SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “methanogenesis”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Rainforest-to-pasture conversion stimulates soil methanogenesis across the Brazilian Amazon
The Amazon rainforest is a biodiversity hotspot and large terrestrial carbon sink threatened by agricultural conversion. Rainforest-to-pasture conversion stimulates the release of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. The biotic methane cycle is driven by microorganisms; therefore, this study focused on active methane-cycling microorganisms and their functions across land-use types. We collected intact soil cores from three land use types (primary rainforest, pasture, and secondary rainforest) of two geographically distinct areas of the Brazilian Amazon (Santarém, Pará and Ariquemes, Rondônia) and performed DNA stable-isotope probing coupled with metagenomics to identify the active methanotrophs and methanogens. At both locations, we observed a significant change in the composition of the isotope-labeled methane-cycling microbial community across land use types, specifically an increase in the abundance and diversity of active methanogens in pastures. We conclude that a significant increase in the abundance and activity of methanogens in pasture soils could drive increased soil methane emissions. Furthermore, we found that secondary rainforests had decreased methanogenic activity similar to primary rainforests, and thus a potential to recover as methane sinks, making it conceivable for forest restoration to offset greenhouse gas emissions in the tropics. These findings are critical for informing land management practices and global tropical rainforest conservation.
Solar-driven methanogenesis with ultrahigh selectivity by turning down H[subscript 2] production at
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Asgard archaea modulate potential methanogenesis substrates in wetland soil
The roles of Asgard archaea in eukaryogenesis and marine biogeochemical cycles are well studied, yet their contributions in soil ecosystems remain unknown. Of particular interest are Asgard archaeal contributions to methane cycling in wetland soils. To investigate this, we reconstructed two complete genomes for soil-associated Atabeyarchaeia, a new Asgard lineage, and a complete genome of Freyarchaeia, and predicted their metabolism in situ. Metatranscriptomics reveals expression of genes for [NiFe]-hydrogenases, pyruvate oxidation and carbon fixation via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway. Also expressed are genes encoding enzymes for amino acid metabolism, anaerobic aldehyde oxidation, hydrogen peroxide detoxification and carbohydrate breakdown to acetate and formate. Overall, soil-associated Asgard archaea are predicted to include non-methanogenic acetogens, highlighting their potential role in carbon cycling in terrestrial environments.
Methyl-reducing methanogenesis by a thermophilic culture of Korarchaeia
Not provided.
Genomes to ecosystem function: Targeting critical knowledge gaps in methanogenesis and translation to updated global biogeochemical models
Natural freshwater temperate wetland systems currently represent the largest natural source of atmospheric methane, but are relatively understudied using systems biology tools (e.g. meta-omics) compared to other high producing methane systems (e.g. peat, tropical, or reconstructed wetlands). Using field investigations at the NOAA operated sentinel site on Lake Erie, methane producing activities and responses to geochemical conditions will be determined along seasonal and spatial gradients (Objective 1). Here, a combination of high-throughput activity and gas measurements, combined with high-resolution systems biology and analytical methods, will provide in depth knowledge of the microbiological, chemical, and physical constraints on methane production in wetlands. Using laboratory microcosms, the formation of anoxic microsites and their capacity to facilitate methane production in wetland soils will be simulated (Objective 2). This objective will validate the findings from the field investigations, offering a more controlled environment for teasing out the role of different yet interrelated variables. Lastly, these field and laboratory data will be used for multi-scale, process-level evaluation of an ecosystem biogeochemical model that accommodates these newly identified processes and parameterizes representation of these processes along relevant environmental gradients (Objective 3).This research will identify multiple interacting geochemical, ecological, and metabolic constraints that are poorly understood, oversimplified, or missing in global biogeochemical methane models. This proposal targets the role of oxygen limitation on methane processes in soil domains, to improve reactive transport models of microbial carbon cycling across terrestrial-aquatic soils and generate data on nutrient cycling activities in Great Lake wetlands. This information could provide new insights into the microbial controllers of Lake Erie eutrophication.
