Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “localized high-concentration electrolytes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Demarcating the Impact of Electrolytes on High–Nickel Cathodes and Lithium–Metal Anode

The ever-growing demand for low-cost, high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) makes high-nickel layered oxide cathodes, especially LiNiO 2 (LNO), one of the most appealing candidates. However, poor structural and surface instability that leads to a short cycle life remains a formidable challenge. Herein, a systematic investigation of LNO performance in two different electrolytes (a conventional carbonate-based LP57 electrolyte and an ether-based localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE)) with different charge cut-off voltages is presented. These findings show that the cathode-electrolyte reactivity is the main factor dictating the performance degradation of LNO at high voltages rather than bulk integrity. While LHCE can provide good stability beyond 4.2 V with a robust, uniform solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer on the Li-metal anode, there is no significant difference in cyclability at 4.15 V (96% capacity retention after 200 cycles) for both LP57 and LHCE. From LNO symmetric cells, carbonate-based electrolyte is found to be good for LNO stability while ether-based electrolyte is beneficial toward Li-metal anode. Furthermore, a suitable electrolyte or a low cut-off voltage is necessary to maintain a decent cycle life. Altogether, this work highlights the impact of electrolyte and cut-off voltage on LNO and Li-metal, which can help guide the development of cells based on LNO.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Interfacial pressure improves calendar aging of lithium metal anodes

Lithium (Li) metal is a promising anode because its theoretical specific capacity is approximately ten times larger than graphite. However, Li anodes suffer from long-term capacity fade due to Li stranding (becoming electronically disconnected) and electrolyte decomposition. Applied interfacial pressure has been shown to improve Li anode cycling, likely due to reincorporating stranded or “dead” Li into the anode. Calendar aging can also lead to Li capacity loss due to electrolyte decomposition/Li corrosion and the formation of stranded Li. Some research suggests that calendar aging during cycling results in reversible capacity losses due to Li stranding and reconnection. We here investigate the effect of applied interfacial pressure on Li anode calendar aging during cycling with incorporated rest steps in a localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE) to understand if pressure can mitigate stranded Li formation during rest by manipulating the Li morphology. Pouch cells exhibit more stable cycling and denser Li deposits between 10 kPa and 1,000 kPa of applied pressure compared to no applied pressure. Despite drops in CE during periodic rest cycles, the average cumulative lost capacity and average coulombic efficiency (CE) of cells over 50 cycles show that cells aged with incorporated rest steps perform similarly to cells cycled without added rests. This similar average CE suggests that dead Li is largely responsible for drops in CE during rest rather than irreversible Li corrosion and that the dead Li can be reconnected in subsequent cycling. The addition of a lithiophilic ZnO coating to the Cu working electrode increases the adhesion and coverage of Li deposits at low pressures and improves CE during the first cycle.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Rational Electrolyte Design for Elevated-Temperature and Thermally Stable Lithium-Ion Batteries with Nickel-Rich Cathodes

As the energy density of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) increases, the shortened cycle life and the increased safety hazard of LIBs are drawing increasing concerns. To address such challenges, a series of localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) based on a solvating-solvent mixture of tetramethylene sulfone and trimethyl phosphate and a high flash-point diluent 1H,1H,5H-octafluoropentyl 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl ether were designed. The LHCEs exhibited non-flammability and greatly suppressed heat release at high temperatures, which would potentially improve the safety performance of the LIBs. Moreover, the optimal LHCE achieved capacity retentions of 87.1% and 81.7% in graphite||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cells after 500 cycles at 25 °C and 45 °C, respectively, which were significantly better than the conventional electrolyte, whose capacity retentions were only 75.2% and 38.5% under the same condition. Mechanistic studies revealed that the LHCE not only formed a more robust solid electrolyte interphase, but also exhibited improved anodic stability, compared with the conventional electrolyte. Further, this work sheds light in rational electrolyte design for high energy density LIBs with high battery performance and low safety concerns.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Locally Confined Polysulfide-Reactive Electrolytes for Shuttle-Free Sodium–Sulfur Batteries

