Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “manufacturing processes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2002

Development of a Launch Vehicle Manufacturing Process

One of the goals of this chapter is to provide sufficient information so that you can develop a manufacturing process for a potential launch vehicle. With the variety of manufacturing options available, you might ask how this can possibly be done in the span of a single chapter. Actually, it will be quite simple because a basic manufacturing process is nothing more than a set of logical steps that are iterated until they produce a desired product. Although these statements seem simple and logical, don't let this simplicity fool you. Manufacturing problems with launch vehicles and their subassemblies have been the primary cause of project failures because the vehicle concept delivered to the manufacturing floor could not be built as designed.

Vickers, John↗
NASA NTRS1996

Cost Models for MMC Manufacturing Processes

Processes for the manufacture of advanced metal matrix composites are rapidly approaching maturity in the research laboratory and there is growing interest in their transition to industrial production. However, research conducted to date has almost exclusively focused on overcoming the technical barriers to producing high-quality material and little attention has been given to the economical feasibility of these laboratory approaches and process cost issues. A quantitative cost modeling (QCM) approach was developed to address these issues. QCM are cost analysis tools based on predictive process models relating process conditions to the attributes of the final product. An important attribute, of the QCM approach is the ability to predict the sensitivity of material production costs to product quality and to quantitatively explore trade-offs between cost and quality. Applications of the cost models allow more efficient direction of future MMC process technology development and a more accurate assessment of MMC market potential. Cost models were developed for two state-of-the art metal matrix composite (MMC) manufacturing processes: tape casting and plasma spray deposition. Quality and Cost models are presented for both processes and the resulting predicted quality-cost curves are presented and discussed.

Elzey, Dana M.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Manufacturing processes for fabricating graphite/PMR 15 polyimide structural elements

Investigations were conducted to obtain commercially available graphite/PMR-15 polyimide prepreg, develop an autoclave manufacturing process, and demonstrate the process by manufacturing structural elements. Controls were established on polymer, prepreg, composite fabrication, and quality assurance, Successful material quality control and processes were demonstrated by fabricating major structural elements including flat laminates, hat sections, I beam sections, honeycomb sandwich structures, and molded graphite reinforced fittings. Successful fabrication of structural elements and simulated section of the space shuttle aft body flap shows that the graphite/PMR-15 polyimide system and the developed processes are ready for further evaluation in flight test hardware.

Sheppard, C. H.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Cost model relationships between textile manufacturing processes and design details for transport fuselage elements

Textile manufacturing processes offer potential cost and weight advantages over traditional composite materials and processes for transport fuselage elements. In the current study, design cost modeling relationships between textile processes and element design details were developed. Such relationships are expected to help future aircraft designers to make timely decisions on the effect of design details and overall configurations on textile fabrication costs. The fundamental advantage of a design cost model is to insure that the element design is cost effective for the intended process. Trade studies on the effects of processing parameters also help to optimize the manufacturing steps for a particular structural element. Two methods of analyzing design detail/process cost relationships developed for the design cost model were pursued in the current study. The first makes use of existing databases and alternative cost modeling methods (e.g. detailed estimating). The second compares design cost model predictions with data collected during the fabrication of seven foot circumferential frames for ATCAS crown test panels. The process used in this case involves 2D dry braiding and resin transfer molding of curved 'J' cross section frame members having design details characteristic of the baseline ATCAS crown design.

Metschan, Stephen L.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development for Aerospace Components

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is a generic term that captures a variety of fabrication techniques. Each of these manufacturing process has unique advantages, applications for use, and challenges. The most common AM processes in use include Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) and Directed Energy Deposition (DED) as well as many solid state processes. While detailed research has been conducted among many of the processes including parameters and material properties, navigating which processes are best to select is difficult as it is based on component requirements. The focus of this presentation is to provide an overview of considerations for each of metal AM process selection for aerospace components based on various attributes. These attributes include geometric considerations, metallurgical characteristics, cost basis, post-processing and maturity of the processes. The data for these trade selections are based on studies that NASA as performed internally and with academic and industry partners. These studies include multiple AM build experiments to evaluate (1) geometric variations and constraints within the processes, (2) alloy characterization and mechanical testing, (3) pathfinder component development and hotfire evaluations, and (4) certification approaches. This presentation summarizes these results and meant to introduce various considerations when designing a metal AM component.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS1978

Manufacturing Process Applications Team (MATeam)

The activities of the Manufacturing Process Applications Team concerning the promotion of joint Industry/Federal Agency/NASA funded research and technology operating plan (RTOP) programs are reported. Direct transfers occurred in cutting tools, laser wire stripping, soldering, and portable X-ray unit technology. TROP program funding approval was obtained for the further development of the cutting tool Sialon and development of an automated nondestructive fracture toughness testing system.

