Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Ground testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2021

Comparing Cumulative Flight Thermal Fatigue to Ground Test Results for Memory Components on the Mars Curiosity Rover

This paper explores the methods used to examine Mars Curiosity Rover’s flight temperature data in relation to the Package Qualification and Verification (PQV) accelerated thermal cycle life test data in response to flight anomalies. The redundant Rover Compute Element (RCE-A, B) has experienced an inability to mount the flash memory several times. The leading cause of these anomalies is likely the loss of electrical connectivity, which is theorized to be due to cracks on the memory component solder joints by thermal cycle fatigue. To investigate this theory, the number of thermal cycles accumulated in flight was compared to PQV accelerated thermal cycle life test data. The goal of this study was to inform mission operations of the risk associated with thermal cycling damage on the RCE. However, since the RCE-B does not have continuous temperature data from the Platinum Resistance Thermometer (PRT) closest to the flash memory, a model was made to correlate continuous data from two other nearby sensors on the RCE-B to the noncontiguous sensor. Using the Rainflow Counting Algorithm, the reconstituted data was converted into the number of equivalent thermal cycles. The Coffin-Manson Equation was used to compare flight thermal cycles to the PQV test. The accelerated life test showed cracking on the memory component solder joints after 500 cycles of 80°C temperature excursions. This study found that the RCE-A and RCE-B have undergone an equivalent of 144 and 430 cycles of 80°C temperature excursions during flight, respectively.

Bell, Charles↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Ground Testing Contributions to Electrified Aircraft Propulsion

This presentation presents an overview of the NASA's Advanced Air Transport Technology investments in electrified aircraft propulsion. The content focuses on machines, drives, fault, power and thermal management and provides a brief status update of in-house and contracted work in these areas. This content is part of a panel for the Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS) at Aviation 2023 and will show how current technologies being worked on can be informed by the flight demonstrators and serve as a bridge to future flight work as well as eventual entry into service.

electrified aircraft↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Ground Test Stand Development for One-step Electrochemical Production of High-Pressure Oxygen

NASA designed a test rig, High-Pressure Oxygen Generation Assembly (HPOGA) to test a novel method of electrolysis as an alternative technology to the state-of-the-art Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA) currently on the International Space Station (ISS). This approach involves utilizing a specialized electrolysis cell stack designed to both generate and compress high-pressure oxygen up to 3600 PSIG. The design eliminates the need for an external compressor and hydrogen separator, streamlining the oxygen generation process. HPOGA tests the viability of an electrolysis cell stack for extended life usage. Within the system, there are several key subsystems: nitrogen, high/low pressure oxygen, hydrogen, water recirculation, and water injection. The water injection subsystem supplies deionized (DI) water to a centralized reservoir for consumption. Subsequently, a water recirculation loop transfers the DI water across the cathode side of the electrolysis cell stack with constant flow rate. The result is a supply of hydrogen in the water loop and oxygen accumulation on the anode side of the cell stack. Hydrogen is evaporated out as part of the hydrogen sub-system which also measures hydrogen/oxygen concentration for safety. The oxygen subsystem is responsible for managing high pressure oxygen, O2 exhaust, and conducting hydrogen/oxygen concentration measurements. The nitrogen subsystem serves dual functions, purging the hydrogen/oxygen subsystems, and regulating pressure in both high/low-pressure O2 sections via pneumatic back pressure regulators. Various sensors monitor pressure, temperature, humidity, gas concentration and flow rate in each subsystem. This paper presents the design and testing of a comprehensive test stand, which serves to operate and functionally verify the performance of the electrolysis cell while offering valuable lessons learned.

electrolysis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Air Quality Monitor “Benzene” Anomaly: Ground Testing and On-going Effects

