Enabling Scalability in the Cloud for Scientific Workflows: An Earth Science Use Case
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Olaya, Paula↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Scientific Workflows”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Modeling the Performance and Scaling of Scientific Workflows with Resource-efficient Workflow Mini-apps
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Kilic, Ozgur↗
ScyFlow: An Environment for the Visual Specification and Execution of Scientific Workflows
With the advent of grid technologies, scientists and engineers are building more and more complex applications to utilize distributed grid resources. The core grid services provide a path for accessing and utilizing these resources in a secure and seamless fashion. However what the scientists need is an environment that will allow them to specify their application runs at a high organizational level, and then support efficient execution across any given set or sets of resources. We have been designing and implementing ScyFlow, a dual-interface architecture (both GUT and APT) that addresses this problem. The scientist/user specifies the application tasks along with the necessary control and data flow, and monitors and manages the execution of the resulting workflow across the distributed resources. In this paper, we utilize two scenarios to provide the details of the two modules of the project, the visual editor and the runtime workflow engine.
McCann, Karen M.↗
Scalable Composition and Analysis Techniques for Massive Scientific Workflows
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Computer science↗
ExaWorks software development kit: a robust and scalable collection of interoperable workflows technologies
Scientific discovery increasingly requires executing heterogeneous scientific workflows on high-performance computing (HPC) platforms. Heterogeneous workflows contain different types of tasks (e.g., simulation, analysis, and learning) that need to be mapped, scheduled, and launched on different computing. That requires a software stack that enables users to code their workflows and automate resource management and workflow execution. Currently, there are many workflow technologies with diverse levels of robustness and capabilities, and users face difficult choices of software that can effectively and efficiently support their use cases on HPC machines, especially when considering the latest exascale platforms. We contributed to addressing this issue by developing the ExaWorks Software Development Kit (SDK). The SDK is a curated collection of workflow technologies engineered following current best practices and specifically designed to work on HPC platforms. We present our experience with (1) curating those technologies, (2) integrating them to provide users with new capabilities, (3) developing a continuous integration platform to test the SDK on DOE HPC platforms, (4) designing a dashboard to publish the results of those tests, and (5) devising an innovative documentation platform to help users to use those technologies. Our experience details the requirements and the best practices needed to curate workflow technologies, and it also serves as a blueprint for the capabilities and services that DOE will have to offer to support a variety of scientific heterogeneous workflows on the newly available exascale HPC platforms.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Integrating HPC, AI, and Workflows for Scientific Data Analysis: Report from Dagstuhl Seminar 23352
The Dagstuhl Seminar 23352, titled “Integrating HPC, AI, and Workflows for Scientific Data Analysis,” held from August 27 to September 1, 2023, was a significant event focusing on the synergy between High-Performance Computing (HPC), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and scientific workflow technologies. The seminar recognized that modern Big Data analysis in science rests on three pillars: workflow technologies for reproducibility and steering, AI and Machine Learning (ML) for versatile analysis, and HPC for handling large data sets. These elements, while crucial, have traditionally been researched separately, leading to gaps in their integration. The seminar aimed to bridge these gaps, acknowledging the challenges and opportunities at the intersection of these technologies. The event highlighted the complex interplay between HPC, workflows, and ML, noting how ML has increasingly been integrated into scientific workflows, thereby enhancing resource demands and bringing new requirements to HPC architectures, like support for GPUs and iterative computations. The seminar also addressed the challenges in adapting HPC for large-scale ML tasks, including in areas like deep learning, and the need for workflow systems to evolve to leverage ML in data analysis fully. Moreover, the seminar explored how ML could optimize scientific workflow systems and HPC operations, such as through improved scheduling and fault tolerance. A key focus was on identifying prestigious use cases of ML in HPC and understanding their unique, unmet requirements. The stochastic nature of ML and its impact on the reproducibility of data analysis on HPC systems was also a topic of discussion.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
WfCommons: Data Collection and Runtime Experiments using Multiple Workflow Systems
Scientific workflows have become ubiquitous across scientific fields, and their execution methods and systems continue to be the subject of research and development. Most experimental evaluations of these workflows rely on workflow instances, which can be either real-world or synthetic, to ensure relevance to current application domains or explore hypothetical/future scenarios. The WfCommons project addresses this need by providing data and tools to support such evaluations. In this paper, we present an overview of WfCommons and describe two recent developments. Firstly, we introduce a workflow execution "tracer" for Nextflow, which significantly enhances the set of real-world instances available in WfCommons. Secondly, we describe a workflow instance "translator" that enables the execution of any real-world or synthetic WfCommons workflow instance using Dask. Our contributions aim to provide researchers and practitioners with more comprehensive resources for evaluating scientific workflows.
