A study of TiO 2 nanocrystal growth and environmental remediation capability of TiO 2 /CNC nanocomposites
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Remediation”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Groundwater Contamination, Subsurface Processes, and Remediation Methods: Overview of the Special Issue of Water on Groundwater Contamination and Remediation
This special issue of Water brings together ten studies on groundwater contamination and remediation. Common themes include practical techniques for plume identification and delineation, the central role of subsurface processes, the pervasiveness of non-Fickian transport, and the importance of bacterial communities in the broader context of biogeochemistry.
Mays, David↗
Kennedy Space Center Remediation Program Overview- Streamlined RCRA Remediation via Engineering Evaluation Process
No abstract available
Remediation↗
Interactive comparison and remediation of collections of macromolecular structures: Interactive Comparison and Remediation
Often similar structures need to be compared to reveal local differences throughout the entire model or between related copies within the model. Therefore, a program to compare multiple structures and enable correction any differences not supported by the density map was written within the Phenix framework (Adams et al., Acta Cryst 2010; D66:213–221). This program, called Structure Comparison, can also be used for structures with multiple copies of the same protein chain in the asymmetric unit, that is, as a result of non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS). Structure Comparison was designed to interface with Coot(Emsley et al., Acta Cryst 2010; D66:486–501) and PyMOL(DeLano, PyMOL 0.99; 2002) to facilitate comparison of large numbers of related structures. Structure Comparison analyzes collections of protein structures using several metrics, such as the rotamer conformation of equivalent residues, displays the results in tabular form and allows superimposed protein chains and density maps to be quickly inspected and edited (via the tools in Coot) for consistency, completeness and correctness.
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
Sorbent materials for rapid remediation of wash water during radiological event relief
Not Available
Jolin, William C. (ORCID:0000000261203632)↗
Electrokinetic nanoparticle injection for remediating leaks in oil well cement
Not Available
Němeček, Jiří↗
Initiating events, functional remediation, and assessment of risk to ecological resources
Not provided.
Biodiversity & Conservation↗
A pore-scale investigation of heavy crude oil trapping and removal during surfactant-enhanced remediation
Not Available
Ghosh, Jaydeep↗
G 4 -quartet hydrogels from 5'-hydrazino-guanosine for the non-covalent and covalent remediation of contaminants from water
HG 2 ·KCl hydrogel assemblies non-covalently bind anionic dyes and covalently bind an aldehyde in water.
Chemistry↗
A Novel Mobile Examination and Remediation Facility for On-Site Remediation of Dry Storage Systems
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Chatzidakis, Stylianos↗
Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site
Several nations are faced with the need to remediate large contaminated sites following World War II, the Cold War, and abandoned industrial sites, and to return them to productive land uses. In the United States, the Department of Energy (DOE) has the largest cleanup challenge, and its Hanford Site in the state of Washington has the most extensive and most expensive cleanup task. Ideally, the risk to ecological resources on remediation sites is evaluated before, during, and after remediation, and the risk from, or damage to, ecological resources from contaminants should be lower following remediation. In this paper, we report the risk to ecological resources before, during, and as a consequence of remediation on contaminated units requiring cleanup, and then examine the causes for changes in risk by evaluating 56 cleanup evaluation units (EUs) at the Hanford Site. In this case, remediation includes a restoration phase. In general, the risk to ecological and eco-cultural resources is currently not discernible or low at most contaminated units, increases during remediation, and decreases thereafter. Remediation often causes physical disruption to ecosystems as it reduces the risk from exposure to contaminants. Most new remediation projects at the Hanford Site include ecological restoration. Ecological restoration results in the potential for the presence of higher quality resources after remediation than currently exists on these contaminated lands and facilities. Although counter-intuitive, our evaluation of the risk to ecological resources following remediation indicated that a significant percentage of units (61%) will be at increased risk in the post-remediation period. This increased risk is due to DOE's successful remediation and restoration that results in a higher percent of native vegetation and higher ecological value on the sites in the post-remediation period than before. These newly-created resources can then be at risk from post-remediation activities. Risks to these new higher quality resources include the potential for spread of invasive species and of noxious grasses used in previous cleanup actions, disruption of ecosystems (including those with state or federally listed species and unique ecosystems), compaction of soil, use of pesticides to control invasive species, and the eventual need for continued monitoring activities. Thus, by greatly improving the existing habitat and health of eco-receptors, and maintaining habitat corridors between high quality habitats, the ecological resources in the post-remediated units are at risk unless care is taken to protect them. Many of the negative effects of both remediation and future monitoring (or other future land uses) can be avoided by planning and management early in the remediation process. We suggest DOE and other agencies convene a panel of managers, remediation scientists, regulators, environmental and ecological scientists, Native Americans, economists, and the public to develop a generic list of performance metrics for the restoration phase of remediation, including evaluation of success, which could be applied across the DOE complex.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
SURF: Advances in the Incorporation of Sustainability Into Remedial Approaches - 16451
