Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “flow testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Preliminary Analysis of FFTF Loss-of-Flow Tests with SAS4A/SASSYS-1

The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) was the most recent Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) built in the United States. The Passive Safety Test (PST) program was carried out on FFTF between 1984 and 1986 to demonstrate the capability of passive reactor shutdown and decay heat removal in response to protected and unprotected transients. In order to recover the information and knowledge that has been gained from FFTF, a research project was initiated focusing on the simulation of Unprotected Loss of Flow Without Scram (LOFWOS) tests similar to the knowledge preservation activities conducted for EBR-II by Argonne National Laboratory in earlier years. These knowledge preservation activities are intended to support the validation of computational tools and methods in the area of SFR passive safety. Comparisons with experimental data and other safety codes provide opportunities to improve SFR design and safety analysis codes and methods.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Niowave Flow Testing of the High Power Converter - FY 21

Design work for a 100 kW converter to produce a neutron flux via electron impact on a flowing stream of liquid metal lead-bismuth (LBE) was conducted in FY20. In FY21, the focus shifted to a 20 kW converter which was designed in collaboration with Niowave engineers. A flow visualization model is needed to validate model results for the 20 kW converter and ensure adequate coolant flow over containment structures. This work highlights the mockup that was made with quartz side plates by LANL.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Toward reducing uncertainty quantification costs in DEM models of particulate flow: Testing simple, sensitivity-based, forward uncertainty propagation techniques

The performance of two conceptually-simple uncertainty quantification techniques are tested against the rigorous nested-loop sampling technique of Roy and Oberkampf (Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 200: 2131–2144, 2011) (herein called full-sampling) using two very small-scale DEM-based models of particulate flow (one gas-solid flow and one granular flow). The first simplified forward uncertainty propagation technique, reduced-sampling, uses a sensitivity analysis to eliminate uncertain inputs that have little impact on the model output prior to nested-loop sampling. The second technique, boundary-sampling, uses a sensitivity analysis to inform the selection of two bounding cases for each key model output. In conclusion, the uncertainties in the model outputs obtained via the reduced- and boundary-sampling methods agree well with those from full-sampling for both the gas-solid and granular flow models while yielding computational savings of 65–75% (reduced sampling) and 94–97% (boundary sampling).

42 ENGINEERING↗

Uncertainty Quantification on SAM Simulations of EBR-II Loss-of-Flow Tests

The System Analysis Module (SAM) is a modern system analysis tool being developed at Argonne National Laboratory for advanced non-LWR safety analysis. It aims to provide fast-running, whole-plant transient analyses capability with improved-fidelity for SFR, LFR, and MSR/FHR. In prior work, SAM has performed well in modeling the EBR-II benchmark based on the SHRT-17 and SHRT-45R protected and unprotected loss-of-flow experiments. However, underlying uncertainties in the modeling parameters need to be quantified to gain confidence in any best-estimate simulations. In this work, a Python coupling framework between Dakota and SAM has been developed to investigate these uncertainties, alongside code enhancements in SAM for user-flexibility in perturbing physical closure models and fluid equations of state. 25 significant input parameters covering boundary conditions, geometry, physical closure models, and equations of state were identified with their uncertainties defined from literature. Two SAM transient models for SHRT-17 and SHRT-45R were perturbed on these input parameters using Latin Hypercube Sampling and the uncertainties in predicted maximum fuel, cladding, and coolant temperatures were quantified as the output responses. Spearman rank correlation of input parameters to the predicted temperatures indicated that the most sensitive parameters include the initial core power, pipe wall drag, fuel & coolant conductivity, and peak channel flow area. Sensitivity of input parameters was found to differ between the two transients and core channel modeling strategies. The overall perturbations did not result in large uncertainties in the predicted temperatures, despite the efforts made to obtain accurate yet conservative input uncertainties.

Mui, Travis↗

Reducing Uncertainty in Hydrodynamic Modeling of ATR Experiments Via Flow Testing, Validation, and Optimization

