Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “plug nozzles”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Study of a Plug Nozzle for Supersonic Aircraft Concepts

A plug nozzle with a cylindrical cowl is studied. The geometry is adopted following commercial supersonic aircraft concepts considered in an ongoing NASA program. For the given cowl, the plug geometry is varied that includes shapes developed by a numerical optimization study as well as porous plugs. Experimental data on noise and flow field are discussed with an eye for minimum noise at low nozzle pressure ratios (NPR2) representing landing and takeoff (LTO) conditions. NPR up to about 4.7 is covered in the experiments. Limited thrust data with accompanying numerical simulation results are also presented. Results show that a plug designed for optimum thrust at cruise is noisier while a plug designed for optimum thrust at LTO has less noise, throughout the NPR range covered. The results also show that a plug nozzle can generate transonic tones and excess broadband noise (EBBN) at lower NPR, apart from well-known screech tones and broadband shock associated noise (BBSN) at higher NPR. A long porous plug is found to effectively suppress all these aberrant noise components while suffering less than 1% loss in thrust coefficient.

Jets↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Study of a Plug Nozzle for Supersonic Aircraft Concepts

A plug nozzle with a cylindrical cowl is studied. The geometry is adopted following commercial supersonic aircraft concepts considered in an ongoing NASA program. For the given cowl, the plug geometry is varied that includes shapes developed by a numerical optimization study as well as porous plugs. Experimental data on noise and flow field are discussed with an eye for minimum noise at low nozzle pressure ratios (NPR2) representing landing and takeoff (LTO) conditions. NPR up to about 4.7 is covered in the experiments. Limited thrust data with accompanying numerical simulation results are also presented. Results show that a plug designed for optimum thrust at cruise is noisier while a plug designed for optimum thrust at LTO has less noise, throughout the NPR range covered. The results also show that a plug nozzle can generate transonic tones and excess broadband noise (EBBN) at lower NPR, apart from well-known screech tones and broadband shock associated noise (BBSN) at higher NPR. A long porous plug is found to effectively suppress all these aberrant noise components while suffering less than 1% loss in thrust coefficient.

Jets↗
NASA NTRS1985

Aeroacoustics of contoured and solid/porous conical plug-nozzle supersonic jet flows

The acoustic far field, the shock-associated noise and characteristics of the repetitive shock structure of supersonic jet flows issuing from a contoured plug-nozzle and uncontoured plug-nozzle having a short conical plug of either a solid or a combination of solid/porous surface with pointed termination operated at a range of supercritical pressure are reported. The contoured and the uncontoured plug-nozzles had the same throat area and the same annular-radius ratio.

Dosanjh, D. S.↗
NASA NTRS1996

Computational Noise Study of a Supersonic Short Conical Plug-Nozzle Jet

A computational jet noise study of a short conical plug-nozzle (CPN) is presented. The CPN has an exit diameter of 45 mm and the geometrical configuration closely approximates that of an ideal contoured plug-nozzle having shockless flow at pressure ratio xi(sub d) = 3.62. The gasdynamics of the jet flows have been predicted using the CFD code, NPARC with k-epsilon turbulence model; these data are then used for noise computations based on the modified GE/MGB code. The study covers a range of pressure ratio, 2.0 less than or equal to xi less than or equal to 5.0. The agreement of the computational results with the available experimental data is favorable. The results indicate consistent noise reduction effectiveness of the CPN as compared to equivalent convergent, convergent-divergent and ideal contoured plug nozzles at all pressure ratios. At design pressure ratio, codes predict noise levels within 4.0 dB of the measurements; and at off-design pressure ratios, in general, within 5.0 dB except at very high frequencies when deviations up to 10 dB are noted. The shock formation mechanism in the CPN jet is noted to be basically different from those in the convergent and CD nozzle jets.

Das, Indu S.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Investigation of Physical Mechanisms for Jet Noise Reduction by Plug Nozzle Porosity

This paper presents the results of a computational study on porous-plug nozzles for their eventual application in reducing takeoff noise levels for supersonic civil transport. The study explores a wide range of porous-plug geometries, encompassing variations in hole size, plug length and porosity. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses are employed in concert with an advanced automated mesh refinement (AMR) scheme, Sketch-to-Solution (S2S), to investigate porous plug nozzle design strategies that may diminish shock strength, broad-band shock noise (BBSN), flow separation, and other undesirable characteristics associated with high takeoff noise levels. A selected subset of the porous-plug nozzles that were analyzed computationally were manufactured at subscale using stereolithography 3D printing. These nozzles were tested experimentally, obtaining far-field noise spectral data and schlieren flow visualization pictures. Detailed comparisons between CFD predictions and experimental results were conducted. These comparisons focus on gaining a better understanding of the underlying physical mechanisms responsible for noise reduction with the porous plugs relative to corresponding solid plugs.

