Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “DIALOGUE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Initial Site-Specific Studies for Removing SNF from Six Shutdown Sites - 18042

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is exploring options for developing a large-scale transportation system for the safe transport of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste to future storage or disposal facilities. This complex, large-scale transportation system will involve coordinated, integrated activities. Interfaces with various transportation and non-transportation activities must be defined, and systems must be developed to ensure successful integration when the system becomes operational. To provide an understanding of the tasks and interfaces required for the complete de-inventory of particular sites where SNF is stored, DOE solicited bids from integrating contractors to develop initial site-specific de-inventory reports. The reports were developed for several nuclear power plant sites selected to represent a range of geographic locations, existing on-site SNF storage systems, and expected transportation modal options. Each report is presented in a self-contained narrative describing a potential campaign for removing all SNF and greater-than-class-C low-level radioactive waste (GTCC waste) from each specified site. Each study narrative includes site information; an analysis of the near-site transportation infrastructure; a concept of operations for the de-inventory; an estimated budget and schedule for the duration of operations; and a safety and security plan with site-specific considerations, emergency response considerations, and recommendations for the next steps DOE could take to de-inventory the site. The reports provide cost estimates for analytical purposes only; they do not attempt to specify the party or parties responsible for the costs. These reports present a first look at how an integrating contractor might recommend removing SNF from particular sites. They are written from the perspective of the contractor and do not represent DOE's plans. At this writing, six sites have been studied: - Connecticut Yankee, - Big Rock Point, - Humboldt Bay, - Maine Yankee, - Trojan, - Kewaunee. DOE may develop de-inventory reports for all reactor sites, with an initial focus on shutdown reactor sites. The order in which sites have been selected for study should not be considered an indicator of the order used by DOE to remove SNF from the sites. Since the SNF's destination is not important for the purpose of this work, DOE tasked the contractor with planning transportation of the SNF from the site to a generic railroad location in the approximate geographical center of the United States. These reports represent an initial study of the specific sites. Per the terms of the contract, the contractor was not permitted to engage in dialogue with power plant site personnel; near-site railroad personnel; or any local, state, or regional stakeholders about the studies. DOE provided site-specific data. The contractor was tasked to rely on past corporate experience, data available from DOE, and publicly available data when making site-specific recommendations for removing all SNF from each site. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Need for an Independent Monitoring of Nuclear Waste Repository: Lessons from WIPP Experience - 18130

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is the only operating deep geological repository for the permanent disposal of defense transuranic (TRU) waste in the world. The facility recently resumed waste disposal operations after recovering from a February 2014 accident involving a radiological release from a waste container in the WIPP underground. WIPP had been a DOE success story, operating nearly 15 years with no significant incidents or accidents. Many factors contributed to this success, one of the most important being the overwhelming support exhibited by the local community and the local elected officials. One component of the broad public acceptance by the citizens of Southeast New Mexico has been the concept of independent, third party monitoring of environmental effluents at the site. Independent environmental monitoring ensures a role for the local community in ongoing evaluation of the safety and performance of the site. At WIPP this has been achieved through an independent environmental monitoring program operated by the Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring and Research Center (CEMRC). The CEMRC has been conducting independent environmental monitoring activities on and around the WIPP site since 1991 and makes the results of monitoring activities available and easily accessible to members the general public. The public's free and open access to this data and their direct participation in the CEMRC's whole body counting program provides transparency, which is key to maintaining public trust and confidence. The circumstances following the 2014 radiological release event at WIPP reinforced the value of independent environmental monitoring in order to maintain the high level of transparency necessary for long term local acceptance and support for nuclear facilities. Following what was a minor radiological release event, there were understandably fearful reactions from a number of citizens residing in Carlsbad and the nearby communities of Hobbs, Loving, and Artesia. CEMRC's independent environmental monitoring program and their early public engagement proved invaluable in providing timely and accurate environmental data to local community leaders and members of the general public. The data, and open communication from CEMRC, helped reassure citizens in Carlsbad and the surrounding area that the release was extremely low and the extent was very limited. CEMRC further communicated that the probability of any environmental or health impacts from the release was extremely low. It is unlikely the local community would have placed the same level of trust in similar assurances of safety coming from DOE or other State and Federal regulators. The CEMRC's performance in the days following the release meant the local community had access to independent monitoring data and an independent voice in the dialogue with DOE and state officials that shaped the recovery and eventual re-opening of the WIPP facility. The WIPP radiological release event yielded a plethora of lessons learned that will frame the next phase of operational, oversight, and emergency planning surrounding the facility. In this presentation we will be discussing the value and viability of federally-funded, university-housed independent monitoring programs in maintaining trust of state officials and the local communities. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Nuclear, Land marker for a Waste Isolation Site: International Architecture Competition - 18240