Source record↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Adaptation of Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes for the International Space Station

The In-Space Manufacturing (ISM) project at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, in a partnership with the company, Made in Space, has previously investigated 3D printing of polymer materials on-orbit. In recent years, the project has begun exploring the potential for metal additive manufacturing (AM) on future space missions to reduce logistics and enable point-of-use manufacturing for sparing and repair. This presentation will provide an overview of constraints for demonstrating a manufacturing process on the International Space Station (ISS) as well as trades of available metal AM processes and their potential for in-space use. There are currently two processes in development as payloads for an ISS technology demonstration: wire+arc additive manufacturing (the Vulcan payload from Made in Space, Inc.) and bound metal deposition (the Fabrication Laboratory from Techshot, Inc). An update on both of these systems, results to date, and future development efforts will be presented. Relevant modeling work to evaluate operation of certain aspects of the processes in a microgravity environment will also be summarized.

manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Adaptation of Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes for the International Space Station

The In-Space Manufacturing (ISM) project at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, in a partnership with the company, Made in Space, has previously investigated 3D printing of polymer materials on-orbit. In recent years, the project has begun exploring the potential for metal additive manufacturing (AM) on future space missions to reduce logistics and enable point-of-use manufacturing for sparing and repair. This paper provides an overview of constraints for demonstrating a manufacturing process on the International Space Station (ISS) as well as information on previous trades of available metal AM processes and their potential for in-space use. There are currently two processes in development as payloads for an ISS technology demonstration: wire+arc additive manufacturing (the Vulcan payload from Made in Space, Inc.) and bound metal additive manufacturing (the Fabrication Laboratory from Techshot, Inc). An update on both of these systems, key results to date, and future development efforts will be presented. Relevant modeling work, performed by NASA Ames Research Center, to evaluate operation of certain aspects of the bound metal AM process in a microgravity environment will also be summarized.

in-space manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS1979

Assessment of low-cost manufacturing process sequences

An extensive research and development activity to reduce the cost of manufacturing photovoltaic solar arrays by a factor of approximately one hundred is discussed. Proposed and actual manufacturing process descriptions were compared to manufacturing costs. An overview of this methodology is presented.

Chamberlain, R. G.↗
DOE OSTI2023

System and method to facilitate a search for a hybrid-manufacturing process plan

One embodiment of the present disclosure provides a system and method for facilitating a search for a hybrid-manufacturing process plan for manufacturing an object. During operation, the system can obtain a set of partial order constraints constraining the order in which a set of at least two manufacturing actions, corresponding to addition or removal of predefined regions of space, appear in a process plan. The system can constrain, based on the set of partial order constraints, a search space. The search space can correspond to a tree in which the nodes represent the object's state and the edges represent available actions at each node. The system can then determine a set of optimized process plans represented by orderings of the actions, corresponding to paths on the search tree, that produce the desired final state in a cost-effective manner.

Crawford, Lara S.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Manufacturing Process Development for Adhesively Bonded Joints in Large-Scale Space Structures

In order to take full advantage of the weight savings and performance gains offered by the use of composite materials in large-scale space structures, adhesively bonded joints must be considered. While bonded joint manufacturing at laboratory scale can be straightforward, the same manufacturing processes are not trivial at full scale. Surface preparation becomes particularly challenging (a viable process must yield consistent results over a large application area and be repeatable for multiple application sites), as does the application of heat to cure the doublers and/or bond them to the primary structure (the nature and scale of assembled or partially assembled aerospace structures often necessitates an out-of-oven/out-of-autoclave approach). In this work, bonded joint manufacturing processes are adapted for a full-scale (approximately 30 feet in diameter at the aft end) composite payload adapter at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. By iterating across a range of variables, process parameters for adhesively bonded joints on a large-scale composite structure have been developed. Primary findings are presented with respect to overarching bonded joint manufacturing concepts so as to maximize the applicability of this work to similar material systems and structures.

Guin, William E.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Printing Outside the Box: Additive Manufacturing Processes for Fabrication of Large Aerospace Structures

To achieve NASA's mission of space exploration, innovative manufacturing processes are being applied to the fabrication of propulsion elements. Liquid rocket engines (LREs) are comprised of a thrust chamber and nozzle extension as illustrated in figure 1 for the J2X upper stage engine. Development of the J2X engine, designed for the Ares I launch vehicle, is currently being incorporated on the Space Launch System. A nozzle extension is attached to the combustion chamber to obtain the expansion ratio needed to increase specific impulse. If the nozzle extension could be printed as one piece using free-form additive manufacturing (AM) processes, rather than the current method of forming welded parts, a considerable time savings could be realized. Not only would this provide a more homogenous microstructure than a welded structure, but could also greatly shorten the overall fabrication time. The main objective of this study is to fabricate test specimens using a pulsed arc source and solid wire as shown in figure 2. The mechanical properties of these specimens will be compared with those fabricated using the powder bed, selective laser melting technology at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. As printed components become larger, maintaining a constant temperature during the build process becomes critical. This predictive capability will require modeling of the moving heat source as illustrated in figure 3. Predictive understanding of the heat profile will allow a constant temperature to be maintained as a function of height from substrate while printing complex shapes. In addition, to avoid slumping, this will also allow better control of the microstructural development and hence the properties. Figure 4 shows a preliminary comparison of the mechanical properties obtained.

