Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “RANS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2015

LagRST Model Predictions of a Wingtip Vortex Floweld

The performance of the new LagRST models is compared with curvature corrected eddyviscosity RANS models. The Reynolds-stress models provide very good predictions of thisow without any additional curvature corrections. Along with comparison of predictionsof the vortex itself, some of the other measurements included in the oweld are comparedwith the predictions in the wake and over the wing. Dierences in predictions between thevarious RANS models in the wake region are small - not substantial, and all predictionsare in line with experimental measurements from 0.005c to 0.67c downstream of the trailingedge, at odds with what self-similar wake analysis would predict.

wing tip vortices↗
NASA NTRS2019

Turbulent Axial Odometer Model

A Galilean-invariant field equation is proposed and tested on standard turbulence model test cases. The field equation provides an additional non-dimensional outer scale which allows the turbulence models to reproduce the axial normal stress increase with Re seen in high Reynolds numbers experiments. The field equation provides a Reynolds number for every point based on the length of turbulent flow upstream of that point in the domain. This outer scale equation can be considered an odometer that gives a length scale conjectured to be related to the large streamwise structures that are seen in turbulent flow and that require run length to develop. A new RANS model using this additional scale is able to match the Reynolds number variation of the normal stresses seen at high Reynolds number. Furthermore, the good attached flow prediction capabilities of current RANS models appears to be attained. Using this scale equation, the entire Reynolds-stress state appears to be predicted correctly, over a large run length Reynolds number range such as experienced in aircraft design.

Olsen, Michael E.↗
NASA NTRS2019

eddy Users Manual

eddy is a collection of tools - nonlinear solvers, meshing, post-processing, visualization, optimization, etc. - for performing scale-resolving simulations of multi-physics applications. The framework is designed to enable advanced R&D on a variety of topics by leveraging a mature capability for scale resolving simulations, and simultaneously be an appropriate tool for application analysis and support. Currently, eddy is at a relatively low technical readiness level (TRL), and users and developers should maintain appropriate expectations. The technical details behind eddy are outlined in several publications which can be consulted for more information [1–10]. The solvers are built around an unstructured high-order capability, and heavily utilize the tensor product sum-factorization approach for efficiency. The unsteady formulation utilizes a fully implicit space-time approach with a matrix-free Newton- Krylov method. A primitive steady-state solver is available for testing purposes, but is not expected to converge for all but simple verification cases. The Navier-Stokes fluid solvers do not support either RANS or hybrid-RANS capability, only LES and wall-modeled LES approaches. All of the solvers within eddy support three modes of operation: a primal solve of the full nonlinear problem, and two linearization approaches of the primal solve - the ad joint and the tangent solution. Details on how to select and use these three modes are outlined in Sec. 3.

Murman, Scott M.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Direct Numerical Simulation of Acoustic Disturbances in the Rectangular Test Section of a Hypersonic Wind Tunnel

Direct numerical simulations (DNS) of the full-scale rectangular nozzle of a hypersonic wind tunnel are conducted to study the acoustic freestream fluctuations radiating from turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) along the nozzle walls. The nozzle geometry and the flow conditions of the DNS match those of the NASA 20-Inch Mach 6 Tunnel, and the DNS has been completed for a domain without spanwise sidewall boundary conditions. The turbulent boundary layer parameters based on the DNS compare well with those derived from Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) calculations as well as with the predictions based on Pate’s correlation. A similarly good comparison is observed for both the Mach number distribution and the Reynold’s stresses obtained from the DNS and RANS calculations, respectively. Various characteristics of the acoustic pressure fluctuations within the inviscid core of the nozzle flow are compared with those associated with a single flat plate at a similar freestream Mach number. The frequency spectrum and bulk propagation speeds match well between the nozzle and the flat plate, but the rms pressure fluctuation is higher for the nozzle configuration, likely due to the combined effect of acoustic radiation from the top and bottom walls. Spatial contours of the two-point correlation coefficient display elliptical tails with approximately equal but opposite angles corresponding to the preferred directionality of acoustic structures radiated from both walls. Future work will focus on DNS of the full nozzle configuration, including the effects of the nozzle side walls.

Deegan, Cole P.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Adaptive Embedded LES of the NASA Hump

A scheme for adaptive embedded LES is proposed which automatically determines boundaries for LES regions in a hybrid LES-RANS computation, with the goal of minimizing the LES part of the computation for maximum accuracy with minimum cost. The model-invariant hybrid formulation enables this scheme through greater flexibility in the placement of RANS-LES transitions. An adaptive embedded large-eddy simulation is carried out for the NASA hump test case and adaptive meshing is added to show how additional adaptive features may be controlled by the adaptive hybrid scheme.

