Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “generators”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Atomate: A high-level interface to generate, execute, and analyze computational materials science workflows

We introduce atomate, an open-source Python framework for computational materials science simula-tion, analysis, and design with an emphasis on automation and extensibility. Built on top of open sourcePython packages already in use by the materials community such as pymatgen, FireWorks, and custodian,atomate provides well-tested workflow templates to compute various materials properties such as elec-tronic bandstructure, elastic properties, and piezoelectric, dielectric, and ferroelectric properties. Atomatealso enables the computational characterization of materials by providing workflows that calculate X-rayabsorption (XAS), Electron energy loss (EELS) and Raman spectra. One of the major features of atomate isthat it provides both fully functional workflows as well as reusable components that enable one to com-pose complex materials science workflows that use a diverse set of computational tools. Additionally,atomate creates output databases that organize the results from individual calculations and contains abuilder framework that creates summary reports for each computed material based on multiplesimulations.

Mathew, Kiran↗
DOE OSTI2020

Comparison of Surface Tension Generation Methods in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics for Dynamic Systems

Developing robust numerical models of dynamic surface tension dominated multiphase systems is an ongoing challenge, especially in scenarios with large density and viscosity ratios. This is critical to the design and understanding of various physical and engineering systems, such as fluidized beds, fuel injectors, and drug delivery schemes. Much of the computational work in surface tension dominated multiphase flows has employed the continuum surface force method (CSF) of Brackbill et al. [1], which recasts surface tension from a surface force to a volumetric force that can be imposed in the vicinity of an interface. The CSF method produces accurate results across a variety of systems, however it relies on the identication of surface normals, which can be unreliable under certain conditions. Alternative methods of simulating surface tension have been proposed. Here the advantages and disadvantages of the CSF method in comparison to a pairwise forces (PF) method proposed by Tartakovsky and Panchenko [2] are explored. The CSF and PF methods are used in a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) framework to model dynamic systems. Results are compared to existing test cases from the literature and to analytic solutions derived from fundamental normal mode behavior of bubbles and droplets. A physical system for which the PF method is more stable and physically appropriate than the CSF method is identied.

smoothed particle hydrodynamics, multiphase flow↗