Comparison of predicted and observed solar radiation in an urban area
Measurements of the downward solar radiant flux in the St. Louis area are compared with predictions from an approximate solution to the radiative transfer equation. The atmospheric aerosols were assumed to have a power size distribution and the refractive indices suggested by Fischer (1973) for an urban area. On a relatively clean day, the predictions compared well with observations. On a hazy day, the comparison was poor with the a priori choice of aerosol properties. The particles on the hazy day apparently had more submicron particles than those found in the assumed size distribution, and the particles were considerably less absorbing than those observed by Fischer. These changes could represent the effects of relative humidity and different air mass characteristics.