SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
First coatings testing located at the Cape side launch pads during the Gemini Apollo Programs for long-term protective coatings for atmospheric protection of carbon steel.
With the gradual increase in robotic rover sophistication and the desire for humans to explore the solar system, the need for reentry systems to deliver large payloads into planetary atmospheres is looming. Heritage ablative Thermal Protection Systems (TPS) using Viking or Pathfinder era materials are at or near their performance limits and will be inadequate for many future missions. Significant advances in TPS materials technology are needed in order to enable susequent human exploration missions. This paper summarizes some recent progress at NASA in developing families of advanced rigid ablative TPS that could be used for thermal protection in planetary entry missions. In particular, the effort focuses on technologies required to land heavy masses on Mars to facilitate exploration.
This work concerns the development of smart coating technologies based on microencapsulation for the autonomous control of corrosion. Microencapsulation allows the incorporation of corrosion inhibitors into coating which provides protection through corrosion-controlled release of these inhibitors.One critical aspect of a corrosion protective smart coating is the selection of corrosion inhibitor for encapsulation and comparison of the inhibitor function before and after encapsulation. For this purpose, a systematic approach is being used to evaluate free and encapsulated corrosion inhibitors by salt immersion. Visual, optical microscope, and Scanning Electron Microscope (with low-angle backscatter electron detector) are used to evaluate these inhibitors. It has been found that the combination of different characterization tools provide an effective method for evaluation of early stage localized corrosion and the effectiveness of corrosion inhibitors.
Ablative thermal protection systems are commonly used as protection from the intense heat during re-entry of a space vehicle and have been used successfully on many missions including Stardust and Mars Science Laboratory both of which used PICA - a phenolic based ablator. Historically, phenolic resin has served as the ablative polymer for many TPS systems. However, it has limitations in both processing and properties such as char yield, glass transition temperature and char stability. Therefore alternative high performance polymers are being considered including cyanate ester resin, polyimide, and polybenzoxazine. Thermal and mechanical properties of these resin systems were characterized and compared with phenolic resin.
This oral presentation will be given at the 13th International Planetary Probe Workshop on June 14th, 2016 and will cover the drivers for reliability and the challenges faced in selecting and designing the thermal protection system (TPS). In addition, an assessment is made on new emerging TPS related technologies that could help with designs to meet the planetary protection requirements to prevent backward (Earth) contamination by biohazardous samples.
The Orion (CEV) thermal protection system (TPS) advanced development project (ADP) was initiated in late 2006 to reduce developmental risk by significant investment in multiple heat shield architectural solutions that can meet the needs both the Low Earth orbit (LEO) and Lunar return missions. At the same time, the CEV TPS ADP was also charged with developing a preliminary design for the heat shield to meet the PDR requirement and at the time of the PDR, transfer the design to Lockheed- Martin, the prime contractor. We reported on the developmental activities of the first 18 months at the IPPW5 in Bordeaux, France, last summer. In June 08, at the time of the IPPW6, the CEV TPS ADP would have nearly completed the preparation for the Orion PDR and would be close to the original three-year mark. We plan to report on the progress at the Atlanta workshop. In the past year, Orion TPS ADP investment in TPS Technology, especially in PICA ablative Heat-shield design, development, testing and engineering (DDTE) has paid off in enabling MSL mission to switch from SLA 561 V heat shield to PICA heat shield. CEV TPS ADP considered SLA 561 V as a candidate for LEO missions and our testing identified failure modes in SLA and as a result, we dropped SLA for further evaluation. This close synergy between two projects is a highly visible example of how investment in technology areas can and does benefit multiple missions. In addition, CEV TPS ADP has been able to revive the Apollo ablative system namely AVCOAT honeycomb architecture as an alternate to the baseline PICA architecture and we plan to report the progress we have made in AVCOAT. CEV TPS ADP has invested considerable resources in developing analytical models for PICA and AVCOAT, material property measurements that is essential to the design of the heat-shield, in arcjet testing, in understanding the differences between different arc jet facilities, namely NASA Ames, NASA JSC and Air Force's AEDC, and in Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE), and in integration of and manufacturing heat shield as a system. The capabilities of the two heat shield systems including failure modes via testing and analysis, once established, can serve the Probe Community and future mission designers to inner and outer planetary exploration very well. For example, missions to Venus, Mars and Titan can use either one of the system by selecting the mission design parameters that utilizes the full characteristics of these system to make use of system efficiency that will result in reduced heat shield mass, system robustness that will enhance mission success and cost. We plan to present significant progresses of the past three years and highlight the significant contributions CEV TPS ADP Project has made to advance the state of the art in Thermal Protection System technology that has and will continue to benefit future entry probe missions.
