Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “calendar life”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Impact of Lithium‐Free Borate Additives on the Cycle Life and Calendar Aging of Silicon‐Based Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Silicon-anode lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) suffer from limited cycle life and poor calendar life, constraining their large-scale commercialization. Integrating additives into electrolytes is a simple and cost-effective strategy to improve these aspects. The effects of lithium-free boron-based additives on cycling and calendar performance of high-loading Si-anode LIBs remain largely unexplored. In this work, the influence of five Li-free borate additives, each with distinct molecular structures and elemental compositions, is systematically investigated. All additives enhance cycle life to varying extents. Notably, the addition of 1 v/v% tri(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) borate to the baseline electrolyte nearly doubles the cycle life at 50% state of health. This enhancement is attributed to three key factors. Specifically, borate additives 1) improve electrochemical activity, 2) act as anion receptors that interact with [PF6]- anions and carbonate solvents to reduce electrolyte decomposition, and 3) promote the formation of a stable and polymeric solid electrolyte interphase layer. Furthermore, these additives exhibited negligible impact in mitigating leakage current during a 180 h voltage-hold calendar-aging test, indicating their limited effect in calendar life. These findings provide insight into the role of Li-free borate additives in improving cycle life while addressing the knowledge gap regarding their influence on calendar aging.

Li, Defu↗
DOE OSTI2026

Mechanistic Understanding of Interphase-driven Aging in Silicon Anodes

Conventional solid electrolyte interphases (SEIs) strongly adhere to micro-silicon (µ-Si) and crack under volume changes, causing poor cycling performance. Nano-silicon improves cycling performance but remains costly with limited calendar life. Here potentiostatic ageing tests demonstrate that both calendar and cycle ageing are governed by SEI cracking and dissolution with different relative contributions. When the system is not dominated by SEI dissolution, the relative calendar life of Si anodes could correlates positively with their cycle life. LiF-rich SEI that enables long cycle life in µ-Si is therefore expected to enhance calendar life as well. Using this framework, we screened electrolytes, SEIs and electrodes and validated them with full-cell storage. LiF-rich SEI minimizes cracking and dissolution, enabling μ-Si to achieve excellent calendar life, whereas nano-silicon suffers from SEI dissolution and needs reduced electrolyte–electrode contact for better calendar life. This work clarifies calendar-ageing behaviour and accelerates electrolytes and SEI development for long-life Si anodes.

Johnson, Christopher S.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Enabling Silicon Anodes with Novel Isosorbide-Based Electrolytes

Silicon is seen as one of the most promising anode candidates for next-generation lithium-ion batteries, due to its high theoretical capacity and energy density. However, many technical barriers remain to its implementation, due to its high chemical/electrochemical reactivities with standard electrolytes and incomplete passivation from large volume changes. Herein, we report an isosorbide dimethyl ether (IDE) based electrolyte, which exhibits greatly improved stability, as evidenced by long cycle life and calendar life. An analysis of the cycled silicon surface shows minimal decomposition of organic species from IDE solvent, confirming that the electrolyte maintains a limited chemical reactivity with nucleophilic lithiated silicon (Li x Si). Here, this research opens up new avenues for designing new electrolytes which could ultimately enable the practical application of silicon anodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Grand challenges and opportunities in next-generation batteries and technologies

The development of advanced Li-ion batteries and technologies generally addresses one of four objectives: 1) create a higher volumetric energy density and/or specific energy/power, 2) impart intrinsically safer chemistry, 3) produce speedier charging, and 4) utilize less expensive batteries but with competitive/near-competitive performances. Certainly, other factors can play a role as well, dependent on the type of market targeted and the availability of global supplies; however, for widespread adoption, the above points/criteria remain salient. Li-ion is commercially well entrenched in industry for communication and transportation (EV) applications. Nowadays, slight iterations, mostly electrolyte-defined, are incrementally improving safety, cost, and cycle or calendar life. The last point, calendar life, is one that is often overlooked for very high-energy dense Li-ion batteries, because of their reactivity at higher charge (OCV conditions) and elevated temperatures. While cycle life is debated with respect to capacity/energy performance decline, attempts to re-purpose the battery itself or recycle the internal chemical constituents at end of life have considerably grown in the field. Hopefully, energy-neutral processes are also considered in the recycling loop. Nevertheless, the energy storage arena is quite large, and this pursuit hinges on pushing the field in one of many directions, toward loftier objectives. The pursuit of next-generation batteries and technologies must thus delve deeper into new and novel chemistry and electrochemistry to create a world with a neutral, carbon-free environment, and one that is solely sufficient on energy-producing renewables such as the Sun and wind-derived means. The application of electricity and chemistry within our world is thus a 21st century opus.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Critical Contribution of Imbalanced Charge Loss to Performance Deterioration of Si-Based Lithium-Ion Cells during Calendar Aging