Woodruff, Stephen↗
NASA NTRS2020

Juncture Flow Computations using kL-Based Turbulence Models

The development and implementation of kL-based Reynolds-Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) two-equation turbulence models are reported in this paper. The kL model is based on Abdol-Hamid's closure and Menter's modification to Rotta's two-equation model. Rotta showed that a reliable transport equation can be formed from the turbulence length scale L, and the turbulence kinetic energy k. Rotta's kL equation is well suited for a term-by-term modeling and displays useful features compared to other scale formulations. One of the important differences is the inclusion of higher-order velocity derivatives in the source terms of the scale equation. This can enhance the ability of RANS solvers to simulate unsteady flows in URANS mode. The k-kL scheme has been modified to include the Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model (ARSM) and the Quadratic Constitutive Relation (QCR) as nonlinear models. These models have gone through extensive validations using two-dimensional benchmark problems. The present study documents the application of the k-kL schemes to simulate flow around the Juncture Flow Model (JFM). The k-kL prediction results show generally good comparisons with measurements. The results from this formulation are similar to, or better than results using the SA-RC-QCR2000 two-equation turbulence model. The ARSM and the QCR formulations of k-kL show promise with a similar level of computational resources as basic two-equation turbulence models.

K S Abdol-Hamid↗
NASA NTRS2021

Solving Two-Equation Turbulence Models With a Perspective on Solving Transport Equations

There are three principal objectives of this report. The first objective is to investigate frequently used two-equation models when solving the RANS equations. In this study, we consider the 2006Wilcox and the 2003 Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) models. Also, a simple change of the Wilcox model is introduced to improve computational predictions for transonic flows. Computations for flows over two different airfoils are examined to compare these turbulence models. Effects on modeling the physics of each flow due to variations in the models, such as using either strainrate or vorticity in the turbulence production term, are considered and discussed. The second objective of this report is to not only explore but also evaluate the performance of the solution algorithm for the mean flow and the transport equations. The RANS and turbulence modeling equations aresolved in a weakly coupled manner with a diagonal implicit Runge-Kutta (DIRK) solution algorithm. Throughout this report, emphasis is given to reducing the residuals to machine zero in all flow calculations, so as to eliminate the error due to numerical integration of the discrete governing equations. The final objective is to provide a perspective on solving transport equations for turbulence modeling. Aspects of solving such stiff systems of equations, as well as various numerical difficulties and possible techniques to overcome them, are considered. Discussion is also provided concerning what is called ’numerical compatibility’, which is an essential requirement when designing a solution algorithm for solving transport equations.

turbulence modeling↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Summary of the 5th Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop Nozzle Test Case: Heated Nozzle Exhaust Passing Over A Film-Cooled Plate

This paper summarizes findings from the fifth AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop nozzle test case. The experimental configuration examined by workshop participants was a subsonic nozzle with a square exit blowing a heated exhaust over a film-cooled plate. Computational fluid dynamics solutions were obtained and compared to experimental measurements of flow velocities and temperatures, as well as plate surface temperatures. The heated nozzle operated with a Mach 0.3 exit flow at a static temperature ratio of 2.7. Cooling air blowing ratios of 0, 1, and 2 were considered. Computational meshes for the flow domain were provided for participants. Workshop participants from eight separate organizations represented government, industry, and academia. A variety of flow solutions were obtained: Most of the flow solutions employed a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach, but scale-resolving simulations were used in some cases, including wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (LES), and a few hybrid RANS-LES approaches. One Lattice-Boltzmann solver was employed. For heat transfer to the test article, many participants used a conjugate heat transfer approach. Effects of mesh sensitivity, flow solution approach, and wall heat transfer approach are considered. In general, a fully three-dimensional conjugate heat transfer approach enabled better prediction of surface temperatures than simpler wall temperature boundary treatments. Also, the scale resolving approaches provided better prediction of static temperatures in the flow immediately above the plate consisting of the hot jet exhaust boundary layer interacting with the cooling film. Comparisons of plate surface friction drag and heat transfer obtained from the computations are also presented.

nozzle↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

OVERFLOW Analysis of Supersonic Retropropulsion Testing on a Blunt Mars Entry Vehicle Concept

