Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium-metal stabilization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

High-efficiency, anode-free lithium–metal batteries with a close-packed homogeneous lithium morphology

Anode-free lithium–metal batteries (LMBs) are ideal candidates for high-capacity energy storage as they eliminate the need for a conventional graphite electrode or excess lithium–metal anode. Current anode-free LMBs suffer from low Coulombic efficiency (CE) due to poor lithium stripping efficiency. Advanced electrolyte development is a promising route to maximize lithium plating and stripping CE and minimize capacity fade. However, a poor understanding of the mechanisms by which advanced electrolytes improve performance hampers progress in the practical development of anode-free LMBs. Here, we use synchrotron techniques and other tools to analyze the influence of three commercially available electrolytes on the composition, heterogeneity, kinetics, morphology, and electrochemistry of anode-free LMBs. Advanced electrolytes improve the electrochemical performance of anode-free LMBs by forming much denser and better-packed Li morphologies on a Cu current collector than on the conventional electrolyte. Li plates uniformly over the electrode area with the advanced electrolytes rather than in a few active sites. Inactive crystalline Li with heterogeneous distribution dominates the capacity degradation of anode-free cells, especially with the conventional electrolyte, indicating that reducing the amount of “dead” crystalline Li will significantly improve the cycling stability of anode-free cells. Finally, the understanding of the Li plating and stripping process obtained from this work will accelerate the development of anode-free LMBs with high efficiency.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Dual–Phase Electrolyte for High–Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Dissolution of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) is essential for fast cathode kinetics, but detrimental for anode stability, especially under lean electrolyte conditions. Here in this work, the phase separation phenomenon between solvents with different polarities (tetramethyl sulfone [TMS] and dibutyl ether [DBE]) is utilized to enable the design of a dual-phase electrolyte. High-polarity, high-density TMS–lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide–ammonium trifluoroacetate as the cathode electrolyte strongly solvates LiPSs, which propel the sulfur redox reaction. Moreover, the composite of DBE and a polymeric ion conductor serves as the anode electrolyte. The addition of DBE in the anode side effectively prevents the crossover of corrosive species (LiPSs and ammonia trifluoroacetate), enabling a significant improvement in Li-metal anode stability. The electrode-specific dual-phase electrolyte design provides electrochemical performance superior to conventional electrolytes. Without additional electrode engineering, pouch cells assemble with the dual-phase electrolyte cycle under a lean electrolyte (4 µL mg –1 ) and low-Li-excess condition (N/P = 3) for 120 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Operation of Layered LiCoO 2 to Higher Voltages with a Localized Saturated Electrolyte

The commercialization of lithium-ion batteries started with the layered LiCoO 2 (LCO) cathode for portable electronics, but only 50% of its theoretical capacity can be used in practical cells due to detrimental surface and bulk degradations when charged to high voltages. Here we demonstrate here that the stability of electrolyte plays a critical role in the performance of LCO at high voltages by employing a localized saturated electrolyte (LSE). With a cutoff voltage of 4.5 V, LCO achieves an initial 1C discharge capacity of 176 mA h g -1 and a capacity retention of 80% over 230 cycles. Even with a cutoff voltage of 4.6 V, LCO with 2% aluminum doping displays an initial discharge capacity of 189 mA h g -1 at 1C rate with 80% capacity retention over 137 cycles. With extensive analytical characterization, we show that the improved cycling stability stems from a suppression of the O3 to H1-3 phase transition as well as a robust inorganic-rich cathode-electrolyte interphase (CEI) facilitated by the LSE. This work highlights the importance of protecting the surface as well as the bulk with appropriate electrolytes for the high-voltage, higher-energy-density operation of LCO.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Visualizing the SEI formation between lithium metal and solid-state electrolyte