Methanosarcina acetivorans: A Model for Mechanistic Understanding of Aceticlastic and Reverse Methanogenesis
Not Available
Biological methanogenesis and the CO2 greenhouse effect
It is well established that plants tend to increase net photosynthesis under increased carbon dioxide. It is also well established that a large fraction of atmospheric methane is produced by microbial metabolism of organic sediments in paddies and freshwater wetlands, where a major source of organic debris is local plant growth. As CO2 increases, it may lead to increased methane production and a resulting enhancement of the expected greenhouse warming. A rough estimate of the present rate of this biologically mediated feedback on the climate system indicates that it might account for as much as 30 percent of the observed methane increase and speed up the greenhouse forcing by as much as 15 percent.
Root-Associated Methane Oxidation and Methanogenesis: Key Determinants of Wetland Methane Emissions
During the award period, we have assessed the extent and controls of methane oxidation in north temperate wetlands. It is evident that wetlands have been a major global source of atmospheric methane in the past, and are so at present. It is also evident that microbial methane oxidation consumes a variable fraction of total wetland methane production, perhaps 10%-90%. Methane oxidation is thus a potentially important control of wetland methane emission. Our efforts have been designed to determine the extent of the process, its controls, and possible relationships to changes that might be expected in wetlands as a consequence of anthropogenic or climate-related disturbances. Current work, has emphasized controls of methane oxidation associated with rooted aquatic plants. As for the sediment-water interface, we have observed that oxygen availability is a primary limiting factor. Our conclusion is based on several different lines of evidence obtained from in vitro and in situ analyses. First, we have measured the kinetics of methane oxidation by intact plant roots harboring methane-oxidizing bacteria, as well as the kinetics of the methanotrophs themselves. Values for the half-saturation constant (apparent K(sub m)) are approximately 5 microns. These values are roughly equivalent to, or much less than porewater methane concentrations, indicating that uptake is likely saturated with respect to methane, and that some other parameter must limit activity. Methane concentrations in the lacunar spaces at the base of plant stems are also comparable to the half-saturation constants (when expressed as equivalent dissolved concentrations), providing further support for limitation of uptake by parameters other than methane.
Methanogenesis, Mesospheric Clouds, and Global Habitability
Hyperthermophilic methanogens can exist in a deep hot biosphere up to 110 C, or 10 km deep. Methane (CH4) itself is thermodynamically stable to depths of 300 km. Geologic (microbial plus abiogenic thermal) methane is transported upward, attested to by its association with helium, to form petroleum pools. Near or at the surface, geologic CH4 mixes with other natural and with anthropogenic CH4 yielding annual emissions into the atmosphere of 500 Tg, of which 200 Tg are natural and 300 Tg are man-made. The atmospheric lifetime of CH4, a greenhouse gas 20 times more effective than CO2 in raising global temperatures, is approximately 10 years. It is removed from the atmosphere mainly by reactions with hydroxyl radical (OH) to form CO2, but also by dry soil and by conversion to H2O in the stratosphere and middle atmosphere. A sudden rise in atmospheric temperatures by 9-12 C some 55 million years ago has been explained by the release in a few thousand years of three trillion tons of CH4 out of 15 trillion tons that had formed beneath the sea floor. What prevented this CH4-induced greenhouse effect from running away? An analog to the CH4-burp of 55 million years ago is the CH4-doubling over the past century which resulted in a increase in upper level H2O from 4.3 ppmv to 6 ppmv. This 30% increase in H2O vapor yielded a tenfold increase in brightness of polar mesospheric clouds because of a strong dependence of the ice particle nucleation rate on the water saturation ratios. Models show that at a given temperature the optical depth of mesospheric clouds scales as [H2O]beta with beta varying between 4 and 8. Radiative transfer tools applied to mesospheric particles suggest that an optical depth of approximately one, or 1000 times the current mesospheric cloud optical depth, would result in tropospheric cooling of about 10 K. Assuming beta=6, a thousandfold increase in optical thickness would require a three-fold increase of H2O, or a 20-fold increase of CH4. At the current rate of anthropogenic emissions this is expected to occur within the next 1000 years. This timescale is also commensurate with what has been assumed for the CH4- burp 55 million years ago.
