SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “testing data”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2025

Advancements in NEAMS Tool Capabilities for Multiphysics Simulation of Fast Reactor Core Bowing and Identification of Validation Test Data

Under the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program, an integrated multiphysics approach is being developed to model the core bowing phenomena important to liquid metal-cooled fast reactors. Core bowing is an important passive safety mechanism in liquid metal-cooled fast reactors and involves Multiphysics effects including radiation transport, fluid flow, heat transfer, and mechanical response to temperature and flux gradients. This report summarizes recent progress on developing a multiphysics, MOOSE-based workflow to predict core bowing and associated reactivity feedback. Last year, thermal fluids and mechanics were coupled on a multi-assembly benchmark problem based on ABR-1000 design. This year, the reactor physics code Griffin was assessed for readiness of core bowing calculations. Preliminary integration of Griffin’s ring-heterogeneous model with thermal fluids and thermal mechanics solvers was performed. Specifically, thermal-mechanics and reactor physics were coupled for single- and multi-assembly problems, and reactor physics and subchannel methods were coupled for a single assembly model. Finally, the workflow of all three physics was preliminarily demonstrated on a single assembly model. Caveats and future development needed have been identified. To supplement the multiphysics demonstration, verification and assessment efforts of thermos-mechanical capabilities for modeling thermo-mechanical core bowing behavior were continued by analyzing IAEA Verification Problem 5 which includes radiation swelling and creep. Additionally, a small core reactor physics benchmark defined by Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) was performed to assess neutronics models for estimating reactivity feedback. Finally, Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) validation test data for core bowing phenomena has been identified and summarized, with a recommended path forward for validation once this capability is mature.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2024

HERO WEC Belt Test Data

The following submission includes raw and processed data from the 2024 Hydraulic and Electric Reverse Osmosis Wave Energy Converter (HERO WEC) belt tests conducted using NREL's Large Amplitude Motion Platform (LAMP). A description of the motion profiles run during testing can be found in the run log document. Data was collected using NREL's Modular Ocean Data AcQuisition (MODAQ) system in the form of TDMS files. Data was then processed using Python and MATLAB and converted to MATLAB workspace, parquet, and csv file formats. During Data processing, a low pass filter was applied to each array and the arrays were then resampled to common 10Hz timestamps. A MATLAB data viewer script is provided to quickly visualize these data sets. The following arrays are contained in each test data file: - Time: Unix seconds timestamp - Test_Time: Time in seconds since beginning of test - POS_OS_1001: Encoder position in degrees (the encoder is located on the secondary shaft of the spring return and is driven by the winch after a 4.5:1 gear reduction) - LC_ST_1001: Anchor load cell data in lbf - PRESS_OS_2002: Air spring pressure in psi This data set has been developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Water Power Technologies Office.

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence M - Raw Data

Sequence M: Transition Fixed (P) Test sequence M used an upwind, rigid turbine with a 0° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 5 m/s to 15 m/s. Yaw angles ranged from 0° to 90°. The blade tip pitch was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade pressure measurements were collected. The five-hole probes were removed and the plugs were installed. Plastic tape 0.03-mm-thick was used to smooth the interface between the plugs and the blade. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pre-tensioned to 40,000 N. During post-processing, the probe channels were set to read –99999.99. Zigzag tape was installed near the leading edge of the instrumented blade on both the upper and lower surfaces as described in Appendix K. In addition to the standard 30-second campaigns, yaw sweeps were done at 7 m/s and 10 m/s. These 90-second campaigns were collected while the yaw drive rotated the turbine 90° at a rate of 1°/s. The file names for these campaigns use the letter designation, followed by two digits for wind speed, followed by YSU, followed by 00.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence G - Raw Data

Sequence G: Upwind Teetered (F) Test sequence G used an upwind, teetered turbine with a 0° cone angle. The wind speeds ranged from 5 m/s to 25 m/s. Yaw angles of ±180° were achieved at low wind speeds and angles of ±10° were achieved at the high wind speeds. The blade tip pitch was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade and probe pressure measurements were collected.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2024