The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is regarded as the most important factor affecting the durability of lithium-metal anode in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). Despite its significance, the nucleation and growth mechanism of SEI is not yet well understood. Here, we elucidate the thermodynamics and kinetics governing SEI formation at the Li|β-Li 3 PS 4 interface at the atomic scale via thermodynamic phase equilibrium analysis and machine-learning-potential-assisted molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. An accurate moment tensor potential using the machine-learning method is developed for a reactive model of Li|β-Li 3 PS 4 . This potential enabled us to perform large-scale MD simulations with the model size expanded to the experimental dimensions (~40 nm) while maintaining the same level of accuracy as density functional theory calculations. The results reveal a four-stage evolution process at the Li|β-Li 3 PS 4 interface, namely (i) fast ion diffusion, (ii) nucleation, (iii) Li 2 S growth, and (iv) stabilization. Notably, we demonstrate that the SEI can be categorized into crystalline and amorphous regions. The simulated SEI thickness, structure, and composition closely match experimental findings, validating the accuracy of the MD simulations. We further disclose the significant impact of ion diffusion kinetic limitations on the phase formation and crystallization of interfacial products. Furthermore, we shed light on the detailed potential energy (PE) distribution of lithium along the direction perpendicular to the interface. Finally, this information is crucial for better understanding interfacial ion mobility.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Systematic Evaluation of Carbon Hosts for High-Energy Rechargeable Lithium-Metal Batteries

Rechargeable lithium batteries (RLBs) have attracted wide attention for achieving high energy and low cost, but the poor stability of the Li anode has remained as a large challenge. In the last several years, great efforts have been made to develop carbon anode structures for RLB applications. A wide range of carbon structures as well as many chemical modification strategies have been investigated to improve the Coulombic efficiency and extend the cycle life of the anodes or the cells. However, currently there is no clear conclusion on key factors that determine the performance of such the types of carbon structures due to the wide range of experimental conditions used in such studies. In this study, we systematically evaluated and compared the electrochemical properties of representative carbon anode materials as well as chemically functionalized carbon materials in different electrolytes. We have found that chemical functionalization, metallic loading, and the types of micro or nano-structures all have an effect on Li deposition/stripping process, but by far the most critical factor is the nature of the electrolytes. All carbon materials produced poor Coulombic efficiency and cycle life in conventional carbonate or ether-based electrolytes. However, when a Li metal compatible is used, the average Coulombic efficiency of Li metal deposition on all carbon structures is increased to 99% or higher. This study provides critical lessons on the directions for carbon anodes for RLBs. Based on these findings, we constructed Li metal coin cells using prelithiated hard carbon, LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 (NMC622) cathode, and compatible electrolyte and tested the cells under conditions of lean electrolyte, lean Li metal and high cathode loading required for more than 300 Wh kg-1 specific energy. More than 200 stable cycles were demonstrated with over 80% capacity retention. Furthermore, the existing challenges and potential approaches have been discussed to further extend the cyclability of lithium-metal batteries under practical conditions.

Liu, Yao↗

Constructing a multi-functional polymer network for ultra-stable and safe Li-metal batteries

We report the practical application of lithium (Li) metal electrodes is impeded by Li dendrite growth and unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Herein, a multi-grafting polymer network, poly(dimethyl siloxane)-g-[poly(poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate)-r-sodium poly(p-styrene sulfonate)] (PPS), is chemically synthesized from reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. With integrated stretchability, ionic conductivity, and mechanical robustness, it serves a dual role to stabilize the Li electrode. As artificial SEI layer, the PPS enables superior electrochemical performance in half cells, symmetric cells, and full cells (PPS@Li/LiFePO 4 , capacity retention of >70% after 600 cycles). Utilized as solid polymer electrolyte (SPE), the all-solid-state Li/SPE/LiFePO 4 full cell delivers excellent cycling performance with an unprecedented capacity retention of 90% over 1,700 cycles at 0.5 C and 81% over 1,000 cycles at 1.0 C. With high-voltage LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) as cathode, the Li/SPE/NMC811 cell exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 162.2 mAh g -1 with a capacity retention of 72% after 200 cycles. The assembled solid-state Li/SPE/LiFePO4 pouch cell with SPE exhibits stable cycling performance over 200 cycles with a capacity retention of 75% and still operates well even after curling, folding, and cutting, demonstrating great potential for achieving ultra-safe and high energy density batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Effects of Applied Interfacial Pressure on Li-Metal Cycling Performance and Morphology in 4 M LiFSI in DME