When we send humans to search for life on other planets, we'll need to know what we brought with us versus what may already be there. To ensure our crewed systems meet planetary protection requirements?and to protect our science from human contamination?we'll need to assess whether microorganisms may be leaking or venting from our spacecraft. Microbial sample collection outside of a pressurized spacecraft is complicated by temperature extremes, low pressures that preclude the use of laboratory standard (wetted) swabs, and operation either in bulky spacesuits or with robotic assistance. A team at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) recently developed a swab kit for use in collecting microbial samples from the external surfaces of crewed spacecraft, including spacesuits. The Extravehicular Activity (EVA) Swab Kit consists of a single swab tool handle and an eight-canister sample caddy. The design team minimized development cost by re-purposing a heritage Space Shuttle tile repair handle that was designed to quickly snap into different tool attachments by engaging a mating device in each end effector. This allowed the tool handle to snap onto a fresh swab end effector much like popular shaving razor handles can snap onto a disposable blade cartridge. To disengage the handle from a swab, the user performs two independent functions, which can be done with a single hand. This dual operation mitigates the risk that a swab will be inadvertently released and lost in microgravity. Each swab end effector is fitted with commercially available foam swab tips, vendor-certified to be sterile for Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA). A microbial filter installed in the bottom of each sample container allows the container to outgas and re-pressurize without introducing microbial contaminants to internal void spaces. Extensive ground testing, post-test handling, and sample analysis confirmed the design is able to maintain sterile conditions as the canister moves between various pressure environments. To further minimize cost, the design team acquired extensive ground test experience in a relevant flight environment by piggy-backing onto suited crew training runs. These training runs allowed the project to validate tool interfaces with pressurized EVA gloves and collect user feedback on the tool design and function, as well as characterize baseline microbial data for different types of spacesuits. In general, test subjects found the EVA Swab Kit relatively straightforward to operate, but identified a number of design improvements that will be incorporated into the final design. Although originally intended to help characterize human forward contaminants, this tool has other potential applications, such as for collecting and preserving space-exposed materials to support astrobiology experiments.
Mars 2020 will fly the Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation II (MEDLI2) sensor suite consisting of a total of seventeen instrumented thermocouple sensor plugs, eight pressure transducers, two total heat flux sensors, and one radiometer embedded in the thermal protection system (TPS). Of the MEDLI2 instrumentation, eleven instrumented thermocouple plugs and seven pressure transducers will be installed on the heatshield of the Mars 2020 vehicle while the rest will be installed on the backshell. The goal of the MEDLI2 instrumentation is to directly inform the large performance uncertainties that contribute to the design and validation of a Mars entry system. A better understanding of the entry environment and TPS performance could lead to reduced design margins enabling greater payload mass-fraction and smaller landing ellipses. The MEDLI2 total heat flux sensors and radiometer are new instruments that were not flown on the Mars Science Laboratory mission. These sensors directly measure the surface heat flux and radiation at specific backshell locations. The total heat flux sensors use a Schmidt-Boelter sensing element. The radiometer version uses a sapphire window placed over the Schmidt-Boelter sensing element to separate the radiative component of the total heat flux. MEDLI2 recently planned and executed protoflight environmental testing as well planetary protection measures on the flight and flight-spare total heat flux sensors and radiometers. This testing is required to provide confidence in the performance of the flight-lot sensors when exposed to flight-like environments, and to reduce the risk of biological contamination on the planet of Mars with microbes from Earth.
Among the challenges faced by the Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) community have been: the lack of a matured forebody heatshield thermal protection system (TPS) capable of meeting the demanding entry environments for the high priority in-situ science missions identified in the decadal survey at Venus, Saturn and the Ice Giants, and the continued sustainment of thermal protection systems/materials. In response to the identified shortfall in TPS technologies capable of extreme entry environments NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and Science Mission Directorate (SMD) initiated the Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET) project which has matured a 3D-Woven TPS to Technology Readiness Level 6 and which is ready for infusion into these high priority missions. During the development of HEEET long term sustainability was a key consideration. However existing TPS also continue to face sustainability issues. Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) has been/is being utilized by many SMD Missions (Stardust, Mars Science Laboratory, OSIRIS-Rex, Mars 2020, Dragonfly) and is under consideration for others including Mars Sample Return, so maintaining PICA for the long term is a priority for NASA. This presentation will discuss raw material sustainability challenges faced by PICA and the efforts by NASA to work with Fiber Materials Inc (FMI) to resolve these challenges with a more sustainable supply chain. In addition, NASA is working with FMI to increase the manufacturing scale for single piece PICA heatshields and to expand the aerothermal performance envelop maturing PICA for larger sized heatshield and more aggressive entry environments. This presentation will also identify challenges and limitations with these systems, particularly around understanding failure modes in these materials and systems and how understanding these may allow use of these systems in environments that are difficult to achieve in ground based testing.
