Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “non-dimensional numbers”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

20 records · Page 2

On the hot surface ignition of a wall-stagnating spray flame

The ignition of fuel sprays due to interaction with hot surfaces is an important phenomenon in the safety analysis of many engineering systems. We perform a parametric study of the hot surface ignition (HSI) of a fuel spray approaching a heated surface caused by the accidental leakage of a fuel line. Here, to this end, we employ a one-dimensional Eulerian-Eulerian formulation with a non-equilibrium evaporation model and a realistic chemical mechanism to describe $n$-dodecane fuel chemistry. We first describe and analyze the phenomenology of the unsteady processes leading to ignition using non-dimensionalized quantities. Through consideration of the temporal development of the most reactive mixture, we demonstrate that ignition occurs at a fuel-lean composition in a premixed region near the hot surface. Using non-dimensional parameters identified from the governing equations, we perform a parametric study of the time, location and local mixture composition at ignition and determine the ignition limits. We then identify the most important parametric sensitivities for physical analysis using a data-driven classification method. Our analysis demonstrates a contraction of the ignition limits with increased Stokes number and a regime of parametric insensitivity of igniting mixture composition. We also show that at high Damköhler numbers, the ignition location conforms to the parametric behavior of the thermal boundary layer, whereas at low Damköhler numbers approaching the ignition limit it reaches a near-unity value of the quenching Peclet number. We then compare the demonstrated parametric dependencies to the results of the quasi-steady asymptotic ignition literature, showing that our results are consistent with those obtained analytically within the limitations imposed by the simplified formulation of the latter.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Machine Learning for Improving Surface-Layer-Flux Estimates

Abstract Flows in the atmospheric boundary layer are turbulent, characterized by a large Reynolds number, the existence of a roughness sublayer and the absence of a well-defined viscous layer. Exchanges with the surface are therefore dominated by turbulent fluxes. In numerical models for atmospheric flows, turbulent fluxes must be specified at the surface; however, surface fluxes are not known a priori and therefore must be parametrized. Atmospheric flow models, including global circulation, limited area models, and large-eddy simulation, employ Monin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) to parametrize surface fluxes. The MOST approach is a semi-empirical formulation that accounts for atmospheric stability effects through universal stability functions. The stability functions are determined based on limited observations using simple regression as a function of the non-dimensional stability parameter representing a ratio of distance from the surface and the Obukhov length scale (Obukhov in Trudy Inst Theor Geofiz AN SSSR 1:95–115, 1946), $$z/L$$ z / L . However, simple regression cannot capture the relationship between governing parameters and surface-layer structure under the wide range of conditions to which MOST is commonly applied. We therefore develop, train, and test two machine-learning models, an artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF), to estimate surface fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, and moisture based on surface and near-surface observations. To train and test these machine-learning algorithms, we use several years of observations from the Cabauw mast in the Netherlands and from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Field Research Division tower in Idaho. The RF and ANN models outperform MOST. Even when we train the RF and ANN on one set of data and apply them to the second set, they provide more accurate estimates of all of the fluxes compared to MOST. Estimates of sensible heat and moisture fluxes are significantly improved, and model interpretability techniques highlight the logical physical relationships we expect in surface-layer processes.

Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences↗