The International Space Station (ISS) Air Quality Monitors (AQMs) have provided targeted in-flight analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the ISS atmosphere since early 2013. During their initial half decade of use covering multiple sets of units, the AQMs performed well, meeting their validation criteria and showing excellent accuracy compared to archival samples. In addition to routine environmental monitoring, the AQMs have also been used during a number of contingency situations and investigations related to Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS). These include a potential ammonia leak, increases in atmospheric ethanol, and efforts to locate potential sources of polydimethylsiloxanes that lead to the production of dimethylsilanediol (DMSD) in the US Water Processor Assembly (WPA). As the fleet of AQMs has aged, several issues have arisen. These have ranged from pervasive problems on electronics boards to loss of sensitivity due to operating in an elevated CO2 environment. The most notable issue encountered during on-orbit operations was incorrect identification of compounds. This initially occurred in mid-2020, when AQM1 reported the presence of benzene. While the AQM team questioned the validity of these results, the concentration of the “benzene” continued to increase and eventually exceeded the 30- and 180-day Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentration (SMAC). This led to wide-ranging efforts by a number of groups aimed at understanding the situation and identifying the source of the “benzene.” AQM1 failed after being relocated to the Russian Segment as part of the investigation, and the unit was returned for evaluation. When archive samples collected while the AQM was measuring elevated benzene showed no detectable benzene, the focus of the investigation shifted to determining the cause of the false positive readings. Here, we will discuss the results of this investigation by the AQM team, potential causes of the interference, and subsequent reporting of AQM1 results.

W T Wallace↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Ground Tests on the BOLT Geometry at Mach 7: Cross-Facility Comparison and Stability Analysis

Transition measurements have been obtained through two experimental campaigns conducted independently by the German Aerospace Center and the French Aerospace Lab with the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission on subscale models of the BOLT-1 flight experiment geometry. This paper details a cross-facility comparison of measurements obtained at Mach 7, as well as subsequent computational analysis. Infrared (IR) thermography measurements obtained by both campaigns have facilitated a global comparison of the transition front across facilities at analagous conditions, which are found to be in good agreement. High-frequency surface pressure fluctuation data demonstrate significant amplification of instabilities with Mack-mode characteristics in the outboard regions of the acreage. These measurements are compared to stability analyses of varying fidelity. The computational methods employed to characterize the boundary-layer transition phenomena include the traditional line-marching implementation of the Parabolized Stability Equations (PSE), 2D eigenvalue analysis coupled with PSE, and Adaptive Mesh Refinement Wavepacket Tracking. While the 2D eigenvalue analysis is found to predict instabilities, which correlate in terms of frequency and acreage location to the experimental measurements, the predicted amplification for these instabilities is lower than would typically be expected for transition. Line-marching results for traveling crossflow produce the best match to the experimental transition front, with a consistent transition N factor of approximately 3-3.5.

Boundary Layer Transition↗
NASA NTRS2024

The Air Quality Monitor “Benzene” Anomaly: Ground Testing and On-going Effects

The International Space Station (ISS) Air Quality Monitors (AQMs) have provided targeted in-flight analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the ISS atmosphere since early 2013. During their initial half decade of use covering multiple sets of units, the AQMs performed well, meeting their validation criteria and showing excellent accuracy compared to archival samples. In addition to routine environmental monitoring, the AQMs have also been used during a number of contingency situations and investigations related to Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS). These include a potential ammonia leak, increases in atmospheric ethanol, and efforts to locate potential sources of polydimethylsiloxanes that lead to the production of dimethylsilanediol (DMSD) in the US Water Processor Assembly (WPA). As the fleet of AQMs has aged, several issues have arisen. These have ranged from pervasive problems on electronics boards to loss of sensitivity due to operating in an elevated CO2 environment. The most notable issue encountered during on-orbit operations was incorrect identification of compounds. This initially occurred in mid-2020, when AQM1 reported the presence of benzene. While the AQM team questioned the validity of these results, the concentration of the “benzene” continued to increase and eventually exceeded the 30- and 180-day Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentration (SMAC). This led to wide-ranging efforts by a number of groups aimed at understanding the situation and identifying the source of the “benzene.” AQM1 failed after being relocated to the Russian Segment as part of the investigation, and the unit was returned for evaluation. When archive samples collected while the AQM was measuring elevated benzene showed no detectable benzene, the focus of the investigation shifted to determining the cause of the false positive readings. Here, we will discuss the results of this investigation by the AQM team, potential causes of the interference, and subsequent reporting of AQM1 results.