Comparative Analyses of Bioequivalence Assessment Methods for In Vitro Permeation Test Data

ABSTRACT For topical, dermatological drug products, an in vitro option to determine bioequivalence (BE) between test and reference products is recommended. In particular, in vitro permeation test (IVPT) data analysis uses a reference‐scaled approach for two primary endpoints, cumulative penetration amount (AMT) and maximum flux ( J max ), which takes the within donor variability into consideration. In 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a draft IVPT guidance that includes statistical analysis methods for both balanced and unbalanced cases of IVPT study data. This work presents a comprehensive evaluation of various methodologies used to estimate critical parameters essential in assessing BE. Specifically, we investigate the performance of the FDA draft IVPT guidance approach alongside alternative empirical and model‐based methods utilizing mixed‐effects models. Our analyses include both simulated scenarios and real‐world studies. In simulated scenarios, empirical formulas consistently demonstrate robustness in approximating the true model, particularly in effectively addressing treatment–donor interactions. Conversely, the effectiveness of model‐based approaches heavily relies on precise model selection, which significantly influences their results. The research emphasizes the importance of accurate model selection in model‐based BE assessment methodologies. It sheds light on the advantages of empirical formulas, highlighting their reliability compared to model‐based approaches and offers valuable implications for BE assessments. Our findings underscore the significance of robust methodologies and provide essential insights to advance their understanding and application in the assessment of BE, employed in IVPT data analysis.

Leon, Sami↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence E - Raw Data

Sequence E: Yaw Releases (P) This test sequence used a downwind, rigid turbine with a 3.4° cone angle. The wind speeds ranged from 7 m/s to 17 m/s. Initial yaw angles of ±90° were achieved. The blade tip pitch was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade and probe pressure measurements were collected. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pre-tensioned to 40,000 N. The turbine was positioned at each specified yaw angle. A 30- second data set was collected with the yaw brake engaged. These points used a letter for the last digit beginning with A and proceeding through the alphabet as repeat points were needed. These points were plotted and compared to ascertain the functionality of the instrumentation. The files ending in numbers beginning with 0 and increasing with each repetition represent yaw release points. Once the fixed-position yaw test was complete, the yaw drive was engaged to hold the turbine. The yaw brake was released, and the yaw drive was disabled allowing the turbine to yaw freely. The yaw drive was disabled about 5 seconds into the campaign, and the turbine was allowed to yaw freely for the rest of the 30-second duration. When the yaw drive is disabled, no torque is applied to the motor, and the inertia and yawing force of the nacelle and rotor overcomes the friction and inertia of the yaw gear and motor. The yaw releases were repeated five times at each condition. Four additional campaigns were collected to determine the turbine’s natural yaw error by releasing the brake at 0° yaw error. These file names use the E designation, followed by two digits for wind speed, followed by XXXX, followed by the repetition digit.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence 7 - Raw Data

Sequence 7: Shroud Operating (P) This test sequence used a downwind, rigid turbine with a 3.4° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 5 m/s to 25 m/s. Turntable angles from 0° to 30° were achieved, but the yaw error angle was maintained at 0° by adjusting the nacelle yaw. The blade tip pitch was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade and probe pressure measurements were collected. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pre-tensioned to 40,000 N. An airfoil-shaped aluminum shroud was placed on the tower below the 34% span five-hole probe. It extended below the 91% span five-hole probe. The turntable angle was adjusted to position the shroud at various angles relative to the flow, but the turbine yaw error angle was maintained at 0°. Two additional points were collected where the turntable angle was 0°, and the turbine yaw angle was 20° (71000200) or -20° (710M0200).

