Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “TSCR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

26 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Filtration of Hanford Tank 241-AW-105 Supernatant at 16 °C

Approximately 9 L of supernatant from Hanford waste tank 241-AW-105 was delivered by Hanford Tank Waste Operations and Closure (H2C) to the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory (RPL) at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The thirty-six 241-AW-105 sample bottles consisted of four sets of nine samples, with each set pulled from a unique tank sampling level. Prior to testing, samples from each level were composited and diluted to 5.5 M Na to provide nominally level-independent feed for dead-end filtration and ion exchange testing. The composited 241-AW-105 supernatant was chilled to 16 °C for 1 week prior to testing. Filtration testing was then conducted using a backpulse dead-end filter (BDEF) system equipped with a feed vessel and a Mott inline filter (Model 6610, Media Grade 5) in the hot cells of the RPL. The purpose of this testing was to (a) demonstrate dead-end filtration (DEF) of 241-AW-105 feed at reduced temperature to obtain prototypic Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) flux rates and identify issues that may impact filtration after dilution to 5.5 M Na, and (b) provide feed for follow-on ion exchange unit operation. The feed was filtered through the BDEF system at a targeted flux of 0.065 gpm/ft2. For most of the filtration campaign, the differential pressure required to effect filtration at 0.065 gpm/ft2 was slow to increase. After all the feed bottles had been pumped into the slurry reservoir, the bottoms of the bottles were added to the reservoir and transmembrane pressure (TMP) reached 2.0 psid (the TSCR action limit). A backpulse was performed after >50 hours of filtration to remove fouled solids and reduce the TMP. The filter was cleaned after completing filtration of the 241-AW-105 feed, and clean water flux tests showed filter performance was effectively restored. Solids concentrated from the backpulse solutions were composed of steel-like particles, uranium-bearing phases, Mn-Fe phases, a Ce-bearing phase, Zr phases, and some smaller Ca-bearing particles. The Ca-bearing and U bearing phases were identified as calcite and clarkeite, respectively.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Strontium Speciation in Relevant Tank Waste Components Examined by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

The identification of chemical species formed in complex nuclear waste is crucial for the development and employment of advanced separations technologies to remediate the Hanford site by processing tank waste. The current Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) process deployed at Hanford utilizes crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange (IX) media to aid in the separation of low-activity waste for proper treatment and disposal. The inorganic IX media is highly selective for Cs but has been shown to also remove Sr from caustic simulants and small-scale IX processing of Hanford tank waste.(Fiskum, Rovira et al. 2019, Fiskum, Campbell et al. 2021, Westesen, Campbell et al. 2022) Quantitative Sr removal has not been observed in all tank waste supernates tested; thus, to better understand Sr removal and effectively predict processing behavior through TSCR, it is necessary to first investigate Sr speciation in tank waste. This work utilized electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) to identify ionic Sr complexes that form in the presence of NO 3 –, NO 2 –, OH–, and Cl–. Although our results show that NO 3 –, NO 2 –, and OH– are competitive for Sr 2+ binding, previous data from IX studies indicate that [SrOH] + is not the dominant species of concern in tank waste processing schemes.(Fiskum, Campbell and Trang-Le 2020) Our results show that the [Sr(NO3)]+ species and the [Sr(NO2)] + species form in considerable abundances, which may affect the ability to separate Sr using CST in nuclear waste separation processes.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Ion Exchange Processing of AW-105 Hanford Tank Waste through Crystalline Silicotitanate in a Staged 2- then 3-Column System