Increasing the energy density of lithium-ion batteries, and thereby reducing costs, is a major target for industry and academic research. One of the best opportunities is to replace the traditional graphite anode with a high-capacity anode material, such as silicon. However, Si-based lithium-ion batteries have been widely reported to suffer from a limited calendar life for automobile applications. Heretofore, there lacks a fundamental understanding of calendar aging for rationally developing mitigation strategies. Both open-circuit voltage and voltage-hold aging protocols were utilized to characterize the aging behavior of Si-based cells. Particularly, a high-precision leakage current measurement was applied to quantitatively measure the rate of parasitic reactions at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The rate of parasitic reactions at the Si anode was found 5 times and 15 times faster than those of LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 and LiFePO 4 cathodes, respectively. Here, the imbalanced charge loss from parasitic reactions plays a critical role in exacerbating performance deterioration. In addition, a linear relationship between capacity loss and charge consumption from parasitic reactions provides fundamental support to assess calendar life through voltage-hold tests. These new findings imply that longer calendar life can be achieved by suppressing parasitic reactions at the Si anode to balance charge consumption during calendar aging.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Surface and Bulk Stabilization of Silicon Anodes with Mixed-Multivalent Additives: Ca(TFSI) 2 and Mg(TFSI) 2

Here, silicon is drawing attention as the upcoming anode material for the next generation of lithium-ion batteries due to its higher capacity compared to commercial graphite. However, silicon anions formed during lithiation are highly reactive with binder and electrolyte components creating an unstable SEI layer and limiting the calendar life of silicon anodes. The reactivity of lithium silicide and the formation of an unstable SEI layer is mitigated by utilizing the use of a mixture of Ca and Mg multivalent cations as an electrolyte additive for Si anodes to improve their calendar life. The effect of mixed salts on the bulk and surface of silicon anodes was studied by multiple structural characterization techniques. Ca and Mg ions in the electrolyte formed relatively thermodynamically stable quaternary Li-Ca-Mg-Si Zintl phases in an in-situ fashion and more stable and denser SEI layer on the Si particles. These in turn protect silicon particles against side reactions with electrolytes in a coin cell. The full cell with the mixed cation electrolyte demonstrates enhanced calendar life performance with lower measured current and current leakage than that of the baseline electrolyte due to reduced side reactions. Electron Microscopy, HRXRD, and solid-state NMR results showed that electrodes with mixed cations tended to have less cracking on the electrode surface compared to Si electrodes with Gen2 + FEC and the presence of mixed cations enhances cation migration and formation of quaternary Zintl phases stabilizing bulk and forming a more stable SEI.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

High-Nickel Cathode Materials for High-Energy, Long-Life, Low-Cost Lithium-Ion Batteries (Final Report)

The overall goal of this project is to produce Li-ion cells, which deliver at least 600 Wh kg -1 at the cathode level with usable lifetimes of at least 1,000 cycles or 15 years of storage (calendar life). A secondary goal of this project is to minimize the use of cobalt in the cathode, with the ultimate goal of eliminating cobalt entirely. To develop such a cathode, the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) team extensively investigated the structural, physical, and chemical properties of layered oxide materials. A panel of dopant elements were surveyed with an emphasis on identifying those, which impart electrochemical and thermal stability. Of those tested, Al and Mg showed the greatest performance improvements while still being easily incorporated into the cathode through simple alterations of the precursor coprecipitation method. Other dopants, such as Ta, Nb, B, and F significantly improved cathode performance, yet their mode of incorporation required additional processing which negated their use under scaled-up conditions. From this work, a first-generation cathode LiNi 0.85 Mn 0.075 Co 0.05 Al 0.02 Mg 0.005 O 2 (NMCAM-85) was produced and an initial set of 2 Ah cells was fabricated by Tesla Inc. These cells delivered 650 Wh kg -1 and a cycle life of just over 700 cycles. Further improvements were garnered through careful study of electrolyte additives. A tailored, ethylene carbonate (EC)-free electrolyte was developed, which improved capacity retention from 60% to 82% after 500 cycles in model LiNi 0.9 Mn 0.05 Al 0.05 O 2 (NMA-90) full cells. This study identified the additives fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and lithium difluorophosphate (LiPO 2 F 2 ) as beneficial additives, which were included in the electrolyte for the end-of-project cells. The UT Austin team developed a high-Ni layered oxide cathode LiNi 0.85 Mn 0.1 Al 0.05 Mg 0.005 O 2 (NMAM-85) capable of meeting the project goals. This cathode was synthesized in kilogram quantities and delivered to Tesla for fabrication into 2 Ah pouch cells for DOE testing. These large-format cells achieved 630 Wh kg -1 at the cathode level under the designated testing parameters, meeting the project goal with a completely cobalt-free cathode. The large-format cells are currently undergoing cycle life and calendar life evaluation at Idaho National Lab.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Suppressing Chemical Corrosions of Lithium Metal Anodes

