Voltage-current characteristics of Hartmann boundary layers in plasmas.
Voltage-current characteristics measured by Fahleson alternate explanation, based on properties of Hartmann boundary layer in continuum type plasma
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Voltage-current characteristics measured by Fahleson alternate explanation, based on properties of Hartmann boundary layer in continuum type plasma
Studies of the fundamental processes of combustion are usually concerned with wide ranges of investigation of individual processes. In general, each fundamental combustion process may be studied in an environment that is most suited to its evaluation and possibly unrelated basically to any practical application. The majority of the data presented in volume I of this series concern the fundamental aspects of combustion as functions of the individual occurrence of various contributing processes. In a jet engine, however, the various fundamental combustion processes may occur simultaneously and may interact. Furthermore, the engine environment usually does not permit independent variation of single combustion parameters, since specified operating conditions impose specific values on the parameters. In volume II, data are presented to show the effect of operating conditions on the over-all combustion process in different combustion components. To show the effect of operating conditions, it is necessary to specify the range of these conditions within which combustion components may operate. Therefore, this chapter presents only the operating conditions that might be required in the primary combustors and afterburners of typical current turbojet engines. (Corresponding information on ram-jet engines is presented in ch. xisi.) This chapter is not intended to serve as an explanation of engine operation. The operating conditions of the combustion components are presented in terms of total pressures and temperatures at the primary-combustor and afterburner inlets, reference velocities and outlet total temperatures of the primary combustors, and velocities at the plane of the flameholder in the afterburners. The data are presented to relate the operating regions of typical current turbojet combustion components to flight altitudes, Mach numbers, and modes of engine operation. Specifically, data are presented for the combustion parameters of the primary combustor and afterburner of three turbojet engines having rated compressor total-pressure ratios of 5, 8, and 12 under full-throttle conditions. Operational data for the primary combustor also include part-throttle operation at 70, 80, and 90 percent of rated engine speed and windmifling operation. The range of flight conditions includes altitudes from sea level to 65,000 feet and flight Mach numbers from zero to 1.6.
Comet fracture, discussing fracture zone /near ecliptic plane/, suggesting collisions with interplanetary boulders as possible explanation
Pulsar CP 1919 observed simultaneously at Arecibo and Stanford, discussing interstellar scintillation as possible explanation for amplitude variations
Inverse compton scattering of far IR background radiation proposed as explanation of high energy gamma ray flux
Pulsar PSR 0833-45 period decrease and rate of change in period increased between 24 February-3 March 1969, discussing contraction explanation
Limb darkening on earth night side observed by Aerobee rocket, with explanation based on atmospheric opacity in water vapor and carbon dioxide bands
PCM data handling system for NASA Space Tracking and Data Acquisition Network with explanation for output capabilities, noting BIOSAT project
The prospect of undertaking a reusable launch vehicle development led the NASA Office of Manned Space Flight (OMSF) to request the Office of Advanced Research and Technology (OART) to organize and direct a program to develop the technology that would aid in selecting the best system alternatives and that would support the ultimate development of an earth-to-orbit shuttle. Such a Space Transportation System Technology Program has been initiated. OART, OMSF, and NASA Flight and Research Centers with the considerable inputs of Department of Defense personnel have generated the program through the efforts of several Technology Working Groups and a Technology Steering Group. Funding and management of the recommended efforts is being accomplished through the normal OART and OMSF line management channels. The work is being done in government laboratories and under contract with industry and universities. Foreign nations have been invited to participate in this work as well. Substantial funding, from both OART and OMSF, was applied during the second half of fiscal year 1970. The Space Transportation System Technology Symposium held at the NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, July 15-17, 1970, was the first public report on that program. The Symposium goals were to consider the technology problems, their status, and the prospective program outlook for the benefit of the industry, government, university, and foreign participants considered to be contributors to the program. In addition, it offered an opportunity to identify the responsible individuals already engaged in the program. The Symposium sessions were intended to confront each presenter with his technical peers as listeners, and this, I believe, was substantially accomplished. Because of the high interest in the material presented, and also because the people who could edit the output are already deeply involved in other important tasks, we have elected to publish the material essentially as it was presented, utilizing mainly the illustrations used by the presenters along with brief words of explanation. Those who heard the presentations, and those who are technically astute in specialty areas, can probably put this story together again. We hope that more will be gained by compiling the information in this form now than by spending the time and effort to publish a more finished compendium later.