The design and construction of a nuclear waste marker must include many architectural considerations. Very little research has been conducted by architects to address this issue to date. Historically, the task of designating a nuclear waste site has been a discussion predominantly contained within the scientific and engineering communities. In an effort to engage architects within this dialogue, arch out loud hosted the NUCLEAR competition as an international, architectural investigation into the design of a nuclear waste site marker. The NUCLEAR competition asks participants to design a marker to designate the site of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) located near Carlsbad, New Mexico. The marker will be meant to be a means of passive institutional controls (PICs) to deter inadvertent human intrusion upon the site and should last 10,000 years. The NUCLEAR competition defined the purpose of the nuclear waste site marker as a means to communicate the danger of inadvertent intrusion from future generations. The competition requires that entries must be both legible in communication and durable in their construction. The competition brief challenged participants to consider how customs and languages will evolve over time and to predict what motivations future generations might have for digging at the site. Other background information was provided about the site such as how waste was stored and how the unique geology of the site seals the waste. The 1993 Sandia National Laboratories report titled Expert Judgment on Markers to Deter Inadvertent Human Intrusion into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant [1] was referenced along with the 1992 WIPP Land Withdrawal Act [2], interviews with WIPP scientists [3] involved with the WIPP PICs program and the Nuclear Energy Agency Records Knowledge and Memory working group. Competition participants were given digital 3-D Computer-Aided Design models for reference that included the underground storage portion of the site, existing buildings and the 16-square-mile site boundary identified in the 1992 WIPP Land Withdrawal Act [2]. This paper will: - Provide a detailed description of the submitted proposals including graphic analysis of the visualizations, diagrams, technical drawings, jury comments and statements. - Catalogue and identify the consistent themes within all submissions with possible categories including: 1) overall architectural form and language, 2) integration of written language and symbols within architecture, 3) use of technology and robotics, 4) construction methods and materials. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board - How a Recommendation Comes to Life - 18523

The Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board (ORSSAB) is a federally appointed citizens' panel that provides independent advice and recommendations to the DOE's Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (OREM). To provide unbiased evaluation and recommendations on DOE's cleanup efforts related to the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), the board seeks opportunities for input through collaborative dialogue with the communities surrounding the Oak Ridge Reservation, Governmental regulators, and other stakeholders. This paper describes how a recommendation from the ORSSAB comes to life. There are two stages to the board's process, the planning stage and the execution stage. The planning stage begins several months prior to the start of the fiscal year (FY). During this planning stage OREM develops a list of issues that it would like input from the community on. The EPA and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) act as consulting parties and provide their input in the form of letters to the board. ORSSAB holds a planning meeting in August, where DOE EM, EPA and TDEC present their suggestions to the board. The board members have opportunity to ask questions and hold discussions on the issues presented but can also present issues of their own. DOE then takes the input from the meeting and develops the ORSSAB Work Plan for the next FY. The execution stage begins with the ORSSAB Work Plan which sets the issues for each month and the specific dates of the activities associated with each issue. The remaining elements of the execution stage include: presentations by DOE OREM at the monthly ORSSAB Meetings, field trips (as appropriate), and additional discussion at the monthly subcommittee meeting of the EM/Stewardship Committee. Early in the FY, members of the ORSSAB are given the opportunity to sign up to be involved with the potential development of a recommendation for the various issues on the Work Plan that interest them and to provide support as an issue manager. Then at the EM/Stewardship Committee Meeting the issue manager is assigned to lead the issue group and a decision is made as to whether to make a recommendation on the specific issue. The issue group prepares the recommendation for discussion and approval by the EM/Stewardship Committee. Once the EM/Stewardship Committee has reached consensus on the wording for the recommendation, the EM/Stewardship Committee Chair presents the recommendation to the ORSSAB Executive Committee for discussion and approval. The Executive Committee then approves the recommendation for presentation and discussion at the next month's ORSSAB General Meeting, providing opportunity for discussion by the full board. The ORSSAB may approve the recommendation as is, approve it with changes, or it may send the recommendation back to the EM/Stewardship Committee for further consideration. Once approved by the full ORSSAB, the recommendation is sent to DOE OREM for consideration. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

International Training to Promote Successful Environmental Remediation Projects - 18636

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supports the efforts of its Member States to manage their nuclear and radiological liabilities, including radioactive waste management, decommissioning of facilities, and remediation of contaminated sites. As part of a project addressing Constraints in Decommissioning and Environmental Remediation (the CIDER Project), the IAEA is developing initiatives to further support capacity development specifically to promote implementation of safe, appropriate, and cost-effective environmental remediation (ER) projects. The IAEA sponsors numerous initiatives to provide its Member States training on important topics related to ER. It has become clear in recent years, however, that the existing training should be augmented with more in-depth training to provide for the development of the critical expertise needed to address significant ER challenges. ER projects typically are very complex, requiring the integration of numerous scientific and engineering disciplines, along with effective project planning and management. There are many examples of ER projects where considerable work has been completed, qualified technical staff are available, and adequate funding has been obtained, yet actual progress towards a final solution has been limited. In such cases, it appears that a key barrier is the lack of capacity to develop strategies, make fully informed decisions, plan for and manage activities, and implement successful ER actions. In light of the above, the IAEA has placed a priority on capacity development across the broad spectrum of ER project implementation. Efforts are underway to develop a new training program to develop capacity at the institutional and individual levels to equip course graduates to effectively integrate all areas of expertise in the planning and execution of ER projects. The target audience includes decision-makers; project managers, planners, and implementers; and academics. The core capabilities to be developed via this program include knowledge and skills related to: (1) radiation issues and radionuclide behavior; (2) health and safety protection principles and requirements; (3) identification, evaluation, and selection of ER technologies and approaches; (4) ongoing, constructive dialogue with stakeholders; (5) project planning, management, and communication; (6) cost estimation and funding development; and (7) implementation of appropriate site monitoring activities. The IAEA is collaborating with multiple organizations to develop and implement this training program, to leverage existing training programs and materials, and to coordinate on the development of sustainable training solutions. This paper will present the status of this initiative and work accomplished thus far. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Why Cleanup Acceptance Is Running into Conflicts - Off-site Disposal Versus On Site Disposal - 19068

For years the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) identified several sites to receive shipments of various types of wastes. However, with the backlog at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the inability to license Yucca Mountain, and the agency's desire to expedite cleanup, DOE is trying to 'dispose of' or 'store' more waste belonging to the Federal government on-site. Some states and communities that were 'promised' disposal of DoE's waste in geologic repositories and licensed landfills in arid locations, are now being told that on-site disposal is the best path forward. Competition for resources is forcing more sites to focus on near term cost savings of on-site disposal, rather than develop comprehensive life-cycle estimates representing a more realistic picture of costs associated with isolating radioactive and other hazardous materials on-site in perpetuity. The paper explores the issues and possible solutions in a case study on proposed on-site disposal of DOE waste, and concludes that DOE needs community support and community acceptance to successfully implement the agency's cleanup mission. Ongoing dialogue with the community saves both time and money but more importantly, cooperation helps ensure that effective long-term cleanup occurs. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

