Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “U3Si2”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Challenges and opportunities to alloyed and composite fuel architectures to mitigate high uranium density fuel oxidation: uranium silicide

We report the challenges and opportunities to alloyed and composite fuel architectures designed and intended to mitigate oxidation of the fuel during a cladding breech of a water-cooled reactor are discussed in three review manuscripts developed in parallel, with the presented article focused on the oxidation performance of uranium silicide. Several high uranium density fuels are under consideration for deployment as accident tolerant and/or advanced technology nuclear reactor fuels, including UN, U 3 Si 2 , UC and UB 2 . Presented here are the literature for the U3Si2 degradation modes, thermodynamics, and oxidation performance of the pure compound and its reported alloyed and composite architectures. Furthermore, this review covers the materials and techniques for the incorporation of additives, dopants, or composite fuel architectures to improve the oxidation/corrosion behavior for high uranium density fuels for use in LWRs.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Robust Processing Approach for Producing Highly Loaded Dispersion Fuels

A robust fabrication method, resulting in higher yields, to produce highly loaded U3Si2-Al dispersion fuels for converting research reactors from a high enriched to a low enriched uranium fuel needs to be developed. To reliably produce a highly loaded dispersion fuel, process changes need to be implemented where the traditional approach has experienced challenges and poor yields. The present work describes the key changes needed. Parts of the work were done with uranium silicide and parts were completed with a representative silicide surrogate. The major deviations from traditional fabrication methods are associated with a refinement in particle size distribution, method for compacting to achieve complex shapes, and welding of the aluminum picture frame used to encapsulate the fuel compact. Methods for rolling and arc melting are also discussed. By using the methods described within, fabricating a highly loaded dispersion fuel that can meet stringent fuel homogeneity and geometry requirements at higher yields and lower costs may be possible.

U3Si2, HFIR, dispersion fuel, Uranium, Research Re↗

Phase-field simulations to inform nuclear fuel performance modeling

Software tools to simulate nuclear fuel performance at the engineering scale, such as Idaho National Laboratory (INL)’s BISON code, are increasingly relied upon in regulatory and economic decision-making. However, accurate results from these tools depends on the availability of materials parameters that are used as input. In recent years, atomistic and mesoscale simulation methods have emerged as a cost-effective, expedient means to obtain such input parameters. Phase-field simulations using INL’s Marmot application have been used to obtain microstructure-level parameters and to improve material models for fuel performance modeling using BISON. In this talk, recent examples of this process are given, including applications in UO2, U3Si2, and UZr fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Conceptual Fuel Element Design Candidates for Conversion of High Flux Isotope Reactor with Low-Enriched Uranium Silicide Dispersion Fuel

Engineering design studies are underway to assess the feasibility of converting the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) to operate with low-enriched uranium (LEU) silicide dispersion (U3Si2-Al) fuel. These studies are supported by the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration’s Office of Material Management and Minimization. A systematic approach employing neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analyses have been performed with the ORNL Shift and HFIR Steady State Heat Transfer Code tools, respectively, to predict reactor performance and thermal safety margins for proposed LEU3Si2-Al fuel designs. The design process was initiated by generating an optimized design with fabrication features identified from previous studies that result in excellent performance and safety metrics. The approach continued by substituting a single fabrication feature anticipated to be difficult to manufacture with another feature expected to perform an analogous function to that of the removed feature. Four conceptual fuel element design candidates, with various fabrication features, for conversion of HFIR with 4.8 gU/cm3 LEU3Si2-Al fuel have been generated and shown to meet pre-defined performance and safety metrics. Results to date indicate that HFIR could convert with the subject fuel system and meet performance and safety requirements if, among other considerations, fabrication of the specific design features are demonstrated and qualification of the fuel is complete under HFIR-specific conditions.

Chandler, David↗

Phase Equilibria and Thermochemistry of Advanced Fuels: Modeling Burnup Behavior (Final Report)