Lithium-metal anodes can theoretically enable 10x higher gravimetric capacity than conventional graphite anodes. However, Li-metal anode cycling has proven difficult due to porous and dendritic morphologies, extensive parasitic solid electrolyte interphase reactions, and formation of dead Li. We systematically investigate the effects of applied interfacial pressure on Li-metal anode cycling performance and morphology in the recently developed and highly efficient 4 M lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide in 1,2-dimethoxyethane electrolyte. We present cycling, morphology, and impedance data at a current density of 0.5 mA/cm 2 and a capacity of 2 mAh/cm 2 at applied interfacial pressures of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 MPa. Cryo-focused ion beam milling and cryo-scanning electron microscopy imaging in cross section reveal that increasing the applied pressure during Li deposition from 0 to 10 MPa leads to greater than a fivefold reduction in thickness (and therefore volume) of the deposited Li. This suggests that pressure during cycling can have a profound impact on the practical volumetric energy density for Li-metal anodes. A “goldilocks zone” of cell performance is observed at intermediate pressures of 0.1–1 MPa. Increasing pressure from 0 to 1 MPa generally improves cell-to-cell reproducibility, cycling stability, and Coulombic efficiency. However, the highest pressure (10 MPa) results in high cell overpotential and evidence of soft short circuits, which likely result from transport limitations associated with increased pressure causing local pore closure in the separator. All cells exhibit at least some signs of cycling instability after 50 cycles when cycled to 2 mAh/cm 2 with thin 50 μm Li counter electrodes, though instability decreases with increasing pressure. In contrast, cells cycled to only 1 mAh/cm 2 perform well for 50 cycles, indicating that capacity plays an important role in cycling stability.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Stabilizing High–Nickel Cathodes with High–Voltage Electrolytes

Electrolytes connect the two electrodes in a lithium battery by providing Li + transport channels between them. Advanced electrolytes are being explored with high-nickel cathodes and the lithium-metal anode to meet the high energy density and cycle life goals, but the origin of the performance differences with different electrolytes is not fully understood. Here, the mechanisms involved in protecting the high-capacity, cobalt-free cathode LiNiO 2 with a model high-voltage electrolyte (HVE) are delineated. The kinetic barrier posed by a thick surface degradation layer with poor Li + -ion transport is found to be the major contributor to the fast capacity fade of LiNiO 2 with the conventional carbonate electrolyte. In contrast, HVE reduces the side reactions between the electrolyte and the electrodes, leading to a thinner nano-interphase layer comprised of more beneficial species. Crucially, the HVE leads to a different surface reorganization pathway involving the formation of a thinner nanoscale LiNi 2 O 4 spinel phase on the LiNiO 2 surface. Finally, with a high 3D Li + -ion and electronic conductivity, the spinel LiNi 2 O 4 reorganization nanolayer preserves fast Li + transport across the cathode–electrolyte interface, reduces reaction heterogeneity in the electrode and alleviates intergranular cracking within secondary particles, resulting in superior long-term cycle life.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Demarcating the Impact of Electrolytes on High–Nickel Cathodes and Lithium–Metal Anode

The ever-growing demand for low-cost, high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) makes high-nickel layered oxide cathodes, especially LiNiO 2 (LNO), one of the most appealing candidates. However, poor structural and surface instability that leads to a short cycle life remains a formidable challenge. Herein, a systematic investigation of LNO performance in two different electrolytes (a conventional carbonate-based LP57 electrolyte and an ether-based localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE)) with different charge cut-off voltages is presented. These findings show that the cathode-electrolyte reactivity is the main factor dictating the performance degradation of LNO at high voltages rather than bulk integrity. While LHCE can provide good stability beyond 4.2 V with a robust, uniform solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer on the Li-metal anode, there is no significant difference in cyclability at 4.15 V (96% capacity retention after 200 cycles) for both LP57 and LHCE. From LNO symmetric cells, carbonate-based electrolyte is found to be good for LNO stability while ether-based electrolyte is beneficial toward Li-metal anode. Furthermore, a suitable electrolyte or a low cut-off voltage is necessary to maintain a decent cycle life. Altogether, this work highlights the impact of electrolyte and cut-off voltage on LNO and Li-metal, which can help guide the development of cells based on LNO.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Crossover Effects in Lithium–Metal Batteries with a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte and High–Nickel Cathodes

