SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “REACTOR FUELING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2024

The University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Preliminary Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA) mission to eliminate or minimize the civilian use of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU, ≥ 20 wt% U-235) fuels, the NNSA Material Management and Minimization (M3) Office of Reactor Conversion and Uranium Supply is collaborating with six U.S. high performance research reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU, < 20 wt% U-235) fuel. Primary conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations and maintain the existing experimental facilities performance. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities by stakeholders across organizations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Assessing Fuel Cycle Options for Elysium Molten Chloride Salt Fast Reactor from Spent Nuclear Fuel, Plutonium, and Depleted Uranium (Final CRADA Report)

Argonne National Laboratory performed calculations in order to determine the viability of various mode of operation and operating conditions for the reactor designed by Elysium Industry. The reactor description, operating conditions, startup fuel composition, and other relevant information were provided by Elysium to Argonne. The tools currently available at Argonne were used to perform the calculations and provide an assessment for the various cases agreed upon. The results were shared with Elysium.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Fabricating Fuel for the Versatile Test Reactor

A metal driver fuel has been proposed for the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR). About 30 years ago, the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II) was the last reactor in the U.S. to utilize a full core of metal driver fuel. While the necessary knowledge to make metal fuels is well preserved and is practiced for research activities today, re-establishing a production line to support the fuel needs of a 300 MWth reactor has unique technical and engineering challenges. These challenges are the focus of a multi-laboratory and private sector team that has been tasked with the responsibility to fabricate fuel for the VTR.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Nuclear fuels for transient test reactors

Transient test reactors with the ability to test fissile specimens under extreme conditions have been crucial tools in the development of nuclear technologies. Less than 10 unique facility designs have ever been constructed, most of which remain operational today and still use the original nuclear fuel constructed for them more than 40 years ago. Historic fuel systems for transient test reactors vary in significant ways which have marked influences on reactor capabilities. Eventually, new fuel will be needed to support the longevity of transient test reactor missions. This paper reviews precedent transient reactor fuel systems in the context of their unique requirements. A few key conclusions are illustrated by comparing and contrasting these transient test reactors. Fuel composites which are mostly graphite can enable transient reactors with very high neutron fluence capability (>2E16 n/cm 2 ) and are amenable to longer “shaped” transients but cannot achieve pulses <10 ms in duration. Reducing the graphite-to-uranium ratio can yield a very narrow pulse capability but delivers less fluence and requires cores with considerably more fissile material. Designs based on uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) make use of readily available materials to create compact cores with narrow pulse width capabilities but with moderate neutron fluence capabilities (~2E15 n/cm 2 ). Uranium zirconium hydride (U-ZrHx) is a well-established fuel system for pulsing reactors which has been intermittently manufactured throughout the decades. U-ZrHx offers similar capabilities to UO 2 designs in terms of nuclear kinetics, but with about half the fluence capability (~1E15 n/cm 2 ). An evolution of the UO 2 system, termed “ternary ceramic” fuel, shows that dispersing UO 2 in zirconium oxide and calcium oxide can increase fluence capability greatly (~7E15 n/cm 2 ), but is not presently a commonly available fuel form. A unique composite of UO 2 and beryllium oxide (UO 2 -BeO) can be used to create a core with similar kinetics and compact core geometry as U-ZrHx designs, but with significantly higher fluence capability (~6E15 n/cm 2 ). Like ternary ceramic fuel, newly fabricated UO 2 -BeO would require reestablishing its historic manufacturing process which would be further complicated by the health hazards associated with beryllium. In conclusion, like most engineering problems, there is no perfect solution, but this paper outlines the advantages and disadvantages of candidate fuel options to help guide detailed evaluations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Development of an MC&A toolbox for liquid-fueled molten salt reactors with online reprocessing (Final Report)

