Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “prominence eruption”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1990

The role of Magnetic Reconnection in flares and prominence eruptions

Magnetic Reconnection is often invoked as the primary mechanism for driving a flare or a prominence eruption. This paper argues that a catastrophic loss of mechanical equilibrium, rather than reconnection, is probably the primary mechanism for driving these phenomena. However, reconnection is still essential in order for any significant amount of energy to be released. To illustrate this idea, some recent results are presented from an MHD simulation based on a catastrophe mechanism first proposed by Van Tend and Kuperus. In order for this mechanism to be effective, a substantial amount of reconnection must occur within a few Alfven-scale times. Such rapid reconnection is plausible since the loss of mechanical equilibrium can generate flows which drive the reconnection at a rapid rate.

Forbes, T. G.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Magnetic field evolution during prominence eruptions and two-ribbon flares

Simple models for the MHD eruption of a solar prominence are presented in which the prominence is treated as a twisted magnetic flux tube that is being repelled from the solar surface by magnetic pressure forces. Including a background magnetic field allows the prominence to be in equilibrium initially with an inverse polarity and then to erupt due to magnetic nonequilibrium when the background magnetic field is too small or the prominence twist is too great. The electric field at the neutral point below the prominence rapidly increases to a maximum value and then declines. Including the effect of gravity also allows an equilibrium with normal polarity to exist. Finally, an ideal MHD solution is found which incorporates self-consistently a current sheet below the prominence and which implies that a prominence will still erupt and form a current sheet even if no reconnection occurs. When reconnection is allowed it is, therefore, driven by the eruption.

Priest, E. R.↗
NASA NTRS1988

An eruptive prominence and associated cm-mm emission outside the solar limb

Radio maps at 22 and 44 GHz are presented which show the emission before and after the eruption of a quiescent prominence located at the west limb. The observed radiation followng the eruption is not consistent with thermal bremsstrahlung mechanism. It can be interpreted as due to gyrosynchrotron emission of nonthermal electrons. The observations appear to be similar to the microwave radiation observed in post-flare loops. This radiation is due to nonthermal electrons trapped in the closed magnetic structures formed after the prominence eruption.

Zodi, A. M.↗
NASA NTRS2011

3D Reconstruction of a Rotating Erupting Prominence

A bright prominence associated with a coronal mass ejection (CME) was seen erupting from the Sun on 9 April 2008. This prominence was tracked by both the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) EUVI and COR1 telescopes, and was seen to rotate about the line of sight as it erupted; therefore, the event has been nicknamed the "Cartwheel CME." The threads of the prominence in the core of the CME quite clearly indicate the structure of a weakly to moderately twisted flux rope throughout the field of view, up to heliocentric heights of 4 solar radii. Although the STEREO separation was 48 deg, it was possible to match some sharp features in the later part of the eruption as seen in the 304 Angstrom line in EUVI and in the H alpha-sensitive bandpass of COR1 by both STEREO Ahead and Behind. These features could then be traced out in three dimensional space, and reprojected into a view in which the eruption is directed towards the observer. The reconstructed view shows that the alignment of the prominence to the vertical axis rotates as it rises up to a leading-edge height of approximately equals 2.5 solar radii, and then remains approximately constant. The alignment at 2.5 solar radii differs by about 115 deg. from the original filament orientation inferred from H alpha and EUV data, and the height profile of the rotation, obtained here for the first time, shows that two thirds of the total rotation is reached within approximately equals 0.5 solar radii above the photosphere. These features are well reproduced by numerical simulations of an unstable moderately twisted flux rope embedded in external flux with a relatively strong shear field component.

Thompson, W. T.↗
NASA NTRS2011

3D Reconstruction of a Rotating Erupting Prominence

A bright prominence associated with a coronal mass ejection (CME) was seen erupting from the Sun on 9 April 2008. This prominence was tracked by both the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) EUVI and COR1 telescopes, and was seen to rotate about the line of sight a it erupted; therefore, the event has been nicknamed the "Cartwheel CME." The threads of the prominence in the core of the CME quite clearly indicate the structure of a weakly to moderately twisted flux rope throughout the field of view, up to heliocentric heights of 4 solar radii. Although the STEREO separation was 48 deg, it was possible to match some sharp features in the later part of the eruption as seen in the 304 A line in EUVI and in the H-alpha-sensitive bandpass of COR I by both STEREO Ahead and Behind. These features could then be traced out in three-dimensional space, and reprojected into a view in which the eruption is directed toward the observer. The reconstructed view shows that the alignment of the prominence to the vertical axis rotates as it rises up to a leading-edge height of approximately equal to 2.5 solar radii, and then remains approximately constant. The alignment at 2.5 solar radii differs by about 115 deg from the original filament orientation inferred from H-alpha and EUV data, and the height profile of the rotation, obtained here for the first time, shows that two thirds of the total rotation are reached within approximately equal to 0.5 solar radii above the photosphere. These features are well reproduced by numerical simulations of an unstable moderately twisted flux rope embedded in external flux with a relatively strong shear field component.