Supersonic retropropulsion (SRP) flow over a Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) blunt-body vehicle was simulated using the Overflow Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver. Two nozzle configurations were tested (1E and 1F) as a subset of the seven total configurations in the Descent System Study (DSS) testing campaign. A generalized, Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) shock capturing and plume refinement technique was developed and calibrated for producing automatic and unique grid systems optimized for any given testing condition. Solution independence from grid resolution was determined by successively increasing grid refinement until asymptotic convergence of the mean aerodynamic loads was observed. Overflow Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solutions produced realistic SRP flow phenomena, including Mach disk normal shocks contained in high-thrust plumes and bow shock triple-points. Solutions for the 1E nozzle configuration were steady. Conversely, a subset of the 1F test conditions were unsteady and exhibited periodic, non-sinusoidal expansions and contractions of the streamwise-oriented plume, resulting in unsteady aerodynamic loads on the vehicle. Initial investigations into the effect of turbulence modeling fidelity demonstrated significant differences between the aerodynamic loads simulated with RANS and Detached Eddy Simulation (DES). Multiple flow mechanisms were identified as root causes of these differences, including bow shock shape augmentation and reduced entrainment due to reduced turbulence in the DES simulations. Initial comparisons of pitching moment control authority and aerodynamic drag performance between the tested nozzle configurations demonstrated that the 1E configuration may be more advantageous for the Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) task.

Supersonic Retropropulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Influence of Adaptive Mesh Refinement on the Prediction of Vortex Interactions about a Generic Missile Airframe

The complex interaction of forebody and wing vortices significantly impacts missile aerodynamics. The formation of these vortices involves smooth regions of the geometry or geometric discontinuities like leading edges, trailing edges, tips, and corners. Regions of supersonic flow and complex shock topologies interact with boundary layers and vortices. Smooth-body separation and 3D viscous effects strain current Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) techniques. The quantification and control of discretization error is critical to obtaining reliable simulation results and often turbulence model assessments are made in the presence of unquantified (and potentially large) discretization errors. Two mesh adaptation schemes are applied to steady RANS simulations. Multiscale unstructured mesh adaptation is applied to control interpolation error estimates of the Mach field, which resolves boundary layers, vortices, and shocks. A dual-mesh approach with overset communication is applied between an expert-crafted near-body unstructured mesh and an adaptive off-body Cartesian mesh refined with Q-criterion scaled by the strain tensor magnitude. A generic missile configuration is examined in a supersonic flow field to show the interaction of mesh adaptation and turbulence model. Turbulence model modifications for rotational correction and a quadratic constitutive relationship show a strong influence on adaptive mesh refinement and predicted rolling moment.

slender body aerodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Summary of the 5th Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop Nozzle Test Case: Heated Nozzle Exhaust Passing Over A Film-Cooled Plate

This paper summarizes findings from the fifth AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop nozzle test case. The experimental configuration examined by workshop participants was a subsonic nozzle with a square exit blowing a heated exhaust over a film-cooled plate. Computational fluid dynamics solutions were obtained and compared to experimental measurements of flow velocities and temperatures, as well as plate surface temperatures. The heated nozzle operated with a Mach 0.3 exit flow at a static temperature ratio of 2.7. Cooling air blowing ratios of 0, 1, and 2 were considered. Computational meshes for the flow domain were provided for participants. Workshop participants from eight separate organizations represented government, industry, and academia. A variety of flow solutions were obtained: Most of the flow solutions employed a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach, but scale-resolving simulations were used in some cases, including wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (LES), and a few hybrid RANS-LES approaches. One Lattice-Boltzmann solver was employed. For heat transfer to the test article, many participants used a conjugate heat transfer approach. Effects of mesh sensitivity, flow solution approach, and wall heat transfer approach are considered. In general, a fully three-dimensional conjugate heat transfer approach enabled better prediction of surface temperatures than simpler wall temperature boundary treatments. Also, the scale resolving approaches provided better prediction of static temperatures in the flow immediately above the plate consisting of the hot jet exhaust boundary layer interacting with the cooling film. Comparisons of plate surface friction drag and heat transfer obtained from the computations are also presented.

nozzle↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

OVERFLOW Analysis of Supersonic Retropropulsion Testing on a Blunt Mars Entry Vehicle Concept