A critical barrier to the deployment of MSRs is the absence of a well-defined nuclear material control and accounting (MC&A) approach, a vital prerequisite to meet NRC licensing requirements as well as facilitating future international exports. Liquid-fueled MSR variants (especially those incorporating online refueling or reprocessing) present a unique set of challenges to traditional nuclear material control and accountancy. Unlike solid-fueled light-water reactors, traditional item-counting methods cannot be applied as an accountancy strategy. Rather, MC&A approaches to MSR variants (including both uranium and thorium fueled designs) are more analogous to bulk material handling facilities (e.g., enrichment and reprocessing); yet further complicating matters is the fact that fuel medium is also highly radioactive. Meanwhile, the space of MSRs covers a broad range of design parameters, including thermal and fast spectra designs; operation in actinide breeder or burner modes, choice of actinide fuel used (e.g., 235 U, 232 Th / 233 U, denatured 233 U, etc.), pool or loop-type configuration, and even different salt chemistry. Each of these design choices introduce significant challenges to MC&A approaches within MSR facilities. We propose to bridge this gap for liquid-fueled MSRs by developing a modular, component-based test framework for evaluating viable process monitoring and MC&A techniques specifically suited to liquid-fueled MSR system variants employing online refueling or reprocessing. This test platform will consist of a toolbox of independent process modules representing discrete physical units (such as the reactor core, off-gas processing, decay tanks, and actinide separation units), each with its own self-contained physics responsive to the input mass flow, along with appropriate measurement models that can be coupled to key flow points. These dynamic physical signatures thus afford the ability to test the viability and efficacy of potential accountancy techniques under the full range of reactor operating conditions. As process modules are connected via mass flows, the result is a reconfigurable, generic MSR mass flow model capable of serving as an MC&A test platform for a broad spectrum of possible MSR configurations. The resulting MSR MC&A toolbox will enable robust assessment of accountancy strategies for this unique facility type, including analysis of physical feedbacks arising both from depletion of the fuel over time as well as from potential off-normal events, including those introduced by equipment failures (e.g., a pump failure) as well as by malicious action (i.e., attempts to divert material). The proposed toolbox both addresses a critical needs area for the MPACT analysis toolkit while leveraging existing MPACT-sponsored tools, especially with respect to simulation of measurement and accountancy techniques for advanced fuel cycle facilities. Beyond enabling new analysis capabilities for MSR systems, the design of this toolbox will be to such to maximize compatibility with existing MPACT tools, such to enhance existing facility MC&A analysis capabilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Comparison of Irradiated TRISO Fuel Radioactivity from Multiple Advanced Reactor Designs

The SCALE code system was used to model, deplete, and compare several different TRISO-fueled reactor designs: a helium-cooled prismatic reactor, a helium-cooled pebble-bed reactor (PBR), and a Fluoride-Lithium-Beryllium (FLIBE) molten-salt-cooled PBR. The purpose of this comparison was to understand how differences in the reactor designs affect the radioactivity of the fuel after discharge and whether those differences are significant. First, the various reactor designs were build and depleted in the TRITON module for each design and fuel enrichment. Then, the TRITON outputs were used to create burn-up dependent reactor libraries. These libraries were then used by ORIGEN to determine the activities of discharged fuel for each reactor, which were compared to generic Westinghouse 17x17 fuel. Overall, the results showed that short term decays are dominated by reactors with higher operating powers, and the reactor type, initial fuel enrichment, and maximum burn-up are of only secondary importance. Although this analysis only focuses on activities in becquerels, these dependencies are consistent with the expected behavior of decay heat. However, analysis of long- term time periods post-irradiation shows that the reactor type and maximum burn-up have strong impacts on the activities; initial fuel enrichment has a secondary impact while operating power is inconsequential. These results would be useful for analyses, such as dose assessment and modeling in post- release scenarios; normal fuel handling operations; and spent fuel transport, storage and disposal. Of particular interest, the results in this report show that analyses that focus on spent nuclear fuel of advanced reactors need to consider each parameter carefully. Unsurprisingly, if the correct operating power is not used in short term analyses, the results will not be correct. Perhaps unexpectedly, however, if the correct reactor type is not used, then the long term results will also be incorrect, especially for areas such as permanent disposal. Even though this report focuses on the total activity of nuclear fuel, it provides initial results on the effects of various input parameters and also provides a framework to extend the work into other analyses of spent fuel from advanced reactors, especially those employing TRISO fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

ECAR-6581 Rev 0 Hydraulic Assessment of Conceptual Design of Ring-type Spacer for MARVEL Reactor

The fuel rods in the nuclear reactor core can be deformed due to various reasons, such as thermal expansion, the effect of irradiation, hydrodynamic effects, etc. The deformation of the fuel rods can lead to contact between them, which can deteriorate the coolability of the nuclear fuel and increase the potential risk of failure. To prevent the fuel rods from coming into contact with each other, a ring-type spacer may be introduced in the MARVEL reactor. However, the ring spacers can result in an additional pressure drop, which could restrict the natural circulation operation of the MARVEL reactor. Therefore, this ECAR will examine the additional pressure drop caused by the introduction of the ring-type spacer by comparing with the bare rod condition.