Challenges faced by the Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) community include the lack of a matured forebody heatshield thermal protection system (TPS) capable of meeting the demanding entry environments for the high priority in-situ science missions identified in the decadal survey at Venus, Saturn and the Ice Giants, and the continued sustainment of thermal protection systems/materials. In response to the identified shortfall in TPS technologies capable of extreme entry environments NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and Science Mission Directorate (SMD) initiated the Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET) project which has matured a 3D-Woven TPS to Technology Readiness Level 6 and which is ready for infusion into these high priority missions. During the development of HEEET long term sustainability was a key consideration. However existing TPS also continue to face sustainability issues. Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) has been/is being utilized by many SMD Missions (Stardust, Mars Science Laboratory, OSIRIS-Rex, Mars 2020, Dragonfly) and is under consideration for others including Mars Sample Return, so maintaining PICA for the long term is a priority for NASA. This presentation will discuss raw material sustainability challenges faced by PICA and the efforts by NASA to work with Fiber Materials Inc (FMI) to resolve these challenges with a more sustainable supply chain. In addition, NASA is working with FMI to increase the manufacturing scale for single piece PICA heatshields and to expand the aerothermal performance envelop maturing PICA for larger sized heatshield and more aggressive entry environments. This presentation will also identify challenges and limitations with these systems, particularly around understanding failure modes in these materials and systems and how understanding these may allow use of these systems in environments that are difficult to achieve in ground based testing
Several international Venus missions, both orbiter, and in-situ probe are in the works after a prolonged absence. Future missions are expected to be long-duration lander missions and balloon missions to investigate the cloud layer. The entry mass for these in-situ missions will be significantly higher, and the aeroshell will be larger, than previous missions. Two cardinal requirements govern the selection and use of thermal protection systems (TPS), namely, robustness to assure mission safety during entry and mass efficiency so that the useful mass for science is maximized. One cannot trade mission safety for mass when it comes to TPS. The robustness of the TPS is a paramount requirement as it is a single point of system failure. At the same time, TPS mass is carried for the entire mission duration prior to entry, and any excess TPS mass is at the cost of science payload. Future missions will benefit enormously from TPS options with mass and performance benefits far beyond advanced carbon-carbon (ACC) that is currently proposed for the DAVINCI mission. NASA STMD, and SMD jointly invested in the development of 3-D woven thermal protection systems in the last decade, and as a result, the Heat-shield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET) TPS has been matured to TRL 6. It is ready for future mission use including Venus. The HEEET project focused on developing a broad technology base, applicable for missions not only to Venus, but also to Saturn, the Ice Giants, and higher speed sample return missions such as Mars Sample Return requiring extreme robustness due to bio-hazards. The dual-layer HEEET (DL-HEEET) is proven to be extremely robust. DL-HEEET performed well in arc jet and laser testing conditions where heritage carbon-phenolic failed. HEEET also proved to be more mass efficient compared to Carbon-Phenolic. Recently, the principal author was invited to present his perspectives to the 2023-2032 Planetary Sciences Decadal Venus subcommittee on the current state of TPS for future Venus missions [1]. In addition to pointing out successful TPS and other developments in the last decade in support of entry systems, the principal author made two findings: 1) importance of and need to sustain TPS capabilities that took nearly a decade to develop and 2) the opportunity to further optimize TPS mass without sacrificing robustness to further enable future in-situ missions. This talk will focus on the above two recommendations and provide the rationale for them. The intent of the talk is to seek advocacy from the VEXAG community for the criticality of TPS sustainment and the benefits of 3D woven TPS optimization. TPS Capability Sustainment: HEEET development was necessitated by the atrophy of heritage carbon-phenolic. Atrophy has impacted other TPS materials as well. Avcoat, the TPS that successfully allowed astronauts to explore the Moon in the 1960s and 70s, took nearly a decade and $10’sM to recover in support of Orion/Artemis. One of the most used TPS materials, SLA 561V, had to be recovered prior to its use on Mars Pathfinder. Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA), the TPS that replaced SLA 561V on MSL, has undergone multiple replacements and recovery due to constituent rayon changes. Recently, NASA invested in a domestic rayon replacement program and also invested in FMI to consolidate PICA capability for NASA missions, as a result of FMI’s decision to discontinue commercial FiberForm, which is needed for PICA. TPS used for planetary missions are unique and have no other commercial or defense use. In addition, low mission cadence is also a driver for TPS atrophy. Hence, NASA, as the steward, must take steps to ensure and sustain TPS capabilities. In this talk, we outline steps NASA can take to keep abreast of emerging risks and target risk mitigation steps to ensure TPS capability sustainment for Venus and other extreme environment missions. Next Generation of Mass efficient and Robust TPS: NASA invested in an alternate TPS to PICA based on felt-technology called Conformal-PICA which has the potential to save 30% - 50% mass over PICA. The development was discontinued at a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of ~ 5. 3D Mid-Density Carbon Phenolic (3MDCP) is a single layer variant of HEEET, based on the insulating layer only (SL-HEEET) and currently baselined for the Mars Sample Return Mission Earth Entry System due to its mass efficiency (30% more mass efficient than DL- HEEET). Currently, SL-HEEET is limited to aeroshell diameters of < 1.3m. The SL-HEEET was compared to DL-HEEET in the recent ADVENT flag-ship class mission study in support of the Planetary Science Decadal. SL HEEET was the recommended TPS based on 30% mass savings for both the balloon and lander missions. Given C-PICA and SL-HEEET have superior reliability and mass efficiency, advocacy from VEXAG is sought for completing their further development to TRL 5/6 in this decade so as to enable TPS readiness for future missions.
NASA monitors its spacecraft from a planetary protection (PP) perspective, to ensure continued compliance with planetary protection requirements. This report to COSPAR on previous, ongoing and future missions will describe the issues and considerations regarding the PP implementation and compliance status of each mission, with changes noted as appropriate from previous reports. Missions not described in other presentations will be covered, including (but not limited to): Mars Odyssey, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, Escape and Plasma Acceleration and Dynamics Explorers (EscaPADE), Juno, New Horizons, Parker Solar Probe, Dragonfly, Artemis I and its secondary payloads, and NASA partnered missions.
Due to increasingly high DC link voltages and further advancements in the current density of silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETs, it has become evident that conventional IGBT protection methods are not sufficient to protect these devices from overcurrent during low-inductance fault events. The use of an air core Rogowski coil topology was explored to see if it could mitigate these hard fault events. The design of this circuit resulted in safe shutdown of a low impedance phase-tophase fault, tested up to DC link voltages of 1 kV.
All spacecraft use some sort of thermal insulation in their design, which is usually placed on the spacecraft’s exterior. As such, it is highly susceptible to high-speed impacts by meteoroids and orbital debris. These high-speed impacts can damage the insulation to a point where the protection it offers is below acceptable limits. It is, therefore, important to be able to characterize expected TPS damage levels stemming from such high-speed impacts. In a recent paper, we presented the results of a study that sought to characterize the high-speed impact damage that would be sustained by two thermal protection materials that have recently gained attention for possible use in interplanetary missions. As part of the analyses performed, ballistic limit equations for these materials were developed using recent high-speed impact test data, and then assessed by comparing their predictions against test data. In this paper, we extend the applicability of the ballistic limit equation for one of those thermal materials beyond the testable regime using the results of series of Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Code (SPHC) impact simulations at velocities in excess of 10 km/s. When the predictions of the updated and expanded BLE were compared against the results of the SPHC runs, the predictions were seen to be consistent with the data: non-perforation data points were typically below the BLE curves, while perforation data points were typically above them.