Carbon isotope effects associated with aceticlastic methanogenesis
The carbon isotope effects associated with synthesis of methane from acetate have been determined for Methanosarcina barkeri 227 and for methanogenic archaea in sediments of Wintergreen Lake, Michigan. At 37 degrees C, the 13C isotope effect for the reaction acetate (methyl carbon) --> methane, as measured in replicate experiments with M. barkeri, was - 21.3% +/- 0.3%. The isotope effect at the carboxyl portion of acetate was essentially equal, indicating participation of both positions in the rate-determining step, as expected for reactions catalyzed by carbon monoxide dehydrogenase. A similar isotope effect, - 19.2% +/- 0.3% was found for this reaction in the natural community (temperature = 20 degrees C). Given these observations, it has been possible to model the flow of carbon to methane within lake sediment communities and to account for carbon isotope compositions of evolving methane. Extension of the model allows interpretation of seasonal fluctuations in 13C contents of methane in other systems.
Interaction and Synergism of Microbial Fuel Cell Bacteria within Methanogenesis
Biological hydrogen production from waste biomass has both terrestrial and Martian advanced life support applications. On earth, biological hydrogen production is being explored as a greenhouse neutral form of clean and efficient energy. In a permanently enclosed space habitat, carbon loop closure is required to reduce mission costs. Plants are grown to revitalize oxygen supply and are consumed by habitat inhabitants. Unharvested portions must then be recycled for reuse in the habitat. Several biological degradation techniques exist, but one process, biophotolysis, can be used to produce hydrogen from inedible plant biomass. This process is two-stage, with one stage using dark fermentation to convert plant wastes into organic acids. The second stage, photofermentation, uses photoheterotrophic purple non-sulfur bacteria with the addition of light to turn the organic acids into hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Such a system can prove useful as a co-generation scheme, providing some of the energy needed to power a larger primary carbon recovery system, such as composting. Since butyrate is expected as one of the major inputs into photofermentation, a characterization study was conducted with the bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides SCJ, a novel photoheterotrophic non-sulfur purple bacteria, to examine hydrogen production performance at 10 mM-100 mM butyrate concentrations. As butyrate levels increased, hydrogen production increased up to 25 mM, and then decreased and ceased by 100 mM. Additionally, lag phase increased with butyrate concentration, possibly indicating some product inhibition. Maximal substrate conversion efficiency was 8.0%; maximal light efficiency was 0.89%; and maximal hydrogen production rate was 7.7 Umol/mg/cdw/hr (173 ul/mg cdw/hr). These values were either consistent or lower than expected from literature.