International Government Collaboration in ISD (In Situ Decommissioning/In Situ Disposal) - 19261

In situ decommissioning (ISD) is considered by IAEA as the permanent entombment of a legacy facility in 'a structurally long lived material' (e.g. concrete) and is considered a solution only under 'exceptional circumstances' (e.g. following a severe accident). However, this definition of ISD as 'only' entombment is not universally accepted; the approach has been implemented as a decommissioning approach by the US Dept of Energy in the past decade at the Savannah River Site (P and R reactors)2,3, the Hanford site (U Canyon) and at the Idaho site (CP601, CP640 and CP633). The application of ISD outside of the United States has been much less common for large facilities although its use for underground substructures (e.g. discarded pipelines) is commonplace. Proponents of ISD consider it beneficial since it eliminates the need to remove, package and transport contaminated equipment from a nuclear legacy site to a disposal facility and it maximizes the use of an existing nuclear site footprint by consolidating equipment in one place. ISD is considered to offer major safety benefits to both workers and the public, as well as major cost and schedule benefits to Government. Opponents of the approach cite the fact that, following ISD, the decommissioned facility has effectively become a long-term waste disposal site and that regulations pertaining to long term waste disposal have been circumvented. Given the increasing pressure on environmental cleanup budgets and schedules around the world, countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Japan are considering ISD in its various forms as a potential path forward for decommissioning certain facilities in lieu of the more traditional approaches of either deferred decommissioning or immediate decontamination/demolition. To address this emerging area of decommissioning, a Governmental Technical Information Exchange meeting was held in December 2017 at the DOE Savannah River Site in Aiken, SC, to bring together responsible parties from the US Dept of Energy (DOE), Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd (AECL), the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and the Japanese Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) and those countries' respective regulatory agencies to share information about respective 'best practices' and challenges with ISD. Representatives from organizations such as IAEA and US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) also participated to discuss their organizations' perspectives and position on ISD. Following the meeting, a series of Working Groups were established which have continued the dialogue in three key areas 5; - ISD-Defined: Identify and share case-specific ISD solutions which allows for the full spectrum of needs and which demonstrate that 'entombment' is not the only definition of 'ISD'. - Regulatory - Share and discuss regulatory concerns and challenges with ISD; - Benchmarking - Share information to support informed and transparent decision-making in ISD. This paper discusses the plans for ISD in some of the countries involved in the December meeting and provides an update on the topics being discussed, and progress being made, by the Working Groups that were formed at the meeting. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 12: Featured Country Canada - Engaging the Public and Indigenous Groups in Canadian Waste and D and D Projects

This panel will share insights from those directly involved in the dialogue among members of the Canadian public, elected officials of host communities, indigenous groups, project proponents, and the Canadian regulator. History has shown time and again that the early and meaningful engagement of stakeholders must go hand-in-hand with technical solutions in order to assure the successful start and finish of waste management and decommissioning projects. In this panel discussion, the requirements for consultation and communication, the tools and strategies used, the results of efforts to date, and plans will be addressed by those at the center of some of Canada's biggest and most controversial radioactive waste projects. Presentations proposed include: 1 - Engaging the Public and Indigenous Groups in Canadian Waste and D and D Projects (Candida Cianci, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (Canada)); 2 - Indigenous Engagement (Bob Watts, Nuclear Waste Management Organization (Canada)); 3 - Engaging the Public and Indigenous Groups Related to Canadian Waste and D and D Projects (Patrick Quinn, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (Canada)); 4 - Engaging the Public and Indigenous Groups in Canadian Waste and D and D Projects Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities Point of View (Blair Skinner, Local Government District of Pinawa, Manitoba (Canada))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 73: DOE-EM End-State Contracting