Achieving the goal of developing advanced fuel concepts that meet the DOE objectives of being robust, demonstrating high performance, and are more tolerant of accident conditions than current fuel systems will require a thorough understanding of the thermophysical and thermochemical properties of the constituent materials. Non-oxide fuel systems are being explored under the Advanced Fuels Program that hold significant promise for improved performance and accident tolerance, including the uranium silicide-based system considered in the current work. Prospective cladding materials currently considered that contribute to improved accident tolerance include silicon carbide composites and ferritic alloys (Fe-Cr-Al base compositions). Thus, the effort developed thermochemical models and values, supported with targeted experiments, to evaluate the ferritic alloy and silicon carbide composite cladding systems in contrast to current zirconium alloy cladding. The developed detailed understanding will serve to aid in relatively early screening of candidate systems to avoid wasted effort, guide development of new fuel forms, and to provide a basis for predicting and modeling fuel performance. Major deliverables for the project included: Thermochemical assessment and models of phases in the U-Si and U-Si-N systems; thermochemical evaluation supported by experimental measurements of fuel-cladding interactions of silicide fuel with baseline zirconium, ceramic composite, and ferritic alloy cladding; thermochemical assessment and models of phases supported by experimental measurements for silicide fuel with key fission products provided in a dataset and reported in refereed publications. Within the project a significantly refined U-Si phase diagram was developed and reported that now includes homogeneity ranges for key phases, such at the U 3 Si 2 proposed fuel phase, and settles issues with regard to uncertainty in the stability of some phases. Computational efforts together with key experiments has determined phase formation in interactions between U 3 Si 2 and Zircaloy-4 cladding material, a ferritic FeCrAlY alloy of interest as an advanced cladding material, and silicon carbide, also of interest as a fiber-reinforced composite cladding. As expected, very significant reactions occur between U3Si2 and Zircaloy-4, with much less interaction at higher temperatures for the ferritic alloy, and finally interactions with SiC only in the region of contact. A potentially major issue is the stability of U 3 Si 2 fuel that has undergone significant burnup. The result is the loss of the uranium metal, liberating silicon, and the formation of concomitant fission product elements that either dissolve in the U 3 Si 2 phase or form independent, and possibly silicide phases. A combination of experimental determinations of phase formation of U 3 Si 2 reacted with representative fission products yttrium, gadolinium, cerium, zirconium, and molybdenum and first principles calculations has helped understand the fuel chemistry. The behavior of the U 3 Si 2 phase and the partitioning of silicon to possible fission product phases with burnup was thus determined, with significant dissolution in U 3 Si 2 of cerium, gadolinium, zirconium, and plutonium predicted along with independent phase formation of a U-Mo-Si ternary phase, yttrium silicide, and elemental selenium. It can be concluded that at significant burnup there will be a very minor amount of the U 3 Si 2 fuel phase that will decompose to a lower silicide or a uranium alloy as silicon preferentially forms a secondary phase.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

High Flux Isotope Reactor Low-Enriched Uranium High Density Silicide Fuel Preliminary Design Update: System Transient Analysis

As a part of conversion efforts from highly enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel under direction of the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy, multiple proposed designs of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) have been created and assessed regarding reactor physics performance metrics, including designs utilizing uranium silicide dispersion fuel (U3Si2-Al). This report updates the previous analyses that evaluated the nuclear safety performance of LEU fuel designs with respect to selected accident events from the HFIR Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Both the Low Density (LD) and High Density (HD) Optimized designs’ reactivity initiated accident fuel performance improved relative to the HEU fuel, attributed to greater 238 U negative Doppler feedback. However, the thermal margins for primary coolant system accidents were reduced with some acceptance criteria unable to be met. The need to resolve reduced thermal margin, open modeling items, and unresolved assumptions was identified.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Plan to Qualify New Fuel for the High Flux Isotope Reactor for Material Minimization

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of five high power research reactors the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) Program, Office of Conversion is working to convert from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to using low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This effort stems from the primary objective within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to achieve permanent threat reduction by minimizing, and when possible, eliminating weapon-usable nuclear material around the world. Under M3’s Office of Conversion, the U.S. High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Project is pursuing fuel qualification and licensing of LEU fuels to support the high-performance reactors. All high-performance reactors except HFIR will be converted to LEU monolithic uranium-molybdenum alloy fuel. HFIR will be evaluated for conversion to LEU using a uranium silicide fuel, namely, U3Si2-Al dispersion fuel. The mission of the USHPRR Project is to develop the technology needed to reduce, and eventually eliminate, worldwide use of HEU in civilian applications. The goal is to develop the technical means needed to use low enriched uranium (LEU) instead of HEU fuel in research and test reactors without significant penalties in performance, economics, or safety of the reactors. The USHPRR Project has four major elements, called Pillars: Fuel Qualification (FQ) managed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Fuel Fabrication (FF) managed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Reactor Conversion (RC) managed at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne), and Cross-Cutting (CC) managed at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). FQ is responsible for the qualification of the fuel type. RC is responsible for supporting reactor conversion analysis and overseeing licensing submittals leading to conversions of domestic reactors to LEU fuel. For the FQ effort, FQ (INL) worked in collaboration with RC (Argonne) and ORNL to develop the plan for the uranium silicide fuel qualification for HFIR. The resulting HFIR Fuel Qualification Plan provides the general approach for the USHPRR team to move the selected uranium silicide fuel design for HFIR conversion through qualification. Authorization and use in HFIR will be approved through the DOE’s Office of Science. Uranium silicide fuel was previously qualified in NUREG-1313 at an approximate maximum heat flux of 1.4 MW/m2 and a maximum fuel section temperature of about 130°C. In addition to the different regulator process utilized by DOE, these upper limits will be exceeded in HFIR; therefore, further testing will be necessary to ensure the fuel can meet HFIR qualification requirements. The HFIR fuel loading may exceed 4.8 gU/cm3 which was determined in the NUREG-1313 safety evaluation to be acceptable for use in non-power NRC-licensed reactors provided there exist no other safety considerations. In addition, the uranium silicide fuel will need to be qualified in a HFIR-specific design. This plan includes the currently available information from the USHPRR Project Functions and Requirements document and expands these requirements to ensure that planned tests have traceable results providing evidence that the requirements have been met. Data collection methods are discussed as well as the process to show that the requirements have been met. This document is designed to provide a pathway for researchers to obtain data necessary and at the appropriate quality level for HFIR fuel qualification