21 - SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLAN↗

DOE OSTI2021

Performance of HALEU and HEU-Fueled Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Reactors

Interplanetary spaceflight may be significantly improved by rockets that utilize nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) instead of the chemically propelled rockets in use today. To be efficient, NTP reactors must be light, which presents unique design opportunities and challenges to reactor designers. One such opportunity is the enrichment of the nuclear fuel that powers the NTP reactor. The use of high-enriched uranium (HEU) instead of high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) will result in a lower mass of fuel required but may present additional challenges beside the mass considerations, such as proliferation concerns, availability, public acceptance and authorization basis. Whether or not a NTP reactor fueled with HEU is significantly lighter than its HALEU counterpart is unclear and an assessment has been performed here as part of the Mars Transportation Assessment Study. This report assesses the impact of reducing the fuel enrichment form HEU (93 wt.% 235U) to HALEU fuel (19.5 wt.% 235U) on reactor design outcomes for a conceptual NTP reactor. Two reactor designs, one fueled with HEU and the other with HALEU, were prepared based on a multi-stage design process. The neutronics and thermal-hydraulics characteristics of these reactors are compared and contrasted to illustrate the impacts of fuel enrichment. Despite differences in fuel and moderator mass, the overall mass difference between the HALEU and HEU cores was only 9%. The required core size and assembly dimensions are nearly equivalent. This finding is based on a rapid design process that targeted core volume minimization. Each features some neutronics advantages - depletion is much less significant in the HEU core, but the Doppler reactivity feedback is stronger in the HALEU core. Additional discussions are made about the possible benefits of other design changes, including the possibility of utilizing a fast-spectrum reactor. Given the scope of this assessment the findings discussed in this report are not exhaustive and are only providing an initial comparison of the most obvious design and performance parameters.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Evaluation of an Accident Tolerant Fuel Leak in the Advanced Test Reactor

Accident Tolerant Fuels (ATF), which are nuclear fuel sources designed to withstand operational irregularities and incidents, have been a topic of interest in the nuclear industry for several decades. Interest in ATF technology surged following the 2011 accident at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan. At the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), one of Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL) four operating nuclear reactors, the ATF program is a collaborative effort between the national laboratory and various stakeholders within the nuclear industry. This program focuses on the research and development of novel fuel compositions, cladding, and component materials with enhanced accident-resistant properties. During one of ATR’s 60-day operating cycles in 2024, the reactor experienced five unplanned shutdowns. Following the fifth shutdown, radiation monitors detected an increase in radiation levels coming from the loop piping. Subsequent water samples confirmed the cause was a leak of fission products from the ATF experiment, designated as ATF-2C. The source of the leak was identified as the instrumented section of the test train. The primary discussions in this paper are 1) the design of the ATF test train, 2) the operating parameters leading up to and following the detection of the leak, and 3) the quantification and characterization of the released fission products.

Accident Tolerant Fuels↗

DOE OSTI2025

Evaluation of an Accident Tolerant Fuel Leak in the Advanced Test Reactor

Accident Tolerant Fuels (ATF), which are nuclear fuel sources designed to withstand operational irregularities and incidents, have been a topic of interest in the nuclear industry for several decades. Interest in ATF technology surged following the 2011 accident at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan. At the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), one of Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL) four operating nuclear reactors, the ATF program is a collaborative effort between the national laboratory and various stakeholders within the nuclear industry. This program focuses on the research and development of novel fuel compositions, cladding, and component materials with enhanced accident-resistant properties. During one of ATR’s 60-day operating cycles in 2024, the reactor experienced five unplanned shutdowns. Following the fifth shutdown, radiation monitors detected an increase in radiation levels coming from the loop piping. Subsequent water samples confirmed the cause was a leak of fission products from the ATF experiment, designated as ATF-2C. The source of the leak was identified as the instrumented section of the test train. The primary discussions in this presentation are 1) the design of the ATF test train, 2) the operating parameters leading up to and following the detection of the leak, and 3) the quantification and characterization of the released fission products.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Potential Disposition Options for a Salt Fueled Molten Salt Reactor At the INL (A White Paper)