Supersonic retropropulsion (SRP) flow over a Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) blunt-body vehicle was simulated using the Overflow Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver. Two nozzle configurations were tested (1E and 1F) as a subset of the seven total configurations in the Descent System Study (DSS) testing campaign. A generalized, Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) shock capturing and plume refinement technique was developed and calibrated for producing automatic and unique grid systems optimized for any given testing condition. Solution independence from grid resolution was determined by successively increasing grid refinement until asymptotic convergence of the mean aerodynamic loads was observed. Overflow Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solutions produced realistic SRP flow phenomena, including Mach disk normal shocks contained in high-thrust plumes and bow shock triple-points. Solutions for the 1E nozzle configuration were steady. Conversely, a subset of the 1F test conditions were unsteady and exhibited periodic, non-sinusoidal expansions and contractions of the streamwise-oriented plume, resulting in unsteady aerodynamic loads on the vehicle. Initial investigations into the effect of turbulence modeling fidelity demonstrated significant differences between the aerodynamic loads simulated with RANS and Detached Eddy Simulation (DES). Multiple flow mechanisms were identified as root causes of these differences, including bow shock shape augmentation and reduced entrainment due to reduced turbulence in the DES simulations. Initial comparisons of pitching moment control authority and aerodynamic drag performance between the tested nozzle configurations demonstrated that the 1E configuration may be more advantageous for the Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) task.

Supersonic Retropropulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Large-Eddy Simulations of a Single-Injector Cooling Flow Using the High-Order Flux Reconstruction Method

A single-injector cooling flow into a heated crossflow was used as a validation case for large eddy simulations (LES) from two high-order CFD codes with comparisons to a state-of-the-art Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence model. The focus of this paper is on the validation of LES for one of the high-order CFD codes, namely the GFR (Glenn Flux Reconstruction) code that is being developed at NASA Glenn Research Center. Fourth-order LES were performed for the single-injector cooling flow configuration at blowing ratios of both 1.0 and 2.0, and a fifth-order LES was also performed with a blowing ratio of 1.0. The GFR simulations agree very well with the experiment mean quantities and reasonably well with the experiment turbulence quantities. The LES solutions from GFR and the other high-order CFD code, FDL3DI, agreed very closely for nearly every flow quantity examined, despite the fact that these two codes use completely different numerical methods, different grid geometries and domains, and different inflow boundary conditions. Finally, both LES show a significant accuracy improvement over RANS turbulence models for flows with large temperature gradients, where the standard gradient diffusion approximation is insufficient for temperature predictions.

Large Eddy Simulations↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Large Eddy Simulations of a Single-Injector Cooling Flow Using the High-Order Flux Reconstruction Method

A single-injector cooling flow into a heated crossflow was used as a validation case for large eddy simulations (LES) from two high-order CFD codes with comparisons to a state-of-the-art Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence model. The focus of this paper is on the validation of LES for one of the high-order CFD codes, namely the GFR (Glenn Flux Reconstruction) code that is being developed at NASA Glenn Research Center. Fourth-order LES were performed for the single-injector cooling flow configuration at blowing ratios of both 1.0 and 2.0, and a fifth-order LES was also performed with a blowing ratio of 1.0. The GFR simulations agree very well with the experiment mean quantities and reasonably well with the experiment turbulence quantities. The LES solutions from GFR and the other high-order CFD code, FDL3DI, agreed very closely for nearly every flow quantity examined, despite the fact that these two codes use completely different numerical methods, different grid geometries and domains, and different inflow boundary conditions. Finally, both LES show a significant accuracy improvement over RANS turbulence models for flows with large temperature gradients, where the standard gradient diffusion approximation is insufficient for temperature predictions.

Large Eddy Simulation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

HLPW-4/GMGW-3: Wall-Modeled LES and Lattice-Boltzmann Technology Focus Group Workshop Summary