Thompson, W. T.↗
NASA NTRS2013

Alternating Twist Along an Erupting Prominence

Triangulation measurements using observations from the two Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft, combined with observations from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), are used to characterize the behavior of a prominence involved in two successive coronal mass ejections 6-7 December 2010. The STEREO separation at the time was 171.6 degrees, which was functionally equivalent to a separation of 8.4 degrees, and thus very favorable for feature co-identification above the limb. The first eruption at approximately 14:16 UT (Universal Time) on 6 December of the middle branch of the prominence starts off a series of magnetic reconfigurations in the right branch, which itself erupts at approximately 2:06 UT the next day, about 12 hours after the first eruption. The cool prominence material seen at 304 angstroms drains back down to the surface, but a flux-rope-like magnetic structure is seen to erupt in both 195 angstroms by the STEREO/Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUVI), and in white light by the STEREO/COR1 (Coronagraph 1) inner coronagraph. In between the two eruptions, two different signs of helicity are seen in the measured twist of the right branch. This is interpreted to be caused by the overall prominence channel being composed of different segments with alternating helicity signs. The erupting parts on 6 and 7 December both show positive twist, but negative twist is seen in between these positive sections. Negative twist is consistent with the dextral chirality signs seen in the He II line at 304 angstroms prior to both eruptions. However, during the period between the eruptions, a region of positive twist grows and replaces the region of negative twist, and finally erupts. We interpret these observations in the light of models that predict that helicity cancellation can be an important factor in the triggering of flares and coronal mass ejections.

Prominences↗
NASA NTRS1986

The extreme-ultraviolet spectrum (300-630 A) of an erupting prominence observed from Skylab

The Skylab 300-630 A images of the January 17, 1974 eruptive spray event imply that the energy input to the arch was maintained during the first 22 min, accompanied by upward motion and heating. From the spectrum obtained, thermal properties are derived for the brightest portion of the nearly straightened leg of the arch. Wavelengths, identifications and intensities are presented for about 90 emission lines formed at temperatures between 100,000 and 1,000,000 K. The emission measure plot obtained is similar to those plots observed for the quiet sun.

Widing, K. G.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Dynamics of the eruptive prominence of 6 May 1980 and its relationship to the coronal transient

The active prominence of the 6 May 1980 has been observed between 5.23 and 10.22 UT with the Ultraviolet Spectrometer and Polarimeter (UVSP) on board the Solar Maximum Mission (SMM) satellite. Intensities of 1548 A line of CIV and dopplershifts have been derived. A motion of the magnetic tube maintaining the prominence material is noted. This motion is followed by a coronal transient observed with the Coronagraph and Polarimeter (C/P) between 11 and 13 UT. It is suggested that the event is related to a MHD wave induced by a flare occurring behind the solar disk, and a MHD modeling of the perturbation is proposed.

Mein, N.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Formation and eruption of solar prominences

A model for the magnetic field associated with solar prominences is considered. It is shown that flux cancellation at the neutral line of a sheared magnetic arcade leads to the formation of helical field lines which are capable, in principle, of supporting prominence plasma. A numerical method for the computation of force-free, canceling magnetic structures is presented. Starting from an initial potential field we prescribe the motions of magnetic footpoints at the photosphere, with reconnection occurring only at the neutral line. As more and more flux cancels, magnetic flux is transferred from the arcade field to the helical field. Results for a particular model of the photospheric motions are presented. The magnetic structure is found to be stable: the arcade field keeps the helical field tied down at the photosphere. The axis of the helical field moves to larger and larger height, suggestive of prominence eruption. These results suggest that prominence eruptions may be trigered by flux cancellation.