The Hanford Site stores an estimated 56 million gallons of mixed radioactive and chemically hazardous waste in large underground tanks. In support of the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) Program for expediting Hanford tank waste supernate treatment, laboratory-scale ion exchange processing using prototypic unit operations was conducted on AW-105 tank waste at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. This report describes the small-scale ion exchange testing with 9.2 L of diluted and filtered supernate from Tank 241-AW-105 (hereafter referred to as AW-105) at 16 °C (62 °F). One of the waste acceptance criteria (WAC) for the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste Facility is that the waste must contain less than 3.18×10 -5 Ci 137 Cs per mole of Na. For the AW-105 tank waste to meet this criterion, only 0.225% of the influent 137 Cs concentration may be delivered to the WTP; this requires a Cs decontamination factor of 445. Testing with AW-105 matched current Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) facility prototypic operations where a lead-lag configuration was used until the lag column reached the WAC limit, then a polish column was brought online for continued processing in a lead-lag-polish column configuration. Feed was processed at 1.9 bed volumes (BVs) per hour; the flowrate, in terms of contact time with the crystalline silicotitanate (CST) bed, matched the expected flowrate at TSCR. The Cs-decontaminated product was retained for vitrification testing (to be reported separately). The lead column reached 83% Cs breakthrough after processing ~1500 BVs of feed; the 50% Cs breakthrough was interpolated from the breakthrough data and occurred at 1041 BVs. Despite the AW-105 having a significantly higher K concentration (0.55 M compared to 0.10 M), testing compared to previous AP-107 ion exchange column testing at 16 °C showed no difference in BVs processed to reach the WAC on the lead column and only an approximate ~20 BV decrease in volume processed to reach the WAC limit on the lag column. The negligible differences in capacity despite the 5x concentration differences in K was determined to be due to the significantly lower NO3 concentration in the AW-105 supernate compared to the AP-107 tank waste matrix. A comparison in breakthrough curves for the two tests also indicated slightly faster kinetic behavior in the AW-105, with the variations in feed matrices (lower NO3 concentration) likely responsible for the deviation. The Cs effluent from the lag column reached the WAC limit after processing 772 BVs. Anticipating this breakthrough point, the polish column was preemptively installed around 675 BVs. Cs breakthrough from the lag column began at 300 BVs, reaching 1.10×10 1 µCi/mL, or 14.13 % Cs breakthrough, after processing all 1500 BVs of feed. The polish column processed nominally 830 BVs and reached 2.10×10 -1 µCi/mL, or 0.27 % Cs breakthrough at the conclusion of the test. Table S.1 and Figure S.1 summarize the observed column performance and relevant Cs loading characteristics.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Effect of Na Concentration on Cs Distribution with Crystalline Silicotitanate in Tank Waste Simulants

Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media is currently utilized in the tank side cesium removal (TSCR) system on the Hanford site to remove Cs-137 from the tank waste supernate. As the main dose contributor to the liquid supernate in Hanford tank waste, it is necessary to remove the Cs-137 to expedite low activity waste processing and immobilization. Ongoing batch contact experiments with CST have been done to tease out the impact of group II metals, anions, potassium, and temperature on Cs removal to better understand bounding conditions for operations as well as aid in development of a wholesome isotherm model to predict Cs behavior in the tank waste. This paper discusses the impact of Na concentration on Cs exchange and provides insight into the challenges associated with activity coefficient estimations for modeling Cs distribution in tank waste matrices.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2026

Plutonium Retention by Crystalline Silicotitanate under Hyperalkaline Conditions Relevant to Tank-Side Cesium-Removal at the Hanford Site

Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) is used in Hanford’s Tank-Side Cesium-Removal (TSCR) process to selectively remove Cs-137 from highly caustic, nitrate-rich tank supernatants. Recent testing with actual waste samples suggests that CST can also retain measurable plutonium (Pu), which could affect radiological classification and disposal pathways for spent CST. To quantify this behavior, Pu partitioning to CST was studied under Hanford-relevant conditions using batch-contact experiments in a representative simulant (2 M NaNO3, 0.7 M NaOH). Isotherm data were measured and distribution ratios calculated, with Cs+ uptake used as benchmark. Under low-carbonate conditions, Pu was retained strongly by CST in systems initially contacted with either PuO2 nanoparticles (Pu(IV)) or aqueous Pu(VI), with distribution ratios of ~2,200–3,700 mL/g, generally exceeding those for Cs+ (~400–1,000 mL/g). Increasing carbonate concentration strongly reduced PuO2 nanoparticle retention; at [Na2CO3] = 1 M, distribution ratios decreased by up to one order of magnitude to roughly 100–300 mL/g. Electron microscopy suggests that Pu retention involves a combination of mechanisms such as PuO2 NP aggregation induced by CST leachate components, and association with CST bead surfaces.