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Plan to Qualify New Fuel for the High Flux Isotope Reactor for Material Minimization

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of five high power research reactors the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) Program, Office of Conversion is working to convert from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to using low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This effort stems from the primary objective within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to achieve permanent threat reduction by minimizing, and when possible, eliminating weapon-usable nuclear material around the world. Under M3’s Office of Conversion, the U.S. High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Project is pursuing fuel qualification and licensing of the high-performance reactors to operate with LEU fuels. All high-performance reactors except HFIR will be converted to LEU monolithic uranium-molybdenum alloy fuel. HFIR will be evaluated for conversion to LEU using a uranium silicide fuel, namely, U3Si2-Al dispersion fuel.The mission of the USHPRR Project is to develop the technology needed to reduce, and eventually eliminate, worldwide use of HEU in civilian applications. The goal is to develop the technical means needed to use low enriched uranium (LEU) instead of HEU fuel in research and test reactors without significant penalties in performance, economics, or safety of the reactors. The USHPRR Project has four major elements, called Pillars: Fuel Qualification (FQ) managed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Fuel Fabrication (FF) managed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Reactor Conversion (RC) managed at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne), and Cross-Cutting (CC) managed at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). FQ is responsible for the qualification of the fuel type. RC is responsible for supporting reactor conversion analysis and overseeing licensing submittals leading to conversions of domestic reactors to LEU fuel. For the FQ effort, FQ (INL) worked in collaboration with RC (Argonne) and ORNL to develop the plan for the uranium silicide fuel qualification for HFIR.The resulting HFIR Fuel Qualification Plan provides the general approach for the USHPRR team to move the selected uranium silicide fuel design for HFIR conversion through qualification. Authorization and use in HFIR will be approved through the DOE’s Office of Science. Uranium silicide fuel was previously qualified in NUREG-1313 at an approximate maximum heat flux of 1.4 MW/m2 and a maximum fuel section temperature of about 130°C. In addition to the different regulator process utilized by DOE, these upper limits will be exceeded in HFIR; therefore, further testing will be necessary to ensure the fuel can meet HFIR qualification requirements. The HFIR fuel loading may exceed 4.8 gU/cm3 which was determined in the NUREG-1313 safety evaluation to be acceptable for use in non-power NRC-regulated reactors provided there exist no other safety considerations. In addition, the uranium silicide fuel will need to be qualified in a HFIR-specific design. This plan includes the currently available information from the USHPRR Project Functions and Requirements document and expands these requirements to ensure that planned tests have traceable results providing evidence that the requirements have been met. Data collection methods are discussed as well as the process to show that the requirements have been met. This document is designed to provide a pathway for researchers to obtain data necessary and at the appropriate quality level for HFIR fuel qualification.