In this study, the lithium metal anode is essential for next-generation high-energy-density rechargeable Li-metal batteries. Although extensive studies have been performed to prolong the cycle life of Li-metal batteries, the calendar life, which associates with the chemical corrosion of Li metal in liquid electrolytes, has not been quantitatively understood. Here, by combing the titration gas chromatography method and cryogenic focused ion beam, a quantitative relationship between the chemical corrosion rate and electrochemically deposited Li morphology in various liquid electrolyte systems is established. It has been identified that the corrosion rate is dominated by the porosity of the deposited Li. The larger the porosity of deposited Li has, the faster the corrosion rate will be. Strategies to mitigate the chemical corrosion on Li thus to extend the calendar life of Li-metal batteries are further proposed. By strictly controlling the stacking pressure during Li plating, Li deposits with ultra-low porosity can be achieved, suppressing the corrosion rate to 0.08 ± 0.16%/day compared with 1.71 ± 0.19%/day of the high-porosity Li.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Batteries (2021 Annual Progress Report)

This document summarizes the progress of VTO battery R&D projects supported during the fiscal year 2021 (FY 2021). In FY 2021, the DOE VTO battery R&D funding was approximately $\$$115 million. Its R&D focus was on the development of high-energy batteries for EVs as well as very high-power devices for hybrid vehicles. The electrochemical energy storage roadmap (which can be found at the EERE Roadmap web page2) describes ongoing and planned efforts to develop electrochemical storage technologies for EVs. To advance battery technology, which can in turn improve market penetration of PEVs, the program investigates various battery chemistries to overcome specific technical barriers, e.g., battery cost, performance, life (both the calendar life and the cycle life), its tolerance to abusive conditions, and its recyclability/sustainability. VTO R&D has had considerable success, lowering the cost of EV battery packs to $\$$185/kWh in 2019 (representing more than 80% reduction since 2008) yet even further cost reduction is necessary for EVs to achieve head-to-head cost competitiveness with ICEs (without Federal subsidies). In addition, today’s batteries also need improvements in such areas as their ability to accept charging at a high rate, referred to as extreme fast charging (XFC) (15 minute charge) – to provide a “refueling” convenience similar to ICEs, and the ability to operate adequately at low temperatures. Research into “next-gen lithium-ion” batteries which would provide such functionalities is one of the R&D focus areas. VTO is funding research on both “next gen” chemistries (which employ an alloy anode and/or a high voltage cathode) and beyond lithium-ion (BLI) chemistries (which can, for example, employ a lithium metal anode).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Batteries 2022 Annual Progress Report

This document summarizes the progress of VTO battery R&D projects supported during the fiscal year 2022. Its R&D focus was on the development of high-energy batteries for PEVs. The electrochemical energy storage roadmap describes ongoing and planned efforts to develop electrochemical storage technologies for EVs. To advance battery technology, which can in turn improve market penetration of PEVs, the program investigates various battery chemistries to overcome specific technical barriers, e.g., battery cost, performance, life (both the calendar life and the cycle life), its tolerance to abusive conditions, and its recyclability/sustainability.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Batteries (2023 Annual Progress Report)

