimum, solar maximum, and over the entire 13 year span of the data. A muon distribution for each shadow was then sampled to simulate CR motions near the Sun using the Parker Spiral model of the Sun’s IMF and a dipole model of the Earth’s GMF. The resulting particle distributions were then compared to their position with respect to the Sun. An analytical relationship between the primary CR cutoff energy E0 and the associated shadow deflections was observed. The minimum cutoff energy of the primary CR energy spectrum consistent with the Parker Spiral model was determined to be $E_0 = 22.8 \pm 1.2$~TeV. This value is 2-3 times higher than the experimentally determined value. Complexities that can be added to the Parker Spiral Model and affect the overall shift of the the Sun’s cosmic ray shadow are discuss ed to explain discrepancies. Results show that the Parker Spiral model is most consistent with the the solar minimum shadow and least consistent with the solar maximum shadow, as expected.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
NASA NTRS1967

Particles and fields

Interplanetary magnetic field, magnetosphere, solar energetic protons, and galactic cosmic rays

MAGNETOSPHERE↗
NASA NTRS1994

Empirical models of the magnetospheric magnetic field

A general overview of magnetospheric modeling is given, along with a more detailed discussion of several empirical models which are widely used. These models are composed of representations of the Earth's main internal field (basically a bipolar field), plus external field contributions due to ring currents (carried by the particles in the Van Allen radiation belts), magnetopause currents (the boundary surface between the Earth's magnetic field and interplanetary magnetic field carried by the solar wind), and tail currents (carried by particles in the neutral sheet of the magnetotail). The empirical models presented here are the Mead-Fairfield, Olsen-Pfitzer tilt-dependent (1977), Tsyganenko-Usamo, Tsyganenko (1987), Olsen-Pfitzer dynamic (1988), Tsyganenko (1989), and Hilmer-Voight models. The derivations, agreement with quiet time and storm time data from the two satellite programs, Spacecraft Charging at High Altitudes (SCATHA) and Combined Release Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES), and computational requirements of these models are compared.

Jordan, C. E.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Cross correlation between cosmic-ray fluctuations and interplanetary magnetic-field fluctuations

Study of the cross-correlation between cosmic-ray intensity fluctuations and the interplanetary magnetic field, using the low-frequency limit of the theory of the interplanetary scintillations of cosmic rays. Cross-spectral analysis of the flux of the Alert neutron monitor and simultaneous values of the interplanetary magnetic field components are presented which support the theory. A model of cosmic-ray fluctuations is described, with effects of gradients and interplanetary sector structure dominating for very low frequencies (less than or about equal to .000005 Hz) and magnetic-field induced interplanetary scintillations of cosmic rays dominating for higher frequencies.

Jokipii, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Interplanetary magnetic-field variations and substorm activity.

A fine time-scale study of interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) variations and auroral-zone magnetograms during active and moderately active days show that the time delay between the southward turning of the IMF and the first sign of a negative magnetic bay is typically less than 15 min. During the moderately active period, 88% of all substorms were associated with southward interplanetary magnetic fields. Conversely, 80% of all large southward IMF events were associated with auroral-zone negative bays; during some events, however, magnetic bays could not be found, even by using high-latitude stations. It is concluded that the main mechanism for the triggering of magnetospheric substorms is the southward turning of the IMF.

Tsurutani, B. T.↗