Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “protein interaction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Identification of small-molecule protein–protein interaction inhibitors for NKG2D

NKG2D (natural-killer group 2, member D) is a homodimeric transmembrane receptor that plays an important role in NK, γδ + , and CD8 + T cell-mediated immune responses to environmental stressors such as viral or bacterial infections and oxidative stress. However, aberrant NKG2D signaling has also been associated with chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and as such NKG2D is thought to be an attractive target for immune intervention. Here, in this study, we describe a comprehensive small-molecule hit identification strategy and two distinct series of protein–protein interaction inhibitors of NKG2D. Although the hits are chemically distinct, they share a unique allosteric mechanism of disrupting ligand binding by accessing a cryptic pocket and causing the two monomers of the NKG2D dimer to open apart and twist relative to one another. Leveraging a suite of biochemical and cell-based assays coupled with structure-based drug design, we established tractable structure–activity relationships with one of the chemical series and successfully improved both the potency and physicochemical properties. Together, we demonstrate that it is possible, albeit challenging, to disrupt the interaction between NKG2D and multiple protein ligands with a single molecule through allosteric modulation of the NKG2D receptor dimer/ligand interface.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Physical models reveal indirect reader protein interactions that facilitate epigenetic crosstalk

The spatial organization of chromatin is governed by epigenetic factors, including epigenetic marks and the reader proteins that bind them. By dictating the accessibility of genomic loci, epigenetic factors contribute to the physical regulation of gene expression, enabling diverse cellular phenotypes to be encoded by a shared genome in an individual. Epigenetic dysregulation can lead to aberrations in chromatin architecture, contributing to diseases such as neurological disorders and cancers. Despite the known importance of chromatin organization for human health, the physical mechanisms governing chromatin folding remain underspecified. In this work, we develop a physical model of chromatin organization based on contributions from multiple epigenetic factors. Using our model, we evaluate how conditions in the nuclear environment and crosstalk between epigenetic marks affect the compartmentalization of chromatin into dense heterochromatin and loose euchromatin. Our results emphasize the role of reader protein binding in chromatin compartmentalization. We show that reader proteins interact through an indirect mechanism facilitated by the shared chromatin “scaffold” to which they bind. Under a scenario where reader proteins compete for binding sites, we find that indirect interactions affect the program adopted by the chromatin fiber. By isolating indirect modes of epigenetic crosstalk, we demonstrate how the interplay between epigenetic patterning and environmental factors influences chromatin architecture.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

AI-Based Protein Interaction Screening and Identification (AISID)

In this study, we presented an AISID method extending AlphaFold-Multimer’s success in structure prediction towards identifying specific protein interactions with an optimized AISIDscore. The method was tested to identify the binding proteins in 18 human TNFSF (Tumor Necrosis Factor superfamily) members for each of 27 human TNFRSF (TNF receptor superfamily) members. For each TNFRSF member, we ranked the AISIDscore among the 18 TNFSF members. The correct pairing resulted in the highest AISIDscore for 13 out of 24 TNFRSF members which have known interactions with TNFSF members. Out of the 33 correct pairing between TNFSF and TNFRSF members, 28 pairs could be found in the top five (including 25 pairs in the top three) seats in the AISIDscore ranking. Surprisingly, the specific interactions between TNFSF10 (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, TRAIL) and its decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2 gave the highest AISIDscore in the list, while the structures of DcR1 and DcR2 are unknown. The data strongly suggests that AlphaFold-Multimer might be a useful computational screening tool to find novel specific protein bindings. This AISID method may have broad applications in protein biochemistry, extending the application of AlphaFold far beyond structure predictions.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Protein–Protein Interaction Networks Derived from Classical and Machine Learning-Based Natural Language Processing Tools

The study of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) provides insight into various biological mechanisms, including the binding of antibodies to antigens, enzymes to inhibitors or promoters, and receptors to ligands. Recent studies of PPIs have led to significant biological breakthroughs. For example, the study of PPIs involved in the human:SARS-CoV-2 viral infection mechanism aided in the development of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Though several databases exist for the manual curation of PPI networks, text mining methods have been routinely demonstrated as useful alternatives for newly studied or understudied species where databases are incomplete. Here, the relationship extraction (RE) performance of several open-source classical text processing, machine learning (ML)-based natural language processing (NLP), and large language model (LLM)-based NLP tools were compared. Overall, our results indicated that networks derived from classical methods tend to have high true positive rates at the expense of having overconnected-networks, ML-based NLP methods have lower true positive rates but networks with the closest structures to the target network, and LLM-based NLP methods tend to exist in-between the two other approaches, with variable performances. Finally, the selection of a specific NLP approach should be tied to the needs of a study and text availability, as models varied in performance due to the amount of text provided.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Comprehensive characterization of protein–protein interactions perturbed by disease mutations