Biological methane production and accumulation under sulfate-rich conditions at Cape Lookout Bight, NC
Introduction: Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) is hypothesized to occur through reverse hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in marine sediments because sulfate reducers pull hydrogen concentrations so low that reverse hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis is exergonic. If true, hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis can theoretically co-occur with sulfate reduction if the organic matter is so labile that fermenters produce more hydrogen than sulfate reducers can consume, causing hydrogen concentrations to rise. Finding accumulation of biologically-produced methane in sulfate-containing organic-rich sediments would therefore support the theory that AOM occurs through reverse hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis since it would signal the absence of net AOM in the presence of sulfate. Methods: 16S rRNA gene libraries were compared to geochemistry and incubations in high depth-resolution sediment cores collected from organic-rich Cape Lookout Bight, North Carolina. Results: We found that methane began to accumulate while sulfate is still abundant (6–8 mM). Methane-cycling archaea ANME-1, Methanosarciniales, and Methanomicrobiales also increased at these depths. Incubations showed that methane production in the upper 16 cm in sulfate-rich sediments was biotic since it could be inhibited by 2-bromoethanosulfonoic acid (BES). Discussion: We conclude that methanogens mediate biological methane production in these organic-rich sediments at sulfate concentrations that inhibit methanogenesis in sediments with less labile organic matter, and that methane accumulation and growth of methanogens can occur under these conditions as well. Our data supports the theory that H2 concentrations, rather than the cooccurrence of sulfate and methane, control whether methanogenesis or AOM via reverse hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis occurs. We hypothesize that the high amount of labile organic matter at this site prevents AOM, allowing methane accumulation when sulfate is low but still present in mM concentrations
Spatial evidence of cryptic methane cycling and methylotrophic metabolisms along a land–ocean transect in salt marsh sediment
Methylotrophic methanogenesis in the sulfate-rich zone of coastal and marine sediments couples with anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), forming the cryptic methane cycle. This study provides evidence of cryptic methane cycling in the sulfate-rich zone across a land–ocean transect of four stations–two brackish, one marine, and one hypersaline–within the Carpinteria Salt Marsh Reserve (CSMR), southern California, USA. Samples from the top 20 cm of sediment from the transect were analyzed through geochemical and molecular (16S rRNA) techniques, in-vitro methanogenesis incubations, and radiotracer incubations utilizing 35 S-SO 4 , 14 C-mono-methylamine, and 14 C-CH 4 . Sediment methane concentrations were consistently low (3 to 28 µM) at all stations, except for the marine station, where methane increased with depth reaching 665 µM. Methanogenesis from mono-methylamine was detected throughout the sediment at all stations with estimated CH 4 production rates in the sub-nanomolar to nanomolar range per cm 3 sediment and day. 16S rRNA analysis identified methanogenic archaea (Methanosarcinaceae, Methanomassiliicoccales, and Methanonatronarchaeacea) capable of producing methane from methylamines in sediment where methylotrophic methanogenesis was found to be active. Metabolomic analysis of porewater showed mono-methylamine was mostly undetectable (<3 µM) or present in trace amounts (<10 µM) suggesting rapid metabolic turnover. In-vitro methanogenesis incubations of natural sediment showed no linear methane buildup, suggesting a process limiting methane emissions. AOM activity, measured with 14 C-CH 4 , overlapped with methanogenesis from mono-methylamine activity at all stations, with rates ranging from 0.03 to 19.4 nmol cm −3 d −1 . Geochemical porewater analysis showed the CSMR sediments are rich in sulfate and iron. Porewater sulfate concentrations (9–91 mM) were non-limiting across the transect, supporting sulfate reduction activity (1.5–2,506 nmol cm −3 d −1 ). Porewater sulfide and iron (II) profiles indicated that the sediment transitioned from a predominantly iron-reducing environment at the two brackish stations to a predominantly sulfate-reducing environment at the marine and hypersaline stations, which coincided with the presence of phyla (Desulfobacterota) involved in these processes. AOM activity overlapped with sulfate reduction and porewater iron (II) concentrations suggesting that AOM is likely coupled to sulfate and possibly iron reduction at all stations. However, 16S rRNA analysis identified anaerobic methanotrophs (ANME-2) only at the marine and hypersaline stations while putative methanogens were found in sediment across all stations. In one sediment horizon at the marine station, methanogen families (Methanosarcinaceae, Methanosaetaceae, Methanomassiliicoccales, and Methanoregulaceae) and ANME 2a,2b, and 2c groups were found together. Collectively, our data suggest that at the brackish stations methanogens alone may be involved in cryptic methane cycling, while at the marine and hypersaline stations both groups may be involved in the process. Differences in rate constants from incubations with 14 C-labeled methane and mono-methylamine suggest a non-methanogenic process oxidizing mono-methylamine to inorganic carbon, likely mediated by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Understanding the potential competition of sulfate reducers with methanogens for mono-methylamine needs further investigation as it might be another important process responsible for low methane emissions in salt marshes.