Casanova, Henri↗
Enabling Command-and-Control in Advanced In Situ Workflows
Scientific discovery is progressing towards autonomous science with the combination of scientific instruments, high-performance computing, and artificial intelligence in complex workflows. This evolution introduces new requirements for managing scientific workflows, including feedback loops, near real-time constraints, and the ability to dynamically control workflow execution. In situ workflows that analyze and visualize data as it is generated are well-suited to satisfy stringent time constraints and their iterative nature offers greater opportunities for command-and-control. However, only a few of the many workflow management systems available have been specifically designed to manage in situ workflows and often lack support for automated feedback loops that allow analysis and visualization components to interact with the main scientific data producer. To address this need, we present in this paper how to add command-and-control capabilities to a workflow management system. We identify the functional design requirements of such a command-and-control system, detail its architecture, interface, and core mechanisms, and illustrate how advanced in situ workflows can leverage command-and-control in three use cases: graceful termination with checkpoint, dynamic and adaptive data reduction, and event-triggered analysis.
Mehta, Kshitij [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000297149981)↗
Asynchronous Execution of Heterogeneous Tasks in ML-Driven HPC Workflows
Heterogeneous scientific workflows consist of numerous types of tasks that require execution on heterogeneous resources. Asynchronous execution of those tasks is crucial to improve resource utilization, task throughput and reduce workflows' makespan. Therefore, middleware capable of scheduling and executing different task types across heterogeneous resources must enable asynchronous execution of tasks. In this paper, we investigate the requirements and properties of the asynchronous task execution of machine learning (ML)-driven high-performance computing (HPC) workflows. We model the degree of asynchronicity permitted for arbitrary workflows and propose key metrics that can be used to determine qualitative benefits when employing asynchronous execution. Our experiments represent relevant scientific drivers, we perform them at scale on Summit, and we show that the performance enhancements due to asynchronous execution are consistent with our model.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Interpretable Models for Workflow Differentiation in High-Performance Scientific Networks
Scientific workflows in high-performance networks spawn hundreds of interdependent flows that must be managed collectively—yet existing network classifiers treat each flow in isolation, leading to fragmented QoS decisions and missed interflow patterns. We present a novel traffic classification solution that operates at the workflow level, distinguishing entire filetransfer operations from streaming analytics by capturing how concurrent flows interact and burst together. We introduce a workflow identification window (WIW) that ingests raw packet headers from parallel flows into unified tensors, preserving the spatial-temporal patterns that differentiate scientific workflows. This approach achieves 98.7% accuracy using CNN, LSTM, and hybrid architectures, while maintaining 84% accuracy on production traffic collected a week later—demonstrating robustness to temporal drift. By integrating SHAP and GradCAM explainability, we reveal that early-packet timing patterns and cross-flow correlations drive classification decisions, providing operators with interpretable insights. Our system enables coherent workflow-level QoS enforcement and dynamic bandwidth allocation in scientific networks, eliminating manual per-flow configuration while maintaining classification latency at millisecond level.