Sodium-sulfur batteries promise high-energy-density and sustainable electrochemical energy storage but suffer from uncontrolled polysulfides dissolution and high sodium reactivity. These challenges fundamentally originate from poor electrolyte-electrode compatibility. Current electrolyte research inadequately addresses the trade-off between minimal polysulfides solvation and stabilizing sodium interfaces. Here, we present a locally-confined polysulfide-reactive electrolyte strategy that mediates the polysulfide dissolution dynamics and sodium stability by leveraging an electrophilic solvating species with a localized high-concentration electrolyte. This design enables shuttle-free cell operation by synergistically restricting the global solvating power of the electrolyte through intermolecular interactions and locally scavenging sparingly dissolved polysulfides via electrolyte electrophilicity. The precisely confined surface reaction facilitates a protective cathode-electrolyte interface, realizing a quasi-solid-state sulfur conversion in our liquid ether-based electrolyte, which crucially avoids crossover-induced catastrophic sodium-metal degradation. The proposed electrolyte demonstrates long-term cycling of high-mass-loading sulfur cathodes (> 3 mg S cm −2 with commercial carbon host and 70 wt% sulfur content), which afford 710 mA h g −1 over 400 cycles in coin cells and steady pouch cell operation over 180 cycles. Furthermore, this work establishes a scalable electrolyte design protocol that regulates the reaction chemistry of highly reactive electrodes, offering a pathway toward sustainable renewable energy storage.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Advanced All-Fluorinated Electrolytes for Extended Cycle Life and Stability of Li||SPAN Batteries

Achieving long-term stability and consistent capacity in lithium (Li) metal batteries with sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) cathodes requires precisely engineered electrolytes to optimize interphase formation and redox reversibility. Here, this study presents 1,1-difluoro-2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethane (DFE)-based localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs), incorporating fluorinated components such as salt, solvating solvent, and diluent for improved electrode stability. Molecular dynamics simulations and surface analyses reveal that the DFE-LHCE with 1,2-bis(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethoxy)ethane (BTFEE) diluent produces uniform and robust interphase layers on both cathode and anode, enriched with inorganic species like LiF and Li 2 O. These properties lead to prolonged redox reversibility of the SPAN cathode, suppressed side reactions, and extended cycle life for Li||SPAN cells. Remarkably, DFE-BTFEE-LHCE enables Li||SPAN coin cells with an areal capacity of ∼7 mAh cm -2 for SPAN to retain 81.3% capacity after 200 cycles and pouch cells of 0.12 Ah with 8 mAh cm -2 of SPAN and lean electrolyte to maintain 96.4% capacity over 80 cycles. These findings pave the way for advancing Li||SPAN battery technologies.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Advanced Low-Flammable Electrolytes for Stable Operation of High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Batteries

Despite being an effective flame retardant, trimethyl phosphate (TMP a ) is generally considered as an unqualified solvent for fabricating electrolytes used in graphite (Gr) based lithium ion batteries as it readily leads to Gr exfoliation and cell failure. In this work, by adopting the unique solvation structure of localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE) to TMP a and tuning the composition of the solvation sheath via electrolyte additive, excellent electrochemical performance can be achieved with TMPa based electrolytes in Gr||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cells. After 500 charge/discharge cycles within the voltage range of 2.5-4.4 V, the batteries containing TMPa based LHCEs with proper additive can achieve a capacity retention of 85.4%, being significantly higher than cells using a LiPF 6 -organocarbonates baseline electrolyte (75.2%). Meanwhile, due to the flame retarding effect of TMP a , TMP a based LHCEs exhibit significantly reduced flammability compared with the conventional LiPF 6 -organocarbonates electrolyte.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Nonsacrificial Additive for Tuning the Cathode–Electrolyte Interphase of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Solid–electrolyte interphases is essential for stable cycling of rechargeable batteries. The traditional approach for interphase design follows the decomposition of additives prior to the host electrolyte, which, as governed by the thermodynamic rule, however, inherently limits the viable additives. Here we report an alternative approach of using a nonsacrificial additive. This is exemplified by the localized high-concentration electrolytes, where the fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) plays a nonsacrificial role for modifying the chemistry, structure, and formation mechanism of the cathode–electrolyte interphase (CEI) layers toward enhanced cycling stability. On the basis of ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, we further reveal that the unexpected activation of the otherwise inert species in the interphase formation is due to the FEC–Li + coordinated environment that altered the electronic states of reactants. In conclusion, the nonsacrificial additive on CEI formation opens up alternative avenues for the interphase design through the use of the commonly overlooked, anodically stable compounds.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

