Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “UT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Ultrasonic Testing (UT) Reference Standard for Additive Manufacturing Quality Control

Many additive manufacturing (AM) reference standards for build quality verification concentrate primarily on external features. In contrast, EPRI proposes a pair of AM reference blocks that feature only internal and embedded forms. This report presents, collates, and discusses quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) results from various techniques, including visual testing (VT), radiographic testing (RT), conventional ultrasonic testing (UT), and full matrix capture/total focusing method (FMC/TFM) scanning. The blocks are intended, as part of a larger series of blocks, to evaluate build quality and the relative performance of different NDE techniques in detecting various features. The limits of detectability and the closeness of the as-built shape to the intended form for certain features are quantified, facilitating direct comparison. Upon analysis of the results of this testing, it was found that FMC/TFM was consistently superior in detection, followed by conventional UT, then VT, and lastly RT.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOESC Remote Canister Closure System UT Inspection Couplant Solutions

The DOE Standard Canister (DOESC) Remote Canister Closure System is a remotely operated welding and inspection mechanism designed for the packaging of DOE-managed spent nuclear fuel into canisters. The ultrasonic testing (UT) inspection, included in the system, requires the use of water tanks that are opened to act as a couplant between the canister and the sensors. With the couplant, the UT inspection can guarantee accurate results determining imperfections in the weld.

12 - MGMT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTE↗

UT-GOM2-1 Hydrate Pressure Coring Expedition Summary (Chapter 1. Expedition Summary)

The UT-GOM2-1 Hydrate Pressure Coring Expedition drilled two wells in Green Canyon Block 955 (GC 955) in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico: Hole GC 955 H002 (H002) and Hole GC 955 H005 (H005). 21 10 ft (3.05 m) pressure cores were attempted in and near the methane hydrate reservoir. In the first hole, H002, 1 of the 8 cores were recovered under pressure and there was 34% recovery of sediment (both pressurized and depressurized). In the second hole, H005, 12 of the 13 cores were recovered under pressure and there was 72% recovery of sediment. The pressure cores were imaged and logged under pressure. Samples were quantitatively degassed either on-board or on-shore to determine the hydrate concentration and the gas composition. Pore water analyses were performed on depressurized samples, and sediment samples were collected to enable characterization of the microbial community. 21 3.3 ft (1 m) vessels containing pressure core sections were returned to the University of Texas for storage, distribution, and further analysis. These cores will provide a foundation for scientific exploration by the greater hydrate research community. This is the initial expedition summary (preliminary expedition report).

03 NATURAL GAS↗

UT-GOM2-1 Hydrate Pressure Coring Expedition: Chapter 3. Hole GC 955 H002

This report describes the operations, sample collection and handling, initial analyses, and preliminary interpretations developed by the UT-GOM2-1 Science Party for Hole GC 955 H002 (H002). This chapter describes the results of H002 pressure coring, physical property analysis, quantitative degassing, lithostratigraphic analysis, geochemical analysis, and wireline logging. All methods are described in Chapter 2 Expedition Methods.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

UT-GOM2-1: Chapter 4. Hole GC 955 H005

This report describes the operations, sample collection and handling, initial analyses, and preliminary interpretations developed by the UT-GOM2-1 Science Party for Hole GC 955 H005 (H005). This chapter describes H005 pressure coring, physical property analysis, quantitative degassing, lithostratigraphic analysis, geochemical analysis, and wireline logging. All methods are described in Chapter 2 Expedition Methods

03 NATURAL GAS↗

Data Report: UT-GOM2-1 Sediment Grain Size Measurements at Site GC 955, Holes H002 and H005

Sediment grain size measurement in marine sediments provides a record of the stratigraphic variation in grain size and thus energy regime at the time of deposition. In addition to the grain size distribution, the degree of sediment sorting can also be calculated, and together they both influence primary sediment porosity and permeability. Here we present sediment grain size results from laser diffraction particle size analysis of samples from pressure cores collected during the 2017 UT GOM2-1 Expedition. We measured both bulk sediment and organic carbon-free sediment fractions for 46 samples and organic carbon-free sediment for 5 samples at Site GC 955, Holes H002 and H005. Differences between the bulk sediment and organic carbon-free fractions reflect the relative amount and size fraction of the organic carbon. The sample results presented here represent the grain size variation of the host lithology across the Green Canyon (GC) 955 gas hydrate reservoir.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

Data Report: UT-GOM2-1 Lithostratigraphic Core Description Logs at Site GC 955, Holes H002 and H005