US DOE-EM's new end-state contracting model, the ID/IQ (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quality) approach, is intended to give EM the flexibility to better define discrete scopes of work for site closure or end states. This is the result of several years of dialogue between industry and DOE about the way to collectively improve the way to do business more safely, quickly and cost effectively. This model requires a fine balance between incentives and clearly defined end states, with the ability for contractors and DOE to react quickly to respond to changes. By March 6, DOE and industry were one month into the new end-state contracting model with two requests for proposals issued and contractors responding. The purpose of the panel was to hear from DOE and industry about the status so far. DOE and the contractor community are generally supportive of the new model, but it will require closer partnership and a new mindset and approach among DOE, contractors, regulator and the workforce. This panel focused on the implementation of DOE EM's new End State Contracting Model, which uses a single-award ID/IQ approach to give EM the flexibility to better define discrete scopes of work for site closure or end states. The panelists provided their perspective on the initial implementation of the new approach and the path forward for upcoming opportunities utilizing this model. Presentation proposed: DOE EM End State Contracting (Tamara Miles, US DOE (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Scientists and Reporters Can be Friends - 19509

The dialogue between scientists and journalists has never been more needed than it is today. Today, science must struggle to survive in the public discourse. In an always-on culture dominated by crowdsourcing, 144-character news alerts and shrinking newsrooms, technical details get distorted and lost. In the context of environmental remediation, audiences must sort out complicated relationships among government sponsors, contractors, regulators and local citizens. Journalism is being redefined. Media literacy, an approach to how we understand the role of media in society, is an emerging discipline that offers essential skills of inquiry and critical reflection on information sources. In addition, new tools exist for scientific professionals and consumers alike to access, analyze, engage with media more effectively. (authors)

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Graduating Sustainable Industrial Decarbonization Solutions from the Laboratory to Real-World Deployments

Accelerating innovation and integration of industrial decarbonization technology solutions is crucial for achieving industry-wide net-zero greenhouse gas emissions targets. This can be accomplished in various ways through increased utilization of low-embodied carbon materials and the adoption of advanced manufacturing techniques in construction practices. At the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), we facilitate dialogue and action across all sectors to uncover industry needs to inform innovation, and explore ways we can help with implementation of emerging solutions in the real world. As an applied laboratory, NREL sits between academia and industry to fully bridge the gap from foundational science research to examining the feasibility of market applications. Integration of innovative technologies and solutions that are efficient, resilient, and grid-interactive will play a pivotal role in supporting a clean energy future. However, it is imperative that these solutions prioritize equitable outcomes, addressing the challenges faced by all communities. By embracing decarbonization, the construction industry can revolutionize itself, promoting sustainability, reducing carbon emissions, conserving resources, while enhancing performance and durability - all major steps toward a greener and more sustainable future.

cement↗
DOE OSTI2024

Microreactors for a Changing Energy Landscape

Join us for a discussion on the role of microreactors within our sustainable energy future. This interactive session will invite attendees to engage directly with nuclear industry trailblazers. Together, we'll uncover the promise of microreactors in meeting nuclear data needs, powering remote locations, and overcoming the challenges of regulatory landscapes. Your participation will help shape a dialogue on how diverse perspectives can unite to transform our energy infrastructure.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Hanford Tank Waste Technology Development Integration and Innovation Synergy

The Chief Technology Office (CTO) within Hanford Tank Waste Operations & Closure (H2C) identifies technology development needs and develops solutions for tank waste treatment. One key element of the technology development (TD) program is the annual Technology Development Integrated Coordination (TDIC) meeting series. The main goal of these meetings is to inform the National Laboratories and other entities of the needs identified by the end users of the technology. In turn, the meetings provide an opportunity for National Laboratories and others to provide insight into potential solutions. This dynamic facilitates dialogues that frequently identify not only new, innovative approaches, but also enhancements to ongoing technology development projects.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Fostering Nuclear Security Culture through Effective Leadership: An Operational Perspective

