Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “coal fly ash”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Selective sulfur removal from semi-dry flue gas desulfurization coal fly ash for concrete and carbon dioxide capture applications

High-sulfur mixed fly ash residues from semi-dry flue gas desulfurization units in coal-fired power plants are unsuitable for use as supplementary cementitious material (SCM) for concrete production or carbon dioxide utilization. In this work, we explore the potential for upcycling a representative spray dry absorber ash (10.44 wt% SO 3 ) into concrete-SCM by selective sulfur removal via weak acid dissolution while simultaneously exploring the possibility for CO 2 capture. Towards this effort, parametric studies varying liquid-to-solid ratio, acidity, and CO 2 pressure were conducted in a batch reactor to establish the sulfur removal characteristics in de-ionized water, nitric acid, and carbonic acid, respectively. The dissolution studies show that the leaching of sulfur from calcium sulfite hemihydrate, which is the predominant S phase, is rapid and achieves a concentration plateau within 5 min, and subsequently, appears to be controlled by the primary mineral solubility. Here, preferential S removal was sufficient to meet SCM standards (e.g., 5.0 wt% as per ASTM C618) using all three washing solutions with 0.62–0.72 selectivity (S^), defined as the molar ratio of S to Ca in the leachate, for a raw fly ash with bulk S^ = 0.3. Acid dissolution with 1.43 meq/g of ash or under 5 atm CO 2 retained > 18 wt% CaO and other Si-, Al-rich phases in the fly ash. Based on the experimental findings, two sulfur removal schemes were suggested for either integration with CO 2 capture and utilization processes using flue gas or to produce fly ash for use as a SCM.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Economic Extraction and Recovery of REEs and Production of Clean Value-Added Products from Low-Rank Coal Fly Ash

The University of North Dakota (UND) Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) teamed with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) , the North Dakota Industrial Commission Lignite Research Program, and commercial partners Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Great River Energy, and Southern Company to execute a Cooperative Agreement funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) focused on identifying unique pathways and pretreatments to extract rare-earth elements (REEs) from low-rank coal (LRC) ash in a more economical and environmentally benign manner than current methods. The EERC drew upon the unique and deep knowledge of the team regarding LRC geochemistry, ash transformation mechanisms during combustion, and fly ash chemistry in the approach to understand the portioning of REEs in LRC ash. A comprehensive characterization effort was undertaken to fully establish the form, associations, and partitioning of the REEs and other elements/minerals of interest in fly ash, as well as the ash chemistry, mineralogy, and morphology. Using this information, the team tested methods of REE extraction to take advantage of the unique and advantageous properties of LRC ash. Multiple complementary approaches were evaluated that combined both novel and proven methods to develop an extractive process for REEs and other high-value metals from LRC ash that provide technological and economic progress on the current state of the art. Methodologies were also evaluated for the potential to synergistically remove toxic metals while extracting other high-value metals from the ash, generating a clean, safe ash material as a value-added product. This would eliminate waste and offer significant additional revenue potential. Based on laboratory-scale testing, an initial high-level technical and economic analysis to estimate operating expenses and product revenues to guide future phases of technology development was implemented. By focusing on minimizing process steps and consumptive use of extraction solutions, a tunable, economically viable process for REE extraction from LRC ash was developed. The tunable process has the ability to be adjusted to adapt to the differing ash chemical and physical properties that are characteristic of LRC ash. This is key to deployment as a commercial process. In demonstrating the process, the EERC was able to illustrate mixed REE concentration greater than the goal of 2 wt%. High-level economic analysis of the process with LRC ash of moderate REE levels demonstrated the potential of the process, but recovery of just the REEs was insufficient to cover operational costs. With the additional extraction of other high-value metals found in LRC ash, the process economics approach would break even, and it is anticipated that with process optimization, the developed process could potentially be economically sound. The same economic analysis performed utilizing LRC ash with high levels of REEs showed the recovery of the REEs alone would make the process economically viable even without further optimization.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Economic Extraction and Recovery of REEs and Production of Clean Value-Added Products from Low-Rank Coal Fly Ash

TechConnect World Innovation Conference & Expo, Washington, DC, June 13–15, 2022. The University of North Dakota (UND) Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) teamed with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; the North Dakota Industrial Commission Lignite Research Program; and commercial partners Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Great River Energy, and Southern Company to execute a Cooperative Agreement funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) focused on identifying unique pathways and pretreatments to extract rare-earth elements (REEs) from low-rank coal (LRC) ash in a more economical and environmentally benign manner than current methods. By focusing on minimizing process steps and consumptive use of extraction solutions, a tunable, economically viable process for REE extraction from LRC ash was developed.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Method for sulfur removal from coal fly ash

A method of reducing sulfur concentration in fly ash, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) ash, and mixtures thereof by contacting the fly ash, FGD ash, or mixtures thereof with an aqueous acidic solution, for a time, at a temperature, and at a liquid-to-solid ratio wherein the sulfur concentration within the fly ash, FGD ash, or mixture thereof is reduced to no more than 5 wt % SO.sub.3 based on the total weight of dry fly ash, FGD ash, or mixture thereof so treated.