While crossover effects, such as transition–metal dissolution, are well–understood in lithium–ion batteries, there is a limited understanding of the effect of crossed–over chemical species in cells with oxide cathodes and lithium–metal anodes. In this work, the effects of cathode–to–anode and anode–to–cathode crossover are explored in cells with a high–nickel cathode, lithium–metal anode, and a localized high–concentration electrolyte (LHCE). Dramatic differences are found among cells; a lithium–metal anode paired with a high–nickel cathode has three times less solid–electrolyte interphase growth than a lithium–metal anode paired with lithium metal. Meanwhile, the cathode paired with lithium metal has 2–3 times higher capacity fade than the same cathode paired with graphite. Decomposition and crossover of the FSI salt is identified as the main source of these changes. The fluorine in the salt is first stripped off at the lithium–metal anode, and the remaining sulfur and nitrogen cross over to the cathode. Although the reduction in fluorine content harms the surface stability of the cathode, the lithium–metal anode benefits from the increased fluorine content. Furthermore, because the lithium–metal anode is typically the bottleneck for cells with thin lithium, crossover is a major factor in the enhanced performance of lithium–metal batteries with LHCE.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Molecular Interlocking Multidimensional Modulations of Cathode‐Electrolyte Interface for Constructing High Energy Density Quasi‐Solid‐State Batteries

Gel polymers are regarded as a promising candidate electrolyte for lithium-metal quasi-solid-state batteries, primarily due to their high ionic conductivity and solid-liquid synergistic properties. However, challenges such as interfacial side reactions, limitations in Li + transport caused by interfacial issues, and leaching of transition metals from the cathode have yet to be effectively solved. Herein, a novel gel electrolyte modulation strategy based on electrostatic filler assembly is proposed to address the issues of ineffective capacity utilization and inadequate cycling stability of high-energy-density cathode materials in solid-state lithium-ion batteries. It constructs a 3D interpenetrating charge-bridge network that effectively tackles the phase-separation challenge between fillers and electrolytes at the molecular level. Meanwhile, the molecular interlocking structure effectively inhibits the electrolyte erosion. More critically, it optimizes and stabilizes the cathode-electrolyte interface film, which facilitates the conduction of Li + -ions through a size-sieving mechanism. Consequently, this strategy enables effective adaptation across diverse high-energy-density cathode materials with satisfactory capacity performance (170.4 mAh g −1 at 4.5 V/1 C for LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 and 194.0 mAh g −1 at 4.3 V/1 C for LiNi 0.9 Co 0.08 Mn 0.02 O 2 ). In conclusion, this investigation offers a straightforward and effective reference for addressing the critical challenges of ionic transport and interface stabilization in the design of gel electrolytes.

cathode-electrolyte interface↗

Li 2 S 6 ‐Integrated PEO‐Based Polymer Electrolytes for All‐Solid‐State Lithium‐Metal Batteries

Abstract The integration of Li 2 S 6 within a poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)‐based polymer electrolyte is demonstrated to improve the polymer electrolyte's ionic conductivity because the strong interplay between O 2− (PEO) and Li + from Li 2 S 6 reduces the crystalline volume within the PEO. The Li/electrolyte interface is stabilized by the in situ formation of an ultra‐thin Li 2 S/Li 2 S 2 layer via the reaction between Li 2 S 6 and lithium metal, which increases the ionic transport at the interface and suppresses lithium dendrite growth. A symmetric Li/Li cell with the Li 2 S 6 ‐integrated composite electrolyte has excellent cyclability and a high critical current density of 0.9 mA cm −2 at 40 °C. Impressive electrochemical performance is demonstrated with all‐solid‐state Li/LiFePO 4 and high‐voltage Li/LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cells at 40 °C.