The inclusion of sustainability considerations in remediation cleanup process (investigation through site closure) benefits site owners, including Federal agencies such as the Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of Energy (DOE), through development of more efficient and cost-effective remedies as well as communities by considering socio-economic impacts and redevelopment into remedial decisions. The incorporation of social, environmental, and economic considerations early in the remedial process often enables achievement of regulatory site closure sooner and with broader community acceptance. In order to achieve these objectives, stakeholders, including federal facilities, regulators, contractors, and consultants, have expressed the need for case studies demonstrating successful implementation of sustainable practices. The Sustainable Remediation Forum emerged in 2006 and was established as a non-profit organization in 2010. Through exploration of technical issues such as groundwater conservation and reuse at remediation sites to life cycle assessment approaches, subject matter experts have led discussions across the industry of how the incorporation of sustainability into the remediation process can provide benefits through: - Consideration of socioeconomic impacts and drivers for remediation and redevelopment; - Reduced environmental impacts of remedial actions; and - Enhanced economic value through partnerships and informed decision making. Incorporation of sustainable remediation concepts provides distinct and recognizable value, as demonstrated through the technical initiatives of the Sustainable Remediation Forum, remediation industry conferences and events, and the prevalence of government agency and corporate sustainable remediation programs, such as the DOE's Cross-Programmatic Work Group. Sustainable remediation has evolved from discussions of environmental impacts of cleanups (with considerable green-washing), to quantifying and minimizing the environmental footprint and subsequent long term global impacts of a remedy, and currently, incorporating strategies to address all three components of sustainability - environmental, social, and economic. However, the practice of sustainability must continue to advance and new approaches should be adopted to holistically evaluate beneficial and detrimental impacts from the remedial process and incorporate sustainability concepts throughout the project life cycle. A more holistic and comprehensive approach, beyond the traditional paradigm of sustainable remediation, will lead a project team to achieve social and economic sustainability objectives of the community while protecting human health and the environment. This 'advanced' approach is where the most significant benefits will be achieved. Practitioners need documented, peer-reviewed, technically sound concepts and examples of sustainable remediation as supporting material to gain acceptance and approval of incorporation of best management practices and evaluation techniques. Reviewing the advancements of sustainable remediation over the last 5-10 years and the identification of lessons learned has great merit. This discussion of case studies will highlight successful incorporation of social impacts, economic analysis, and site redevelopment into the remedial process to provide a roadmap for site owners in developing sustainable approaches for their sites. Specifically, benefits were achieved in these case studies through promotion of economic development, innovative financing, incorporation of risk-based approaches, and consideration of social value of a site. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Integrated program for department of energy environmental management office of soil and groundwater remediation - 15426
The subsurface problems that remain at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) sites are technically complex and the costs to complete the cleanup mission are expected to range from $17 billion to $21 billion. There is growing recognition that conventional remedies will not meet regulatory goals at a number of sites and alternative approaches will be required. To address the challenge, the EM Office of Soil and Groundwater Remediation created an integrated program to develop innovative scientific and technical in conjunction with engagement of stakeholders, regulators, and the public. The integrated program provides a holistic approach to assess the risk associated with the remaining challenges facing EM and develop solutions that achieve remediation goals and protect human health and the environment. The integrated program uses a systems-based framework for achieving environmental remediation goals. The framework is based on developing and updating a site conceptual model and includes steps to 1) provide the technical basis for remedial actions, 2) assessments of potential remedies, and 3) implementation and management of remedies to achieve site restoration goals. The Office of Soil and Groundwater remediation defines research and development needed to successfully define and apply the framework. Research opportunities and targets are identified in characterization and conceptual model development, predictions of site conditions, remediation, monitoring, and remediation decision support. Characterization and quantification of key subsurface uncertainties is needed to support conceptual model development, identify contaminant source zones, quantify the flux of contaminants from source terms to points of compliance, and characterize controlling processes for remediation approaches including natural attenuation. Predictive analyses are needed to support development of remediation endpoints, select and design active and in situ or passive remedies, assess remedy performance, and predict long-term contaminant behavior for design of monitoring systems. Advancements are needed to support adaptive remediation approaches and to develop long-term contaminant management strategies for complex sites, such as effective in situ treatment methods for long-lived contaminants ({sup 99}Tc, {sup 129}I, U, Hg, etc.). Monitoring tools and approaches are needed to evaluate remedy performance and plume behavior and decision support methods are needed to quantitatively evaluate remediation alternatives. The Office of Soil and Groundwater Remediation leverages scientific understanding provided through partnerships with the DOE Office of Science, the Department of Defense, and Environmental Protection Agency. These partnerships are helping EM develop scientific understanding and technologies for implementing the assessment framework. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Sustainable Remediation of Radionuclides By a Common Sense Approach to Enhanced Attenuation - 16441