This document summarizes the progress of VTO battery R&D projects supported during the fiscal year 2023. Its R&D focus was on the development of high-energy batteries for PEVs. The electrochemical energy storage roadmap describes ongoing and planned efforts to develop electrochemical storage technologies for EVs. To advance battery technology, which can in turn improve market penetration of PEVs, the program investigates various battery chemistries to overcome specific technical barriers, e.g., battery cost, performance, life (both the calendar life and the cycle life), its tolerance to abusive conditions, and its recyclability/sustainability.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

The Effect of the SEI Layer Mechanical Deformation on the Passivity of a Si Anode in Organic Carbonate Electrolytes

The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on a Si negative electrode in carbonate-based organic electrolytes shows intrinsically poor passivating behavior, giving rise to unsatisfactory calendar life of Li-ion batteries. Moreover, mechanical strains induced in the SEI due to large volume changes of Si during charge-discharge cycling could contribute to its mechanical instability and poor passivating behavior. This study elucidates the influence that static mechanical deformation of the SEI has on the rate of unwanted parasitic reactions at the Si/electrolyte interface as a function of electrode potential. Further, the experimental approach involves the utilization of Si thin-film electrodes on substrates with disparate elastic moduli, which either permit or suppress the SEI deformation in response to Si volume changes upon charging-discharging. We find that static mechanical stretching and deformation of the SEI results in an increased parasitic electrolyte reduction current on Si. Furthermore, attenuated total reflection and near-field Fourier-transform infrared nanospectroscopy reveal that the static mechanical stretching and deformation of the SEI fosters a selective transport of linear carbonate solvent through, and nanoconfinement within, the SEI. These, in turn, promote selective solvent reduction and continuous electrolyte decomposition on Si electrodes, reducing the calendar life of Si anode-based Li-ion batteries. Finally, possible correlations between the structure and chemical composition of the SEI layer and its mechanical and chemical resilience under prolonged mechanical deformation are discussed in detail.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Evaluating the roles of electrolyte components on the passivation of silicon anodes

A protocol was recently developed to compare calendar life using a constant potential while monitoring the electrical current required to maintain the potential. Here, this calendar life protocol is used with electrolyte formulations containing various mole fractions of ethylene carbonate (EC), ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), and LiPF 6 to elucidate the role each component plays in passivation for high silicon anodes. Together, EC and LiPF 6 lead to higher currents, and thus poorer passivation, whereas EMC acts as a spectator. The variation of the components' mole fraction also changes the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) composition, as measured by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Importantly, higher LiPF 6 content leads to increased LiF as well as increased current, indicating that higher LiF content does not enhance the passivation of the silicon surface. Finding that EC did not yield a passivating SEI, instead ethylene sulfite, sulfolane, and propylene carbonate (PC) were used in place of EC. Using ethylene sulfite and sulfolane resulted in poorer passivation compared to EC, whereas PC resulted in superior passivation. As a result, the superior passivation may be related to more stable lithium-solvent complexes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Solid State Li Ion Batteries Using Si Composite Anodes

Solid Power has teamed with Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) to develop an all solid-state lithium-ion battery (ASSB), enabled by a high-capacity Si anode and a solid state electrolyte (SSE). Replacing liquid electrolytes with solid electrolytes addresses the calendar life challenges that currently limit the widespread adoption of Si anodes. In this project, Si-SSE composite materials have been developed with a specific capacity >1500 mAh/g (at electrode level). A Si anode was coated by using a roll-to-roll process. All-solid-state NMC-Si pouch cells have been assembled and tested. Cycle life of 1100 at 100% DOD has been demonstrated in the solid state Si pouch cell. Excellent calendar life is achieved in the cell via a high temperature storage test.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Effects of catholyte aging on high-nickel NMC cathodes in sulfide all-solid-state batteries