Introduction: On missions seeking signs of potential life elsewhere in the solar system, we have an obligation not to bring our own Earthly life with us. Reducing the bioburden (number of living microbes) on spacecraft is therefore required by the COSPAR Policy on Planetary Protection to target bodies that are of interest for understanding the origins of life (such as Mars). The method of spacecraft sterilization predominantly used by NASA is Heat Microbial Reduction, which is typically incompatible with heat-sensitive components such as optics and electronics, and is expensive and time-consuming. Here, we present preliminary results on a novel method for spacecraft hardware sterilization: high-intensity ultrashort (femtosecond) pulsed laser illumination. Femtosecond lasers use extremely high photon fluxes (10^29 photons/sec*cm^2, ~0.03 J/cm^2) in extremely short pulses, which can inactivate even stress-tolerant microbial spores with minimal damage to the spacecraft surface. This rapid sterilization technique could be carried out in situ in a spacecraft assembly clean room using high-speed surface scanning, saving critical time and resources. It also can potentially remove or reduce debris from inactivated cells and spores. Methods: To develop optimal laser processing parameters for inactivating planetary protection-relevant organisms on metal surfaces, we inoculated 1-cm^2 mirror-polished aluminum coupons with Bacillus subtilis spores (2x10^5 spores/coupon) and tested the effect of several parameters, including pulse count and fluence. Sterilization effectiveness was measured by recovering spores using a PVA (polyvinyl acetate) peel and conducting serial dilution and plating for colony-forming units (CFUs). Results: Our results show that pulse count and fluence both affect sterilization effectiveness and that within a certain pulse count range, increasing fluence increases effectiveness. We have demonstrated the ability to reduce viable microbial counts by at least 10^-4. Future work will include testing higher abundances and different species of microorganisms, effectiveness on complex surfaces, compatibility with sensitive surfaces, and quantification of cell debris removal. Femtosecond pulsed laser illumination has the potential to provide dramatic savings in both cost and schedule over current methods of bioburden reduction to prevent forward contamination. It may also have the potential for use in surface sterilization of returned samples to prevent back contamination.
Space Launch System (SLS) experienced deflagration of the acreage of the Core Stage base heat shield during the Green Run hot-fire test campaigns and Artemis I flight. The burning products from the base heat shield during Green Run hot-fire test operation led to concerns in aerothermal environments and thermal protection system (TPS) performance prior to Artemis I flight. This work documents a highly controlled ground test within the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center’s Nonmetallic Materials Branch thermal vacuum chamber (TVC) and investigates the P50 cork heat transfer environments and thermal protection system (TPS) response due to sensitivity changes in radiative heat rates, ambient pressure, air entrainment mass flow rates, test gas and TPS sample types. An SLS ascent ambient pressure profile was also simulated within the TVC facility. This test data enabled the efforts toward the Artemis I SLS post-flight reconstruction and initial assessment of flight TPS performance. A ground test program was developed to gain an in-depth understanding of the cork combustion dynamics and TPS response due to the SLS launch vehicle flight ascent environments.
The Space Launch System (SLS) Core Stage base heat shield experienced the highest external heating environments on the entire launch vehicle during Artemis I ascent flight. This result was consistent with design predictions. The base heat shield experiences P50 cork combustion dynamics at low altitudes, plume-induced recirculation at moderate altitudes and then in-space base flow physics out to Main Engine Cut-Off (MECO). The base heat shield thermal protection system (TPS) is composed of a P50 cork ablator which is bonded to a substrate. The heat shield protects the gimbal actuation system, RS-25 turbomachinery systems and other aft section sensitive components during ascent. This paper estimates the base heat shield TPS performance from Artemis I using flight data from the NASA Langley Research Center’s Scientifically Calibrated In-Flight Imagery (SCIFLI) Airborne Multispectral Imager (SAMI), development flight instrumentation (DFI) and other TPS recession flight measurements. Predictions from computational and ground test-derived engineering ablation models and observations are also applied. Since no base heat shield substrate thermocouple data were obtained for Artemis I, an estimate of the TPS performance data is derived here. This data assesses thermal margin of the SLS Core Stage base heat shield and best informs the Artemis II Crewed mission to the moon.
BOOK 1: Radiation Environment in Space Effects of Space Radiation on Radiosensitive Objects Biological Effects of Space Radiation BOOK 2 : Shielding Against Space Radiations The realization in recent years that outer space is traversed by high-energy radiations has caused man to reevaluate the feasibility of manned or even instrumented exploration outside our atmosphere. Fortunately, it is possible to determine the nature and intensities of these radiations and to produce similar radiations on earth by means of accelerators. Thus we can learn how to attenuate them and to design capsules which afford protection against them. Of course this protection carries a weight penalty so that there is a premium on optimizing the shield design. Many groups in the United States are engaged in research to this end, and it was the purpose of this symposium to bring these groups together so that they could exchange information. To make the meeting more comprehensive, sessions on the nature of the radiations and their effects on people and things were included. However, the major part of the meeting was devoted to discussions on shielding research, comprising theoretical calculations and experiments carried out mainly with high-energy accelerators. The symposium committee feels that the aims of the symposium were met and that progress in space research program was greatly accelerated thereby.