Lithostratigraphic core description provides a record of the stratigraphic variation in composition, texture, and sedimentary structure preserved in marine sediment cores. Here we present graphical lithostratigraphic core description logs for pressure cores collected during the 2017 UT GOM2-1 Expedition. The cores summarized here were those that were not retrieved under pressure, but nevertheless recovered some sufficient, intact strata that represent the host lithology across the Green Canyon (GC) 955 gas hydrate reservoir. Our results here represent visual core descriptions and include split core photos and location data for samples collected during core description.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

UT-GOM2-2 Preliminary Report: Terrebonne Basin Northern Gulf of Mexico, 30 July-28 September 2023

In the summer and fall of 2023, the Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Hydrate Coring Expedition (UT-GOM2-2) drilled, cored, made downhole measurements, and analyzed samples from the seafloor to the base of the gas hydrate stability zone in one location (Site H, WR313) in the Terrebonne basin, deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Analyses of data and samples from the expedition will inform biological, geochemical, and geomechanical models to constrain the role of gas hydrates in the carbon cycle and the potential for gas hydrates as an energy resource. Pressure and conventional cores were collected continuously to a depth of 155.1 meters below the seafloor (mbsf). At deeper depths, cores were taken periodically from hydrate-bearing sands and their bounding muds to a total depth of 861.3 mbsf. 162.6 m of conventional core and 54.8 m of pressure core were obtained. Twelve temperature measurements were made between 27.1 and 144.5 mbsf to determine the geothermal gradient. At the seafloor, more than 4 m of sandy silt of unknown origin was encountered. Beneath this sand, to a depth of ~200 mbsf, the section was composed of interbedded mud and biogenic carbonate ooze. The biogenic ooze correlated to low density and high porosity intervals observed in the previously acquired logging while drilling (LWD) data and as measured. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy constrains the entire record to the Pleistocene (< 0.91 million years) with a pronounced increase in sedimentation rate with depth. Beneath 200 mbsf, the section was predominantly composed of mud with two thicker, hydrate-bearing coarse-grained intervals, which are commonly known as the Blue and Orange sands. The dissolved gas concentration was quantified from pressure cores. In the shallow section, dissolved methane concentration increased below the sulfate-methane transition zone (SMTZ) and reaches saturation (the limit of solubility for methane) at 147 mbsf. Gas expansion was very common in conventional and depressurized pressure (conventionalized) cores below the SMTZ. At deeper depths, the methane concentration within muds bounding the Blue and Orange reservoirs was generally found to be less than saturation. The dissolved and hydrate gas composition is consistent with a microbial source, containing greater than 99.99% methane and only trace concentrations of ethane, propane, and butane. The methane to ethane ratio (C 1 /C 2 ) and the methane to ethane plus propane (C 1 /(C 2 +C 3 )) decrease with depth down to at least 678 mbsf, mainly driven by the increase in ethane with depth. It is unclear if this trend continues through the Orange sand interval. The δ 13 C isotopic signature of methane ranges between -69.9 and -78.5 ‰ Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB). Pressure core recovery of all sandy intervals was poor. However, pressure core logs of the Orange sand show intervals of low density and high velocity, which are indicative of high hydrate saturation. One core from within the Orange sand was composed of interbedded graded sandy silt and mud. The sandy silts from this core are composed of mainly quartz and feldspar with some lithics. Most of the recovered pressure core samples are maintained at near in-situ pressure and temperature (within the hydrate stability field) at the University of Texas Pressure Core Center awaiting analysis. In the shallow section, samples will be used to determine the flux of organic carbon through the basin system, find the rate at which that carbon was consumed, and understand the microbial population responsible for these processes. In the deeper section, samples from in and around the hydrate reservoirs will be used to determine the petrophysical properties of the reservoir and bounding seals in these systems.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

Heat Loss Characteristics and Energy Use of Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper (PZAS) at the UT-SRP Pilot Plant

Heat duty and heat loss were measured at the pilot plant at UT Austin. Heat loss was measured with energy balances using water. Heat loss was studied using surface temperature measurements over 68 different locations at the pilot plant. Surface temperature measurements indicated that bare metal surfaces were the primary source of heat loss from the pilot plant. Heat loss from bare metal surfaces was at least 50% controlled by natural convection and in many cases was as high as 75% natural convection controlled. Measured heat loss at the pilot plant was 20100 BTU/hr and overall heat loss did not show any dependence on the heat rate of the plant. Compared to PZAS™ at the National Carbon Capture Center, heat loss relative to heat rate was higher at 38%. The relative heat loss at the pilot plants was found to decrease by 20% per MW of added capacity. Measured net heat duty was found to be dependent on measured lean loading and cold rich bypass flow rate. Measured net heat duty was between 2.2 and 2.4 GJ/tonne at an optimum lean loading of 0.2–0.21 mol/mol. Data reconciliation by Aspen Plus® Data Fit™ underpredicted CO2 flow rate by 20% due to an overprediction of lean loading by 19%, indicating a necessary change in thermodynamic parameters in the model. This resulted in an over prediction of heat duty by 33% on average.