Fang, Ruyi↗

In situ formation of polymer-inorganic solid-electrolyte interphase for stable polymeric solid-state lithium-metal batteries

Composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs) for solid-state Li-metal batteries (SSLBs) still suffer from gradually increased interface resistance and unconstrained Li-dendrite growth. Herein, we addressed the challenges by designing a LiF-rich inorganic solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) through introducing a fluoride-salt-concentrated interlayer on CPE film. The rigid but flexible CPE helps accommodate the volume change of electrodes, while the polymeric highly concentrated electrolyte (PHCE) surface-layer regulates Li-ion flux due to the formation of a stable LiF-rich SEI via anion reduction. The designed CPE-PHCE presents enhanced ionic conductivity and high oxidation stability of >5.0 V (versus Li/Li + ). Furthermore, it dramatically reduces the interfacial resistance and achieves a high critical current density of 4.5 mA cm –2 . The SSLBs, fabricated with thin CPE-PHCE membranes (<100 μm) and Co-free LiNiO 2 cathodes, exhibit exceptional electrochemical performance and long cycling stability. Lastly, this approach of SEI design can also be applied to other types of batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interplay of molten salt and dopants in tuning the performance of single-crystalline LiNiO 2

Single-crystalline layered oxide cathodes have seen great research interest in recent years. Adoption of single-crystal morphology improves mechanical robustness and eliminates intergranular boundaries, improving the chemical stability of the cathode. Furthermore, single-crystal cathodes also suffer from worsened lithium-diffusion kinetics stemming from the significantly increased diffusion path lengths. Sluggish lithiation kinetics induce concentration gradients within the cathode particle during cell operation, resulting in the accumulation of lattice strain, which deteriorates cell performance. Foreign dopants have been shown to greatly improve ion diffusion in many high-Ni layered oxide cathode systems. In particular, we identify Ti and Te as promising dopants to ameliorate the slow diffusion kinetics. We find that doping 1 mol.% Te into single crystal LiNiO 2 greatly improves Li + diffusivity, as determined through galvanostatic intermittent titration technique. Further incorporating 2 mol.% Al and pairing with lithium-metal anode in a localized high concentration electrolyte (LHCE) delivers 206 mA h g -1 at C/3 rate and retains 94% capacity after 100 cycles in Li metal half cells. By addressing kinetically mediated degradation with Te doping, and surface-based degradation with Al and LHCE, the cathode experiences very little polarization and overpotential growth, enabling stable cycling with high accessible capacity.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Voltage and Temperature Limits of Advanced Electrolytes for Lithium-Metal Batteries

Several advanced electrolytes (mainly ether-based) have recently demonstrated excellent electrochemical performance in high energy density lithium (Li)-metal batteries. However, the safety of these ether-based electrolytes is still unknown. This work evaluates the thermal stability of these new formulations to understand their safety limits of operation in comparison to carbonate electrolytes typically used in Li-ion batteries. Electrolyte stability is assessed in conjunction with LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cathode and Li-metal anode at ultra-high voltages (≤ 4.8 V) and temperatures (≤ 300°C) to trigger thermal runaway, where onset and extent of heat release are monitored via isothermal microcalorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry Most ether-based electrolytes show improved thermal resilience over commercial carbonate formulations when heated up to 300°C. The thermal behavior in presence of charged cathode and Li-metal suggests that the new electrolytes may be better at stabilizing active material surfaces than carbonate electrolytes. Although extreme voltages severely destabilize the ether-based formulations, prompting thermal runaway, a phosphate based localized high concentration electrolyte exhibits superior stability over commercial carbonate electrolytes at all tested temperatures (32°C, 45°C, and 60°C). Although thermal analysis during the first charge process (as adopted in this preliminary study) may be insufficient to conclude the long-term advantages of these electrolytes, a more stable electrolyte identified under extreme voltage and temperature conditions will provide valuable guidance for the safety of future electrolyte designs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Molecular Engineering Enabled Stable Deep Eutectic Amide-Based Electrolyte for High-Temperature Lithium–Metal Batteries

