Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “inorganic electrolytes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Review of Multifunctional Separators: Stabilizing the Cathode and the Anode for Alkali (Li, Na, and K) Metal–Sulfur and Selenium Batteries

Alkali metal batteries based on lithium, sodium, and potassium anodes and sulfur-based cathodes are regarded as key for next-generation energy storage due to their high theoretical energy and potential cost effectiveness. However, metal–sulfur batteries remain challenged by several factors, including polysulfides’ (PSs) dissolution, sluggish sulfur redox kinetics at the cathode, and metallic dendrite growth at the anode. Functional separators and interlayers are an innovative approach to remedying these drawbacks. Here we critically review the state-of-the-art in separators/interlayers for cathode and anode protection, covering the Li–S and the emerging Na–S and K–S systems. The approaches for improving electrochemical performance may be categorized as one or a combination of the following: Immobilization of polysulfides (cathode); catalyzing sulfur redox kinetics (cathode); introduction of protective layers to serve as an artificial solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) (anode); and combined improvement in electrolyte wetting and homogenization of ion flux (anode and cathode). It is demonstrated that while the advances in Li–S are relatively mature, less progress has been made with Na–S and K–S due to the more challenging redox chemistry at the cathode and increased electrochemical instability at the anode. Throughout these sections there is a complementary discussion of functional separators for emerging alkali metal systems based on metal–selenium and the metal–selenium sulfide. The focus then shifts to interlayers and artificial SEI/cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) layers employed to stabilize solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) in metal–sulfur solid-state batteries (SSBs). The discussion of SSEs focuses on inorganic electrolytes based on Li- and Na-based oxides and sulfides but also touches on some hybrid systems with an inorganic matrix and a minority polymer phase. The review then moves to practical considerations for functional separators, including scaleup issues and Li–S technoeconomics. The review concludes with an outlook section, where we discuss emerging mechanics, spectroscopy, and advanced electron microscopy (e.g. cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and cryo-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB))-based approaches for analysis of functional separator structure–battery electrochemical performance interrelations. Finally, throughout the review we identify the outstanding open scientific and technological questions while providing recommendations for future research topics.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Advancements in active filler-contained polymer solid-state electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries: A concise review

Lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) usually are regarded as the pinnacle of next-generation energy storage due to the high specific capacity and low redox potential of the Li-metal anode. However, their development is hindered by safety hazards related to flammable electrolytes and uncontrolled side reactions within the battery. Both polymer and solid-state inorganic electrolytes, despite their potential, exhibit shortcomings that limit their practical applications. Active filler-containing polymer electrolytes (AFPEs) offer a promising solution by combining the benefits of both types. Enhanced by supramolecular interactions between the polymer matrix and active fillers, AFPEs demonstrate superior electrochemical performance over traditional polymer electrolytes. This review discusses the progress in active fillers and various polymer matrices, examining the factors that enhance performance, particularly ionic conductivity. It also outlines the future research directions of AFPEs, aiming to broaden the application of solid electrolytes in high-performance LMBs.

All solid-state batteries↗

A Facile Potential Hold Method for Fostering an Inorganic Solid-Electrolyte Interphase for Anode-Free Lithium-Metal Batteries

Anode-free lithium batteries are regarded as an ultimate form of high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Unfortunately, irreversible lithium loss during cycling plays a major role in degrading the overall cell performance in the anode-free configuration. To alleviate the deterioration, building a robust solid-electrolyte interface on an anode current collector is an indispensable requirement. Here, we present a facile in-situ electrochemical method of a potential hold during the first charge to guide more salt-derived (less solvent-derived) decomposition on the anode interface. Here we show the distinctive decomposition potential of lithium salts and ether/carbonate solvents, where the Li-solvation structures with salt contact-ion-pairs preferentially decompose to form LiF-rich and less organic components, leading to enhanced lithium Coulombic efficiency in Li||Cu cells as well as mitigating the capacity fade of Cu||LiFePO 4 and Cu||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cells.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

In situ formation of polymer-inorganic solid-electrolyte interphase for stable polymeric solid-state lithium-metal batteries

Composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs) for solid-state Li-metal batteries (SSLBs) still suffer from gradually increased interface resistance and unconstrained Li-dendrite growth. Herein, we addressed the challenges by designing a LiF-rich inorganic solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) through introducing a fluoride-salt-concentrated interlayer on CPE film. The rigid but flexible CPE helps accommodate the volume change of electrodes, while the polymeric highly concentrated electrolyte (PHCE) surface-layer regulates Li-ion flux due to the formation of a stable LiF-rich SEI via anion reduction. The designed CPE-PHCE presents enhanced ionic conductivity and high oxidation stability of >5.0 V (versus Li/Li + ). Furthermore, it dramatically reduces the interfacial resistance and achieves a high critical current density of 4.5 mA cm –2 . The SSLBs, fabricated with thin CPE-PHCE membranes (<100 μm) and Co-free LiNiO 2 cathodes, exhibit exceptional electrochemical performance and long cycling stability. Lastly, this approach of SEI design can also be applied to other types of batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Inorganic salt mixtures as electrolyte media in fuel cells

Fuel cell designs and techniques for converting chemical energy into electrical energy uses a fuel cell are disclosed. The designs and techniques include an anode to receive fuel, a cathode to receive oxygen, and an electrolyte chamber in the fuel cell, including an electrolyte medium, where the electrolyte medium includes an inorganic salt mixture in the fuel cell. The salt mixture includes pre-determined quantities of at least two salts chosen from a group consisting of ammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate, ammonium trifluoroacetate, and ammonium nitrate, to conduct charge from the anode to the cathode. The fuel cell includes an electrical circuit operatively coupled to the fuel cell to transport electrons from the cathode.

Angell, Charles Austen↗

Realizing high-capacity all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries using a low-density inorganic solid-state electrolyte

Abstract Lithium-sulfur all-solid-state batteries using inorganic solid-state electrolytes are considered promising electrochemical energy storage technologies. However, developing positive electrodes with high sulfur content, adequate sulfur utilization, and high mass loading is challenging. Here, to address these concerns, we propose using a liquid-phase-synthesized Li 3 PS 4 -2LiBH 4 glass-ceramic solid electrolyte with a low density (1.491 g cm −3 ), small primary particle size (~500 nm) and bulk ionic conductivity of 6.0 mS cm −1 at 25 °C for fabricating lithium-sulfur all-solid-state batteries. When tested in a Swagelok cell configuration with a Li-In negative electrode and a 60 wt% S positive electrode applying an average stack pressure of ~55 MPa, the all-solid-state battery delivered a high discharge capacity of about 1144.6 mAh g −1 at 167.5 mA g −1 and 60 °C. We further demonstrate that the use of the low-density solid electrolyte increases the electrolyte volume ratio in the cathode, reduces inactive bulky sulfur, and improves the content uniformity of the sulfur-based positive electrode, thus providing sufficient ion conduction pathways for battery performance improvement.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Operating High-Energy Lithium-Metal Pouch Cells with Reduced Stack Pressure Through a Rational Lithium-Host Design

Transitioning from a liquid electrolyte to an inorganic solid electrolyte offers a potential pathway to enable highly reversible lithium-metal anodes. However, the solid-electrolyte-protected lithium-metal anode suffers from poor interfacial ionic contacts and requires an impractically high stack pressure (>1.0 MPa) to maintain the interfacial contacts. It is demonstrated here that combining a hollow silver/carbon fiber scaffold and an inorganic/organic composite electrolyte enables a highly reversible lithium-metal anode. Since the high surface area of the electrode provides intimate contact and the hollow structure of the electrode relieves the lithium plating-induced stress, the electrode/electrolyte interface remains stable during cycling even under mild stack pressure. This unconventional structural design is validated in practical pouch cells assembled with the 3D lithium host containing a onefold excess of lithium and a high-nickel cathode. At a mild stack pressure of 320 kPa, the pouch cell displays 83% capacity retention for 200 cycles. This work illustrates that combining a hollow electrode architecture and a robust solid electrolyte offers a practical pathway toward rechargeable lithium-metal anodes.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Kinetic pathways of fast lithium transport in solid electrolyte interphases with discrete inorganic components