The molten salt reactor (MSR) design concept has been the focus of significant research and development efforts, both in the U.S. and around the world. There are generally two types of MSRs, salt fueled MSRs that have the fuel dissolved within the salt and solid fueled MSRs that only use the molten salt as a coolant. The range of conceptual designs and the flexibility of operations of MSRs results in a wide range of potential waste streams from salt fueled MSRs; all of which require safe and secure storage and eventual disposition. This white paper will 1) survey the range of salt fueled MSR designs, 2) recognize the implications of design, on the resulting waste streams, and 3) identify the definitions and regulations that apply to the safe and secure management, storage, and disposal of these streams. Research in MSR waste streams is young and the focus of intense research that requires more funding and time to become mature enough to fully support design decisions. Once a specific design is selected, a more detailed management and disposition effort must be performed.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROACH FOR DOWNBLENDING AND DISPOSITION OF IRRADIATED GRAPHITE FUEL

The IGR reactor, a pulse-type test experimental reactor, reached full power in 1961. The reactor contains a center axial experimental ampoule that is subjected to a large pulse of neutrons (neutron flux maximum density of 7×1016 n/cm2·s, peak power 10GW) when the reactor is operated. The fuel form for the IGR reactor is graphite cubes and rods impregnated with highly enriched (90%) uranyl-dinitrate (UO2(NO3)2·6H2O). This fuel is eligible for return to Russia for reprocessing under the Russian Research Reactor Fuel Return program. However due to some technical and licensing issues it was decided to immobilize this fuel in Kazakhstan. The disposition approach thus selected for the spent HEU fuel involves down-blending of the fuel followed by cementation. Development of the process for down-blending and subsequent cementation requires a process that satisfies many criteria, including fissile content, compressive strength, permeability, and containment of radioactivity, among others. One key goal of the final product is to meet the criteria for termination of safeguards. This paper will describe the overall challenge associated with disposition of irradiated HEU graphite spent fuel, the identification of the objectives of the disposition process, and the constraints associated with development of the process and the waste form.

Gaines, Kris↗

DOE OSTI2022

Fast modular reactor nuclear design parameters of fuel cycle and power distributions

This paper describes conceptual design of a 112 MW thermal (50 MW electric) Fast Modular Reactor (FMR) system operating at 7 MPa with inlet/outlet temperatures of 509/800 Celsius degrees. The reactor system includes the reactor core, fuel assemblies, fuel rods, reactor internals, reflector, neutron control system, flow control, and structural components. The nuclear design and analysis were conducted to search for a baseline core with a cycle length greater than 8-year and the power peaking factor less than 1.5 by adjusting the fuel assembly, reactor core, and reflector configurations. The neutron transport calculations of the baseline core showed that a refueling interval of 9-year is achieved with a total peaking factor of 1.47 and a fuel rod average linear power of 3.6 kW/m. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Applying U.S. metal fuel experience to new fuel designs for fast reactors

With the increasing interest in small modular reactors or microreactors, developers are working to design and submit licensing approval requests of U–10Zr-fueled fast reactors. The developers and their proponents cite prior metal fuel experience (worldwide, but U.S. experience in particular for many developers) as the motivation and justification for their reactor concepts. The experience with metal fuel deployment in sodium-cooled fast reactors as well as the underlying irradiation testing database, provide a suitable basis for analytically justifying the use of metal fuel in new reactors. The evolution of metal fuel design and capability illustrates the importance of key fuel design parameters to consider in new applications of the prior experience: fuel smeared density, plenum-to-fuel volume ratio, the ratio of cladding radius to thickness, fuel composition, and cladding and duct materials. In-service operating and deployment conditions to be considered include fuel linear heat generation rate, fuel temperature, cladding temperature, peak burnup and peak fast fluence. Fuel designs and in-service conditions that are bounded by the database and experience are most easily addressed, but deviations from those previous parameters and conditions can be addressed by considering impacts on previously established behavior and applying other mitigating conservatisms, as appropriate. Here, the authors recommend any new deployment proceed with fuel surveillance and monitoring to mitigate risk, application of conservative measures to address uncertainties, and a fuel qualification program that addresses a range of in-service operating conditions with production fuel. The work reported should be of interest to students and regulators unfamiliar with metal fuel in fast reactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Quantify Sodium Fluoride / Beryllium Fluoride Salt Properties for a Liquid Fueled Fluoride Molten Salt Reactor (CRADA C2018-18168 Final Report)

