Ion Migration Mechanisms in the Sodium Sulfide Solid ElectrolyteNa(3-x)Sb(1-x)W(x)S(4)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Smith, Jeffrey G.↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “sulfide electrolytes”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Digestion processes and elemental analysis of oxide and sulfide solid electrolytes
Detailed elemental analysis is essential for a successful development and optimization of material systems and synthesis methods. This is especially relevant for Li- and Na-containing compounds, found in state-of-the-art and next-generation battery systems. Their materials’ properties and thus the final device performance strongly depend on the crystal structure, the stoichiometry, and defect chemistry, e.g., influencing charge carrier concentration and activation energies for vacancy transport. However, a detailed quantitative analysis of light elements in a heavy matrix, featuring a broad range of solubilities and vapor pressures, is often difficult and associated with large uncertainties and thus neglected in favor of just reporting the stoichiometry as “weighed in.” Here, in this work, we report several approaches to digest and dissolve various oxide and sulfide-based materials, used in next-generation Li batteries, for elemental analysis via optical emission spectroscopy. These include the most common solid electrolytes Li-La-Ti–O, a perovskite material (LLTO), and Li-La-Zr-O which has garnet structure (LLZO). Additionally, a facile thermal digestion process is reported for a surrogate sulfide solid electrolyte (Na 2 S). The digestion procedures reported here are suitable for almost any laboratory environment and, when applied, will improve understanding of the synthesis-structure–property correlations needed to advanced batteries with all solid-state configurations.
Malkowski, Thomas F.↗
Size-Dependent Chemomechanical Failure of Sulfide Solid Electrolyte Particles during Electrochemical Reaction with Lithium
The very high ionic conductivity of Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 (LGPS) solid electrolyte (SE) makes it a promising candidate SE for solid-state batteries in electrical vehicles. However, chemomechanical failure, whose mechanism remains unclear, has plagued its widespread applications. Here, we report in situ imaging lithiation-induced failure of LGPS SE. In this work, we revealed a strong size effect in the chemomechanical failure of LGPS particles: namely, when the particle size is greater than 3 μm, fracture/pulverization occurred; when the particle size is between 1 and 3 μm, microcracks emerged; when the particle size is less than 1 μm, no chemomechanical failure was observed. This strong size effect is interpreted by the interplay between elastic energy storage and dissipation. Our finding has important implications for the design of high-performance LGPS SE, for example, by reducing the particle size to less than 1 μm the chemomechanical failure of LGPS SE can be mitigated.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Interlayer Design for Halide Electrolytes in All‐Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries
Abstract All‐solid‐state lithium‐metal batteries (ASSLMBs) are promising for transportation electrification due to their superior safety and high energy density. Lithium halide electrolytes provide excellent processing flexibility, high ionic conductivity, and anodic stability (>4.1 V), making them highly compatible with high‐voltage cathodes, surpassing sulfide electrolytes (<2.1 V). Nevertheless, halide electrolytes suffer from low cathodic stability and form an electronically conductive interphase with lithium, resulting in a critical current density (CCD) of nearly zero. Herein, Li 3 YbCl 6 electrolytes are synthesized that are kinetically stable with lithium by forming an electronic insulating solid electrolyte interphase. Guided by critical overpotential criteria, a PI 3 interlayer is designed that transforms into Li 6 PI 3 upon contact with lithium, substantially reducing the interfacial resistance of Li 3 YbCl 6 against lithium to 34 Ω and achieving a high critical overpotential of 114 mV. By substituting Yb with Lu, Li 3 LuCl 6 electrolytes with Li 6 PI 3 interlayers reach a CCD of 1.0 mA cm −2 at a capacity of 1.0 mAh cm −2 , comparable to sulfide electrolytes but with higher oxidation stability. Additionally, Li 6 PI 3 enables stable cycling of Li//Li cells with Li 3 LuCl 6 electrolytes at 0.5 mA cm −2 for 400 cycles and maintains 86.5% capacity in Li//LiCoO 2 cells after 220 cycles at 30 °C, paving the way for high‐performance ASSLMBs.