The prospect of undertaking a reusable launch vehicle development led the NASA Office of Manned Space Flight (OMSF) to request the Office of Advanced Research and Technology (OART) to organize and direct a program to develop the technology that would aid in selecting the best system alternatives and that would support the ultimate development of an earth-to-orbit shuttle. Such a Space Transportation System Technology Program has been initiated. OART, OMSF, and NASA Flight and Research Centers with the considerable inputs of Department of Defense personnel have generated the program through the efforts of several Technology Working Groups and a Technology Steering Group. Funding and management of the recommended efforts is being accomplished through the normal OAR T and OMSF line management channels. The work is being done in government laboratories and under contract with industry and universities. Foreign nations have been invited to participate in this work as well. Substantial funding, from both OART and OMSF, was applied during the second half of fiscal year 1970. The Space Transportation System Technology Symposium held at the NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, July 15-17, 1970, was the first public report on that program. The Symposium goals were to consider the technology problems, their status, and the prospective program outlook for the benefit of the industry, government, university, and foreign participants considered to be contributors to the program. In addition, it offered an opportunity to identify the responsible individuals already engaged in the program. The Symposium sessions were intended to confront each presenter with his technical peers as listeners, and this, I believe, was substantially accomplished. Because of the high interest in the material presented, and also because the people who could edit the output are already deeply involved in other important tasks, we have elected to publish the material essentially as it was presented, utilizing mainly the illustrations used by the presenters along with brief words of explanation. Those who heard the presentations, and those who are technically astute in specialty areas, can probably put this story together again. We hope that more will be gained by compiling the information in this form now than by spending the time and effort to publish a more finished compendium later.
The prospect of undertaking a reusable launch vehicle development led the NASA Office of Manned Space Flight (OMSF) to request the Office of Advanced Research and Technology (OART) to organize and direct a program to develop the technology that would aid in selecting the best system alternatives and that would support the ultimate development of an earth-to-orbit shuttle. Such a Space Transportation System Technology Program has been initiated. OART, OMSF, and NASA Flight and Research Centers with the considerable inputs of Department of Defense personnel have generated the program through the efforts of several Technology Working Groups and a Technology Steering Group. Funding and management of the recommended efforts is being accomplished through the normal OART and OMSF line management channels. The work is being done in government laboratories and under contract with industry and universities. Foreign nations have been invited to participate in this work as well. Substantial funding, from both OART and OMSF, was applied during the second half of fiscal year 1970. The Space Transportation System Technology Symposium held at the NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, July 15-17, 1970, was the first public report on that program. The Symposium goals were to consider the technology problems, their status, and the prospective program outlook for the benefit of the industry, government, university, and foreign participants considered to be contributors to the program. In addition, it offered an opportunity to identify the responsible individuals already engaged in the program. The Symposium sessions were intended to confront each presenter with his technical peers as listeners, and this, I believe, was substantially accomplished. Because of the high interest in the material presented, and also because the people who could edit the output are already deeply involved in other important tasks, we have elected to publish the material essentially as it was presented, utilizing mainly the illustrations used by the presenters along with brief words of explanation. Those who heard the presentations, and those who are technically astute in specialty areas, can probably put this story together again. We hope that more will be gained by compiling the information in this form now than by spending the time and effort to publish a more finished compendium later.
Maxima increases without limit in damped linear oscillator response to random wideband excitation interpreted by heuristic explanation
N type GaAs doped with Si, conductivity anisotropy observed from measurement and explanation in terms of electron distribution
Heavy elements diffusive separation as explanation of metallic and magnetic A stars abundance anomalies at outer convective envelope bases
General relativistic formulation of massive magnetized rotating conductor, showing electrodynamical properties of surrounding empty space for explanation of stellar structure
Non-LTE physics of He atoms in hot stellar atmospheres, presenting numerical results for He I and II line spectra variations explanation
An explanation for quiet-time electron increases is proposed which predicts as the existence of a modulating region for cosmic ray particles lying at approximately 30 AU from the Sun.
A mathematical model derived from the equation of heat conduction was developed to assist in interpreting thermal infrared images acquired from aircraft and spacecraft. The model assumes steady state boundary conditions. It contains parameters of rock and soil properties, atmospheric effects, site location, and season. The results predicted provide an explanation for the thermal differences among granite, limestone, and dolomite recorded in the December 1968 daytime and predawn flights over the Mill Creek, Oklahoma test site, during which representative thermal inertia and albedo values were used. A second test of the model made use of data acquired during the June 1970 predawn overflight of Mill Creek. A simple model of transient heating of the ground was constructed as an extension of the overall model, in order to examine the effects of atmospheric perturbations. The results obtained are consistent with those of ground observations made at the time of the overflight.