A Coordinated-Anion-Enriched Electrolyte for Lean-Electrolyte Li–S Batteries

The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on Li and cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) at sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) formed in the commonly used liquid electrolytes cannot accommodate the large volume change of both Li anode and SPAN cathode, resulting in severe electrolyte and Li consumption and fast capacity decay under high mass loading and lean electrolyte condition. Herein, a LiF-rich SEI and a LiF-Li x N y O z co-enriched CEI are simultaneously formed by adding ionic liquid (Py 13 TFSI) in the localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE), which forms a coordinated-anion-enriched solvation structure. In this study, the LiF-rich interphase results in less stress/strain during large volume changes of Li and SPAN and therefore achieving obviously improved stability even at a high areal capacity. Consequently, Li (50 μm)||SPAN (6 mg cm -2 ) pouch cells under the lean electrolyte condition (E/S ratio of 5 mL g SPAN -1 ) delivers a stable cycle life of 120 cycles with 79.2% capacity retention, demonstrating great promise for high-energy-density lithium-sulfur batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Quantitative insights for diagnosing performance bottlenecks in lithium–sulfur batteries

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries hold significant promise for electric vehicles and aviation due to their high energy density and cost-effectiveness. However, understanding the root causes of performance degradation remains a formidable challenge, as the interplay of multiple factors obscures key failure mechanisms. A major limitation has been the inability to quantify soluble sulfur species within practical detection limits accurately and to correlate electrochemical processes with associated physical inventory changes. Here, we introduce the high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet spectroscopy and gas chromatography sequential characterization (HUGS) toolkit, capable of precisely quantifying seven distinct sulfur and polysulfide species at concentrations as low as 40 ppb. HUGS has been successfully applied to practical coin and pouch cells without requiring cell modification. Furthermore, our self-developed software, Dr HUGS, enhanced the data analysis speed by over 30 times, enabling multi-source data integration and delivering comprehensive analysis results within minutes. Using HUGS, we identify significant capacity losses from inactive lithium and sulfur during initial cycles and sulfide-rich solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation on the anode during later cycles. Notably, our findings reveal that soluble polysulfides have minimal contributions to capacity loss, challenging long-standing assumptions. Moreover, HUGS demonstrates that constant-pressure setups in Li–S pouch cells improve compositional uniformity compared to constant-gap configurations. For sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) cathodes, unique issues such as non-sulfide SEI formation and lithium pulverization are observed, which can be mitigated through localized high-concentration electrolytes to enhance lithium inventory retention. By enabling precise quantification of critical inventory components, HUGS provides transformative insights into failure mechanisms across various electrolytes and cathode chemistries, guiding rational design strategies for next-generation energy storage systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Impact of Anode to Cathode Crossover in Lithium‐metal Batteries With High‐Nickel Cathodes

The advancement of high-energy-density lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) is hindered by the chemical instability of both lithium-metal anode and high-nickel layered oxide cathodes. While cathode-to-anode crossover is well-documented, the reverse process of anode-to-cathode crossover remains underexplored. Here, we systematically investigate such crossovers and the degradation pathway in pouch cells with a localized high-concentration electrolyte, comparing NMC622, NMC811, and NMC90 cathodes paired with lithium-metal and graphite anodes. Despite delivering higher initial capacities, LMBs exhibit faster capacity fade under long-term cycling at 45 °C. To isolate cathode-side degradation, galvanostatic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (GEIS) measurements of cycled cathodes paired with delithiated lithium iron phosphate (LFP) counter electrodes reveal significantly higher charge-transfer resistance in cathodes cycled with lithium-metal. Surface characterization via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) reveals greater electrolyte decomposition on cathodes cycled with lithium metal, leading to thicker, more organic-rich cathode–electrolyte interphases (CEIs), consistent with the elevated charge-transfer resistance observed in GEIS measurements. Notably, NMC90 shows the most pronounced CEI thickening, linking higher cathode surface reactivity to greater susceptibility to anode-to-cathode crossover. This work presents compelling evidence of crosstalk degradation originating from lithium-metal anodes and underscores the importance of cross-interface stability for the design of durable LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Tailored Solvation and Interface Structures by Tetrahydrofuran-Derived Electrolyte Facilitates Ultralow Temperature Lithium Metal Battery Operations