Chemistry↗
Atomic insights into the oxidative degradation mechanisms of sulfide solid electrolytes
Not Available
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Binder Effects on Processing, Mechanical Properties, and Performance of Thin Sulfide Solid‐State Electrolytes
All‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) offer enhanced safety and energy density compared to conventional lithium‐ion batteries by replacing flammable liquid electrolytes with solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs). Among SSEs, sulfide‐based electrolytes exhibit high ionic conductivity and mechanical deformability, making them promising candidates for next‐generation energy storage. However, their practical implementation is hindered by interfacial instability, mechanical brittleness, and challenges in fabricating ultrathin electrolyte membranes (<30 μm) with robust mechanical integrity. Here, this study systematically examines the influence of polymeric binders—polyisobutylene, hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubber, and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS)—on the structural, mechanical, and electrochemical performance of thin sulfide SSE membranes. Key findings reveal that SEBS enables the fabrication of ultrathin, uniform membranes, while binder elasticity significantly affects structural stability during cycling. Operando stack pressure measurements indicate that binder properties directly influence adhesion force for LPSCl particles, influencing their stabilizing cycling period. These results underscore the critical role of polymer binders beyond mechanical reinforcement, positioning them as essential design variables in sulfide SSE engineering. By linking binder chemistry to processability and electrochemical performance, this study provides insights into optimizing sulfide SSEs, advancing their commercial viability in ASSBs.
argyrodite sulfide electrolyte↗
Surface treatment of a sulfide glass solid electrolyte layer
Chemically treating ionically conductive sulfide glass solid electrolyte separators or separator layers can improve performance. In particular, treatment involving chemically etching a surface or surface region of the sulfide glass separator to blunt, lessen or remove edge defects or surface flaws, and/or to enhance surface smoothness is cost effective, reliable and well suited for high production environments compared to physical methods of removing scratches or smoothing surfaces, such as mechanical grinding and polishing.
Visco, Steven J.↗
Pushing the Limits: Maximizing Energy Density in Silicon Sulfide Solid‐State Batteries
Here, for the first time, we demonstrate a silicon solid-state battery (SSB) architecture that achieves >400 Wh kg −1 , approaching the theoretical limit for silicon-based SSBs. This configuration features a 99.9 wt% micro-Si, a thin sulfide solid electrolyte (SSE), and a high-loading NMC811. Key to these results is strategically selecting and evaluating the processing techniques, whether wet or dry, for the negative electrode, positive electrode and thin sheet-type SSE. Excessive lithium incorporation into the silicon host, beyond the Li 3.75 +Si phase to form a LiSi composite, is essential to match the high capacity of the positive electrode. This SSB achieves over 1000 cycles for a 2 mAh cm −2 with ≈80% capacity retention and 94% capacity retention for 3 mAh cm −2 over 500 cycles at 25 °C. Post analysis identifies the primary capacity decay mechanisms as oxidation at the NMC/SSE interface and structural disruptions within NMC. Meanwhile, the Si electrode maintains a robust solid-electrolyte interphase layer, minimizing capacity decay. This study highlights the necessity for improved NMC coatings, lattice oxygen stabilization, and a durable positive electrode-electrolyte interface to improve the long-term stability of SSBs. Strategies leading to a single-layer pouch cell SSB exceeding 400 Wh kg −1 are developed.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Solvent-Free and Non-Sintered 500 Wh/kg All Solid-State Battery
Navitas teamed up with UMD and ORNL to establish a reliable scientific research team. The project addressed processing limitations of state-of-the-art solid electrolytes by extending solvent-free electrode fabrication technology to the scalable production of cathode/solid electrolyte laminates. The innovation started with a solid-state sulfide electrolyte (LiPS) with Cl stabilization able to meet the keystone conductivity challenge in a film of practical thickness (μ 50 µm). The electrolyte was based on a composite of PTFE, and stabilized LiPSCl. With optimization, the ionic conductivity reached 3.3 ×10 -3 S/cm. The solid electrolyte with as low as 0.4% binder allowed long term cycling (> 500 cycles) of Li/SSE/Li cell at > 4 mA/cm 2 with the utilization of Li > 80%. The Li and SSE interfaces were successfully protected with LiF-rich SEI layer. NCM811cathode active materials were coated with a thin layer of Al 2 O 3 (5 nm). The free standing cathode film was fabricated through dry-process with Al2O3-coated NCM811, LiPSCl, active carbon, and small amount PTFE. The all-solid-state batteries were laminated with free standing surface coated NCM811 cathode film, free standing LiPSCl SSE film, and surface protected Li anode together in a single lamination step, and demonstrated high specific capacity (> 200 mAh/g) with coulombic efficiency > 99.5%. The all-solid-state batteries through solvent-free and no-sintering process are promising for large format cell with 500 Wh/Kg specific energy density.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Suppressing Atmospheric Degradation of Sulfide-Based Solid Electrolytes via Ultrathin Metal Oxide Layers
