Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Closure”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21

Characterization of Tank 9H Salt Dissolution Batch 2A in Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 2 Preparations

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently preparing the second batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A consists of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. The first batch of salt to make up Batch 2 (Batch 2A) has been dissolved in Tank 9H and will later be transferred to Tank 10H. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from the batch of dissolved salt for characterization.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Summary of Results from November 2021 Qualification Samples for Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A)

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 1 for processing through the TCCR 1A unit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Summary of Results from Batch 1 Qualification Samples for Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A)

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each waste supernate batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 1 for processing through the TCCR 1A unit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Characterization of Tank 11H Samples from Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) Batch 1

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR 1A unit processes dissolved salt fed from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST, IONSIV TM R9120-B, 30x60) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. In support of the TCCR 1A program, SRNL analyzed samples taken from Tank 11H (without tank mixing) before, during, and at the completion of TCCR 1A Batch 1 processing. Tank 11H serves as the receipt tank for the filtered and cesium removed product from the TCCR 1A system. Processing of Batch 1 commenced on January 13, 2022 and completed on February 17, 2022, after processing approximately 70,100 gallons. A pre-production sample was collected from the heel remaining in Tank 11H just before Batch 1 processing began. In addition, five interim surface samples were collected from Tank 11H during processing, and both a surface and a variable depth sample (VDS, ~7” from tank bottom) were collected just after processing completed. Analysis of all samples included density and gamma spectroscopy, in addition to a more comprehensive suite of analytes for the pre- and post-production samples. The density of the pre-production sample was the highest of all samples measured and was then observed to decrease for the first two interim samples, followed by becoming fairly consistent for the remainder of the samples (~1.3 g/mL). The density of 1.3 g/mL is similar to the density measured for one of the three Tank 10H qualification samples (HTF-10-21-126). The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease as additional decontaminated effluent from the TCCR columns was added to Tank 11H during processing; however, an increase in activity was observed during periods of no processing which can be attributed to leaching of 137 Cs from the known solids in Tank 11H. The Cs isotope concentrations in the Tank 11H postproduction surface sample were determined to be 99.7-99.8% lower than the concentrations measured in the Tank 10H feed as measured by mass spectrometry.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

3013 Inner Container Closure Weld Region (ICCWR) Characterization by Wide Area 3D Measurement System (WAMS) Analysis (FY21 Progress Report)

As part of the 3013 Surveillance Program, through-wall penetration from stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of the 3013 inner containers has been identified as the most credible condition for failure withing the 50- years lifetime. Chlorides contained in Pu-bearing material, together with intra-canister humidity levels, metallurgical conditions, and internal stresses have been found to produce corrosion in the Inner Container Closure Weld Region (ICCWR) of the 3013 canister system. A Laser Confocal Microscope (LCM) is used as part of the 3013 Surveillance Program protocol to identify the prevalence of corrosion and corrosionrelated cracking in the ICCWR2. With the LCM, a close visual examination is made of the ICCWR surface along with measurements of corrosion-related features. LCM inspections produce immense amounts of image data that is time intensive to analyze. There is also a 9-year backlog of images, with approximately 49 canisters that must be evaluated. To expedite data analysis and reduce the amount of generated data, a Wide Area 3D Measurement System (WAMS) microscope has been added to the examination protocol. Although WAMS is a lower resolution microscope, small features of interest can be still identified. The advantage of collecting data for the full circumference using the WAMS is that it can take about 1/16 of the time needed with the LCM. Both systems offer capabilities that combined can be utilized to expedite the examination of the ICCWR. The WAMS is an efficient system for screening and identification of corrosion features while the LCM can be utilized to obtain higher resolution images areas identified by the WAMS. This report explains and justifies the data collection methods used with the WAMS. It includes a summary of the data generated by WAMS in FY21. The goals set for data collection in FY21 were met. A total of twenty-two DE’s were imaged, and analysis was carried out on eleven samples. The analyzed samples showed large numbers of potential cracks and pits distributed throughout the surfaces. Lastly, to explain the advantages of the WAMS, its capabilities were compared to those of a simpler microscope. Micrographs of the samples imaged in FY21 and those analyzed are included in the appendices.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Characterization of Tank 9H Salt Dissolution Batch 2B in Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 2 Preparations