Wang, Bu↗

Efficiency of natural pozzolans, ground glasses and coal bottom ashes in mitigating sulfate attack and alkali-silica reaction

The use of pozzolans to partially replace Portland cement in concrete has generally demonstrated beneficial impacts on the durability characteristics of concrete for decades. In this paper a diverse range of pozzolans including natural pozzolans, ground glasses and industrial by-products such as coal ash (fly ash and bottom ash) and silica fume were investigated for their synergistic potential in binary or ternary blends with Portland cement in improving resistance to chemical sulfate attack and alkali-silica reaction (ASR). It is generally considered that pozzolans improve most of the durability issues encountered in concrete, including reducing the risk of sulfate attack or ASR. But this is not always the case. For example, it was found that ground glasses were very efficient in improving sulfate resistance, but their ability to mitigate expansion due to ASR was dictated by the equivalent alkalis content (Na{sub 2}O{sub e}) of the glass and high-alkali soda glass was generally not effective in this role. On the other hand, metakaolin, a highly reactive pozzolan, was highly effective in reducing ASR expansion, but may actually increase the damage due to sulfate attack when used at moderate replacement levels. Most pozzolans, such as low-CaO coal fly ash and ground coal bottom ash, silica fume, and pumice, were effective in controlling expansion due to both ASR and sulfate attack. The results demonstrated that the extent of the positive impact of using natural pozzolans on both properties was variable. The pozzolanic reactivity of materials alone was an unreliable indicator to assess the ability of the pozzolan to suppress expansion due to sulfate attack or ASR.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Tetrafluoroboric Acid Digestion for Accurate Determination of Rare Earth Elements in Coal and Fly Ash by ICP-MS Analysis

Coal and coal-related fly ash often contain rare earth elements (REEs) that have the potential to be utilized as valuable mineral resources. Accurately determining the REE content in coal and fly ash is crucial for resource evaluation. The conventional approach involves using hydrofluoric acid (HF) to dissolve silicates and release REEs, which, however, prolongs the digestion process due to the additional step of complexing fluoride ions (F−) with boric acid (H3BO3). Determining the correct amount of H3BO3 for neutralization can be challenging, and in some instances, the binding of fluoride ions with certain lanthanides (Lns) hampers the accurate determination of all 14 naturally occurring rare earth elements in a single digestion batch by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). In this study, we present an alternative method that achieves the accurate determination of all 14 naturally occurring REEs using tetrafluoroboric acid (HBF4) followed by ICP-MS analysis. This approach eliminates the need for an F− complexing step. We tested this method on certified REE reference materials, including NIST 1632e (coal) and NIST 1633c (fly ash), as well as the REE geological reference material USGS AGV-1 (andesite). Our results demonstrated excellent recovery rates (relative standard deviation, RSD < ±10%), with a correlation coefficient (r2) exceeding 0.99. Using this method, we investigated the concentrations of all 14 REEs in coal and fly ash samples collected from various locations in the southwestern USA. This improved digestion technique streamlines the analysis process and enhances the accuracy of REE determination, facilitating a more comprehensive evaluation of REE-rich coal and fly ash deposits for resource exploration.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Coal-Waste-Enhanced Filaments for Additive Manufacturing of High-Temperature Plastics and Ceramic Composites

In the United States, coal waste from over a century of mining and burning coal for heat and electricity has accumulated as mountains of coal fly ash and bottom ash and acre-size ponds, coal fines and gob. These materials can be a problem for local communities and water systems. A cost-effective process to utilize high volumes of these coal wastes in a high-value product would be beneficial to those communities by reducing the amount of waste and providing jobs, manufacturing components, and materials from the waste. Many coal-to-products technologies (e.g., carbon fibers, graphene, carbon foam) rely on carefully choosing the starting material and then altering it chemically or thermally to make the products work. Due to the wide variability of composition and coal content in typical coal waste streams, many high-volume coal waste streams are likely to be unsuitable for use in those technologies. Semplastics’ technology has been shown to utilize most types of coal waste successfully without any pre-selection or pre-processing requirements other than a nominal particle-size reduction for wastes like bottom ash. This characteristic of Semplastics’ solution may enable the use of much larger volumes of a wider range of coal wastes than other coal-to-products technologies. In this project, Semplastics leveraged its unique experience with both coal waste (fly ash or coal combustion residuals), resin materials, and 3D printing to develop 3D printer filaments using common coal wastes – bituminous coal fines and fly ash – and researched the feasibility of using other forms of coal waste as fillers. Simple 3D-printed parts were successfully produced from the coal waste enhanced filaments, which were found to have improved strength and stiffness.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Abstract for CRADA between NETL and Rivalia Chemical Co