Ineffectiveness of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) in cold climates hinders electronics to work in various conditions including frigid environments, despite high demands. Given that intrinsic properties of LIB materials cause this problem, optimized cell chemistries ultimately are required for low-temperature usage. In this study, Li-metal batteries (LMBs) composed of a Li-metal anode (LMA) stabilized by a localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE) are found to significantly enhance low-temperature performance. The LHCE allows the LMA to have compact and regular deposition and excellent plating/stripping efficiency at sub-zero temperatures. The LHCE produces an inorganic-rich solid-electrolyte interphase with larger amounts of Li 2 O/LiF interfaces, dominance of ion aggregates in Li + solvation, and enhanced Li + transport, which can greatly improve the LMA stability. LMB full cells based on LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 cathodes with the tailored electrolyte show high retentions of 75 and 64 % at -20 and -40 °C, respectively. Furthermore, the LMB configuration retains its charge-discharge capability even at -60 °C.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Pressure effects on lithium anode/nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide cathode pouch cells through fixture design

Applying external pressure to a pouch cell results in improved performance, implicating systems-level design of batteries. Here, different formats and amounts of external pressure to Li-Li x Ni 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (Li-NMC811) pouch cells were studied under lean electrolyte conditions. Due to the more uniform lithium plating/stripping, a constant gap fixture that retains the distance of the frame during cycling performed greater than a constant pressure fixture that retains applied pressure to the cell. In addition, the use of flexible foam in a constant gap fixture revealed enhanced cycle life at 10 psi; however, at 30 psi, the use of a rigid plate extended cycle life to over 250 cycles, while the foam severely shortened cycle life. This discrepancy with pressure was proven to be driven by stress distribution on cell components. The failure mechanisms and the effects of pressure fixture design on cell components were unveiled, shedding light on improving high-energy battery performance through at-scale fixture design.

25 - ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Electrolyte Regulating toward Stabilization of Cobalt-Free Ultrahigh-Nickel Layered Oxide Cathode in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Cobalt (Co)-free ultrahigh-nickel (Ni) layered oxides exhibit a double-edged competitive advantages in reducing the cathode cost and boosting the energy density, promising the sustainable development of batteries for electric vehicles. However, the increased Ni content, resultantly more highly oxidative Ni 4+ , potentially induces severe capacity fading due to the aggravated side reactions, limiting the practical applications. Here, we evaluate the compatibility of two localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) with LiNi 0.96 Mg 0.02 Ti 0.02 O 2 (NMT) cathode under a high charging voltage of 4.4 V in lithium ion batteries. The LHCE with EC additive enables the formation of stable interfacial layers on both NMT cathode and graphite anode, thus realizing a capacity retention of 97.2% over 200 cycles at 25 °C and high reversible capacities of ~180.2 and ~185.8 mAh g -1 , respectively, at 5C charge rate and 5C discharge rate. This study offers a promising approach to enable Co-free ultrahigh-Ni layered oxides for practical applications.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