Evidence of cryptic methane cycling and non-methanogenic methylamine consumption in the sulfate-reducing zone of sediment in the Santa Barbara Basin, California
The recently discovered cryptic methane cycle in the sulfate-reducing zone of marine and wetland sediment couples methylotrophic methanogenesis to anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM). Here we present evidence of cryptic methane cycling activity within the upper regions of the sulfate-reducing zone, along a depth transect within the Santa Barbara Basin, off the coast of California, USA. The top 0–20 cm of sediment from each station was subjected to geochemical analyses and radiotracer incubations using 35 S–SO$^{2-}_{4}$, 14 C–mono-methylamine, and 14 C–CH 4 to find evidence of cryptic methane cycling. Methane concentrations were consistently low (3 to 16 µM) across the depth transect, despite AOM rates increasing with decreasing water depth (from max 0.05 nmol cm -3 d -1 at the deepest station to max 1.8 nmol cm -3 d -1 at the shallowest station). Porewater sulfate concentrations remained high (23 to 29 mM), despite the detection of sulfate reduction activity from 35 S–SO$^{2-}_{4}$ incubations with rates up to 134 nmol cm -3 d -1 . Metabolomic analysis showed that substrates for methanogenesis (i.e., acetate, methanol and methylamines) were mostly below the detection limit in the porewater, but some samples from the 1–2 cm depth section showed non-quantifiable evidence of these substrates, indicating their rapid turnover. Estimated methanogenesis from mono-methylamine ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 nmol cm -3 d -1 . Discrepancies between the rate constants (k) of methanogenesis (from 14 C–mono-methylamine) and AOM (from either 14 C–mono-methylamine-derived 14 C–CH 4 or from directly injected 14 C–CH 4 ) suggest the activity of a separate, concurrent metabolic process directly metabolizing mono-methylamine to inorganic carbon. We conclude that the results presented in this work show strong evidence of cryptic methane cycling occurring within the top 20 cm of sediment in the Santa Barbara Basin. The rapid cycling of carbon between methanogenesis and methanotropy likely prevents major build-up of methane in the sulfate-reducing zone. Furthermore, our data suggest that methylamine is utilized by both methanogenic archaea capable of methylotrophic methanogenesis and non-methanogenic microbial groups. We hypothesize that sulfate reduction is responsible for the additional methylamine turnover, but further investigation is needed to elucidate this metabolic activity.
Sulfide stress tolerance as a controller of methane production in temperate wetlands
Abstract Wetlands are a major source of methane emissions and contribute to the observed increase in atmospheric methane over the last 20 years. Methane production in wetlands is the final step of carbon decomposition performed by anaerobic archaea. Although hydrogen/carbon dioxide and acetate are the substrates most often attributed to methanogenesis, other substrates—such as methylated compounds—may additionally play important roles in driving methane production in wetland systems. Here we conducted mesocosm experiments combined with genome-resolved metatranscriptomics to investigate the impact of diverse methanogenic substrate amendment on methanogenesis in two high methane-emitting wetlands with distinct geochemistry, termed P7 and P8. Methanol amendment resulted in high methane production at both sites, whereas acetate and formate amendment only stimulated methanogenesis in P7 mesocosms, where aqueous sulfide concentrations were lower. In P7 sediments, formate amendment fueled acetogenic microbes that produced acetate, which was subsequently utilized by acetoclastic methanogens. In contrast to expression profiles in P7 mesocosms, active methylotrophic methanogen genomes from P8 showed increased expression of genes related to membrane remodeling and DNA damage repair, indicative of stress tolerance mechanisms to counter sulfide toxicity. Methylotrophic methanogenesis generates higher free energy yields than acetoclastic methanogenesis, which likely enables allocation of more energy toward stress responses. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature highlighting methylotrophic methanogenesis as an important methane production pathway in wetlands. By using less competitive substrates like methanol that provide greater energy yields, methylotrophic methanogens may invest in physiological strategies that provide competitive advantages across a range of environmental stresses.