Babai, Majid↗
NASA NTRS1985

Fracture strength of GaAs solar cells as a function of manufacturing process steps

Fracture of single crystal GaAs substrate during the solar cell processing is an important factor in solar cell yield and cost. Fracture mechanics technique was utilized to evaluate cell cracking characteristics and changes in fracture strength of GaAs solar cells in a present state-of-the-art of manufacturing process for GaAs solar cells from wafer to complete cell of a typical production line. Considerable change in the fracture strength of GaAs solar cells as a function of cell processing was found. The strength data were described by Weibull statistical analysis and can be interpreted with the change of flaw distribution of each of the manufacturing process steps.

Chen, C. P.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development for Propulsion Components

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is a generic term that captures a variety of fabrication processes. Each of these manufacturing process has unique advantages and challenges for use in aerospace propulsion applications. The most commonly used AM processes include Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), Directed Energy Deposition (DED), and solid-state processes as in Cold Spray, Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing, and Additive Friction Stir Deposition. While detailed research has been conducted among many of the AM processes to mature processing parameters and material properties, navigating which processes are best to select is difficult as it is based on specific component requirements. The focus of this presentation is to provide an overview of considerations for each of metal AM process selection for aerospace components based on various key attributes. These key attributes include geometric considerations, metallurgical characteristics, cost basis, post-processing and maturity of the processes. The data for these trade selections are based on studies that NASA as performed internally and with academic and industry partners. These studies include multiple AM build experiments to evaluate (1) geometric variations and constraints within the processes, (2) alloy characterization and mechanical testing, (3) pathfinder component development and hot-fire evaluations, and (4) certification approaches. This presentation summarizes these results and is meant to introduce specific examples which show what to consider when designing a metal AM component for aerospace propulsion applications.

Additive Manufacturing↗
DOE OSTI2022

Impacts of the Additive Manufacturing Process on the Roughness of Engine Scale Vanes and Cooling Channels

Abstract By leveraging the additive manufacturing (AM) platform, development time and costs for turbine component testing can be reduced relative to traditional investment casting. Surface roughness is a key characteristic of the additive manufacturing process that can impact flow, heat transfer, and mechanical integrity of printed components. There are multiple design and build considerations that result in variability in surface roughness, especially when additively fabricating complicated three-dimensional vanes and internal cooling passages. This study characterizes the surface roughness of internal cooling passages, vanes, and flat external surface samples made using additive manufacturing, specifically the direct metal laser sintering process. The samples were manufactured with various wall thicknesses, layer thicknesses, build locations, build directions, and on different AM machines. A combination of computed tomography scanning and optical profilometry was used to evaluate surface roughness levels. The data indicate that the dominant factors in roughness for a given layer thickness are a function of wall thickness, build location, and build direction.

Engineering↗
NASA NTRS2000

Simulating the Composite Propellant Manufacturing Process

There is a strategic interest in understanding how the propellant manufacturing process contributes to military capabilities outside the United States. The paper will discuss how system dynamics (SD) has been applied to rapidly assess the capabilities and vulnerabilities of a specific composite propellant production complex. These facilities produce a commonly used solid propellant with military applications. The authors will explain how an SD model can be configured to match a specific production facility followed by a series of scenarios designed to analyze operational vulnerabilities. By using the simulation model to rapidly analyze operational risks, the analyst gains a better understanding of production complexities. There are several benefits of developing SD models to simulate chemical production. SD is an effective tool for characterizing complex problems, especially the production process where the cascading effect of outages quickly taxes common understanding. By programming expert knowledge into an SD application, these tools are transformed into a knowledge management resource that facilitates rapid learning without requiring years of experience in production operations. It also permits the analyst to rapidly respond to crisis situations and other time-sensitive missions. Most importantly, the quantitative understanding gained from applying the SD model lends itself to strategic analysis and planning.

Williamson, Suzanne↗
NASA NTRS2002

Design and Manufacturing Processes of Long-Life Hollow Cathode Assemblies

The design and manufacturing processes for Hollow Cathode Assemblies (HCA's) that operate over a broad range of emission currents up to 30 Amperes, at low potentials, with lifetimes in excess of 17,500 hours. The processes include contamination control procedures which cover hollow cathode component cleaning procedures, gas feed system designs and specifications, and hollow cathode activation and operating procedures to thereby produce cathode assemblies that have demonstrated stable and repeatable operating conditions, for both the discharge current and voltage. The HCA of this invention provides lifetimes of greater than 10,000 hours, and expected lifetimes of greater than 17,500 hours, whereas the present state-of-the-art is less than 500 hours at emission currents in excess of 1 Ampere. Stable operation is provided over a large range of operating emission currents, up to a 6:1 ratio, and this HCA can emit electron currents of up to 30 Amperes in magnitude to an external anode that simulates the current drawn to a space plasma at voltages of less than 20 Volts.

Michael J Patterson↗