computational fluid dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Investigation of Physical Mechanisms for Jet Noise Reduction by Plug Nozzle Porosity

This paper presents the results of a computational study on porous-plug nozzles for their eventual application in reducing takeoff noise levels for supersonic civil transport. The study explores a wide range of porous-plug geometries, encompassing variations in hole size, plug length and porosity. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses are employed in concert with an advanced automated mesh refinement (AMR) scheme, Sketch-to-Solution (S2S), to investigate porous plug nozzle design strategies that may diminish shock strength, broad-band shock noise (BBSN), flow separation, and other undesirable characteristics associated with high takeoff noise levels. A selected subset of the porous-plug nozzles that were analyzed computationally were manufactured at subscale using stereolithography 3D printing. These nozzles were tested experimentally, obtaining far-field noise spectral data and schlieren flow visualization pictures. Detailed comparisons between CFD predictions and experimental results were conducted. These comparisons focus on gaining a better understanding of the underlying physical mechanisms responsible for noise reduction with the porous plugs relative to corresponding solid plugs.

Nozzles↗
NASA NTRS1974

Thrust performance of isolated plug nozzles with two types of 40-spoke noise suppressor at Mach numbers from 0 to 0.45

Plug nozzles with two types of 40-spoke noise suppressor were tested at free-stream Mach numbers from 0 to 0.45 and over a range of nozzle pressure ratios from 1.5 to 4.0. In additon, an unsuppressed plug nozzle and a Supersonic Tunnel Association nozzle were also tested to provide baseline levels of thrust performance. The unsuppressed plug nozzle had an efficiency of 98 percent at an assumed takeoff pressure ratio of 3.0 and at Mach 0.36. At the same condition the suppressor nozzles had efficiencies of approximately 83.5 percent.

Harrington, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS2023

Flow, Noise and Thrust of Supersonic Plug Nozzles

Nozzles with internal mixers and external plugs are candidates for supersonic aircraft concepts. A fundamental experimental investigation is being conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) to assess the optimum performance of external plugs. The focus is on noise reduction potential during landing and takeoff (LTO) operation of the aircraft while maintaining optimum thrust performance. Earlier results on flow field and noise of plug nozzles were presented in the 2022 AIAA Aeroacoustics Meeting [1]; see also [2] for a review of the plug nozzle literature.

Jets↗
NASA NTRS1981

Acoustic and aerodynamic performance investigation of inverted velocity profile coannular plug nozzles

The results of model scale parametric static and wind tunnel aerodynamic performance tests on unsuppressed coannular plug nozzle configurations with inverted velocity profile are discussed. The nozzle configurations are high-radius-ratio coannular plug nozzles applicable to dual-stream exhaust systems typical of a variable cycle engine for Advanced Supersonic Transport application. In all, seven acoustic models and eight aerodynamic performance models were tested. The nozzle geometric variables included outer stream radius ratio, inner stream to outer stream ratio, and inner stream plug shape. When compared to a conical nozzle at the same specific thrust, the results of the static acoustic tests with the coannular nozzles showed noise reductions of up to 7 PNdB. Extensive data analysis showed that the overall acoustic results can be well correlated using the mixed stream velocity and the mixed stream density. Results also showed that suppression levels are geometry and flow regulation dependent with the outer stream radius ratio, inner stream-to-outer stream velocity ratio and inner stream velocity ratio and inner stream plug shape, as the primary suppression parameters. In addition, high-radius ratio coannular plug nozzles were found to yield shock associated noise level reductions relative to a conical nozzle. The wind tunnel aerodynamic tests showed that static and simulated flight thrust coefficient at typical takeoff conditions are quite good - up to 0.98 at static conditions and 0.974 at a takeoff Mach number of 0.36. At low inner stream flow conditions significant thrust loss was observed. Using an inner stream conical plug resulted in 1% to 2% higher performance levels than nozzle geometries using a bent inner plug.

Knott, P. R.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Short conical solid/perforated plug-nozzle as supersonic jet noise suppressor

Experimental studies of the acoustic far field, and the nature of the repetitive shock structure in cold jet flows from an externally expanded plug-nozzle having a short conical plug with a pointed termination, operated in a range of supercritical pressure ratios of 2.0 to 4.5, are reported. The overall sound pressure levels of a short solid conical plug-nozzle (CPN) are found to be within 3 dB of those of the baseline noise levels of a minimum length contoured plug-nozzle operated at the same pressure ratio and having the same annular throat area. As compared to an equivalent convergent nozzle, the noise reductions achieved through the use of a short solid CPN are of the order of 5 dB.