Amine scrubbing, stripper, energy requirement, hea↗

Diffusion of Innovations: Interplay of Social, Economic, Technological, and Policy Drivers in the Solar Industry. Summary of UT Austin Student Capstone Research Projects

The University of Texas at Austin’s Policy Research Project (PRP), a nine-month (two semesters) capstone, is a keystone of the core curriculum at the LBJ School of Public Affairs. In PRPs, small groups of students, under the mentorship of a faculty director, take on real-world problems that require special knowledge and skill sets. PRPs expose students to challenges in formulating and executing research, and in communicating academic research and related complex data to broader stakeholder communities and decision makers. The PRP structure is an innovative and effective approach for integrating research within the teaching and training of graduate students who are preparing themselves to address important real-world problems at the intersection of society, economics, technology, and policy. The project summaries below describe seven papers developed during September 2017 – May 2018 as part of a PRP on “Diffusion of Innovations: Interplay of Social, Economic, Technological, and Policy Drivers in the Solar Industry.” Twenty graduate students, drawn from the LBJ School’s Masters in Public Affairs and Masters in Global Policy Studies programs and the Jackson School Geoscience’s Energy and Earth Resources program, participated in this PRP. Dr. Varun Rai, Associate Professor and Associate Dean for Research at the LBJ School, directed the PRP, with support from his research team including: Dr. Ariane Beck, Dr. Ashok Sekar, D. Cale Reeves, and Erik Funkhouser. Clients for the project included the U.S. Department of Energy (Casey Canfield), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Ben Hoen, Galen Barbose Joachim Seel, Naïm Darghouth, Ryan Wiser), and National Renewable Energy Laboratory (Benjamin Sigrin, Eric O’Shaughnessy). The seven projects separately addressed one of the following topics: (1) low- and middle-income PV adoption, (2) modeling economic and information intervention design, (3) evaluation of DOE’s Solar in Your Community Challenge, (4) property value impacts near large-scale solar facilities, (5) solar market maturity and evolution of business models, (6) social media data for predicting PV adoption, and (7) individual-level variation in adoption of innovations. Many of the papers relied on data collected and curated by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, including data embedded within the annual Tracking the Sun and Utility-Scale Solar reports. Each of the seven teams in the PRP prepared a research paper. The PRP culminated with a full-day conference at UT Austin in May 2018 to present findings from the seven projects in this PRP to a broad audience of about 75 experts from academia, national labs, industry, and government from across the country.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Shock waves generated by the intense solar flare of 1972, August 7, 15:00 UT

The dynamic radio spectrum of the class 3B solar flare of 1972, August 7, 15:00 UT, over the band 10 to 2000 MHz is examined. Type II and type IV bursts in the spectrum are interpreted in terms of a piston-driven shock, which appeared to be traveling at a velocity of about 1500 km per sec and which generated pulsations in the band 100 to 200 MHz as it passed through the corona. The progress of the shock through the interplanetary plasma was subsequently monitored by Malitson et al. with radio equipment covering the band 0.03 to 2.6 MHz on the IMP-6 satellite.

Maxwell, A.↗

Cosmic ray intensity variations during 0200-0700 UT, August 5, 1972

The cosmic ray intensity variations over the energy range of about 0.5 MeV to 1 GeV during the early part of August 5 are discussed in relation to the intensity changes during the entire period of activity (August 2 to 11). Measurements of the interplanetary magnetic field and particle data from ground-based neutron monitors, lunar sensors, and detectors in board Explorers 41 and 43 are used in the investigation. Analysis is made of intensity changes during the period from 0200 to 0700 UT on August 5, the north-south asymmetry in neutron monitor intensities, changes in the alpha particle/proton flux ratios, the lag in onset times as recorded by the two Explorers, and observations of flux enhancement by the lunar detectors. The results indicate that the enhanced particle fluxes (about 1 GeV) were due to a leakage of galactic cosmic rays into a low-intensity region of the interplanetary magnetic field bounded by tangential discontinuities, which connected to different particle sources both near the sun and in the outer solar system.