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence W - Raw Data

Sequence W: Extended Blade (F) This test sequence used an upwind, rigid turbine with a 0° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 5 m/s to 21 m/s, and the yaw angle was held at 0°. The blade pitch angle was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade pressure measurements were collected. The five-hole probes were removed and the plugs were installed. Plastic tape 0.03-mm thick was used to smooth the interface between the plugs and the blade. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pretensioned to 40,000 N. During postprocessing, the probe channels were set to read –99999.99. The standard tip blocks were replaced with blade extensions that created a 5.532-m radius rotor as shown in Appendix A. The extension used the S809 airfoil throughout, and the linear taper of the blade continued along the extension. Note that the blade radius was not changed during post-processing so the pressure tap locations are at the same radial location, but the reference to 30% represents 30% of 5.029 m, not 5.532 m. Throughout this report, references to the blade span are made for the 5.029-m radius, not the 5.532-m radius.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence X - Raw Data

Sequence X: Elevated RPM (F) This test sequence used an upwind, rigid turbine with a 0° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 5 m/s to 12 m/s, and yaw angles of ±30° were obtained. The blade pitch angle was 3°. The rotor rotated at 90 RPM. Blade pressure measurements were collected. The five-hole probes were removed and the plugs were installed. Plastic tape 0.03-mm-thick was used to smooth the interface between the plugs and the blade. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pre-tensioned to 40,000 N. During post-processing, the probe channels were set to read -99999.99. As described in Appendix F, the hydrostatic correction derived for operation at 72 RPM was applied to these data.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence V - Raw Data

Sequence V: Tip Plate (F) This test sequence used an upwind, rigid turbine with a 0° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 5 m/s to 25 m/s, and the yaw angle was held at 0°. The blade pitch angle was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade pressure measurements were collected. The five-hole probes were removed and the plugs were installed. Plastic tape 0.03-mm-thick was used to smooth the interface between the plugs and the blade. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pre-tensioned to 40,000 N. During post-processing, the probe channels were set to read -99999.99. The standard tip blocks were replaced with a tip plate to simulate the effect of an undeployed tip-mounted aerodynamic brake as shown in Appendix A. Note that the blade radius was not changed during post-processing so the pressure tap locations are at the same radial location, but the reference to 30% represents 30% of 5.029 m, not 4.943 m. Throughout this report, references to the blade span are made for the 5.029- m radius, not the 4.943-m radius.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence F - Raw Data

Sequence F: Downwind High Cone (F) This test sequence used a downwind, rigid turbine with an 18° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 10 m/s to 20 m/s. Excessive inertial loading due to the high cone angle prevented operation at lower wind speeds. Yaw angles of ±20° were achieved. The blade tip pitch was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade and probe pressure measurements were collected. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link was replaced with a shorter bar so the load cell was not installed during this test. However, the teeter link load cell channel was flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to -99999.99 N.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence P - Raw Data

Sequence P: Wake Flow Visualization, Upwind (P) This test sequence used an upwind, rigid turbine with a 0° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 5 m/s to 15 m/s. Yaw angles of 0° to –60° were achieved. The blade tip pitch was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade and probe pressure measurements were collected. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pre-tensioned to 40,000 N. The aluminum blade tip designed to contain a smoke generator was installed, and counterweights were installed in the non-instrumented blade tip to compensate. The turbine was positioned at the appropriate yaw angle, and the smoke generator was ignited remotely. The campaign duration was 3 minutes for all tests except P1000000, which was 2 minutes. The file name convention was the standard format except for P10000A0, which indicated a 3° pitch angle. File P1000000 used a 12° pitch angle. After these two campaigns were collected, it was determined that all subsequent data should be collected with a 3° pitch angle. Pressure data were not acquired during this sequence, so all associated data values were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to 0.000 Pa. Corresponding pressure data are available from Sequence H for the 3° pitch angle test points. Flow visualization data obtained from wall- and ceiling-mounted video cameras were recorded to videotape. The camera locations and calibration procedures are described in Appendix J.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence 4 - Raw Data

Sequence 4: Static Pressure Calibration (P) This test sequence used a downwind, teetered turbine with a 3.4° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 5 m/s to 25 m/s. Yaw angles of 0° to 30° were achieved. The blade tip pitch was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade and probe pressure measurements were collected. A static pitot probe was installed on a boom 2.3 m upwind of the nacelle at hub height and connected to the reference side of the Mensor digital differential pressure transducer through the pneumatic rotary coupling. This provided the reference pressure for all blade-mounted pressure transducers, as opposed to the NASA atmospheric pressure reference that was used for all other test sequences. This simulates the pressure system connections used in field measurements where the static pressure was unknown.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence 6 - Raw Data