Shokes, Tamara↗

History of Melt-Processing System at SRNL

Capabilities of Melt Treatment Technology • Research Reactor Aluminum SNF (can extend to SS and Mg Clad Fuel) Aluminum Cladding Alloy • Typical thickness = 38 mils • Boehmite layer > 50 µm • Fuel Core • U -Alx, U308-Al; U3Si2-Al • Fabricated by cast extrusion or powder metallurgy • Enrichment = 20% to > 90% U235 • Typical Reactor Burnup = 5% to 55% • Thermal Output: <100 W, after 10 Years in storage

Adams, Thad M.↗

Forming Complex Nuclear Fuel Shapes in High-Loaded Silicide Surrogates

This work provides proof of the concept that high silicide loading nuclear fuel meat surrogates with complicated geometries can be produced with uniform density through an application of cold isostatic pressing (CIP). Dispersion fuels with high volumetric loading of U_3 Si_2 have challenges in fabrication. Fabrication involves a series of processes including powder compaction, rolling pack assembly, and roll forming. PNNL has undertaken extensive experimental work using MoSi2 and WSi2 as surrogates for U3Si2 to explore the feasibility of reducing or eliminating the issues through the application of CIP in the powder pressing step prior to rolling pack assembly. The composites were prepared at >40 vol% silicide loading, which was representative of 4.8 gU/cm^3 and formed via CIP at 50 KSI (Kilopound per Square Inch) pressure. The CIP mold design was taken through a design process which aimed to reduce defects and increase precision. The application of CIP here provides a broad strategy for producing highly loaded dispersion fuels with complex geometries and uniform density.

Clelland, Dustin T.↗

Cr-doped U 3 Si 2 composite fuels under steam corrosion

Dense Cr-doped U 3 Si 2 composite fuels were manufactured by spark plasma sintering, and the effects of Cr addition on mechanical properties and oxidation resistance were investigated. Furthermore, dynamic oxidation testing by thermogravimetric analysis revealed significantly improved oxidation resistance of U 3 Si 2 with minimal doping of 3 wt% Cr. The onset oxidation temperature increased to above 550 °C in air and ~520 °C in steam conditions for the 5 wt% and 10 wt% Cr-doped composites. Steam corrosion testing under 360 °C for 24 hours indicated well-maintained pellet integrity without pulverization for the 10 wt% Cr-doped U 3 Si 2 pellet which only showed minor surface oxidation. The first promising results open up the possibility of designing and manufacturing metal additive-doped U 3 Si 2 composite fuels with significantly-improved corrosion resistance as a potential candidate for accident tolerant fuels.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Development of a grain growth model for U 3 Si 2 using experimental data, phase field simulation and molecular dynamics

The purpose of this work is to develop a model for normal grain growth in U 3 Si 2 . The average grain boundary energy was determined from previously published molecular dynamics simulations. The grain growth kinetics were quantified at various temperatures by annealing nanocrystalline samples. Here, the mobility was determined by comparing phase field grain growth simulations to the experimental data.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Improvement of the $\mathrm{BISON U_3Si_2}$ modeling capabilities based on multiscale developments to modeling fission gas behavior

Uranium silicide (U 3 Si 2 ) is a concept explored as a potential alternative to UO 2 fuel used in light water reactors (LWRs) since it may improve accident tolerance and economics due to its higher thermal conductivity and increased uranium density. U 3 Si 2 has been previously used in research reactors in the form of dispersion fuel, but operated at lower temperatures than commercial LWRs. The research reactor data illustrated that significant gaseous swelling occurs as the fuel burnup increases. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the fission gas behavior of U 3 Si 2 under higher temperature LWR operating conditions. In this work, molecular dynamics and phase-field modeling techniques are used to reduce the uncertainty in select modeling assumptions made in developing the fission gas behavior model for U 3 Si 2 in the BISON fuel performance code. These lower length scale informed models are then utilized in the validation of BISON U 3 Si 2 modeling capabilities to simulate the ATF-1 experiments irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). Sensitivity analysis (SA) and uncertainty quantification (UQ) are included as part of the validation process to identify where further experiments and lower length scale modeling would be beneficial. Here, the multiscale modeling approach utilized in this work can be applied to new fuel concepts being explored for both LWRs and advanced reactors (e.g., uranium nitride, uranium carbide).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Thermal conductivity degradation due to radiation-induced amorphization in U 3 Si 2 : A pilot study

Here, in this study, we investigate the thermal conductivity of U 3 Si 2 amorphized by ion irradiation using 84 MeV 136 Xe ions at 190 °C. The suspended-bridge method was utilized to measure the thermal conductivity, allowing for a detailed analysis of the specimen while minimizing interference from other crystalline phases. Our results indicate that the thermal conductivity of amorphous U 3 Si 2 is significantly lower than that of unirradiated crystalline U 3 Si 2 . These findings are consistent with recent studies on in-pile-irradiated U 3 Si 2 samples that consider the effects of U 3 Si 2 amorphization, fission gas bubbles, and other impurities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Oxidation kinetics of SPS-densified U 3 Si 2 fuels—Microstructure impact

