Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “technology performance level”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2005

System Study: Technology Assessment and Prioritizing

The objective of this NASA funded project is to assess and prioritize advanced technologies required to achieve the goals for an "Intelligent Propulsion System" through collaboration among GEAE, NASA, and Georgia Tech. Key GEAE deliverables are parametric response surface equations (RSE's) relating technology features to system benefits (sfc, weight, fuel burn, design range, acoustics, emission, etc...) and listings of Technology Impact Matrix (TIM) with benefits, debits, and approximate readiness status. TIM has been completed for GEAE and NASA proposed technologies. The combined GEAE and NASA TIM input requirement is shown in Table.1. In the course of building the RSE's and TIM, significant parametric technology modeling and RSE accuracy improvements were accomplished. GEAE has also done preliminary ranking of the technologies using Georgia Tech/GEAE USA developed technology evaluation tools. System level impact was performed by combining beneficial technologies with minimum conflict among various system figures of merits to assess their overall benefits to the system. The shortfalls and issues with modeling the proposed technologies are identified, and recommendations for future work are also proposed.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1995

An update on SCARLET hardware development and flight programs

Solar Concentrator Array with Refractive Linear Element Technology (SCARLET) is one of the first practical photovoltaic concentrator array technologies that offers a number of benefits for space applications (i.e. high array efficiency, protection from space radiation effects, a relatively light weight system, minimized plasma interactions, etc.) The line-focus concentrator concept, however, also offers two very important advantages: (1) low-cost mass production potential of the lens material; and (2) relaxation of precise array tracking requirements to only a single axis. These benefits offer unique capabilities to both commercial and government spacecraft users, specifically those interested in high radiation missions, such as MEO orbits, and electric-powered propulsion LEO-to-GEO orbit raising applications. SCARLET is an aggressive hardware development and flight validation program sponsored by the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) and NASA Lewis Research Center. Its intent is to bring technology to the level of performance and validation necessary for use by various government and commercial programs. The first phase of the SCARLET program culminated with the design, development and fabrication of a small concentrator array for flight on the METEOR satellite. This hardware will be the first in-space demonstration of concentrator technology at the 'array level' and will provide valuable in-orbit performance measurements. The METEOR satellite is currently planned for a September/October 1995 launch. The next phase of the program is the development of large array for use by one of the NASA New Millenium Program missions. This hardware will incorporate a number of the significant improvements over the basic METEOR design. This presentation will address the basic SCARLET technology, examine its benefits to users, and describe the expected improvements for future missions.

Jones, P. Alan↗
NASA NTRS2021

NASA Strategy for Technology Development

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Office of the Chief Technologist (OCT) provides the strategy and leadership that integrates NASA’s technology development and open innovation activities to advance American aeronautic, science, and space exploration objectives. OCT performs an agency-level technology coordination role, coordinating with the NASA Mission Directorates, field centers, and other government agencies to align the agency’s technology investments to meet mission requirements while filling gaps, anticipating future needs, and minimizing duplication of effort. OCT provides the strategy and coordination that guide NASA's technology and innovation activities through Strategic Technology Integration, Digital Transformation, the Science and Technology Partnership Forum, and Innovation. The Strategic Technology Integration team informs policy, requirements, and strategy for NASA’s technology development activities in support of the Chief Technologist by coordinating with NASA mission directorates, other government agencies, and external organizations. As part of these efforts, OCT develops the NASA Technology Taxonomy and the NASA Strategic Space Technology Investment Plan. Digital Transformation will increasingly change the way NASA operates and will enable the agency’s missions to be completed more efficiently and effectively. It will allow current and future employees to use their talents in more innovative ways. The Science and Technology Partnership Forum is a strategic forum, with principal partners at the United States Space Force and the National Reconnaissance Office. It was established to identify synergistic efforts and technologies in order to leverage those synergies and influence portfolios across space agencies in areas deemed pervasive and ready for collaboration. NASA's Innovation efforts are designed to transform diverse ideas into value and are guided by a framework that is focused on the agency’s people, processes, partnerships and portfolio. The innovation framework is used to connect the workforce to tools, strategies and activities to increase the pace of innovation. OCT translates National space policies into NASA technology strategies and coordination across the agency and interagency communities to guide NASA's technology and innovation activities to achieve capabilities needed for future missions. This chapter provides insight into the value of analyzing future states to inform technology developments to plot the strategic direction of NASA’s space technology program.