Sulfide-based solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) are promising materials with superior Li-ion conductivity; however, their poor atmospheric stability limits commercial manufacturing at scale. Here, we investigate the impact of ultrathin metal oxide layers deposited via atomic layer deposition (ALD) on the stability of Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl). Al 2 O 3 layers grown directly on LPSCl particles significantly stabilize the surface chemistry and Li-ion transport properties relative to uncoated material upon exposure to both an ambient atmosphere (22% relative humidity, RH) and humidified O 2 (100% RH). Detailed investigations indicate that coatings impede the surface and bulk degradation kinetics of exposed materials, even for coatings as thin as ∼1 Å. Furthermore, this suggests that stabilization is due to more than just a physical barrier. Shifts in valence band edge positions of coated LPSCl indicate that ALD coatings alter the surface electronic structure and resulting oxidation tendency of underlying LPSCl, suggesting new avenues to improving the environmental stability of sulfide SSEs.
Atmospheric chemistry↗
Encapsulated sulfide glass solid electrolytes and solid-state laminate electrode assemblies
Nanofilm-encapsulated sulfide glass solid electrolyte structures and methods for making the encapsulated glass structures involve a lithium ion conducting sulfide glass sheet encapsulated on its opposing major surfaces by a continuous and conformal nanofilm made by atomic layer deposition (ALD). During manufacture, the reactive surfaces of the sulfide glass sheet are protected from deleterious reaction with ambient moisture, and the nanofilm can be configured to provide additional performance advantages, including enhanced mechanical strength and improved chemical resistance.
Visco, Steven J.↗
Consolidation of composite cathodes with NCM and sulfide solid-state electrolytes by hot pressing for all-solid-state Li metal batteries
In this study, hot pressing was evaluated as a method of cell fabrication to increase the energy density of next-generation all-solid-state batteries with NCM active material and sulfide solid-state electrolyte. Hot pressing involves consolidating glassy sulfide electrolyte by the application of pressure at a temperature above the electrolyte’s glass transition temperature. Typically, cell stacks are formed at room temperature and retain 15–30% porosity that limits cell energy density. On the other hand, the porosity of hot-pressed cell stacks is reduced to less than 10%. The electrochemical function of hot-pressed cathode composites was assessed as a function of active material and solid-state electrolyte compositions. Specifically, LiNi 0.85 Co 0.10 Mn 0.05 O 2 and LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 were studied in combination with either glassy Li 7 P 3 S 11 , glassy Li 3 PS 4 , or β-Li 3 PS 4 solid-state electrolytes. Cathode composites composed of LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 and Li 3 PS 4 maintained the best function after hot pressing at 200 °C and 370 MPa for 10 min. It was found that LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 ’s resistance to microcracking and the inherent stability of Li 3 PS 4 ’s fully de-networked local structure are critical to maintain good electrochemical function after hot pressing. Furthermore, the results of this study show that hot pressing reduces porosity in the cathode composite and confirms the feasibility of cathode support of consolidated, reinforced glass separators.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Electrolyte strategies for practically viable all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries
All-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries are a promising platform due to their high gravimetric energy density and enhanced safety. However, they face numerous challenges that currently obstruct commercial adoption. The key to overcoming these challenges lies in the rational selection and targeted development of solid-state electrolytes, where different materials classes present distinct trade-offs between performance and practicality. We assert that sulfide electrolytes offer the best compatibility with the cathode and anode requirements for practical sulfur cells, with halides and borohydrides also showing potential for use in the cathode with further development. We provide cell-level target parameters to ensure that the field moves consistently towards commercial relevance. Looking forward, we call for the adoption of the chlorinated argyrodite with a composition range of Li 6-x PS 5-x Cl 1+x (x = 0 - 0.5) as a standardized solid-state electrolyte to enable rigorous benchmarking across the field and accelerate battery development.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Recent Progress on Dominant Sulfide‐Type Solid‐State Na Superionic Conductors for Solid‐State Sodium Batteries