A Systematic Study on the Effects of Solvating Solvents and Additives in Localized High‐Concentration Electrolytes over Electrochemical Performance of Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Abstract Localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) based on five different types of solvents were systematically studied and compared in lithium (Li)‐ion batteries (LIBs). The unique solvation structure of LHCEs promotes the participation of Li salt in forming solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on graphite (Gr) anode, which enables solvents previously considered incompatible with Gr to achieve reversible lithiation/delithiation. However, the long cyclability of LIBs is still subject to the intrinsic properties of the solvent species in LHCEs. Such issue can be readily resolved by introducing a small amount of additive into LHCEs. The synergetic decompositions of Li salt, solvating solvent and additive yield effective SEIs and cathode electrolyte interphases (CEIs) in most of the studied LHCEs. This study reveals that both the structure and the composition of solvation sheaths in LHCEs have significant effect on SEI and CEI, and consequently, the cycle life of energetically dense LIBs.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Phase Transfer‐Mediated Degradation of Ether‐Based Localized High‐Concentration Electrolytes in Alkali Metal Batteries

Abstract Localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) have attracted interest in alkali metal batteries due to the advantages of forming stable solid‐electrolyte interphases (SEIs) on anodes and good chemical/electrochemical stability. Herein, a new degradation mechanism is revealed for ether‐based LHCEs that questions their compatibility with alkali metal anodes (Li, Na, and K). Specifically, the ether solvent reacts with alkali metals to generate solvated electrons (e s − ) that attack hydrofluoroether co‐solvents to form a series of byproducts. The ether solvent essentially acts as a phase‐transfer reagent that continuously transfers electrons from solid‐phase metals into the solution phase, thus inhibiting the formation of stable SEI and leading to continuous alkali metal corrosion. Switching to an ester‐based solvating solvent or intercalation anodes such as graphite or molybdenum disulfide has been shown to avoid such a degradation mechanism due to the absence of e s − .

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Crossover Effects in Lithium–Metal Batteries with a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte and High–Nickel Cathodes

While crossover effects, such as transition–metal dissolution, are well–understood in lithium–ion batteries, there is a limited understanding of the effect of crossed–over chemical species in cells with oxide cathodes and lithium–metal anodes. In this work, the effects of cathode–to–anode and anode–to–cathode crossover are explored in cells with a high–nickel cathode, lithium–metal anode, and a localized high–concentration electrolyte (LHCE). Dramatic differences are found among cells; a lithium–metal anode paired with a high–nickel cathode has three times less solid–electrolyte interphase growth than a lithium–metal anode paired with lithium metal. Meanwhile, the cathode paired with lithium metal has 2–3 times higher capacity fade than the same cathode paired with graphite. Decomposition and crossover of the FSI salt is identified as the main source of these changes. The fluorine in the salt is first stripped off at the lithium–metal anode, and the remaining sulfur and nitrogen cross over to the cathode. Although the reduction in fluorine content harms the surface stability of the cathode, the lithium–metal anode benefits from the increased fluorine content. Furthermore, because the lithium–metal anode is typically the bottleneck for cells with thin lithium, crossover is a major factor in the enhanced performance of lithium–metal batteries with LHCE.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Single-phase local-high-concentration solid polymer electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries

Solid polymers are promising electrolytes for Li-metal batteries, but they have limitations: they cannot simultaneously achieve high ionic conductivity, good mechanical strength and compatibility with high-voltage cathodes while suppressing Li dendrites. Here, we design a class of locally high-concentration solid polymer electrolytes based on polymer blends, which are termed Li-polymer in F diluter (LPIFD). The Li-polymer (polymer-in-salt) ensures continuous Li-ion conduction channels and contributes to the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), and the F diluter (inert fluorinated polymer) adds mechanical strength. Studies reveal that a single-phase LPIFD, which is based on a miscible polymer blend, lacks phase boundaries and forms an organic-less and LiF-rich SEI, effectively suppressing lithium dendrites. The single-phase LPIFD delivers ionic conductivity of 3.0 x 10 -4 S cm -1 and enables the Li anode to reach a high coulombic efficiency of 99.1% and a critical current density of 3.7 mA cm -2 . Furthermore, the ability to form an F-rich cathode electrolyte interphase allows LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 ||Li cells to achieve a cycle life of 450 cycles at a high operating voltage of 4.5 V. In conclusion, this design will inspire efforts to commercialize polymer electrolytes for high-energy Li-metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