Erica Rodgers↗
NASA NTRS2011

Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) Tug Power System Considerations

Solar electric propulsion (SEP) technology is truly at the "intersection of commercial and military space" as well as the intersection of NASA robotic and human space missions. Building on the use of SEP for geosynchronous spacecraft station keeping, there are numerous potential commercial and military mission applications for SEP stages operating in Earth orbit. At NASA, there is a resurgence of interest in robotic SEP missions for Earth orbit raising applications, 1-AU class heliocentric missions to near Earth objects (NEOs) and SEP spacecraft technology demonstrations. Beyond these nearer term robotic missions, potential future human space flight missions to NEOs with high-power SEP stages are being considered. To enhance or enable this broad class of commercial, military and NASA missions, advancements in the power level and performance of SEP technologies are needed. This presentation will focus on design considerations for the solar photovoltaic array (PVA) and electric power system (EPS) vital to the design and operation of an SEP stage. The engineering and programmatic pros and cons of various PVA and EPS technologies and architectures will be discussed in the context of operating voltage and power levels. The impacts of PVA and EPS design options on the remaining SEP stage subsystem designs, as well as spacecraft operations, will also be discussed.

Kerslake, Thomas W.↗
NASA NTRS1996

Definition of 1992 Technology Aircraft Noise Levels and the Methodology for Assessing Airplane Noise Impact of Component Noise Reduction Concepts

This report describes the methodology for assessing the impact of component noise reduction on total airplane system noise. The methodology is intended to be applied to the results of individual study elements of the NASA-Advanced Subsonic Technology (AST) Noise Reduction Program, which will address the development of noise reduction concepts for specific components. Program progress will be assessed in terms of noise reduction achieved, relative to baseline levels representative of 1992 technology airplane/engine design and performance. In this report, the 1992 technology reference levels are defined for assessment models based on four airplane sizes - an average business jet and three commercial transports: a small twin, a medium sized twin, and a large quad. Study results indicate that component changes defined as program final goals for nacelle treatment and engine/airframe source noise reduction would achieve from 6-7 EPNdB reduction of total airplane noise at FAR 36 Stage 3 noise certification conditions for all of the airplane noise assessment models.

Kumasaka, Henry A.↗
NASA NTRS2021

Effects of Energy Capture and Recovery on an N+3 Technology Level Reference Propulsion System

An initial, parametric study was performed to assess the benefits and drawbacks of waste heat recovery on a gas turbine engine. The NASA N+3 technology level reference propulsion system model, an advanced, single-aisle class, gas turbine engine was the baseline cycle. The amount of thermal energy removed from the high-energy core flow and transferred to lower-energy bypass or removed from the cycle was varied. Total pressure losses were included parametrically, as well as the effects of converting some of that thermal energy to work used within the cycle. Propulsion system thrust and thrust specific fuel consumption (TSFC) were minimally affected by total pressure losses or thermal energy removal from the core stream. However, total pressure losses in the bypass stream had significant thrust and TSFC penalties. Those penalties were partially offset if core thermal energy is transferred to the bypass stream. Core thermal energy converted to work for use within the engine cycle via a bottoming cycle showed significant thrust and TSFC benefits. In addition to these results, an engine dataset is also being made available. The dataset contains engine conditions (mass flow rate, total temperature and pressure, flow velocities, etc.) at four flight conditions (maximum climb limit, cruise, rolling takeoff and sea level static) that can be used for specific information to guide heat exchanger design to best realize these benefits with further research. The data set is a .csv (comma-separated values) file and is provided as a supplement to this report (available online from www.sti.nasa.gov).

propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2014

Exploring Advanced Technology Gas Turbine Engine Design and Performance for the Large Civil Tiltrotor (LCTR)

A Large Civil Tiltrotor (LCTR) conceptual design was developed as part of the NASA Heavy Lift Rotorcraft Systems Investigation in order to establish a consistent basis for evaluating the benefits of advanced technology for large tiltrotors. The concept has since evolved into the second-generation LCTR2, designed to carry 90 passengers for 1,000 nautical miles at 300 knots, with vertical takeoff and landing capability. This paper explores gas turbine component performance and cycle parameters to quantify performance gains possible for additional improvements in component and material performance beyond those identified in previous LCTR2 propulsion studies and to identify additional research areas. The vehicle-level characteristics from this advanced technology generation 2 propulsion architecture will help set performance levels as additional propulsion and power systems are conceived to meet ever-increasing requirements for mobility and comfort, while reducing energy use, cost, noise and emissions. The Large Civil Tiltrotor vehicle and mission will be discussed as a starting point for this effort. A few, relevant engine and component technology studies, including previous LCTR2 engine study results will be summarized to help orient the reader on gas turbine engine architecture, performance and limitations. Study assumptions and methodology used to explore engine design and performance, as well as assess vehicle sizing and mission performance will then be discussed. Individual performance for present and advanced engines, as well as engine performance effects on overall vehicle size and mission fuel usage, will be given. All results will be summarized to facilitate understanding the importance and interaction of various component and system performance on overall vehicle characteristics.