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently preparing the second batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A consists of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. The second batch of salt to make up processing Batch 2 (Batch 2B) has recently been dissolved in Tank 9H and transferred to Tank 10H where it was composited with the first part of the batch (Batch 2A) in preparation for processing through the TCCR 1A unit. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from the recent batch (2B) of dissolved salt for characterization. Two samples from Batch 2B were received for characterization, a surface sample and a variable depth sample (VDS). Neither sample contained significant solids, although the VDS appeared slightly cloudy as compared to the surface sample. The sodium concentrations of both the surface and VDS filtrate samples were approximately 5.8 M, and the 137 Cs activity was 9.8E+07 dpm/mL in the surface sample and 9.5E+07 dpm/mL in the VDS. The total Cs concentrations were 2.5 mg/L and 2.4 mg/L in the surface sample and VDS, respectively, using the gamma activity and the Cs isotopic ratios determined by ICP-MS. The alpha activity was below the detection limit in both samples. Nitrate was the dominant anion present, and the samples were primarily concentrated sodium nitrate solutions with hydroxide, nitrite, and carbonate present at 0.1 – 0.2 M. In general, the Batch 2B samples were more dilute than the previously characterized Batch 2A samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Characterization of Tank 9h Salt Dissolution Batch 2C In Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 2 Preparations

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently preparing the second batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A consists of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. The third batch of salt to make up processing Batch 2 (Batch 2C) has recently been dissolved in Tank 9H and transferred to Tank 10H where it was composited with the first part of the batch (Batches 2A and 2B) in preparation for processing through the TCCR 1A unit. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from the recent batch (2C) of dissolved salt for characterization.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Post-Closure Report for Closed Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Units, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, For Calendar Year 2021 (Revision 1)

This report serves as the combined annual report for post-closure activities in compliance with the requirements listed in Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Permit Number NEV HW0101 associated with the following closed corrective action units (CAUs): CAU 90, Area 2 Bitcutter Containment; CAU 91, Area 3 U-3fi Injection Well; CAU 92, Area 6 Decon Pond Facility; CAU 110, Area 3 WMD U-3ax/bl Crater; CAU 111, Area 5 WMD Retired Mixed Waste Pits; and CAU 112, Area 23 Hazardous Waste Trenches. This report will address all monitoring requirements noted in the RCRA Permit NEV HW0101, except groundwater monitoring. Groundwater monitoring is documented in the Nevada National Security Site Data Report: Groundwater Monitoring Program Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Post-Closure Inspection Letter Report for Closed Non-Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action Units (CAUs) On the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), For Calendar Year 2019, With Errata Sheet

Post-Closure inspection letter report for the following CAUs for calendar year 2019 including CAUs located on the Nevada Test and Training Range (NTTR) that are accessed through the NNSS Main Gate. Use restriction issues that were identified in 2018 inspections were addressed in 2019.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOESC Closure Leak Test Assembly

This is the functional and operational requirements document (FOR) for the DOESC Closure Leak Test Assembly ("Bell Jar"), as required per LWP-10000.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Record of Technical Change for Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 113: Area 25 R-MAD Facility, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada

This addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 113: Area 25, Reactor Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly Facility, Building 3110, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, DOE/NV--891-VOL I-Rev. 1, dated July 2003, provides details of demolition, waste disposal, and use restriction (UR) modification for Corrective Action Unit 113, Area 25 R-MAD Facility. Demolition was completed on July 15, 2010, when the last of the building debris was disposed. Final field activities were concluded on August 30, 2010, after all equipment was demobilized and UR signs were posted. This work was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Closure Report for the Project Shoal Area: Subsurface Corrective Action Unit 447 Shoal,Nevada, Site

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) has prepared this Closure Report for subsurface Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 447 at the Shoal, Nevada, Site, which was formerly called the Project Shoal Area. The Shoal site was the location of an underground nuclear test in 1963 that resulted in residual radionuclide contamination at the detonation depth of 1211 feet (ft) (DOE 2015a). The environmental restoration process and Corrective Action strategy are conducted in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) (FFACO 1996, as amended) and all applicable Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) statues and regulations. Responsibility for the environmental site restoration was transferred from the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration, Nevada Field Office, to LM on October 1, 2006. The Shoal site is south of U.S. Highway 50, approximately 30 miles southeast of Fallon, in Churchill County, Nevada (Figure 1). The site was selected for underground nuclear testing in 1961, as part of the Vela Uniform Program. Vela was a research and development program directed toward locating, detecting, and identifying underground and high-altitude nuclear detonations. The Vela Uniform program was specific to underground detonations (AEC 1964). The objective of Project Shoal was to detonate a nuclear device underground in an active seismic area to improve the United States’ ability to detect, identify, and locate underground nuclear detonations. The underground nuclear test at Shoal was a joint effort between the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), which was the predecessor agency to DOE. Figure 1 is a map showing the site location.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Optimization Efforts at DWPF to Ensure Waste Tank Closure by 2037 – 24404

At the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina, the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) produces a glass-form product by processing high-level liquid waste (HLW) with borosilicate glass in a high-heated Melter, then putting the vitrified waste into stainless-steel canisters. Since 1996, DWPF has performed this vitrification process for the liquid waste mission at the SRS; the overall objective for this mission is to reduce the volume in the upstream waste tanks, so those tanks can be emptied and operationally closed. This mission seeks to eliminate the single biggest environmental risk in the state of South Carolina, which requires a robust processing strategy within the DWPF, along with optimal interface between the other facilities in the liquid waste organization (LWO). As of the end of July 2023, DWPF has safely remediated 63.7 MCi of HLW, and filled 4,319 canisters (We project that about 4,000 more canisters are needed to be filled to reach the closure goal.)

