Comparison of Aerocapture Performance Using Bank Control and Direct Force Control with Two Human-Scale Vehicles at Mars
Recent studies of human-scale missions to Mars have included a wide trade space of vehicle configurations and control schemes. Some configurations fly at a low angle of attack with a low L/D,while others fly at a high angle of attack with a mid L/D. Some use bank angle control, while others use direct force control, where the angle of attack and sideslip angle are independently modulated. This paper compares the performance of three vehicle configurations: a low-L/D vehicle using direct force control, a low-L/D vehicle using bank control, and a mid-L/D vehicle using bank control. The reference mission is aerocapture at Mars into a highly elliptical, 1-sol orbit. The trajectories are integrated in three degrees of freedom. All three cases utilize numeric predictor-corrector guidances and emulate control system responses with rate and acceleration limits. The configurations are compared using a Monte Carlo analysis. The robustness of each configuration to increased dispersions is also compared.