vehicle sizing↗
NASA NTRS1990

United States planetary rover status: 1989

A spectrum of concepts for planetary rovers and rover missions, is covered. Rovers studied range from tiny micro rovers to large and highly automated vehicles capable of traveling hundreds of kilometers and performing complex tasks. Rover concepts are addressed both for the Moon and Mars, including a Lunar/Mars common rover capable of supporting either program with relatively small modifications. Mission requirements considered include both Science and Human Exploration. Studies include a range of autonomy in rovers, from interactive teleoperated systems to those requiring and onboard System Executive making very high level decisions. Both high and low technology rover options are addressed. Subsystems are described for a representative selection of these rovers, including: Mobility, Sample Acquisition, Science, Vehicle Control, Thermal Control, Local Navigation, Computation and Communications. System descriptions of rover concepts include diagrams, technology levels, system characteristics, and performance measurement in terms of distance covered, samples collected, and area surveyed for specific representative missions. Rover development schedules and costs are addressed for Lunar and Mars exploration initiatives.

Pivirotto, Donna L. S.↗
NASA NTRS2006

Overview of a Proposed Flight Validation of Aerocapture System Technology

Aerocapture is a very useful capability for NASA that can be used across a wide range of planetary mission sizes and destinations. A substantial mass advantage may be realized through aerocapture maneuver implementation. The mass advantage is enabling for certain outer planet mission profiles. Aerocapture technology provides corollary benefits to the related applications of atmospheric entry and precision landing on worlds with atmospheres through aero/aerothermodynamic model validation, hypersonic guided flight, tps materials, and performance model validation. The ST9 Aerocapture flight validation will be sufficient to immediately infuse aerocapture technology into future NASA science missions. The advanced technologies being flight validated will enable the system level goal of performing an aerocapture maneuver. The advanced technologies include: The GN&C System, TPS materials, plus Advanced recession and heat flux sensors.

Keys, Andrew S.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Mission summary: Halley flyby/Tempel-2 rendezvous

A unique dual-comet flight opportunity exists in mid-1985 which includes flyby of the large and active comet Halley en route to rendezvous with second comet, Tempel-2. This mission will utilize ion propulsion at a modest performance level, based on proven technology. The Project is planned for FY81 start. Launch occurs in July 1985 via the Shuttle/IUS twin stage. Following IUS injection, the ion propulsion stage provides continuous thrust virtually throughout the 3-year flight until the Tempel-2 rendezvous in 1988. En route, a probe is deployed for encounter with Halley about 4 months after launch at a point 73 days before its perihelion. Rendezvous with Tempel-2 occurs about 60 days before the comet's perihelion during the summer of 1988 and continues for about 1 year. Earth will be in favorable relative positions for observing both the flyby and the rendezvous.

Atkins, K.↗
NASA NTRS2003

High Power Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) for Cargo and Propellant Transfer Missions in Cislunar Space

The performance of Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) in transporting cargo and propellant from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) to the first Earth-Moon Lagrange point (EML1) is examined. The baseline NEP vehicle utilizes a fission reactor system with Brayton power conversion for electric power generation to power multiple liquid hydrogen magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) thrusters. Vehicle characteristics and performance levels are based on technology availability in a fifteen to twenty year timeframe. Results of numerical trajectory analyses are also provided.

Falck, Robert D.↗
NASA NTRS2024

Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core (HyTEC) HyTEC Phase 1 – Advanced Aerodynamics Final Report