Van Ballegooijen, A. A.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Coronal mass-ejections-kinematics of the 19 December 1973 event

A detailed description of the observed kinematics of the coronal disturbance of December 19, 1973, is presented along with inferences about the temperatures, densities, magnetic fields, and electric currents within the event. This disturbance consisted of the eruption of a previously quiescent prominence, an associated ejection of coronal material, and the destruction of a large coronal streamer. Observations of the prominence and the corona with a scanning spectroheliometer and a white-light coronagraph aboard Skylab before, during, and after the prominence eruption are discussed, and the temperature and density in the eruptive prominence are traced as the prominence rose to a height of 3 solar radii over 7 hr. The results obtained are shown to reinforce previous arguments that the material comprising the bulk of the mass ejected from the corona in transient events arises from the low corona rather than from the eruptive prominence, which may accompany the coronal mass ejection.

Schmahl, E.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Dynamics of quiescent prominences; Proceedings of the 117th Colloquium of IAU, Hvar, Yugoslavia, Sept. 25-29, 1989

Topics discussed include formation of a filament around a magnetic region, evolution of fine structures in a filament, the spatial distribution of prominence threads, high resolution analysis of quiescent prominences at NSO/Sacramento Peak Observatory, small-scale Doppler velocities in a quiescent prominence, Doppler velocity oscillations in quiescent prominences, oscillatory relaxation of an eruptive prominence, and matter flow velocities in an active region emission loop observed in H-alpha. Attention is also given to an automated procedure for measurement of prominence transverse velocities, the nonlinear evolution of magnetized filaments, thermal equilibrium of coronal loops and prominence formation, thermal instability in planar coronal strucutres, radiative transfer in cylindrical prominence threads, numerical simulation of a catastrophe model for prominence eruptions, and the law of evolution and destruction of solar prominences.

Ruzdjak, Vladimir↗
NASA NTRS1993

Multiple wavelength observations of an off-limb eruptive solar flare

The eruptive prominence and limb flare which occurred at 1454 UT on June 20, 1989 is described and analyzed. This event was observed by many different instruments providing an unusual amount and variety of data: images at 1.4 GHz, 37 GHz, and H-alpha, and spectra in hard X-ray, soft X-ray, and radio frequencies. This array of data makes it possible to explore the relationships between flare and eruptive prominence emissions at different wavelengths. VLA images at 1.4 GHz show changing sources in a set of high (about 10 exp 10 cm) coronal loops associated with the erupting prominence. We use a full gyrosynchrotron code to model a 1.4 GHz source early in the flare as a large coronal loop. The model results lead us to conclude that the initial acceleration occurs in smaller, denser loops which also produce the flare's hard X-ray emission. We also present evidence that a source at 1.4 GHz later in the event is due to second-harmonic plasma emission. This source is adjacent to a leg of the prominence and comes from a dense column of material in the magnetic structure supporting the prominence.

Kugera, T. A.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Coronal mass ejection recurrence studies indicating global activity and local suppression

The distribution of time intervals between successive coronal mass ejection events observed from the SMM and Skylab coronagraphs has been analyzed. Histograms of such recurrence times show that mass ejections tend to cluster in periods of activity. Evidence is found for simultaneous activity on a global scale. A second result is that, statistically, limb regions within + or - 59 deg position angle of a mass ejection show a marked absence of subsequent observable ejections for approximately 10 h. Flares of importance greater than or equal to 1 show no such deficit; however, large disparitons brusques tend similarly to be suppressed, for 24 h. This result, together with the closer association of mass ejection with eruptive prominences rather than with flares and the realization that eruptive prominences are rarely if ever seen without an accompanying mass ejection, obviates suggestions that magnetohydrodynamic conditions in the outflow following the earlier mass ejection hide subsequent coronal events.

Wagner, W. J.↗
NASA NTRS1979

The association of coronal mass ejection transients with other forms of solar activity

Coronal mass-ejection transients observed with the white-light coronagraph on Skylab are found to be associated with several other forms of solar activity. There is a strong correlation between such mass-ejection transients and chromospheric H-alpha activity, with three-quarters of the transients apparently originating in or near active regions. It is inferred that 40% of transients are associated with flares, 50% are associated with eruptive prominences solely (without flares), and more than 70% are associated with eruptive prominences or filament disappearances (with or without flares). Nine of ten flares that displayed apparent mass ejections of H-alpha-emitting material from the flare site could be associated with coronal transients. Within each class of activity, the more energetic events are more likely to be associated with an observable mass ejection.

Munro, R. H.↗