The transport of lithium ions in the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) has been previously accepted to proceed in two steps: a fast pore diffusion through the outer, porous organic layer followed by a slow knock-off or vacancy diffusion in the inner, dense inorganic layer. The second step is believed to be the rate-limiting step during fast-charging. In this study, we have intentionally constructed a thicker SEI (SEI-rich) structure on the surface of monoclinic Nb 2 O 5 (H-Nb 2 O 5 ) by adding LiNO 3 into a conventional ethylene carbonate based electrolyte. The electrochemical performance of two electrodes, one SEI-rich and one with few SEI (SEI-lean), was found to be almost the same, including their fast-charging capability and cycling stability, despite the significant difference in their SEI structure. Importantly, analysis using cryogenic scanning/transmission electron microscopy showed the discrete decoration of individual inorganic particles (e.g., Li 2 O) and amorphous species (LiN x O y /organic components) over the surface of H-Nb 2 O 5 . These discrete inorganic particles are in contradiction to the formation of dense inner inorganic layer, which has been commonly postulated. Based on these findings, we propose a new mechanism for Li ion transport through the SEI: one-step pore diffusion, without the second step slow diffusion. This one-step pore diffusion process provides an extremely fast Li ion transport, and effectively removes the kinetic limitation of Li ion transport in the SEI for fast charging. Finally, these results strongly suggest that the influence of SEI structure on the transport kinetics of lithium ions is much less significant than previously accepted. These results offer a new understanding of possible lithium ion transport pathway within SEI and may have implications for the future designs of fast-charging battery materials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A review of composite polymer-ceramic electrolytes for lithium batteries

All solid-state lithium batteries are garnering attention in both academia and industry. Lithium-ion conductive polymers and lithium-ion conductive ceramics are the two major classes of solid electrolytes that have prevalently been pursued for many years. However, each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages. One approach to overcome the disadvantages and get the best out of each of those materials is a solid composite electrolyte that combines the advantages of inorganic ceramic electrolytes and solid polymer electrolytes. Such composite electrolytes can offer acceptable ionic conductivity, high mechanical strength, and favorable interfacial contact with electrodes, which can greatly improve the electrochemical performance of all-solid-state batteries compared to cells based on a polymer electrolyte alone or a ceramic electrolyte alone. We present in this review the state-of-the-art composite polymer-ceramic electrolytes in view of their electrochemical and physical properties for the applications in lithium batteries. The review mainly encompasses the polymer matrices, various ceramic filler materials, and the polymer/ceramics composite systems. Specifically, the structures, ionic conductivities, electrochemical/chemical stabilities, and fabrications of solid composite electrolytes are discussed in-depth. On the basis of previous work, a perspective on future research directions is highlighted for developing high-performance composite polymer-ceramic electrolytes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

High areal capacity, long cycle life 4 V ceramic all-solid-state Li-ion batteries enabled by chloride solid electrolytes

All-solid-state Li batteries (ASSBs) employing inorganic solid electrolytes offer improved safety and are exciting candidates for next-generation energy storage. Herein, we report a family of lithium mixed-metal chlorospinels, Li 2 In x Sc 0.666-x Cl 4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.666), with high ionic conductivity (up to 2.0 mS cm -1 ) owing to a highly disordered Li-ion distribution, and low electronic conductivity (4.7 × 10-10 S cm -1 ), which are implemented for high-performance ASSBs. Owing to the excellent interfacial stability of the SE against uncoated high-voltage cathode materials, ASSBs utilizing LiCoO 2 or LiNi 0.85 Co 0.1 Mn 0.05 O 2 exhibit superior rate capability and long-term cycling (up to 4.8 V versus Li+/Li) compared to state-of-the-art ASSBs. In particular, the ASSB with LiNi 0.85 Co 0.1 Mn 0.05 O 2 exhibits a long life of >3,000 cycles with 80% capacity retention at room temperature. Additionally, high cathode loadings are also demonstrated in ASSBs with stable capacity retention of >4 mAh cm -2 (~190 mAh g -1 ).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Identifying Bounds of Inorganic Content in Solventless Processing of Hybrid Solid Electrolytes