Venkatesan, D.↗

Evidence for impulsive ion acceleration during the 0312 UT flare of 1980 June 7

One of the basic problems concerning the physics of solar flares is related to the process which is responsible for the acceleration of both electrons and ions. It has been proposed that the acceleration process proceeds in two different phases. The first phase results in the acceleration of electrons to energies in the range from 10 to 100 KeV. Electrons and ions with energies exceeding 30 MeV are finally produced during the second phase. Attention is given to the observational evidence which shows that these two phases, if in fact they are separate, must operate within seconds of each other, and that this process must be able to repeat itself producing pulses of electrons and ions approximately every 10 seconds. The observations were made with the Gamma Ray Spectrometer (GRS) on the SMM satellite during the 0312 UT flare on June 7, 1980.

Forrest, D. J.↗

A direct observation of solar neutrons following the 0118 UT flare on 1980 June 21

The Gamma Ray Spectrometer on the Solar Maximum Mission satellite has observed energetic solar neutrons (greater than 50 MeV) at the earth following a solar flare that occurred on the west limb on June 21, 1980 at 01:18:20 UT. Impulsive photon emission from 10 keV to greater than 65 MeV lasting over a period of about 66 s was followed by a transient flux of 50-600 MeV neutrons incident over a 17 minute period. The peak counting rate corresponds to an average flux at the earth of (3.8 + or - 0.6) x 10 to the -2nd neutrons/sq cm s at 130 MeV. These observations indicate the emission of 3 x 10 to the 28th neutrons/sr with energies greater than 50 MeV, requiring the rapid acceleration (much less than 60 s) of protons to GeV energies during the impulsive phase of the flare.

Chupp, E. L.↗

Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the coronal transient associated with the solar limb flare of 1980, June 29, 18:21 UT

The spatial and temporal behavior of excess and depleted density regions of the coronal transient accompanying the west limb solar flare of 18:21 UT on June 29, 1980, is modeled mathematically on the basis of SMM-X-ray-polychrometer data, and the results are compared to observations made with the radio spectrograph at Harvard Radio Astronomy Station at Fort Davis and with the NCAR/HAO Mark III K-coronameter at Mauna Loa. Input data for the model include T(max) = about 20 x 10 to the 6th K, n(max) = about 4 x 10 to the 11th/cu cm, and an assumed ejection velocity of 200 km/sec. Computations using an improved 2D nonplane MHD model are carried out for locally open and closed magnetic topologies. The spatially wide, large-amplitude, temporarily steepened MHD wave predicted by the model for both magnetic topologies is shown to agree well with the observations, except that the predicted density enhancement exceeded observed values by at least 50 percent for the closed field and by a factor of 3 for the open field. This discrepancy is seen as an indication that the mass emitting soft X-rays was confined in closed-field regions near the sun during the obervation period.

Wu, S. T.↗

Solar neutrons from the impulsive flare on 1982 June 3 at 1143 UT

A transient flux of high energy solar neutrons from 50 MeV to about 1 GeV has been detected by the Gamma Ray Spectrometer (GRS) on the Solar Maximum Mission (SMM) satellite following an intense burst of high energy photons (less than 100 MeV) peaking at 1143:29 UT. The neutrons were also detected by the IGY neutron monitor on Jungfraujoch (Switzerland). In this paper the SMM GRS observations are summarized and compared with the Jungfraujoch neutron monitor data, and both the time dependent neutron flux at the earth and the neutron emission spectrum at the sun are estimated.

Chupp, E. L.↗

The largest white light flare ever observed: 25 April 1984, 0001 UT

The X13/3B flare of 25 April 1984, 0001 UT, was accompanied by intense white light emission that reached a peak power output approx 2x10 to the 29 erg/sec in the optical/near UV continuum; the total energy radiated in the continuum alone reached 10 to the 32 power ergs. This was the most powerful white light flare yet recorded, exceeding the peak output of the largest previously known event by more than one order of magnitude. The flare was a two-ribbon type with intense embedded kernels as observed in both Balmer-alpha line and Balmer continuum, and each of these flare ribbons covered separate umbrae shortly after the maximum of the event. The onset and peak of the white light emission coincided with the onset and peak of the associated E greater than 100 KeV hard X-ray burst, while the 1-8 angstrom soft X-ray emission reached its maximum 4 minutes after the peak in white light.

Neidig, D. F.↗