Methane generation from low-maturity coals and shale source rocks at low temperatures (80–120 °C) over 14–38 months
This study contributes long-term (14 to 38 months) experimental evidence for geocatalytically mediated methanogenesis in immature to early mature shale and coal source rocks at temperatures from 80 to 120 °C. Borosilicate glass tubes with pre-outgassed coal and shale source rock chips and water were sealed under vacuum, sterilized, heated isothermally, and finally opened in connection with a vacuum line where headspace gases methane (CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) were collected. The possibility of admitting pre-existing CH 4 from closed pores into product gases during heating experiments was evaluated by comparative ball milling of original and heated rock chips, followed by quantitation of released gases with a novel closed-circuit laser-based SARAD RTM2200 gas detector system with sub-µmol sensitivity. The yields of produced CH 4 from individual source rocks were corrected by subtracting the amounts of pre-existing CH 4 from formerly closed pores in original source rocks that had leaked during long-term heating. Different shales and coals express contrasting propensities to geocatalytically generate CH 4 and CO 2 , with CH 4 yields ranging from 0.1 to 5.5 µmol g-1 total organic carbon (TOC). CH 4 yields from two petrographically different samples of Springfield Coal with comparable thermal maturity suggest that liptinite expresses a far higher propensity for methanogenesis, but liberates less CO 2 than vitrinite. Shale from the Second White Specks Formation generated approximately 10 times more CH 4 than New Albany Shale per g of TOC, further suggesting complex controls on CH 4 generation during catalytic methanogenesis. Higher temperature can enhance the activities of catalytic methanogenesis. Here, the extrapolation of laboratory-based reaction rates to natural conditions in organic-rich buried sediments suggests that geocatalytic methanogenesis can be fast enough in some source rocks to generate economically sizeable gas plays from immature to early mature source rocks over geologic time.
Transcriptional response of Methanosarcina acetivorans to repression of the energy-conserving methanophenazine: CoM-CoB heterodisulfide reductase enzyme HdrED
ABSTRACT Methane-producing archaea are key organisms in the anaerobic carbon cycle. These organisms, also called methanogens, grow by converting substrate to methane gas in a process called methanogenesis. Previous research showed that the reduction of the terminal electron acceptor is the rate-limiting step in methanogenesis by Methanosarcina acetivorans . In order to gain insight into how the cells sense and respond to the availability of the terminal electron acceptor, we designed an experiment to deplete cells of the essential terminal oxidase enzyme, HdrED. We found that the depletion of HdrED in vivo results in a higher abundance of transcripts for methyltransferases ( mtaC2, mtaB3, mtaC3 ), coenzyme B biosynthesis, C1 metabolism, and pyrimidine compounds. In most cases, these changes were distinct from transcript abundance changes observed during the transition from exponential growth to stationary phase cultures. These data implicate the methylotrophic methanogenesis regulator MsrC (MA4383) in CoM-S-S-CoB heterodisulfide sensing and indicate cells have a specific mechanism to sense intracellular ratio of CoM-S-S-CoB, coenzyme M, and coenzyme B thiols and further suggest transcripts encoding translation and methanogenesis functions are controlled by feed-forward regulation depending on substrate availability. IMPORTANCE Methanosarcina is an emerging model archaeon and synthetic biology platform for the production of renewable energy and sustainable chemicals to reduce dependence on petroleum. Research into metabolic networks and gene regulation in this organism and other methanogens will inform genome-scale metabolic modeling and microbial function prediction in uncultured or non-model anaerobes and archaea. This study suggests methanogens use unknown mechanisms to efficiently couple methanogenesis to gene regulation via CoM-S-S-CoB and ATP availability.