NASA NTRSDate not supplied
Combustor–turbine interactions (CTIs) are investigated by performing three-dimensional unsteady simulations using a realistic combustor and high-pressure turbine (HPT) configurations from the Energy Efficient Engine (E3) program. To understand CTIs, we compare the numerically predicted flow fields from single-component simulations (Step 1: the combustor + the first-stage stator of turbine; Step 2: the two-stage HPT imposing the time-averaged flow solution from Step 1 as the inflow boundary condition) and a fully coupled combustor–turbine simulation (Step 3) at the sea-level takeoff (SLTO) condition. In addition to three previous simulations where the cooling airflows inside the HPT had been neglected for all Step 1, Step 2, and Step 3, two new simulations of Step 2 and Step 3 take into account the cooling airflows using the source team approach. In this approach, to mimic the cooling airflows, we impose the source term at a specific area of a cooling airflow hole at the solid surfaces without making a mesh of each hole. The objective of this study is twofold. One is to investigate the effect of the presence of the cooling airflows on the aerodynamics of the combustor and HPT as well as the HPT performance. The second is to perform a detailed comparison among the calculated flowfields by two different numerical schemes, the central-difference with the standard Jameson–Schmidt–Turkel (CD-JST) scheme and the AUSM scheme. There is a noticeable difference in the hot-streak distributions at the first-stage stator. In addition, depending on the choice of the numerical scheme and the presence of the cooling airflows, an occurrence of shock waves appearing at the first-stage stator is greatly influenced. Thus, this has a noticeable impact on the HPT performance. It is shown that the estimated turbine efficiencies from Step 3 are about 7 % less than the ones from Step 2.
Combustor-turbine interaction↗