Solid-state lithium batteries require safe, robust electrolytes to enable higher energy densities and improved safety over conventional cells. Hybrid polymer–ceramic electrolytes are a promising solution, combining the processability of polymers with the high ionic conductivity and mechanical strength of inorganic fillers. In this work, we demonstrate a solventless, UV-curing method to produce hybrid solid electrolytes using a poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether (PEGDME)-based photocurable matrix incorporating Li 1.5 Al 0.5 Ge 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP) or Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) ceramic electrolyte. Inorganic filler loadings up to ∼55 wt.% could be successfully incorporated via this process which was the highest inorganic content at which the slurry remains processable and cured into a uniform film. The resulting UV-cured composite electrolytes remain flexible and exhibit room-temperature ionic conductivities on the order of 10 −4 S·cm −1 , along with notably improved lithium-ion transference numbers compared to conventional polymer electrolytes. Similar performance and processing limits were observed for both LAGP and LLZO, indicating that ceramic filler chemistry does not significantly affect the UV-curing process or the electrolyte's ion transport properties in this regime. Eliminating solvents from fabrication not only simplifies processing and mitigates environmental concerns but also enables higher solid contents that enhance mechanical strength and help suppress lithium dendrite formation. In conclusion, this scalable approach thus paves the way for manufacturing robust composite solid electrolytes for next-generation solid-state batteries (SSBs).

Batteries↗

Boosting the interfacial superionic conduction of halide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries

Designing highly conductive and (electro)chemical stable inorganic solid electrolytes using cost-effective materials is crucial for developing all-solid-state batteries. Here, we report halide nanocomposite solid electrolytes (HNSEs) ZrO 2 (-ACl)-A 2 ZrCl 6 (A = Li or Na) that demonstrate improved ionic conductivities at 30 °C, from 0.40 to 1.3 mS cm -1 and from 0.011 to 0.11 mS cm -1 for Li + and Na + , respectively, compared to A 2 ZrCl 6 , and improved compatibility with sulfide solid electrolytes. The mechanochemical method employing Li 2 O for the HNSEs synthesis enables the formation of nanostructured networks that promote interfacial superionic conduction. Via density functional theory calculations combined with synchrotron X-ray and 6 Li nuclear magnetic resonance measurements and analyses, we demonstrate that interfacial oxygen-substituted compounds are responsible for the boosted interfacial conduction mechanism. Compared to state-of-the-art Li 2 ZrCl 6 , the fluorinated ZrO 2 -2Li 2 ZrCl 5 F HNSE shows improved high-voltage stability and interfacial compatibility with Li 6 PS 5 Cl and layered lithium transition metal oxide-based positive electrodes without detrimentally affecting Li + conductivity. We also report the assembly and testing of a Li-In||LiNi 0.88 Co 0.11 Mn 0.01 O 2 all-solid-state lab-scale cell operating at 30 °C and 70 MPa and capable of delivering a specific discharge of 115 mAh g -1 after almost 2000 cycles at 400 mA g -1 .

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Suspension electrolyte with modified Li + solvation environment for lithium metal batteries

Designing a stable solid–electrolyte interphase on a Li anode is imperative to developing reliable Li metal batteries. In this work, we report a suspension electrolyte design that modifies the Li + solvation environment in liquid electrolytes and creates inorganic-rich solid–electrolyte interphases on Li. Li 2 O nanoparticles suspended in liquid electrolytes were investigated as a proof of concept. Through theoretical and empirical analyses of Li 2 O suspension electrolytes, the roles played by Li 2 O in the liquid electrolyte and solid–electrolyte interphases of the Li anode are elucidated. Also, the suspension electrolyte design is applied in conventional and state-of-the-art high-performance electrolytes to demonstrate its applicability. Based on electrochemical analyses, improved Coulombic efficiency (up to ~99.7%), reduced Li nucleation overpotential, stabilized Li interphases and prolonged cycle life of anode-free cells (~70 cycles at 80% of initial capacity) were achieved with the suspension electrolytes. We expect this design principle and our findings to be expanded into developing electrolytes and solid–electrolyte interphases for Li metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Li 2 GeS 3 : Lithium Ionic Conductor with an Unprecedented Structural Type

