Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ceilometer”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Ceilometer / Processed Data

This dataset consists of BARG Site netCDF L1 data files containing level 1 (L1) data from the ceilometer.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

WFIP3 - NOAA SHIP site - NREL Ceilometer (Vaisala CL51) / Derived Data

NOAA SHIP ceilometer: netCDF L3 data files have level 3 (L3) data that have gone through the calculation service and contain all the data from the algorithms, including mixing layer height values, and quality index data. L3 default files contain L3 data that use the default preset for a live plot. File naming schema: L3_DEFAULT_ _YYYYMMDDHHMM_ _ .nc Name Description: L3 Identification of the data level DEFAULT Identification of the L3 file type CUSTOM OFFLINE STATION_NUMBER WMO station number, if defined YYYYMMDDHHMM UTC time ParameterKey Identification of the advanced algorithm settings. See the table below for an explanation. FREE_FORMAT File suffix, if defined

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

WFIP3 - CACO site - NREL Ceilometer (Vaisala CL51) / Derived Data

CACO ceilometer: netCDF L3 data files have level 3 (L3) data that have gone through the calculation service and contain all the data from the algorithms, including mixing layer height values, and quality index data. L3 default files contain L3 data that use the default preset for a live plot. File naming schema: L3_DEFAULT_ _YYYYMMDDHHMM_ _ .nc Name Description: L3 Identification of the data level DEFAULT Identification of the L3 file type CUSTOM OFFLINE STATION_NUMBER WMO station number, if defined YYYYMMDDHHMM UTC time ParameterKey Identification of the advanced algorithm settings. See the table below for an explanation. FREE_FORMAT File suffix, if defined

17 WIND ENERGY↗
NASA NTRS1990

Analysis of tethered balloon, ceilometer and class sounding data taken on San Nicolas Island during the FIRE project

During the FIRE Marine Stratocumulus Program on San Nicolas Island, Colorado State University (CSU) and the British Meteorological Office (BMO) operated separate instrument packages on the NASA tethered balloon. The CSU package contained instrumentation for the measurement of temperature, pressure, humidity, cloud droplet concentration, and long and short wave radiation. Eight research flights, performed between July 7 and July 14, are summarized. An analysis priority to the July 7, 8 and 11 flights was assigned for the purposes of comparing the CSU and BMO data. Results are presented. In addition, CSU operated a laser ceilometer for the determination of cloud base, and a CLASS radiosonde site which launched 69 sondes. Data from all of the above systems are being analyzed.

Schubert, Wayne H.↗
NASA NTRS2000

BOREAS TF-8 NSA-OJP and SSA-OBS Ceilometer Data

The BOREAS TF-8 team used ceilometers to collect data on the fraction of the sky covered with clouds and the cloud height. Included with these data is the surface-based lifting condensation level, derived from temperature and humidity values acquired at the flux tower at the NSA-OJP site. Ceilo-meter data were collected at the NSA-OJP site in 1994 and at the NSA-OJP and SSA-OBS sites in 1996. The data are available in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884).

Moore, Kathleen E.↗
DOE OSTI2023

AWAKEN Site A1 - NREL Ceilometer (Vaisala CL51) / Derived Data

Site A1 netCDF L3 data files have level 3 (L3) data that have gone through the calculation service and contain all the data from the algorithms, including mixing layer height values and quality index data. L3 default files contain L3 data that use the default preset for a live plot. File naming schema: L3_DEFAULT_ _YYYYMMDDHHMM_ _ .nc Name Description L3 Identification of the data level DEFAULT Identification of the L3 file type CUSTOM OFFLINE STATION_NUMBER WMO station number, if defined YYYYMMDDHHMM UTC time ParameterKey Identification of the advanced algorithm settings. See the table below for an explanation. FREE_FORMAT File suffix, if defined

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2023

WFIP3 - BARG site - NREL Ceilometer (Vaisala CL51) / Derived Data

Site A1 netCDF L3 data files have level 3 (L3) data that have gone through the calculation service and contain all the data from the algorithms, including mixing layer height values and quality index data. L3 default files contain L3 data that use the default preset for a live plot. File naming schema: L3_DEFAULT_ _YYYYMMDDHHMM_ _ .nc Name Description L3 Identification of the data level DEFAULT Identification of the L3 file type CUSTOM OFFLINE STATION_NUMBER WMO station number, if defined YYYYMMDDHHMM UTC time ParameterKey Identification of the advanced algorithm settings. See the table below for an explanation. FREE_FORMAT File suffix, if defined

