EB Vs PAM Vs VAR for Uranium Alloys
Questions were raised during the February ’97 PDP Meeting at LLNL as to the advisability of funding three separate melting development programs (Advanced Vacuum Arc Remelt (VAR), Plasma Arc Melting (PAM) and Electron Beam Melting (EB)) through PDP in this era of shrinking research funds. The main issues seemed to be: 1) Have we evaluated the potentials of the three processes sufficiently to eliminate any of them out of hand and 2) Have any of these processes to date produced results which show clear advantages over the other two. The feeling at the meeting toward the latter seemed to be that all three processes required further development before they would be accepted by the complex as the standard. As far as evaluating potential for process improvements, however, we at Livermore did go through somewhat of a trade study in 1993 when we proposed the EB route. It seemed to us that even with the elimination of the skull caster via a VIM/VAR/VAR route, the problem of recycle limitations in the VIM step due to excessive carbon pick-up limited the potential for a great improvement in material utilization using this method. A single-step, cold hearth route looked to be the preferable choice. Both EB and PAM are used commercially as cold hearth processes, and both have been used for the production of refractory and specialty metals; EB since the mid 1950’s and PAM since the mid 1980’s. Both seem to have found their individual niches with some applications being suited to EB and others to PAM. Both can be adapted to continuous casting techniques and both are capable of imparting the high heat fluxes necessary to melt refractory metals. The major differences appear to be that for most applications, the EB process is capable of producing a purer product, while PAM results in less loss of volatile components. There exists an abundance of information in the open literature on the results of processing via both routes on various materials. The attached 1984 paper gives a good explanation of electron beam melting and plasma melting, and, I believe, a fair assessment of the advantages and limitations of both processes.