Sulfide solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) in all-solid-state batteries (SSBs) are recognized for their high ionic conductivity and inherent safety. The LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathode offers a high thermodynamic potential of approximately 3.8 V vs. Li/Li + and a theoretical specific capacity of 200 mA h g −1 . However, the practical utilization of NMC811 in sulfide SSBs faces significant interfacial challenges. The oxidation instability of sulfide solid electrolytes against NMC811 and the formation of the cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) during cycling lead to degradation and reduced cell performance. Volumetric changes in NMC during lithiation and de-lithiation can also cause detachment from sulfide electrolytes or internal particle cracking. Despite extensive galvanostatic cycling studies to address the issues, the calendar life of sulfide SSBs remains poorly understood. Here, we systematically studied the effects of four different catholytes on the calendar aging of LiNbO 3 (LNO)-coated NMC811, including Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl), Li 3 InCl 6 –Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LIC–LPSCl), Li 3 YCl 6 –Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LYC–LPSCl), and Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 (LGPS). Our results indicate that LPSCl provides optimal capacity retention when stored at high state-of-charge (SOC) at room temperature, but the LIC–LPSCl cathode shows significant capacity degradation and chemical incompatibility. We also established an effective electrochemical calendar aging testing protocol to simulate daily usage, enabling quick inference of the calendar life of SSBs. In conclusion, this new testing approach accelerates materials selection strategies for high-nickel NMC composite cathodes in sulfide SSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Research and Development on Advanced Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices Enabling a Spectrum of Electrified Vehicles

The USABC Advanced Battery development plan had the following three focus areas: 1. Existing technology validation, implementation, and cost reduction 2. Identification of the next viable technology with emphasis on the potential to meet USABC cost and energy density goals. 3. Support high-risk, high-reward battery technology R&D The primary aim of this project was focused on the barriers that most impede wider public adoption of electrification in vehicles-cost, energy density, low-temp performance, calendar life, and improvements in abuse tolerance. The specific objectives are as follows: Cost Reduction: drive to significantly reduce battery cost to be in-line with the $\$$100/kWh or less (by the end of calendar year 2020) DOE cost goals. Additionally, goals of $\$$75/KWh were set for 2023 aligned with fast charge and some offset of energy density. Energy Density Increase: focus on improving the cell-level specific energy and energy densities to >350 watt hours per kilogram (Wh/kg) and >750Wh/L. Low Temperature Performance Increase: strive toward developments that improve the discharge power and eliminate or dramatically reduce the life limiting lithium plating associated with regenerative braking at low temperatures, during the program. Calendar Life Increase: drive to achieve a 15-year calendar life. Abuse Tolerance Improvement: strive to develop improvements in Li-ion abuse tolerance and/or development of electrochemical energy storage technologies with inherently better response to abuse circumstances. Emerging Areas: initiate new programs that address emerging technologies that arise during the contract period.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Battery calendar aging and machine learning

Batteries continue to attract immense attention due to the critical need for new energy technologies that can help humankind transition to a net-zero future. To meet global goals for implementation of new batteries, the research community needs to more coherently consider how to go about the process of innovation, development, and validation of new technologies. Current practices for bringing a new battery technology from the benchtop to deployment can be very time consuming and complex, given that batteries can have distinct aging pathways based on both how they are cycled and their storage conditions. In nearly all use cases, batteries experience periods of active cycling and also extended periods of rest. Thus, calendar time often occurs when a battery is close to fully charged. Currently, the combined cycle and calendar life aspects receive inconsistent attention during most stages of research and development. For batteries to fulfill the critical role envisioned to meet global energy demands, greater uniformity in practice is needed to alleviate potential delays caused by the inconsistent acquisition of aging data. In this study, we present our thoughts and recommendations on the need to further advance commonality and availability of calendar aging data for emerging high-energy and long-duration batteries. While there is a broad need to adopt best practices for both calendar and cycle life assessment, a push to greater uniformity in approach and reporting is sorely needed to allow calendar life predictions to harness many of the advances that have recently been seen for cycle life prediction using machine learning (ML) and other techniques.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS2000

Prototype Lithium-Ion Battery Developed for Mars 2001 Lander

In fiscal year 1997, NASA, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and the U.S. Air Force established a joint program to competitively develop high-power, rechargeable lithium-ion battery technology for aerospace applications. The goal was to address Department of Defense and NASA requirements not met by commercial battery developments. Under this program, contracts have been awarded to Yardney Technical Products, Eagle- Picher Technologies, LLC, BlueStar Advanced Technology Corporation, and SAFT America, Inc., to develop cylindrical and prismatic cell and battery systems for a variety of NASA and U.S. Air Force applications. The battery systems being developed range from low-capacity (7 to 20 A-hr) and low-voltage (14 to 28 V) systems for planetary landers and rovers to systems for aircraft that require up to 270 V and for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles that require capacities up to 200 A-hr. Low-Earth-orbit and geosynchronousorbit spacecraft pose additional challenges to system operation with long cycle life (>30,000 cycles) and long calendar life (>10 years), respectively.

Manzo, Michelle A.↗