Neumann, J.↗
DOE OSTI2021

Tank Side Cesium Removal IXC-150 Cask Detonation Report

A set of experiments were conducted at Los Alamos National Laboratory’s firing point 88 to determine the blast pressure and effects of a stoichiometric gas mixture of Hydrogen (H 2 ) and Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O) on the IXC-150 Storage Pad Vent Stack assemblies. The Lab was asked to design, build, and test the vent stack assemblies using a reaction gas volume of 340 in 3 that mimics the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) Ion Exchange Column (IXC) assembly. The experimental system with vent stack assembly was designed with input from the Washington River Protection Services (WRPS) to ensure an accurate test setup. The tests were conducted at LANL on the newly built filter/gas assembly at the end of April 2021 timeframe, using WRPS supplied vent stack assemblies and internal HEPA filters. The objective of these tests was to observe that the structural integrity of the vent stack assemblies was maintained and determine the resulting blast overpressures at a distance of 16 and 32 inches from the assembly. All work was performed under the LANL Quality Assurance Program (SD330), using a graded application of ASME NQA-1- 2008/NQA-1a-2009. To ensure that all client quality assurance (QA) expectations were addressed, evaluation of the end data needs was performed and the appropriate controls applied for this work.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Characterization of CST Post-Processing AP-105 Hanford Tank Waste

The primary goal of the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, under development by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS), is to remove entrained solids and 137 Cs from the Hanford tank waste supernate to expedite production of low-activity waste. Ion exchange (IX) testing of 10.9 L of waste from Hanford tank 241-AP-105 (AP-105), performed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, used a lead-lag-polish column format, with a bed volume of 10 mL per column, to decontaminate tank waste supernate using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) as the IX media. The AP-105 Cs IX processing test, discussed elsewhere, resulted in a shorter transition zone (i.e., steeper load curve) than those defined by wastes from tanks 241-AP-107 and 241-AW-102.1 The shorter transition zone was indicative of a matrix effect retarding Cs capacity. Therefore, aliquots of spent CST from the lead, lag, and polish columns were subjected to a digestion protocol to quantify analytes retained by the CST and extrapolate the impact on Cs capacity. The spent CST was digested using a combination of 5 M HNO 3 and H 2 O 2 with vigorous heating and stirring. Due to the radiation dose accompanying the 137 Cs on the CST columns, a secondary Cs separation by ammonium molybdophosphate embedded in polyacrylonitrile (AMP-PAN) was performed to separate the 137 Cs from the CST so the samples could be contact-handled for analysis outside of a shielded facility.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Technology and Innovation Roadmap

This Technology and Innovation Roadmap outlines the Hanford Tank Waste Operations & Closure, LLC (H2C) strategic approach for advancing the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment Mission (HTWTM) through technology development. Our focus is on addressing technology needs that address risks, enhance efficiency, ensure worker safety, and uphold environmental standards. This Roadmap identifies key technology initiatives essential for the successful completion of the Hanford Site tank waste cleanup. Updated annually, it incorporates insights from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Integrated Tank Disposition Contractor (ITDC) H2C, recognized national lab experts, and fieldwork specialists. The Roadmap includes approximately 100 technology elements, each detailed in Technology Element Description Summaries (TEDS) and summarized in catalog sheets. These elements are crucial for aligning technology development activities with mission objectives across the HTWTM. With the initiation of the Direct-Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) program and the operation of the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, our focus now shifts to the support of scaled up production in East Area; applying similar and exploring new treatment alternatives to West Area Tank Waste; and advancing retrieval, delivery and treatment technologies for waste managed as high-level waste (HLW) across the Hanford tank farms. This transition is reflected in the technology and maturation (TM&E) charts, which highlight the evolving technology priorities. This document serves as a guide for navigating the challenges and opportunities in technology development at the Hanford Site.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