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in electric vehicles, mobile electronic devices, and large-scale stationary energy storage systems. However, their liquid electrolytes present significant safety concerns due to their inherent flammability. To address this, the focus has shifted toward all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) utilizing inorganic solid electrolytes that promise enhanced safety. In this work, we report the discovery of a new crystal structural type of Li-ion conductor, Li 2 GeS 3 , with a unique structure, synthesized by a solid-state reaction from Li 2 S and GeS 2 . It was first reported in 2000 with an orthorhombic unit cell, but its detailed crystal structure remains veiled. Here, we have unveiled its structure for the first time, employing an ab initio structure determination technique from powder X-ray and time-of-flight neutron diffraction data. The compound has an unprecedented crystal structural type with a hexagonal $P6_1$ symmetry and a unit cell of α = 6.79364(4) Å and c = 17.90724(14) Å. Its structure is comprised of a distorted hexagonal close-packed arrangement of sulfur anions with three asymmetric metal atoms: Li1, Li2, and Ge are in tetrahedral cavities surrounded by sulfur atoms. The ionic conductivity of Li 2 GeS 3 was measured to be 1.63 × 10 –8 S cm –1 at 303 K and 2.45 × 10 –7 S cm –1 at 383 K. Bond valence energy landscape calculations revealed three-dimensional lithium diffusion pathways within the structure. This novel crystal structure in Li 2 GeS 3 holds the potential for developing high-performance ionic conductors through suitable chemical substitution and offers valuable insights into designing new ionic conductors for ASSBs.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Progress and Prospects of Inorganic Solid-State Electrolyte-Based All-Solid-State Pouch Cells

Here, all-solid-state batteries have piqued global research interest because of their unprecedented safety and high energy density. Significant advances have been made in achieving high room-temperature ionic conductivity and good air stability of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs), mitigating the challenges at the electrode–electrolyte interface, and developing feasible manufacturing processes. Along with the advances in fundamental study, all-solid-state pouch cells using inorganic SSEs have been widely demonstrated, revealing their immense potential for industrialization. This review provides an overview of inorganic all-solid-state pouch cells, focusing on ultrathin SSE membranes, sheet-type thick solid-state electrodes, and bipolar stacking. Moreover, several critical parameters directly influencing the energy density of all-solid-state Li-ion and lithium–sulfur pouch cells are outlined. Finally, perspectives on all-solid-state pouch cells are provided and specific metrics to meet certain energy density targets are specified. This review looks to facilitate the development of inorganic all-solid-state pouch cells with high energy density and excellent safety.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Lithium Dendrite-Free Li 7 N 2 I-LiOH Solid Electrolytes for High Energy Lithium Batteries

All-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) hold great potential to improve the safety and energy density of today’s lithium-ion batteries by using non-flammable inorganic solid electrolytes. Solid electrolytes (SEs) are believed to prevent Li dendrite growth because of high mechanical strength and high Li+ transference numbers. Significant advances in SE have been achieved, among which, Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) and Li2S–P2S5 (LPS) are the most promising SEs for bulk-type solid-state lithium batteries because of high ionic conductivities (>10-4 S/cm2). However, in contrast to our expectations, the growth of lithium dendrites is not suppressed but is facilitated in LLZOs and LPSs regardless of dopants, porosity, and crystallinity of the electrolytes. Despite the unity Li transference number and over two-times of shear modulus than that of Li metal, the critical current densities for Li plating and stripping in these SEs are less than 1.0 mA cm-2, which is one-fourth to one-tenth of that in liquid electrolytes at room temperature. The incompatibility between LLZO and LPS with Li metal seriously limits the energy density of all-solid-state batteries. The mechanism for lithium dendrite formation and growth in SEs are still disputable. Lack of understanding of the Li dendrite formation mechanism seriously impeded the development of solid-state lithium batteries. The development of the criterion for Li dendrite suppression is essential for the success of solid electrolyte lithium batteries. In this project, a criterion for Li dendrite suppression will be developed through thermodynamics and kinetics analysis of lithium dendrite nucleation/growth, which will guide the solid-state electrolyte design. Li7N2I-LiOH, Li5NI2-LiOH and Li3YCl6 solid electrolyte with high ionic conductivity and low electronic conductivity were used to validate the criterion for lithium dendrite suppression. Different surface modifications were also explored to enhance the dendrite suppression capability of SSEs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