Das, I. S.↗
NASA NTRS1956

Effects of external stream flow and afterbody variations on the performance of a plug nozzle

The off-design operation of an isentropic plug nozzle designed for a jet pressure ratio of 15 was investigated experimentally at subsonic Mach numbers up to 0.9 and jet pressure ratios up to 5. When installed in a cylindrical nacelle with a sharp turn at the nozzle lip, the interaction of the jet and the external stream produced low pressures on the base formed by the high lip angle. These low pressures increased the nacelle drag and caused an overexpansion of the jet, which resulted in lower pressures on the plug and, hence, reduced thrust. With a boattail ahead of the plug nozzle, the base pressures were increased and the jet overexpansion significantly reduced.

Salmi, R J↗
NASA NTRS2013

Alternate Methods in Refining the SLS Nozzle Plug Loads

Numerical analysis has shown that the SLS nozzle environmental barrier (nozzle plug) design is inadequate for the prelaunch condition, which consists of two dominant loads: 1) the main engines startup pressure and 2) an environmentally induced pressure. Efforts to reduce load conservatisms included a dynamic analysis which showed a 31% higher safety factor compared to the standard static analysis. The environmental load is typically approached with a deterministic method using the worst possible combinations of pressures and temperatures. An alternate probabilistic approach, utilizing the distributions of pressures and temperatures, resulted in a 54% reduction in the environmental pressure load. A Monte Carlo simulation of environmental load that used five years of historical pressure and temperature data supported the results of the probabilistic analysis, indicating the probabilistic load is reflective of a 3-sigma condition (1 in 370 probability). Utilizing the probabilistic load analysis eliminated excessive conservatisms and will prevent a future overdesign of the nozzle plug. Employing a similar probabilistic approach to other design and analysis activities can result in realistic yet adequately conservative solutions.

Burbank, Scott↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimization of Plug Nozzles Using CFD Informed Design Space Querying

This paper presents an axisymmetric CFD approach based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) calculations for the shape optimization of plug nozzle contours for both supersonic cruise and landing/takeoff (LTO) conditions. Three key external plug design parameters were defined as independent variables in the optimization scheme, while nozzle performance was evaluated using thrust coefficient (Cfg) and discharge coefficient (Cd) as the primary dependent variables. By varying these parameters, a wide range of axisymmetric conic section plug profiles can be achieved, simplifying the problem. The paper also discusses the supersonic plug nozzle optimization approach, design space seeding, meshing, and CFD simulations for the optimization process. The results demonstrate that the approach is effective in exploring the parameter space and reducing computational expenses, making it a viable option for optimizing nozzle plug contours. Using this optimization toolchain, the study yielded preliminary designs for LTO, cruise, and LTO-cruise balanced plug nozzles.

nozzles↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimization of Plug Nozzles Using CFD Informed Design Space Querying

This paper presents an axisymmetric CFD approach based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) calculations for the shape optimization of plug nozzle contours for both supersonic cruise and landing/takeoff (LTO) conditions. Three key external plug design parameters were defined as independent variables in the optimization scheme, while nozzle performance was evaluated using thrust coefficient (Cfg) and discharge coefficient (Cd) as the primary dependent variables. By varying these parameters, a wide range of axisymmetric conic section plug profiles can be achieved, simplifying the problem. The paper also discusses the supersonic plug nozzle optimization approach, design space seeding, meshing, and CFD simulations for the optimization process. The results demonstrate that the approach is effective in exploring the parameter space and reducing computational expenses, making it a viable option for optimizing nozzle plug contours. Using this optimization toolchain, the study yielded preliminary designs for LTO, cruise, and LTO-cruise balanced plug nozzles.

CFD↗
NASA NTRS1975

Thrust performance of isolated 36-chute suppressor plug nozzles with and without ejectors at Mach numbers from 0 to 0.45

Plug nozzles with chute-type noise suppressors were tested with and without ejector shrouds at free-stream Mach numbers from 0 to 0.45 and over a range of nozzle pressure ratios from 2 to 4. A 36-chute suppressor nozzle with an ejector had an efficiency of 94.6 percent at an assumed takeoff pressure ratio of 3.0 and a Mach number of 0.36. This represents only a 3.4 percent performance penalty when compared with the 98 percent efficiency obtained with a previously tested unsuppressed plug nozzle.

Harrington, D. E.↗