The development, characterization, and qualification testing of nuclear fuel at Idaho National Laboratory’s Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) requires extensive design and analysis activities prior to the insertion of an irradiation experiment in-pile. Significant effort is made in the design and development phase of all in-pile experiments to ensure that the maximum feasible impacts of all necessary experimental requirements are satisfied. The advancement of fuel, cladding, and in-reactor materials technology in recent years has introduced complexities associated with the design and construct of in-pile experiments necessitating deeper understanding of boundary conditions and increasingly comprehensive observations resulting from the experiment. Each unique experiment must be assessed for neutronics response, thermal/hydraulic/hydrodynamic performance, and structural integrity. This is accomplished either analytically, computationally, or experimentally, or some combination thereof, prior to insertion into the ATR. The various effects are interrelated to various degrees, such as the case with the experiment temperature affecting the thermal cross section of the fuel or the increased temperature of the experiment’s materials reducing the mechanical strength of the assemblies. Additionally, the feedback between the experiment’s response to a reactor transient could alter the neutron flux profile of the reactor during the transient. Each experiment must therefore undergo a barrage of analyses to assure the ATR operational safety review committee that the insertion and irradiation of the experiment will not detrimentally affect the safe operational envelope of the reactor. In many cases, the nuclear fuel being tested can be double-encapsulated to ensure safety margins are adequately addressed, whereas failed fuel would be encased in a protective capsule. In other cases, the experiments can be inserted in a self-contained loop that passes through the reactor core, remaining isolated from the primary coolant. In the case of research reactor fuel, however, the fuel plates must be tested in direct contact with the reactor coolant, and being fuel designed for high neutron fluxes, they are inherently power-dense plates. The combination of plate geometry, high-power density, and direct contact with primary coolant creates a scenario where the neutronic/thermomechanic/hydrodynamic characteristics of the fuel plates are tightly coupled, necessitating as complete characterization as possible to support the safety and programmatic assessments, thus enabling a successful experiment. This paper explores the efforts of the U.S. High-Performance Research Reactor program to thermomechanically/hydromechanically characterize the program’s wide variety of experiments, which range from stacks of miniplate capsules to full-sized, geometrically representative curved plates. Special attention is given to instances where the combination of experimental characterization and analytical assessment has reduced uncertainties of the safety margins, allowing experiments to be irradiated that would otherwise not have passed the rigorous qualification process for irradiation in the ATR. In some cases, the combined processes have exposed flow and heat transfer characteristics that would have been missed using historical methods, which allows for more accurate and representative postirradiation assessments.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

KJRR-FAI Hydraulic Flow Testing Input Package

The INL, in cooperation with the KAERI via Cooperative Research And Development Agreement (CRADA), undertook an effort in the latter half of calendar year 2013 to produce a conceptual design for the KJRR-FAI campaign. The outcomes of this effort are documented in further detail elsewhere [5]. The KJRR-FAI was designed to be cooled by the ATR’s Primary Coolant System (PCS) with no provision for in-pile measurement or control of the hydraulic conditions in the irradiation assembly. The irradiation assembly was designed to achieve the target hydraulic conditions via engineered hydraulic losses in a throttling orifice at the outlet of the irradiation vehicle.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Conceptual Design – Hydraulic Reactor Design Parameters

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR-II, also referred to as MITR) is one of six U.S. high performance research reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, that is actively collaborating with the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Material Management and Minimization (M 3 ) Reactor Conversion Program to convert to the use of low-enriched uranium (LEU, < 20 wt% 235 U) fuel. The MIT Nuclear Reactor Laboratory has been working with the USHPRR Reactor Conversion (RC) Pillar at Argonne National Laboratory to perform fuel element design and fuel cycle performance analyses, steady-state thermal hydraulics safety analyses, and accident safety analyses in preparation for the conversion of MITR and support a preliminary Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for conversion to LEU fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Conceptual Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA’s) mission to minimize the civilian use of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels, the NNSA Office of Material Management and Minimization (M 3 ) Conversion Program is collaborating with six U.S. High Performance Research Reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The M 3 conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations and maintain the existing experimental performance of each facility. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities that are being completed by stakeholders across organizations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

University of Missouri Research Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Conceptual Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA’s) mission to eliminate or minimize the civilian use of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels, the NNSA Office of Material Management and Minimization (M 3 ) Conversion Program is collaborating with six U.S. High Performance Research Reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The M 3 conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel-element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations, as well as maintain the existing experimental performance of each facility. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities that are being completed by stakeholders across organizations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

National Bureau of Standards Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Conceptual Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA’s) mission to eliminate or minimize the civilian use of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels, the NNSA Office of Material Management and Minimization (M 3 ) Reactor Conversion Program is collaborating with six U.S. High Performance Research Reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The M3 conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations and maintain the existing experimental performance of each facility. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities that are being completed by stakeholders across organizations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Preliminary Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA) mission to minimize the civilian use of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels, the NNSA Office of Material Management and Minimization Conversion Program is collaborating with six U.S. High Performance Research Reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations and maintain the existing experimental facilities performance. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities that are being completed by stakeholders across organizations. Within the Reactor Conversion (RC) Pillar of the USHPRR Project, four of the USHPRR, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR-II, also referred to as MITR), have progressed through preliminary fuel element design using the proposed monolithic alloy of uranium- 10 wt% molybdenum (U-10Mo). Preliminary fuel element design and safety analyses have been completed for MITR. This work has relied on preliminary data for properties, performance, and fabrication tolerances for the fuel systems that have been produced by the Fuel Qualification (FQ), Fuel Fabrication (FF), and RC Pillars of the USHPRR Project.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

The University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Preliminary Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA) mission to eliminate or minimize the civilian use of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU, ≥ 20 wt% U-235) fuels, the NNSA Material Management and Minimization (M3) Office of Reactor Conversion and Uranium Supply is collaborating with six U.S. high performance research reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU, < 20 wt% U-235) fuel. Primary conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations and maintain the existing experimental facilities performance. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities by stakeholders across organizations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