The objective of the Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core (HyTEC) – Advanced High Pressure Turbine (HPT) Aerodynamics project is to develop technology for a compact core that contributes to significant fuel burn reductions of 5-10% over current generation technologies. To accomplish this, the HPT is incorporating a range of aerodynamic features and technologies to improve component efficiency and provide favorable systems level trades. In particular, this project explored low solidity airfoils, advanced tip treatments, platform contouring, and advanced ceramic matrix composite (CMC) Stage 2 Nozzle (S2N) airfoils to eliminate the need for post throat cooling in a compact core environment. The maturation of these technology areas is expected to provide a significant improvement in component efficiencies, and consequently reductions in fuel burn, over the current state of the art (SoA). To mature these technologies to Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 4, a test campaign was performed that consisted of four tests at three facilities. TRL 3 testing was performed in the CW22 linear cascade at NASA Glenn for blade and nozzle technologies, TRL 4 nozzle testing was performed at GE Aerospace (GEA) Test Cell A8, and TRL 4 blade testing was performed at the Notre Dame Turbomachinery Laboratory (NDTL) using the Transonic Research Turbine (TRT) rig. Low solidity was successfully demonstrated to a TRL 4 level. Low solidity nozzles showed benefits in line with pre-project expectations, while low solidity blades were shown to have an aerodynamic penalty. Crucially, this program only considered the aerodynamic losses, and systems trades such as reductions in cooling flows are expected to continue to make low solidity blades a net positive. By successfully quantifying the aerodynamic performance in this project, these trades can be conducted to determine where in the engine architecture low solidity blades will contribute positively to system operation. Platform contouring was demonstrated to a TRL 4 level, with performance in line with the lower end of the pre-project expected range. Advanced tip treatments performance levels were indeterminate, showing the expected improvements to flow physics but with a performance level confounded by several rig issues including whirl mode induced variation in tip clearance. The elimination of post-throat cooling on the S2N was successfully demonstrated to provide a performance benefit, however that benefit was approximately half the level that was expected in pre-project predictions. Overall, the technology maturation plan for HyTEC Phase 1 was successful, bringing the suite of technologies to TRL 4.

High pressure turbine↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Thermal Management System Sizing and Mission Analysis for the SUSAN Electrofan Aircraft

This paper will detail the design, sizing, and mission analysis for the thermal management system (TMS) for the Subsonic Single Aft eNgine (SUSAN) aircraft. Previous work has defined key performance parameters (KPPs) for the electrical power system on SUSAN. These KPPs, efficiency and specific power, were assigned values for each power system component at minimum, nominal, and maximum levels of technology development. The values were based on NASA’s research in Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP) technology. A similar approach was taken in this work, defining and assigning values for KPPs for each component of the TMS. These KPPs are used as inputs to the TMS analysis and sizing and establish targets for future technology development. The minimum level is based on the current state of the art, using available data on commercial off-the-shelf products from suppliers, datasheets, or testing. The nominal level is based on recent published research and on-going NASA-funded work. The maximum level represents a projection of technology performance into the future.

Electrified Aircraft↗
NASA NTRS1989

Uniform task level definitions for robotic system performance comparisons

A series of ten task levels of increasing difficulty was compiled for use in comparative performance evaluations of available and future robotics technology. Each level has a breakdown of ten additional levels of difficulty to provide a layering of 100 levels. It is assumed that each level of task performance must be achieved by the system before it can be appropriately considered for the next level.

Price, Charles↗
NASA NTRS1979

Jet noise and performance comparison study of a Mach 2.55 supersonic cruise aircraft

Data provided by the manufacturer relating to noise and performance of a Mach 2.55 supersonic cruise concept employing a post 1985 technology level, variable cycle engine was used to identify differences in noise levels and performance between the manfacturer and NASA associated with methodology and groundrules. In addition, economic and noise information is provided consistent with a previous study based on an advanced technology Mach 2.7 configuration. The results indicate that the difference between the NASA's and manfacturer's performance methodology is small. Resizing the aircraft to NASA groundrules also results in small changes in flyover, sideline and approach noise levels. For the power setting chosen, engine oversizing resulted in no reduction in traded noise. In terms of summated noise level, a 10 EPNdB reduction is realized for an 8 percent increase in total operating costs. This corresponds to an average noise reduction of 3.3 EPNdB at the three observer positions.

Mascitti, V. R.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Reliability Prediction

RELAV, a NASA-developed computer program, enables Systems Control Technology, Inc. (SCT) to predict performance of aircraft subsystems. RELAV provides a system level evaluation of a technology. Systems, the mechanism of a landing gear for example, are first described as a set of components performing a specific function. RELAV analyzes the total system and the individual subsystem probabilities to predict success probability, and reliability. This information is then translated into operational support and maintenance requirements. SCT provides research and development services in support of government contracts.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1971

Economic impact of stimulated technological activity. Part 1: Overall economic impact of technological progress: Its measurement

Investigations were performed at the national economic level to explore the aggregate effects of technological progress on economic growth. Inadequacies in existing marco-economic yardsticks forced the study to focus on the cost savings effects achieved through technological progress. The central questions discussed in this report cover: (1) role of technological progress in economic growth, (2) factors determining the rate of economic growth due to technological progress; (3) quantitative measurements of relationships between technological progress, its determinants, and subsequent economic growth; and (4) effects of research and development activities of the space program. For Part 2, see N72-32174.

Source record↗