NASA NTRS2019
To improve prognostics for predicting component life, coupon tests were conducted on Ti-6Al-4V to investigate the development of damage. Various test types were employed (tension, creep, stress relaxation, and fatigue) under a wide range of temperatures and loading rates to engage various amounts of time-dependent and damage behavior. Both stiffness degradation and Poisson’s ratio were monitored to see if they were useful in indicating the initiation and accumulation of damage and subsequently the onset of failure. Stiffness exhibited large decreases with increasing strain when calculated using engineering stress and strain. However, minimal stiffness change was observed when using the true-stress and true- strain values. Detailed microscopy and image analysis were performed to document the actual physical damage that occurred within the various specimens. Two types of damage were observed: shallow surface cracks and internal pores. The severity of damage was greater in the region of localized necking and diminished further away from the neck. The area fraction of pores was higher in the necked region, yet even there it did not exceed more than a few percent and, in most cases, was significantly lower. It was observed that conditions that induced more time-dependent deformation (e.g., slower strain rate testing) resulted in a larger number of pores and larger pore sizes. The pores were always found to occur in the softer β-phase. The severity of observed damage was inconsistent with the large drop in engineering stiffness, but was more aligned with stiffness changes from the true-stress and -strain values. Poisson’s ratio was monitored on every test and showed promise as a damage indicator. It was found to be more sensitive than either the ultimate tensile strength or the inception of tertiary creep. However, calculation of Poisson’s ratio was found to be more involved than expected because of anisotropy and the presence of strain gradients along the specimen at large applied strains. First, the material had a moderate texture and resulted in anisotropy of the strains. Second, the evolution of Poisson’s ratio as a function of axial strain showed strange and unexpected behaviors, which necessitated more extensive analyses of its development. This led to an investigation on the use of small versus large strain approaches and the importance of making consistent measurements; that is, axial and transverse strain measurements over the same volume of material. Additionally, finite element analysis of a tensile sample indicated that non- uniform strain occurred in the sample prior to attaining the maximum strength. This, along with the location at which transverse strain was measured, had a significant influence on the resulting values of Poisson’s ratio. Based on this, lessons learned are offered for future testing.