Abstract Over the past decade, solid‐state batteries have garnered significant attentions due to their potentials to deliver high energy density and excellent safety. Considering the abundant sodium (Na) resources in contrast to lithium (Li), the development of sodium‐based batteries has become increasingly appealing. Sulfide‐based superionic conductors are widely considered as promising solid eletcrolytes (SEs) in solid‐state Na batteries due to the features of high ionic conductivity and cold‐press densification. In recent years, tremendous efforts have been made to investigate sulfide‐based Na‐ion conductors on their synthesis, compositions, conductivity, and the feasibility in batteries. However, there are still several challenges to overcome for their practical applications in high performance solid‐state Na batteries. This article provides a comprehensive update on the synthesis, structure, and properties of three dominant sulfide‐based Na‐ion conductors (Na 3 PS 4 , Na 3 SbS 4 , and Na 11 Sn 2 PS 12 ), and their families that have a variety of anion and cation doping. Additionally, the interface stability of these sulfide electrolytes toward the anode is reviewed, as well as the electrochemical performance of solid‐state Na batteries based on different types of cathode materials (metal sulfides, oxides, and organics). Finally, the perspective and outlook for the development and practical utilization of sulfide‐based SE in solid‐state batteries are discussed.
Guo, Xiaolin↗
Phase Field Modeling of Pressure Induced Densification in Solid Electrolytes
Adoption of dense and homogeneous solid electrolytes can possibly mitigate the propagation of lithium dendrites and enable lithium metal anodes. Application of external pressure helps to minimize the sintering temperature in oxide ceramics and can potentially densify softer sulfide electrolytes even under room temperature conditions. Here, a previously developed phase field-based computational scheme for predicting the high-temperature sintering-induced densification of oxide ceramic solid electrolytes is extended in the present context to capture the influence of external pressure for densifying solid electrolytes. Two different bulk deformation mechanisms, namely, "reorganization" and "creep deformation," are dominant under external pressure, which is different from the surface and grain-boundary diffusion-induced densification of solid electrolytes that occurs during high temperature sintering. External pressure also increases the points of contact between the particles, which further enhances the propensity of diffusion-induced sintering process. Results obtained from simulations indicate that densification under external pressure is independent of the solid electrolyte particle morphology. Finally, a phase map is generated between applied pressure and temperature for achieving complete densification of oxide ceramics, which can possibly guide the synthesis of thin and dense solid electrolyte separators.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
A Sulfide‐Based Solid Electrolyte With High Humid Air Tolerance for Long Lifespan All‐Solid‐State Sodium Batteries
Abstract Sulfide‐based superionic conductors present great promise to achieve high energy density and safety for all‐solid‐state sodium batteries (ASSSBs). However, the poor electrolyte/electrode interface compatibility and humid air stability seriously hinder their deployment in ASSSBs. Herein, a series of high‐performance Na 3‐□ Sb 1‐4x (SnWCaTi) x S 4 sulfide‐based solid electrolytes (SSEs) are reported by coupling the vacancy effect with configurational entropy, which displays an excellent interface stability against sodium metal and an extraordinary tolerance toward the moist atmosphere, even for water. The optimized electrolyte effectively inhibits the detrimental mixed ion‐electron conducting interphase formation, achieving the ultra‐stable operation of Na–Na symmetric cell up to 1000 h. Furthermore, the Na + diffusion kinetics is obviously enhanced by increasing the Na sites local anisotropy and Na vacancies. Eventually, the assembled TiS 2 //Na 5 Sn ASSSBs deliver a remarkable reversible capacity of 211.6 mAh g −1 at 0.5C with a long‐term cycling performance of 450 cycles at room temperature. More importantly, it achieves a steady running up to 100 cycles at 1C even if this electrolyte is placed in the air with a dew temperature of 13.8 °C for 30 min, the highest values in the state‐of‐the‐art sulfide‐based ASSSBs. The well‐designed SSEs open a new avenue for realizing the advanced and powerful ASSSBs.
Guo, Yayu↗