Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “error detection”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1998

Analyzing Software Specifications for Mode Confusion Potential

Increased automation in complex systems has led to changes in the human controller's role and to new types of technology-induced human error. Attempts to mitigate these errors have primarily involved giving more authority to the automation, enhancing operator training, or changing the interface. While these responses may be reasonable under many circumstances, an alternative is to redesign the automation in ways that do not reduce necessary or desirable functionality or to change functionality where the tradeoffs are judged to be acceptable. This paper describes an approach to detecting error-prone automation features early in the development process while significant changes can still be made to the conceptual design of the system. The information about such error-prone features can also be useful in the design of the operator interface, operational procedures, or operator training.

Nancy G. Leveson↗
NASA NTRS1980

Joint map data/phase sequence estimation for trellis phase codes

A unified estimation procedure is formulated for the coherent detection of trellis phase codes, including partial response FM codes and multi-h codes. The unknown carrier phase is imbedded in the system state vector, and by simple augmentation of the decoder's state space, joint data and carrier estimation may be accomplished. The procedure is general to all trellis phase codes analyzed thus far. The effect of a static phase error on detection performance is also treated.

Wilson, S. G.↗
NASA NTRS1993

(abstract) Mission Operations and Control Assurance: Flight Operations Quality Improvements

Mission Operations and Command Assurance (MO&CA), a recent addition to flight operations teams at JPL. provides a system level function to instill quality in mission operations. MO&CA's primary goal at JPL is to help improve the operational reliability for projects during flight. MO&CA tasks include early detection and correction of process design and procedural deficiencies within projects. Early detection and correction are essential during development of operational procedures and training of operational teams. MO&CA's effort focuses directly on reducing the probability of radiating incorrect commands to a spacecraft. Over the last seven years at JPL, MO&CA has become a valuable asset to JPL flight projects. JPL flight projects have benefited significantly from MO&CA's efforts to contain risk and prevent rather than rework errors. MO&CA's ability to provide direct transfer of knowledge allows new projects to benefit directly from previous and ongoing experience. Since MO&CA, like Total Quality Management (TQM), focuses on continuous improvement of processes and elimination of rework, we recommend that this effort be continued on NASA flight projects.

mission operation flight operations error detectio↗
NASA NTRS2020

Preliminary Design, Testing, and Performance of the LOFTID Navigation System

The Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) involves the first orbital test of an inflatable decelerator. This test involves the LOFTID re-entry vehicle using an inflatable decelerator to re-enter the atmosphere after flying to orbit as a secondary payload. Due to system constraints, including spin stabilization, unknown time of day, a limited space available for antennas, and a heat shield which blocks magnetic fields, the navigation system includes only an inertial measurement unit and a single GPS receiver. As the vehicle is turned off for the first part of the mission and will not receive commands or data from the ground, the navigation system will not have accurate initialization, and will in-stead rely on pre-flight estimates or first measurement estimation. This could result in significant unknown error in the initial state, resulting in needing to initialize the state on-orbit and requires using the single GPS antenna for attitude updates. These design considerations led to using an Extended Kalman filter, modified to perform with these design constraints. A streamlined testing approach, including tests with flight-like rotations, is being used to limit the time and resources needed to test the navigation system while still fully testing the performance and robustness of the navigation system. This testing approach follows the NASA test-as-you-fly principle and allows for early detection of errors and changes that are needed in the software. This results in a navigation system that, even within the design constraints of the mission architecture, will provide the performance and robustness needed of the mission.

Joel Amert↗
NASA NTRS1993

Altitude deviations: Breakdowns of an error-tolerant system

Pilot reports of aviation incidents to the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) provide a window on the problems occurring in today's airline cockpits. The narratives of 10 pilot reports of errors made in the automation-assisted altitude-change task are used to illustrate some of the issues of pilots interacting with automatic systems. These narratives are then used to construct a description of the cockpit as an information processing system. The analysis concentrates on the error-tolerant properties of the system and on how breakdowns can occasionally occur. An error-tolerant system can detect and correct its internal processing errors. The cockpit system consists of two or three pilots supported by autoflight, flight-management, and alerting systems. These humans and machines have distributed access to clearance information and perform redundant processing of information. Errors can be detected as deviations from either expected behavior or as deviations from expected information. Breakdowns in this system can occur when the checking and cross-checking tasks that give the system its error-tolerant properties are not performed because of distractions or other task demands. Recommendations based on the analysis for improving the error tolerance of the cockpit system are given.

Palmer, Everett A.↗
NASA NTRS1966

Digital system detects binary code patterns containing errors

System of square loop magnetic cores associated with code input registers to react to input code patterns by reference to a group of control cores in such a manner that errors are canceled and patterns containing errors are accepted for amplification and processing. This technique improves reception capabilities in PCM telemetry systems.

Muller, R. M.↗
NASA NTRS1965

On decoding BCH codes.

Extension, modification and analysis of Gorenstein-Zierler decoding algorithm for binary codes of Bose, Ray-Chaudhuri and Hocquenghem /BCH/ correcting erasures and errors

BINARY CODE↗
NASA NTRS1966

Generalized minimum distance decoding.

Generalized minimum distance decoding that permits likelihood information to be used, yielding same probability of error as maximum likelihood decoding

DISTANCE MEASURING EQUIPMENT↗