ThorCon is developing a thermal thorium-uranium fueled molten salt reactor that uses a fuel salt consisting of NaF - BeF 2 - ThF 4 - UF 4 - UF 3 , which uses 19.75% enriched uranium. It is not a breeder reactor but requires regular additions of fissile material. A thorough understanding of the thermophysical properties of the fuel salt at the beginning (BOL) and end (EOL) of its life is critical to establishing its thermal hydraulic behavior and enables ThorCon to design a system with the required natural convection. Experimentally determining the heat capacity and thermal conductivity of the fuel salt will provide data necessary for detailed system design and safety analysis.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Fast Modular Reactor Nuclear Design Parameters of Fuel Cycle and Power Distributions

This paper describes conceptual design of a 112 MW thermal (50 MW electric) Fast Modular Reactor (FMR) system operating at 7 MPa with inlet/outlet temperatures of 509/800 ºC. The reactor system includes the reactor core, fuel assemblies, fuel rods, reactor internals, reflector, neutron control system, flow control, and structural components. The nuclear design and analysis were conducted to search for a baseline core with a cycle length greater than 8-year and the power peaking factor less than 1.5 by adjusting the fuel assembly, reactor core, and reflector configurations. The neutronics calculations of the baseline core showed that a refueling interval of 9-year is achieved with a total peaking factor of 1.47 and a fuel rod average linear power of 3.6 kW/m.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Characterization of MC&A for the Molten Salt Fuel Cycle

Advanced reactor developers are exploring diverse reactor designs, including molten salt reactors (MSRs). These advanced reactors are considered for wider applications and a range of deployment locations, including supporting the integration of renewable energy sources in the grid. There are three main types of MSRs: (1) reactors in which the fuel salt freely circulates within the core; (2) reactors with the fuel salt contained within vented fuel tubes; and (3) reactors that use molten salt solely as a coolant, with the fuel in a separate, solid form. In this document, the term MSR refers specifically to the first two types, which use fuel salt—special nuclear material (enriched uranium, plutonium, and 233 U) in chloride or fluoride form mixed with chloride- or fluoride-based carrier salt in a peritectic mixture—as the primary medium for fission. The composition of fuel salt, both at startup and for makeup or refueling, varies depending on the MSR design and the chosen fuel cycle approach, which can be either once-through or closed. For MSRs, a variety of fuel cycle approaches (e.g., U, U–Pu, U–Pu–TRU, U–Th, U–Pu–Th) are being considered. Fuel in MSRs is much different than traditional solid fuel, including its preparation. The uniqueness warrants investigation into characterizing fuel preparation processes, known as fuel salt synthesis . This effort characterized major fuel preparation and synthesis processes, identifying temperature, equipment, and environmental requirements for uranium-, plutonium-, and thorium-based fuel preparation and synthesis. Because MSR fuel salt synthesis facilities handle special nuclear material in loose, bulk form, a material control and accounting plan will be required for licensing from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission or under the US Department of Energy authorization. This effort serves as a foundation to investigate material control and accounting approaches for synthesis facilities, including determining measurement points and techniques. Because several MSR developers are planning demonstration facilities in the coming years, this effort will support stakeholders with preparing or reviewing material control and accounting plans for providing assurance that all special nuclear material is accounted for at fuel salt synthesis facilities. This report was produced for Materials Protection, Accounting, and Control Technologies (MPACT) program under the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Safeguards Considerations for Salt Fuel Fabrication

Molten salt reactors (MSR) with liquid fuel present a unique safeguards challenge whereby the current verification techniques have not been evaluated for effectiveness and applicability. While MSR operations have been the subject of prior studies, the front-end liquid fuel preparation activities have not been extensively evaluated. Reviewing the existing resources on fuel fabrication and evaluating the range of fuel fabrication process options available will allow safeguards analysts to identify the applicability of existing safeguards practices, identify gaps in capability, and identify opportunities where safeguards may be applied. There is no existing supplier of fuel salt for MSRs. In an extensive review of MSR technology, the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA's) Nuclear Power Technology Development Section acknowledges the gap in existing capabilities for fuel salt fabrication, noting, simply, “if demand exists, supply will appear.” Salt reactor fuel has not been previously produced on an industrial scale in a non-nuclear weapon state. These characteristics of MSR fuel fabrication present high levels of uncertainty, but they also represent an opportunity to mature safeguards techniques alongside liquid fuel preparation technologies.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