W T Wallace↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Ground Test Validations for Uncrewed Dormancy Preparation and Recovery

In future long duration space flight and habitation missions, periods of uncrewed dormancy where life support systems are shutdown or in low power-modes will occur. To examine the impacts of these dormant periods, along with potential pre- and post-dormancy procedures, Marshall Space Flight Center has been building an uncrewed dormancy test stand. The uncrewed dormancy test stand will include a urine separator from the Universal Waste Management System, a condensate separator, urine filter, brine filter and distillate filter. In conjunction to the test stand, the Center for Biofilm Engineering (CBE) has ongoing long-term dormancy experiments to assess microbial survival in a variety of simulated shutdown procedures including shut-in, flushing with and without biocide, and dry-out conditions. This publication will serve as a discussion of dormancy considerations, criteria for success, and experimental designs for testing dormancy conditions and shutdown procedures. It will include an update of ongoing test stand construction, including a description of the current lower-fidelity versions of the urine and condensate separators being produced. It will also examine dormancy work being conducted by the CBE and discuss how this may factor into procedures tested on the uncrewed dormancy test stand.

Eric Beitle↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Air Quality Monitor “Benzene” Anomaly: Ground Testing and On-going Effects

The International Space Station (ISS) Air Quality Monitors (AQMs) have provided targeted in-flight analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the ISS atmosphere since early 2013. During their initial half decade of use covering multiple sets of units, the AQMs performed well, meeting their validation criteria and showing excellent accuracy compared to archival samples. In addition to routine environmental monitoring, the AQMs have also been used during a number of contingency situations and investigations related to Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS). These include a potential ammonia leak, increases in atmospheric ethanol, and efforts to locate potential sources of polydimethylsiloxanes that lead to the production of dimethylsilanediol (DMSD) in the US Water Processor Assembly (WPA). As the fleet of AQMs has aged, several issues have arisen. These have ranged from pervasive problems on electronics boards to loss of sensitivity due to operating in an elevated CO2 environment. The most notable issue encountered during on-orbit operations was incorrect identification of compounds. This initially occurred in mid-2020, when AQM1 reported the presence of benzene. While the AQM team questioned the validity of these results, the concentration of the “benzene” continued to increase and eventually exceeded the 30- and 180-day Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentration (SMAC). This led to wide-ranging efforts by a number of groups aimed at understanding the situation and identifying the source of the “benzene.” AQM1 failed after being relocated to the Russian Segment as part of the investigation, and the unit was returned for evaluation. When archive samples collected while the AQM was measuring elevated benzene showed no detectable benzene, the focus of the investigation shifted to determining the cause of the false positive readings. Here, we will discuss the results of this investigation by the AQM team, potential causes of the interference, and subsequent reporting of AQM1 results.

William T Wallace↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Considerations for High-Speed Background-Oriented Schlieren Visualization Capability for Ground Test Facilities

Since its introduction in the year 2000, background-oriented schlieren (BOS) has become a cornerstone technique for visualizing variable-density flows. In this review, we provide a rigorous examination of the optical principles underpinning BOS and related refractive-index-based techniques, complemented by an appendix linking schlieren imaging to Maxwell’s equations. The core sections delve into the practical aspects of BOS, with detailed discussions on image processing algorithms and critical considerations for experimental setups. We then explore recent advancements and innovations, including extensions of BOS with tomography, data assimilation, and event-based imaging. Finally, we present notable applications of BOS in challenging and unconventional environments, showcasing the method’s versatility and offer inspiration for future research directions.

Brett Bathel↗