Here, U 3 Si 2 is a potential candidate for accident tolerant fuels because of its high uranium density and excellent thermal conductivity in comparison to UO 2 . However, U 3 Si 2 suffers from oxidation, steam corrosion, and subsequent disintegration/pulverization. The detailed investigation of kinetics that incorporates fundamental treatment of oxidation of U 3 Si 2 is scarcely reported, and the oxidation mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. In this paper, the oxidation behavior of microcrystalline (mc - ) and nanocrystalline (nc - ) U 3 Si 2 have been systematically investigated using a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) apparatus through a series of isothermal and non-isothermal kinetic studies. The isothermal kinetic study with a model-fitting approach indicates oxidation activation energy of 85 kJ/mol for dense mc - U 3 Si 2 and 96.4 kJ/mol for nc - U 3 Si 2 pellets, while the isoconversional approach leads to an activation energy in the range of 70–85 kJ/mol for mc - U 3 Si 2 and 75–86 kJ/mol for nc - U 3 Si 2 with three most common model-free methods, including Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose, Flynn–Wall–Ozawa, and Friedman methods. The derivation of oxidation activation energies using both isothermal and isoconversional methods highlights the approach to evaluate the oxidation resistance of nuclear materials using TGA quantitatively and makes it possible to compare among various nuclear fuels.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Coupled Experimental and Simulation Approach to Investigate the Impact of Grain Growth, Amorphization, and Grain Subdivision in Accident Tolerant U 3 Si 2 Light Water Reactor Fuel

Triuranium disilicide (U 3 Si 2 ) is being considered as an alternative accident tolerant fuel (ATF) due to its higher thermal conductivity. However, there is uncertainty in its use due to a lack of irradiation data at light water reactor (LWR) conditions. In this project, we used an integrated experimental and simulation approach to answer two significant questions pertaining to U 3 Si 2 that were not investigated by the Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) and Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) programs: (1) Will grain growth in the hotter portions of the fuel significantly impact U 3 Si 2 LWR fuel behavior? (2) Under what conditions do grain subdivision and amorphization occur in U 3 Si 2 and will either occur at LWR conditions? Our approach to answer these questions used in situ ion irradiation and annealing to investigate grain growth, grain subdivision, and amorphization, along with mesoscale simulations using the MARMOT tool. We found that while the grain boundary mobility of U 3 Si 2 is larger than that of UO 2 , grain growth in U 3 Si 2 fuel pellets will be less than in UO 2 and may be neglected due to the lower thermal conductivity and thus lower centerline temperature. We also found that amorphization will not occur in U 3 Si 2 above 600 K, such that it is not likely to occur at typical LWR operating conditions. Grain subdivision will occur at LWR conditions and will likely occur at lower burnups than in UO 2 .

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

BISON Development and Validation for Priority LWR-ATF concepts

Over the years, the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) (2015-2018, 2020) and Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) (2019) programs have provided support for development of Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) material models in the BISON fuel performance code. Since the beginning, the goal has been to utilize a multiscale modeling approach to gain a physical understanding of the fuel concepts of interest and to develop mechanistic models in the absence of a large amount of experimental data. This work builds upon that of previous years. In particular we present newly updated fission gas release models for both gas behavior in Cr 2 O 3 -doped UO 2 and U 3 Si 2 fuels, and a new creep model for U 3 Si 2 . The validation exercises completed last year are revisited with the latest models and the results updated. A brief summary of recent modeling activities for FeCrAl cladding is also provided.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Mesoscale modeling to inform Bison models of accident tolerant fuel concepts

U 3 Si 2 and doped UO 2 have been under investigation in recent years as potential accident-tolerant fuel concepts. In this report, lower-length scale studies of these fuel concepts carried out during Fiscal Year 2020 are detailed. U 3 Si 2 is a potential accident-tolerant fuel that shows promise due to its high thermal conductivity and higher uranium density relative to UO 2 . However, its swelling and fission gas release behavior in light water reactor (LWR) conditions is relatively unknown. To provide mechanistic insight and determine parameters for engineering-scale fuel performance modeling of pellet-form U 3 Si 2 , phase-field simulations of the growth, interconnection, and venting of intergranular fission gas bubbles were performed. The fractional coverage of the grain boundary and the fraction of bubble area that is vented were calculated as a function of time. From the simulation data, the fractional grain boundary coverage at saturation, an important parameter needed in engineering-scale modeling of swelling and fission gas release, was determined. Multiple simulations were run to determine the uncertainty in the calculated value. The effect of model assumptions and input parameters that are not well known was evaluated. Simulation results are compared to related theoretical and computational work. Based on the simulation results, a value of 0.60 for the fractional grain boundary coverage at saturation is recommended for U 3 Si 2 fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