The development of advanced lithium-metal batteries (LMBs), such as high-temperature LMBs and high-energy-density LMBs, has critical requirements for electrolytes. However, conventional electrolytes suffer from thermal instability and insufficient electrolyte/Li interfacial compatibility, severely limiting their utilization in high-temperature LMBs. Herein, we design a high-temperature N-methylacetamide (NMAc)-based deep eutectic electrolyte (DEE) by molecular engineering on a solvation structure via a sacrificial additive of vinyl ethylene carbonate (VEC). Specifically, VEC interacts with the Li prior to NMAc, facilitating the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase to inhibit the reaction between Li and NMAc. The stable VEC-DEE effectively suppresses the growth of lithium dendrites and ensures the battery a cycling stability of 550 cycles at 80 °C. Additionally, we also demonstrate the application of VEC-DEE in high-energy-density LMBs with a high mass loading of 2.5 mAh/cm 2 . In conclusion, this research opens a new avenue for the rational design of advanced high-temperature electrolytes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Manipulating the diffusion energy barrier at the lithium metal electrolyte interface for dendrite-free long-life batteries

Abstract Constructing an artificial solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on lithium metal electrodes is a promising approach to address the rampant growth of dangerous lithium morphologies (dendritic and dead Li 0 ) and low Coulombic efficiency that plague development of lithium metal batteries, but how Li + transport behavior in the SEI is coupled with mechanical properties remains unknown. We demonstrate here a facile and scalable solution-processed approach to form a Li 3 N-rich SEI with a phase-pure crystalline structure that minimizes the diffusion energy barrier of Li + across the SEI. Compared with a polycrystalline Li 3 N SEI obtained from conventional practice, the phase-pure/single crystalline Li 3 N-rich SEI constitutes an interphase of high mechanical strength and low Li + diffusion barrier. We elucidate the correlation among Li + transference number, diffusion behavior, concentration gradient, and the stability of the lithium metal electrode by integrating phase field simulations with experiments. We demonstrate improved reversibility and charge/discharge cycling behaviors for both symmetric cells and full lithium-metal batteries constructed with this Li 3 N-rich SEI. These studies may cast new insight into the design and engineering of an ideal artificial SEI for stable and high-performance lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Characterization of the structure and chemistry of the solid–electrolyte interface by cryo-EM leads to high-performance solid-state Li-metal batteries

Solid-state lithium-metal (Li 0 ) batteries are gaining traction for electric vehicle applications because they replace flammable liquid electrolytes with a safer, solid-form electrolyte that also offers higher energy density and better resistance against Li dendrite formation. Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are highly promising candidates because of their tunable mechanical properties and easy manufacturability; however, their electrochemical instability against lithium metal (Li 0 ), mediocre conductivity, and poorly understood Li 0 /SPE interphases have prevented extensive application in real batteries. In particular, the origin of the low Coulombic efficiency (CE) associated with SPEs remains elusive, as the debate continues as to whether it originates from unfavored interfacial reactions or lithium dendritic growth and dead lithium formation. In this work, we use state-of-the-art cryo-electromicroscopy (cryoEM) imaging and spectroscopic techniques to characterize the structure and chemistry of the interface between Li 0 and a polyacrylate-based SPE. Contradicting the conventional knowledge, we find that no protective interphase forms, owing to the sustained reactions between deposited Li dendrites and polyacrylic backbones and succinonitrile plasticizer. Due to the reaction induced volume change, large amounts of cracks form inside the Li dendrites with a stress corrosion-cracking behavior, indicating that Li0cannot be passivated in this SPE system. Based on this observation, we then introduce additive engineering leveraging on the knowledge of liquid electrolytes, and demonstrate that the Li 0 surface can be effectively protected against corrosion using fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), leading to densely packed Li 0 domes with conformal and stable solid-electrolyte interphases (SEIs) films. Owing to the high room temperature ionic conductivity of 1.01 mS/cm -1 , the high transference number of 0.57 and the stabilized lithium electrolyte interface, this improved new SPE delivers an excellent lithium plating/stripping CE of 99% and 1800 hours of stable cycling in Li||Li symmetric cells (0.2 mA/cm -2 , 1mAh/cm -2 ). Furthermore, this improved cathodic stability along with the high anodic stability enables record high cycle life of >2000 cycles for Li||LiFePO 4 and >400 cycles for Li||LiCoO 2 full cells.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