The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) will assist Rivalia Chemical Co (Participant) with system analyses to aid the Participant with setting priorities and securing funding. The Participant is an early-stage startup pioneering new chemical extraction technology to solve two important problems: critical mineral scarcity and coal ash waste management. The U.S. generates coal fly ash from coal combustion for power generation and has amassed over two billion metric tons of ash, which contains valuable rare earth elements. The ash is often stored in unlined ponds and frequently contaminates the local environment. The Participant’s patent-pending process harvests rare earths from ash, then transforms the residual ash for use in green concrete, providing an economic pathway for utilities to empty and remediate the ash ponds. Founder Laura Stoy created the company in July 2022 after developing the core intellectual property during her Ph.D. at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Stoy is currently participating in the Chain Reactions Innovations (CRI) program at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) where she will be optimizing the core technology and scaling from bench scale to demonstration scale. The technology has been validated at bench scale (TRL3); the goal is to approach TRL5 by the conclusion of the CRI program and prepare to raise capital investment for a pilot facility. NETL and the Participant will develop an updated technoeconomic analysis (TEA) and identify key sustainability performance parameters to inform ’s research and development priorities and de-risk the technology. NETL will also provide the Participant with guidance to prepare a more detailed life cycle assessment (LCA), and a narrative on the Participant’s product markets. These tools will aid the Participant with the next steps of commercialization.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Synthesis and Functionalization of Coal Fly Ash-Derived Zeolites for Boron Removal From Wastewater

There are hundreds of both active and unused surface impoundments in the United States containing coal combustion residuals (CCRs) produced by coal-fired power plants which can leach toxic elements into surface and groundwater. Therefore, the development of efficient means for both the clean-up of surface impoundments and for deriving economically viable products from CCRs are urgent tasks for researchers. Herein, a microwave-assisted strategy is presented for converting a common coal combustion residual, coal fly ash (CFA), into zeolite-based sorbents for boron (B) removal from wastewater. Specifically, CFA constitutes the main source of Si and Al ions to produce zeolite type-A and the resulting sorbent subsequently undergoes simple cation exchange with Ca to enhance its B adsorption capacity. Structure and composition of the sorbents were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-mass spectrometry (MS), and ICP-optical emission spectroscopy (OES). The Ca-modified zeolite sorbent derived from CFA exhibits comparable B removal capacity with similar commercial zeolites.

Muldoon, Patrick↗

Utilizing lowly-reactive coal gasification fly ash (CGFA) to stabilize aggregate bases

This study explored the feasibility of utilizing lowly-reactive coal gasification fly ash (CGFA) for stabilizing road aggregate bases. Three types of aggregate stabilizers including the ordinary Portland cement (OPC)-CGFA, hydrated lime (CH)-CGFA and alkali-activated CH-CGFA were evaluated based on the performances of compacted base specimens. It was found that the OPC-CGFA stabilized bases showed better mechanical and durability properties while the CH-CGFA samples had low water stability and freeze-thaw durability due to the dissolution of unreacted CH. However, the reaction degree of CGFA associated with the performances of CH-CGFA stabilization could be considerably enhanced by the alkali-activation. The sustainability and economic feasibility analyses showed the use of CGFA could significantly reduce the CO 2 emissions and costs, highlighting the synergy between the recycling of CGFA and the construction of sustainable road bases. Here, a framework of selecting CGFA-based stabilizers for road bases was proposed considering the performance ratings of the material properties.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Landfilled coal ash for carbon dioxide capture and its potential as a geopolymer binder for hazardous waste remediation

In this report, the legacy of global fossil fuel usage is not just the increase in global warming due to CO 2 production, but also the billions of tons of toxic coal ash disposed in landfills. This investigation evaluates the merits of using high-calcium landfilled coal fly ash of different disposal durations and granulated blast furnace (GBF) slag as primary raw materials for production of a new class of geopolymer binder. Processing of landfilled coal fly ash, GBF slag and supplementary raw materials into a geopolymer binder was accomplished by a simple, scalable milling process in the absence of heating under a carbon dioxide environment. The resultant geopolymer cement binders were tested for carbon dioxide uptake, compressive strength, and heavy metal stabilization. The geopolymer binder demonstrated a desired balance of carbon dioxide uptake, strength and safety. These results also indicate that the performance of the geopolymer binder depends on the landfill disposal age of the coal fly ash.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Probing the Critical Element Chemistry of Coal-Combustion Fly Ash: Examination of Zircon and Associated Minerals from a Beneficiated Kentucky Fly Ash

Along with the principal rare earth (REE) minerals such as monazite, xenotime, and bastnasite, Y-and REE-bearing zircon and associated minerals survive the combustion process and are found in coal-combustion fly ash. Beneficiated fly ash from a power plant burning an eastern-Kentucky-sourced coal blend was found to have zircon (ZrSiO4), baddeleyite (ZrO2), fergusonite (YNbO4), yttriaite (Y2O3), and xenotime (YPO4). Previous studies of the same fly had also identified monazite with a broad REE suite. Scanning electron microscopy–electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)–EDS as well as other TEM-based techniques revealed a variety of zircon associations, including heavy-REE suites with Y, Nb, and Hf. Hafnium is a common accessory element in zircons and the Y and Nb may be present as fergusonite (YNbO4) intermixed with zircon.

Berti, Debora (ORCID:0000000311237794)↗