Technological and computational advances in genomics and interactomics have made it possible to identify how disease mutations perturb protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks within human cells. Here, we show that disease-associated germline variants are significantly enriched in sequences encoding PPI interfaces compared to variants identified in healthy participants from the projects 1000 Genomes and ExAC. Somatic missense mutations are also significantly enriched in PPI interfaces compared to noninterfaces in 10,861 tumor exomes. We computationally identified 470 putative oncoPPIs in a pan-cancer analysis and demonstrate that oncoPPIs are highly correlated with patient survival and drug resistance/sensitivity. Further, we experimentally validate the network effects of 13 oncoPPIs using a systematic binary interaction assay, and also demonstrate the functional consequences of two of these on tumor cell growth. In summary, this human interactome network framework provides a powerful tool for prioritization of alleles with PPI-perturbing mutations to inform pathobiological mechanism- and genotype-based therapeutic discovery.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

NGPINT V3: a containerized orchestration Python software for discovery of next-generation protein–protein interactions

Abstract Summary Batch yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays, leveraged with next-generation sequencing, have afforded successful innovations for the analysis of protein–protein interactions. NGPINT is a Conda-based software designed to process the millions of raw sequencing reads resulting from Y2H–next-generation interaction screens. Over time, increasing compatibility and dependency issues have prevented clean NGPINT installation and operation. A system-wide update was essential to continue effective use with its companion software, Y2H-SCORES. We present NGPINT V3, a containerized implementation built with both Singularity and Docker, allowing accessibility across virtually any operating system and computing environment. Availability and implementation This update includes streamlined dependencies and container images hosted on Sylabs (https://cloud.sylabs.io/library/schuyler/ngpint/ngpint) and Dockerhub (https://hub.docker.com/r/schuylerds/ngpint), facilitating easier adoption and integration into high-throughput and cloud-computing workflows. Full instructions and software can be also found in the GitHub repository https://github.com/Wiselab2/NGPINT_V3 and Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15256036.

Biochemistry & Molecular Biology↗

Inhibitor-3 inhibits Protein Phosphatase 1 via a metal binding dynamic protein–protein interaction

To achieve substrate specificity, protein phosphate 1 (PP1) forms holoenzymes with hundreds of regulatory and inhibitory proteins. Inhibitor-3 (I3) is an ancient inhibitor of PP1 with putative roles in PP1 maturation and the regulation of PP1 activity. Here, we show that I3 residues 27–68 are necessary and sufficient for PP1 binding and inhibition. In addition to a canonical RVxF motif, which is shared by nearly all PP1 regulators and inhibitors, and a non-canonical SILK motif, I3 also binds PP1 via multiple basic residues that bind directly in the PP1 acidic substrate binding groove, an interaction that provides a blueprint for how substrates bind this groove for dephosphorylation. Unexpectedly, this interaction positions a CCC (cys-cys-cys) motif to bind directly across the PP1 active site. Using biophysical and inhibition assays, we show that the I3 CCC motif binds and inhibits PP1 in an unexpected dynamic, fuzzy manner, via transient engagement of the PP1 active site metals. Together, these data not only provide fundamental insights into the mechanisms by which IDP protein regulators of PP1 achieve inhibition, but also shows that fuzzy interactions between IDPs and their folded binding partners, in addition to enhancing binding affinity, can also directly regulate enzyme activity.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

PRODeepSyn: predicting anticancer synergistic drug combinations by embedding cell lines with protein–protein interaction network