17 WIND ENERGY↗
NASA NTRS2019

Fusion of Surface Ceilometer Data and Satellite Cloud Retrievals in 2D Mesh Interpolating Model with Clustering

For accurate cloud ceiling information, a data fusion approach is proposed that utilizes satellite data to extend surface station information to much wider areas. Cloud base height (CBH) retrieved from satellite observations provides for much larger spatial coverage and higher resolution. The direct comparison of GOES-16 CBH with surface station ceiling yields a local bias that has to be corrected for in the initial GOES-16 cloud base information. This sparsely sampled bias correction presents an irregular 2D mesh of control points, which is then interpolated by constructing a continuous smooth field using polyharmonic splines. The influence of remote stations is restricted by grouping the control points into clusters depending on an effective distance. This cluster-based approach allows for constructing separate spline surfaces corresponding to physically different clouds. The obtained continuous bias correction function is then applied to the entire GOES-16 pixel level CBH except for areas far away from surface stations in data sparse regions such as offshore. The described method is currently being tested using daytime-only observations over the central and eastern United States. Overall, this approach has potential to provide more accurate, high spatial resolution cloud ceiling information for the aviation community.

Khlopenkov, Konstantin↗
DOE OSTI2025

Five Year Comparison of Mixing Height Determinations at the Savannah River Site

Air quality dispersion modeling is performed for the Savannah River Site (SRS) to demonstrate compliance with applicable regulations. The AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD) modeling system is an EPA recommended model for air quality applications with a data preprocessor (AERMET) to incorporate meteorological data collected on site. AERMET parameterizes or calculates meteorological variables that are not directly measured onsite. One of the parameters estimated by AERMET is the atmospheric mixing height. While the mixing height is not currently a measurement input into AERMET, SRS has the capability to measure the local mixing height. The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) operates a Vaisala CL31 Lidar Ceilometer which estimates mixing height from aerosol backscatter. This study compares the parameterized mixing height from AERMET to the ceilometer estimated mixing height for the current regulatory period at SRS incorporating data from 2015-2019. Results from this study showed the average daily minimum values (morning) from AERMET were an order of magnitude lower than the commonly used Holzworth (1972) method and the ceilometer estimated mixing heights. Additionally, on average, the ceilometer exhibited a daily maximum mixing height value that occurred 1-3 hours later than the AERMET estimated maximum. This difference is likely due to the nighttime atmospheric mixing height assumptions and calculations used by AERMET. The AERMET algorithm cuts off mixing height growth at sunset while the ceilometer data show ongoing evening convection typical of the southeastern United States. These results suggest that the AERMET parametrization scheme assumptions may not be representative of a forested landscape and evening convection which could account for more mixing overnight. The results obtained in this study are significant for air dispersion modeling applications for regulatory purposes and worker safety. Mixing height can impact model estimated pollutant concentrations. A greater mixing height will provide more volume for pollutant dispersion. This report documents efforts to quantify the dependence of mixing height inputs toward a conservative estimated pollutant concentration.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Comparing measurements of the mixing layer height to modeled values

The mixing layer height (MLH) is the top layer of turbulent mixing within the lower atmosphere, above the Earth’s surface. Estimates of the mixing layer height allow us to determine the volume available for the dispersion of pollutants throughout the atmosphere. Our goal is to identify the most suitable mixing layer height input for our dispersion modeling tool (AERMOD). For this project we evaluated two different methods of estimating the local mixing layer height. First, we use 3 estimates of the mixing layer height obtained from a ceilometer, each height estimate corresponds to a different gradient in aerosol backscatter which is used as a proxy for mixing layer height identification. Second, we use AERMET, our AERMOD modeling system preprocessor for meteorological data, which estimates the mixing layer height using several equations combined with measured meteorological data. We evaluate the ceilometer and AERMET estimates over a 5-year period (2015-2019) to see how well aligned the estimated mixing layer heights are. Our results suggest that our model, AERMET, is on average, aligned with ceilometer estimates during the daytime hours. However, daily maximum MLH estimates by AERMET occur earlier in the day than those estimated by the ceilometer. We believe that the ceilometer struggles with accurately measuring the MLH during nighttime hours as a result of sensor limitations.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