Security culture plays a critical role in determining the effectiveness of an organization's security performance, making its significance impossible to overemphasize. It encompasses the collective values, shared perceptions, and habitual actions embraced by all individuals within a nuclear organization—from leadership to frontline staff. When the entire workforce recognizes the reality of potential threats, accepts that security is a shared duty, and integrates security-minded behavior into everyday routines, it fosters an environment where strong security practices are the norm. In such a setting, everyone can take pride and feel reassured in being part of an organization where a strong security culture is deeply embedded. Security culture is based on the broader concept of organizational culture. All organizations—whether families, social clubs, religious institutions, businesses, non-governmental organizations, or governments—possess an underlying culture shaped by core values and beliefs. These values and beliefs influence attitudes and drive behavior throughout the organization. While multiple factors contribute to the development of a strong security culture, leadership plays a particularly pivotal role. In organizations where security culture is well-established, leaders go beyond rhetoric; they demonstrate a genuine commitment to security through their actions. They implement policies and procedures that actively engage all employees, foster open dialogue around security concerns, and encourage teamwork in resolving issues. Furthermore, they reward proactive behavior and ensure that corrective actions are taken promptly. Regular assessments of the organization's security culture allow such leaders to gauge its effectiveness and take strategic steps to strengthen it when necessary. This paper leverages practical, real-world experience to guide leadership and senior management within nuclear organizations through the foundational steps of cultivating a robust, organization-wide culture of nuclear security. It emphasizes the critical importance of early leadership engagement in shaping this culture and outlines a comprehensive approach that includes strategic, tactical, and operational measures. Additionally, it explores methods for fostering a unified vision across all levels of the organization to ensure alignment, commitment, and continuous improvement in nuclear security practices.

Zineddin, Dr. Z. [ORNL] (ORCID:0009000848740725)↗
DOE OSTI2017

Chapter 7: Renewable Energy Options and Considerations for Net Zero Installations

This chapter focuses on renewable energy options for military installations. It discusses typical renewable technologies, project development, and gives examples. Renewable energy can be combined with conventional energy sources to provide part or all of the energy demand at an installation. The appropriate technology mix for an installation will depend on site-specific factors such as renewable resources, energy costs, local energy policies and incentives, available land, mission compatibility, and other factors. The objective of this chapter is to provide basic background information and resources on renewable energy options for NATO leaders and energy personnel.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2017

Chapter 8: Planning Tools to Simulate and Optimize Neighborhood Energy Systems

This section introduces different energy modeling tools available in Europe and the USA for community energy master planning process varying from strategic Urban Energy Planning to more detailed Local Energy Planning. Two modeling tools used for Energy Master Planning of primarily residential communities, the 3D city model with CityGML, and the Net Zero Planner tool developed for the US Department of Defense installations are described in more details.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2013

Integrated Canada-U.S. Power Sector Modeling with the Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS)

The electric power system in North America is linked between the United States and Canada. Canada has historically been a net exporter of electricity to the United States. The extent to which this remains true will depend on the future evolution of power markets, technology deployment, and policies. To evaluate these and related questions, we modify the Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) model to include an explicit representation of the grid-connected power system in Canada to the continental United States. ReEDS is unique among long-term capacity expansion models for its high spatial resolution and statistical treatment of the impact of variable renewable generation on capacity planning and dispatch. These unique traits are extended to new Canadian regions. We present example scenario results using the fully integrated Canada-U.S. version of ReEDS to demonstrate model capabilities. The newly developed, integrated Canada-U.S. ReEDS model can be used to analyze the dynamics of electricity transfers and other grid services between the two countries under different scenarios.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