Abstract Although drug combinations in cancer treatment appear to be a promising therapeutic strategy with respect to monotherapy, it is arduous to discover new synergistic drug combinations due to the combinatorial explosion. Deep learning technology holds immense promise for better prediction of in vitro synergistic drug combinations for certain cell lines. In methods applying such technology, omics data are widely adopted to construct cell line features. However, biological network data are rarely considered yet, which is worthy of in-depth study. In this study, we propose a novel deep learning method, termed PRODeepSyn, for predicting anticancer synergistic drug combinations. By leveraging the Graph Convolutional Network, PRODeepSyn integrates the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network with omics data to construct low-dimensional dense embeddings for cell lines. PRODeepSyn then builds a deep neural network with the Batch Normalization mechanism to predict synergy scores using the cell line embeddings and drug features. PRODeepSyn achieves the lowest root mean square error of 15.08 and the highest Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.75, outperforming two deep learning methods and four machine learning methods. On the classification task, PRODeepSyn achieves an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.90, an area under the precision–recall curve of 0.63 and a Cohen’s Kappa of 0.53. In the ablation study, we find that using the multi-omics data and the integrated PPI network’s information both can improve the prediction results. Additionally, the case study demonstrates the consistency between PRODeepSyn and previous studies.

Wang, Xiaowen↗

Applying Crystallography and 19 F NMR to investigate dynamics and partner protein interactions in a long chain Flavodoxin

Flavodoxin (Fld) is a small FMN containing protein that is involved in single electron transfer. The long‐chain flavodoxin in Rhodopseudomonas palustris bacteria replaces ferredoxin as a low‐potential electron carrier when iron is scarce. Thus it is proposed to interact with the bifurcating electron transfer flavoprotein (ETF) that yields low‐potential electrons. A surface loop on Fld interacts with another of Fld's partner proteins, so we hypothesize that it also mediates Fld's interaction with ETF. To monitor interactions with ETF directly and investigate dynamics in this loop, we are using 19 F NMR in solution. 19 F is hyperresponsive to changes in its chemical environment with a chemical shift range of >300 ppm. To provide a static reference point and assess structural heterogeneity, we are also exploiting X‐ray crystallography. In this study we selectively fluorinated the five tyrosine residues in Fld. We obtained resonance assignments from 19 F spectra of Fld variants in which individual tyrosine residues have been replaced. We obtain well resolved signals for each residue, but the resonances' linewidths indicate dynamics that affects some resonances more than others. Y90 residue displays two resonances demonstrating two different conformations that interconvert slowly on an NMR time scale. Meanwhile the crystal structure solved at 2.1Å resolution reveals two molecules per asymmetric unit providing two perspectives on the details of the structure. The crystal symmetry is monoclinic in contrast to most of the other Flds, which are orthorhombic. Interestingly, the long loop bearing Y121 and Y123 is not well resolved in chain B of the crystal structure, and the NMR line of Y123 is exceptionally broad, both indicating that the loop is dynamic and capable of altering its conformation to accomodate binding to a partner protein. Future directions include monitoring the changes in the 19 F NMR of the Fld when titrated with the partner protein, temperature dependence of the NMR spectrum and relaxation studies to evaluate time scales of motions.

Khan, Sharique↗

Protein–protein interactions between tenascin-R and RPTPζ/phosphacan are critical to maintain the architecture of perineuronal nets

Neural plasticity, the ability to alter the structure and function of neural circuits, varies throughout the age of an individual. The end of the hyperplastic period in the central nervous system coincides with the appearance of honeycomb-like structures called perineuronal nets (PNNs) that surround a subset of neurons. PNNs are a condensed form of neural extracellular matrix that include the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan and extracellular matrix proteins such as aggrecan and tenascin-R (TNR). PNNs are key regulators of developmental neural plasticity and cognitive functions, yet our current understanding of the molecular interactions that help assemble them remains limited. Disruption of Ptprz1, the gene encoding the receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase RPTPζ, altered the appearance of nets from a reticulated structure to puncta on the surface of cortical neuron bodies in adult mice. The structural alterations mirror those found in Tnr -/- mice, and TNR is absent from the net structures that form in dissociated cultures of Ptprz1 -/- cortical neurons. These findings raised the possibility that TNR and RPTPζ cooperate to promote the assembly of PNNs. Here, we show that TNR associates with the RPTPζ ectodomain and provide a structural basis for these interactions. Furthermore, we show that RPTPζ forms an identical complex with tenascin-C, a homolog of TNR that also regulates neural plasticity. Finally, we demonstrate that mutating residues at the RPTPζ–TNR interface impairs the formation of PNNs in dissociated neuronal cultures. Overall, this work sets the stage for analyzing the roles of protein–protein interactions that underpin the formation of nets.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