Giannakou, Anna [LBL, Berkeley]↗
Earth Science Data Processing With Nextflow
Earth science data processing tasks present many challenges. These tasks often process large input datasets and require scores of CPU-hours to generate results. All but the simplest tasks will be decomposed into a series of computational or data manipulation steps, also known as a scientific workflow. In order to reduce the burden of orchestrating and running the dependent processing steps, a workflow execution engine is required. This poster describes the lessons learned by the CLARREO Pathfinder (CPF) team while developing multiple scientific workflows and utilizing the open-source Nextflow engine to execute them in a cloud computing environment. The Nextflow engine is designed with the following stated goals: first, the engine does not dictate how individual steps in the task are implemented (i.e. it is language and interface agnostic); second, the engine supports easy configuration and modularity at the workflow level so that others can easily execute our workflows to reproduce results; lastly, the engine eases development by transparently scaling execution from local to remote environments. Nextflow was developed for the bioinformatics domain but is a good fit for other scientific workflows where the overall task is well-described by a dataflow diagram. The CPF team has developed Nextflow pipelines (i.e. scientific workflows) to simulate CLARREO radiance, generate large look-up tables for inter-calibration algorithms, and generate L4 intercalibration data products. These pipelines consume from single-digits to hundreds of thousands of CPU-hours. In the development and evolution of these pipelines we have discovered many design patterns, pitfalls, and solutions to common problems. Our goal is to demonstrate important aspects of how to design, implement, run, and ultimately share Nextflow pipelines in the domain of Earth science.
Aron D Bartle↗
Leveraging History to Predict Infrequent Abnormal Transfers in Distributed Workflows
Scientific computing heavily relies on data shared by the community, especially in distributed data-intensive applications. This research focuses on predicting slow connections that create bottlenecks in distributed workflows. In this study, we analyze network traffic logs collected between January 2021 and August 2022 at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC). Based on the observed patterns, we define a set of features primarily based on history for identifying low-performing data transfers. Typically, there are far fewer slow connections on well-maintained networks, which creates difficulty in learning to identify these abnormally slow connections from the normal ones. We devise several stratified sampling techniques to address the class-imbalance challenge and study how they affect the machine learning approaches. Our tests show that a relatively simple technique that undersamples the normal cases to balance the number of samples in two classes (normal and slow) is very effective for model training. This model predicts slow connections with an F1 score of 0.926.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Novel Approaches Toward Scalable Composable Workflows in Hyper-Heterogeneous Computing Environments
The annual Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS) is a premier venue for the scientific workflow community to present the latest advances in research and development on the many facets of scientific workflows throughout their life-cycle. The Lightning Talks at WORKS focus on describing a novel tool, scientific workflow, or concept, which are work-in-progress and address emerging technologies and frameworks to foster discussion in the community. This paper summarizes the lightning talks at the 2023 edition of WORKS, covering five topics: leveraging large language models to build and execute workflows; developing a common workflow scheduler interface; scaling uncertainty workflow applications on exascale computing systems; evaluating a transcriptomics workflow for cloud vs. HPC systems; and best practices in migrating legacy workflows to workflow management systems.
Titov, Mikhail↗
Toward designing effective exascale scientific computing workflows: experiences and best practices
Many fields within scientific computing have embraced advances in big-data analysis and machine learning, which often requires the deployment of large, distributed and complicated workflows that may combine training neural networks, performing simulations, running inference, and performing database queries and data analysis in asynchronous, parallel and pipelined execution frameworks. Such a shift has brought into focus the need for scalable, efficient workflow management solutions with reproducibility, error and provenance handling, traceability, and checkpoint-restart capabilities, among other needs. Here, we discuss challenges and best-practices for deploying exascale-generation computational science workflows on resources at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF). We present our experiences with large-scale deployment of distributed workflows on the Summit supercomputer, including for bioinformatics and computational biophysics, materials science, and deep learning model optimization. We also present problems and solutions created by working within a Python-centric software base on traditional HPC systems, and discuss steps that will be required before the convergence of HPC, AI, and data science can be fully realized. Our results point to a wealth of exciting new possibilities for harnessing this convergence to tackle new scientific challenges.