Armstead, III, Frank L.↗

Aboveground Storage Tank Closure Report: Tank TA-55-0560

This project Aboveground Storage Tank Closure Report details tank-removal activities conducted in Technical Area-55 (TA-55) of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or the Laboratory), specifically removal of Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) TA-55-0560, NMED PSTB Facility ID #54763; a 12,000-gallon-capacity aboveground diesel-fuel storage tank.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Tank Closure Cesium Removal Ion Exchange Column CST Characterization: SRNL-STI-2024-00072 (Rev.0) pdf

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) recently suspended operation of the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system which utilized an ion exchange (IX) process to remove radioactive cesium from waste supernate. During the demonstration phase, a total of three batches of Tank 10H dissolved salt waste were processed through the original TCCR columns. Subsequently, dissolved salt waste from Tank 9H was processed through TCCR in a phase referred to as TCCR 1A with four new IX columns. All eight columns have now been moved to Interim Safe Storage (ISS). For each batch processed through the TCCR IX columns, SRNL performed a number of analyses on surface and variable depth samples as well as batch equilibrium contact tests (BECT) to determine equilibrium loadings of Cs on the crystalline silicotitanate (CST) IX media. The BECTs were performed by lowering “teabags” containing ~0.1 g of CST each into the tank for a period of at least 10 days. The teabags were then retrieved and sent to SRNL for digestion and analysis.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Achieving Higher Fidelity Pulsed-Power Simulations Using Advanced Gap Closure Modeling

This project has progressed several physics models in the EMPIRE plasma simulation code to achieve higher fidelity simulations of high-current diode operation in pulsed-power accelerators. In this report, we present details for the following major work products: (1) a set of verification problems covering all key processes involved in gap closure physics has been designed; this suite has facilitated feature vetting and overall model maturation, (2) a new EMPIRE exemplar has been developed: the Radiographic Integrated Test Stand 6 (RITS-6) diode, and (3) An exemplar for the Saturn accelerator exemplar was enabled by the models matured under this work to self-consistently simulate further into the diode pulse than previously possible (bipolar flow regime). These developments have lead to the highest confidence EMPIRE power flow predictions of the Saturn accelerator to date. Additionally, three modeling approaches for simulating electrode plasmas have been investigated. We report on these results and provide recommendations.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Application of aerosol-ice nucleating particle closure to establish the leading parameters governing ice crystal number concentration under commonly observed mixed-phase cloud conditions

This is the final technical report for DOE DE-SC0021034 award entitled “Application of aerosol-ice nucleating particle closure to establish the leading parameters governing ice crystal number concentration under commonly observed mixed-phase cloud conditions”. The overarching objective of this project was to gain a predictive understanding of the processes that lead from aerosols to ice-nucleating particles (INPs) to ice crystal number concentrations (ICNCs) in stratiform mixed-phase clouds where supercooled water droplets and ice crystals coexist, and to inform climate model parameterizations. During this four-year project we addressed the three main research goals of this objective: 1) Study the aerosol-INP link; 2) Develop an aerosol-cloud column model (AC-1D); and 3) Study the INP-ICNC link. Those activities significantly advanced our predictive understanding of how to represent INPs in could models and its implications on ice crystal number concentrations. The results have been published in five peer-reviewed publications with three more in review and preparation. It allowed for collaboration resulting in additional fourteen peer-reviewed publications that are concerned with the objective of this research project. This research has been communicated to the scientific community at national and international meetings and conferences by numerous talks, seminars, and posters including fifteen invited presentations. This project allowed training of four graduate students and one postdoctoral research associate resulting in one M.S. thesis and advancement to Ph.D. candidacy.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Characterization of Tank 15H Sample in Support of Preliminary Cease Waste Removal and Closure Mode Determination

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) to provide sample preparation and analysis of Tank 15H characterization samples. These samples follow an interest in exploring avenues to condense the extensive sampling of the Tank Closure process. One such pathway would be to collect a sample during an earlier waste removal campaign for analysis to determine comparability to the later residual tank inventory determined through Residual Material sampling and characterization prior to grouting. Six Tank 15H samples (HTF-15-24-9, HTF- HTF-15-24-10, HTF-15-24-11, HTF-15-24-12, HTF15-24-13, and HTF-15-24-14) were delivered to SRNL in May of 2024. These six Tank 15H samples were taken as close as possible to the solids layer of the Tank 15H. These six Tank 15H samples were combined to form one composite sample for characterization due to the lack of sufficient solids fraction.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