A summary of the nine submissions to the Wall-Modeled LES and Lattice-Boltzmann(WMLESLB) Technical Focus Group (TFG) at the 4th High lift Prediction Workshop is provided. The focus of this TFG was to assess the current capabilities of WMLES and Lattice-Boltzmann methods on a complex high-lift configuration across a wide range of angles of attack. Preliminary analysis of the submitted data suggests that>250𝑀spatial degrees of freedom are needed to accurately predict pitching moments at high angles of attack due to large pressure gradients present on the outboard slat and main element for𝛼 >17◦(corrected for free-air).While some scatter is reported in pitching moments at the low-angles of attack (𝛼 <11◦) - likely caused by differences in flap separation possibly due to low Reynolds number effects - excellent agreement is observed between the submissions near the𝐶𝐿,max state. Objective superiority over steady state RANS can be seen in terms of lack of excess outboard separation; a majority of the good quality WMLES and LB submissions predict wedge-shaped separation patterns consistent with the experimental oil flow. Differences in the onset of stall mechanism in the free-air configuration for𝛼 >20◦is reported with two distinct topologies observed. Topology A is characterized by the onset of corner-flow separation which progressively grows to produce a pitch break in free-air with an angle of attack increase from𝛼=20.55◦to𝛼=21.47◦+𝜖where𝜖is a small perturbation (varying between submissions and likely to be within±0.3◦). Topology Bis characterized by boundary layer weakness emanating from the inboard side of the wing-pylon juncture substantially larger than any weakness in the wing-body juncture (due to corner-flow);submissions in this category do not show any tendency for occurrence of a pitch break for the free-air configuration within the vicinity of𝛼=21.47◦. The in-tunnel simulations submitted by3 participants using different discretizations, grids and closure models show excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of a) integrated loads, b) surface flow-topology, and c) mechanism for the onset of inboard stall. Further evidence is provided to demonstrate both qualitative and quantitative superiority of all 3 WMLES submissions over a single steady state RANS submission to the workshop.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Toward Verification of the γ-Reθt Transition Model in OVERFLOW and FUN3D

The results of an ongoing assessment of the transition modeling capability in NASA's OVERFLOW and FUN3D programs are presented, with a focus on the Langtry-Menter γ-Reθt transition model in combination with the shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model. While the effect of numerics and boundary conditions on the accuracy and iterative convergence of RANS solutions for fully turbulent flows has been well documented, especially in the context of canonical flow configurations, the same cannot be said for transport-equation-based transition models coupled with RANS-based turbulence models. Given the criticality of transition modeling for new aircraft design and optimization, there has been a renewed focus on the accuracy of such transition models and their inconsistent implementation across different flow solvers as seen from the AIAA and NATO-AVT workshops. In this work, we aim to establish the verification of such models via these two well established CFD codes with different numerics. The goal is to produce high-quality data, such as grids, solutions, and other auxiliary data, that may be utilized for code verification by others in the CFD community. As a first step, the work reported here is focused on the Langtry-Menter transition model as applied to two simple 2D configurations, namely the flat plate, and the NLF-0416, respectively. The paper also highlights how the boundary conditions and baseline turbulence model can affect the solutions from the SST-based Langtry-Menter transition model. A preliminary evaluation of the automatic mesh adaption capabilities of these solvers and potential benefits for flow configurations involving a mix of laminar, transitional, and fully turbulent flows is also reported.

CFD Modeling↗
NASA NTRS2023

HLPW-4: Wall-Modeled LES and Lattice-Boltzmann Technology Focus Group Workshop Summary

A summary of the nine submissions to the Wall-Modeled LES and Lattice-Boltzmann(WMLESLB) Technical Focus Group (TFG) at the 4th High lift Prediction Workshop is provided. The focus of this TFG was to assess the current capabilities of WMLES and LB methods on a complex high-lift configuration across a wide range of angles-of-attack. Analysis of the submitted data suggests that>250𝑀spatial degrees of freedom are needed to accurately predict pitching moments at high angles-of-attack due to large pressure gradients present on the outboard slat and main element for 𝛼 >17◦(corrected for free-air). While some scatter is reported in pitching moment coefficient at the low-angles of attack (𝛼 <11◦) - excellent agreement is observed between submissions near the 𝐶𝐿,max state. Objective superiority of WMLES methods over RANS can be seen in terms of lack of excess outboard separation; a majority of the WMLES and LB submissions predict wedge-shaped separation patterns consistent with the experimental oil flow. The in-tunnel simulations show excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of a) integrated loads, b) surface flow-topology, and c) mechanism for the onset of inboard stall. Further evidence is provided to demonstrate both qualitative and quantitative superiority of the WMLES submissions over RANS.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Data-Driven Turbulence Modeling: Summary and Outcomes of the 2022 NASA Symposium

A three-day symposium sponsored by NASA was held in July 2022 in Suffolk, Virginia on the subject of Turbulence Modeling: Roadblocks, and the Potential for Machine Learning. This meeting brought together over 80 experts from academia, government, and industry to discuss critical issues for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence and transition models, as well as to evaluate the results from a collaborative testing challenge based on data-driven methods and machine learning (ML) technology. The symposium represents a continuation of an earlier symposium sponsored by the University of Michigan and NASA, held in Ann Arbor, MI in 2017. The 2022 symposium included a wide variety of talks on the subjects of RANS and ML, five invited talks, and three panel discussions. This talk summarizes the main outcomes of the symposium, and includes suggested recommendations and future directions.

machine learning↗