Coletti, Mark↗
F*** workflows: when parts of FAIR are missing
The FAIR principles for scientific data (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) are also relevant to other digital objects such as research software and scientific workflows that operate on scientific data. The FAIR principles can be applied to the data being handled by a scientific workflow as well as the processes, software, and other infrastructure which are necessary to specify and execute a workflow. The FAIR principles were designed as guidelines, rather than rules, that would allow for differences in standards for different communities and for different degrees of compliance. There are many practical considerations which impact the level of FAIR-ness that can actually be achieved, including policies, traditions, and technologies. Because of these considerations, obstacles are often encountered during the workflow lifecycle that trace directly to shortcomings in the implementation of the FAIR principles. Here, we detail some cases, without naming names, in which data and workflows were Findable but otherwise lacking in areas commonly needed and expected by modern FAIR methods, tools, and users. We describe how some of these problems, all of which were overcome successfully, have motivated us to push on systems and approaches for fully FAIR workflows.
Wilkinson, Sean↗
Workflows Community Summit 2022: A Roadmap Revolution
Scientific workflows have become integral tools in broad scientific computing use cases. Science discovery is increasingly dependent on workflows to orchestrate large and complex scientific experiments that range from the execution of a cloud-based data preprocessing pipeline to multi-facility instrument-to-edge-to-HPC computational workflows. Given the changing landscape of scientific computing (often referred to as a computing continuum) and the evolving needs of emerging scientific applications, it is paramount that the development of novel scientific workflows and system functionalities seek to increase the efficiency, resilience, and pervasiveness of existing systems and applications. Specifically, the proliferation of machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) workflows, need for processing large-scale datasets produced by instruments at the edge, intensification of near real-time data processing, support for long-term experiment campaigns, and emergence of quantum computing as an adjunct to HPC, have significantly changed the functional and operational requirements of workflow systems. Workflow systems now need to, for example, support data streams from the edge-to-cloud-to-HPC, enable the management of many small-sized files, allow data reduction while ensuring high accuracy, orchestrate distributed services (workflows, instruments, data movement, provenance, publication, etc.) across computing and user facilities, among others. Further, to accelerate science, it is also necessary that these systems implement specifications/standards and APIs for seamless (horizontal and vertical) integration between systems and applications, as well as enable the publication of workflows and their associated products according to the FAIR principles.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
A Task Based Approach for Co-Scheduling Ensemble Workloads on Heterogeneous Nodes
Scientific workflows consist of multiple, connected applications, with data and results flowing from one to another in a pipeline. Traditionally, such workflows are executed in sequential order, storing intermediate data in storage disks. Co-scheduling application workflows concurrently on the same compute nodes would greatly reduce the cost of moving data to/from storage and allow real-time analysis of intermediate results. Nevertheless, most parallel programming runtimes do not allow seamless integration of various applications in a scientific workflow, in part due to the complexity of managing data and resources. The situation is even more complicated for heterogeneous systems. In this work we extend the Minos Computing Library (MCL) runtime to accelerate pipe-lined and parallel workloads where multiple applications are running in the same system. MCL’s asynchronous task library and runtime dynamically manages resources to allow co-scheduling of multiple processes sharing heterogeneous resources. In addition, we design a custom ex- tension of the Open Compute Language (OpenCL) to enable multiple processes to share device memory. We enable MCL to coordinate these shared buffers to allow for easy, fast data sharing between applications. Using malleable micro-benchmarks and two application workflows that combine scientific simulation and AI-based analysis, we show that our method outperforms traditional approaches.
Index Terms—Parallel systems, Scheduling and Task ↗
Elastic Workflows with PMIx [Slides]
Scientific workflows increasing in complexity. Elastic workflows promise improved application and system performance.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