Sequence 6: Shroud Wake Measure (P) This test sequence used a downwind, rigid turbine with a 3.4° cone angle. The wind speeds for this sequence corresponded to subcritical [7 m/s], transitional [15 m/s], and supercritical [20 m/s] Reynolds number regimes for the circular cross-section tower. The yaw angle and blade tip pitch angles were selected to traverse the probe tip across the tower wake while keeping the probe axis approximately parallel to the tunnel centerline. The rotor was parked with the instrumented blade at 180° azimuth. Blade and probe pressure measurements were collected. An airfoil-shaped aluminum shroud was placed on the tower below the 34% span five-hole probe. It extended below the 91% span five-hole probe. The turntable angle was adjusted to position the shroud at various angles relative to the flow.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence 5 - Raw Data

Sequence 5: Sweep Wind Speed (F,P) This test sequence used an upwind, rigid turbine with a 0° cone angle. The wind speed was ramped from 5 m/s to 25 m/s by the wind tunnel operator. This was repeated with a decreasing ramp. The yaw angle was maintained at 0°. The blade tip pitch was 3° or 6°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM. Blade pressure and probe measurements were collected for both pitch angles. The five-hole probes were removed and the plugs were installed for another 3° pitch case. Plastic tape 0.03 mm thick was used to smooth the interface between the plugs and the blade. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pre-tensioned to 40,000 N. During post-processing, the probe channels were set to read -99999.99. The 6- minute campaigns were named using the sequence designation 5, followed by DN or UP, which indicates the wind speed ramp direction. The next four digits are 0000, and the sequence digit is at the end.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence 8 - Raw Data

Sequences 8 and 9: Downwind Sonics (F,P) and Downwind Sonics Parked (P) This test sequence used an upwind, rigid turbine with a 0° cone angle. The wind speed ranged from 5 m/s to 25 m/s. Yaw angles of 0° to 60° were achieved. The blade tip pitch was 3°. The rotor rotated at 72 RPM during Sequence 8, but it was parked during Sequence 9. Blade pressure measurements were collected. The five-hole probes were removed and the plugs were installed. Plastic tape 0.03-mm-thick was used to smooth the interface between the plugs and the blade. The teeter dampers were replaced with rigid links, and these two channels were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to –99999.99 Nm. The teeter link load cell was pre-tensioned to 40,000 N. During post-processing, the probe channels were set to read -99999.99. Sonic anemometers were mounted on a strut downwind of the turbine. The strut was mounted to the T-frame, which was rotated to align the anemometers aft of the 9% and 49% radius locations at hub height. Because of this configuration, the tunnel balance data are considered invalid. Sequence 9 was designed to compare the downwind sonic anemometer readings with the upwind sonic anemometers without interference from the turbine. The rotor was parked with the instrumented blade at 0° azimuth. All pressure measurements obtained in Sequence 9 are invalid because sufficient time for temperature stabilization did not occur, thus all associated data values were flagged as not applicable by setting the measured values in the data file to 0.0000 Pa. This test is further described in Appendix G.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

UAE6 - Wind Tunnel Tests Data - UAE6 - Sequence 9 - Raw Data

17 WIND ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2023

Utah FORGE: Well 16A(78)-32/Well16B(78)-32 Circulation Test Data

This dataset encompasses the collected data and associated reports from the low-rate injection circulation test conducted on wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32 in July 2023 at Utah FORGE. It includes comprehensive raw circulation data, captured by Pason and Schlumberger (SLB). The dataset details various parameters recorded during circulation testing such as produced fluid, injection pressure, injection rate, produced rate, temperature, downhole pressure difference, bottom hole pressure in the well, and surface treating pressure. Note that the Pason data is presented in Mountain Time, whereas the SLB data is in Pacific Time.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