Development of in situ and relatively passive remedies for treatment of groundwater contaminated by metals and radionuclides is becoming more important because of the difficulty and cost - both to the environment and financially -- of removing these types of contaminants from the subsurface by pump-and-treat or excavation. In situ technologies rely on reactions that tend to remove contaminants from groundwater by partitioning them to solid phases in the aquifer. Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) relies solely on natural reactions to achieve remedial goals. Enhanced attenuation (EA) uses engineered approaches to supplement remediation when MNA is not sufficient to meet remedial goals. Both approaches leave contaminants in the subsurface and require a high burden of proof that contaminants will not be mobilized and become a risk in the future. Proof of the sustained effectiveness of an EA remedy is made much easier by strategic design. In multi-contaminant plumes, it is important to prioritize contaminants according to the risk they pose, with the recognition that one remedy rarely treats all contaminants. The goal for the engineered portion of the remedy should be maximum risk reduction with minimal engineering. Natural attenuation or negotiated alternate concentration levels will often allow low risk contaminants to go untreated. Whenever possible, the remedy should be consistent with the geochemical evolution of the waste site, insuring that the treated immobilized contaminants are likely to remain relatively immobile for long time frames. Finally, use what nature provides geologically, hydrologically, geochemically, or microbiologically in the remedy design. One of the impediments faced by waste site managers in implementing EA remedies is paralysis by perceived complexity. There are things that must be known to design an effective EA remedy, but there is always the temptation to know everything to eliminate the possibility of failure. Furthermore, there are plenty of people warning of failure if all is not known and they are usually willing to help the design team know all, for a price. Yet, the price of trying to eliminate all risk is never implementing an innovative remedy. All parties involved -- scientists/engineers, waste site managers, regulators and stakeholders must assume some degree of risk to deploy an EA remedy. If all parties are to assume some risk, then trust built through close communication from the start is required. The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management has funded an applied field research initiative for several years focused, in part, on developing EA remedies for metals and radionuclides using these guiding principles. This approach to EA remedies grew out of developing and deploying a remediation strategy to replace a pump-and-treat system at the F-Area Seepage Basins on the Savannah River Site. The pump-and-treat system was energy intensive, produced several thousand cubic feet of solid radioactive waste per year, and cost $ 1 million per month to operate. The EA remedy that replaced the pump-and-treat is energy efficient, produces no waste, and costs approximately $1 million per year to maintain. At the F-Area Seepage Basins approximately 7 billion liters of low level radioactive waste solutions were disposed in three unlined basins resulting in contaminated groundwater containing various radionuclides and other contaminants. The primary contaminants of concern are tritium, strontium-90, uranium, and iodine-129. Other key features of the contaminant plume are its acidic nature with pH values as low as 3.2, its vertical stratification in the water table aquifer, and the tendency of the most contaminated portions to follow troughs in the top of the clay separating the upper aquifer zone from the lower aquifer zone. The geology was exploited by installing a funnel-and-gate system into the clay with the barrier portion blocking contaminant flow paths in the troughs in the clay. This forces the most contaminated water to flow through the gates where it encounters an in situ treatment zone created by periodic injections of alkaline solution. The flux of tritium has been reduced significantly by the barrier walls. Strontium-90 and uranium are treated by enhanced sorption in the circum-neutral pH treatment zone, consistent with natural geochemical evolution of the waste site from acidic to more neutral pH. An additional in situ treatment zone was created up-gradient of the one of the gates to treat iodine-129. Sub-micrometer diameter silver chloride particles were injected into the aquifer by direct push methods to create the treatment zone. In the laboratory and in a field pilot test the poorly soluble silver chloride particles reacted with iodide to form much less soluble silver iodide. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the silver chloride is ongoing. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Guidance for Monitoring Passive Groundwater Remedies Over Extended Time Scales
Passive remediation can be appropriate where natural processes and actions such as institutional controls mitigate exposure to contaminated groundwater, achieving remedial action objectives and protectiveness of human health and the environment. Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) is a prevalent passive remediation strategy supported by a regulatory framework and monitoring design guidance. However, long-term passive remedies are usually selected in combination with at least one active remedy, such as source removal, in situ treatment, or pump-and-treat, functioning as a complementary method for achieving remediation objectives and meeting the applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. However, MNA and existing monitoring guidance primarily target situations where the remedial action objectives are met within a few decades. When time scales for passive remediation extend to many decades (50 years or more), a corresponding change in monitoring strategy is needed to adapt to the extended time scale. This document provides guidance for implementing an extended-scale monitoring (ESM) approach appropriate for long-duration passive remediation. Extended-scale is defined in this document with respect to time (i.e., a long duration of remediation) and a large enough physical scale such that downstream receptors will not be impacted within the remediation timeframe. ESM applies to slow-moving groundwater contaminant plumes and emphasizes monitoring primarily for potential exposure pathways. For this approach, the primary monitoring objective is to demonstrate that the plume diminishes before reaching the receptor zone or point of compliance and/or a receptor does not receive concentrations above the compliance limit. While the overall objectives of protecting human health and the environment are the same as for plumes where remediation can occur over a shorter time period, the time scales between decisions are longer and the dynamics of plume evolution are slower. To this end, a scenario-based strategy is described for different plume and source conditions, defining a containment and receptor zones. The containment zone is the area where the risk of exposure to groundwater contamination can be mitigated (e.g., through institutional controls) during the remediation time period. The receptor zone is defined as the area where exposure to groundwater contamination cannot be mitigated and compliance concentration standards must be met. Within the containment zone, slow plume migration may occur, leading to concentrations that exceed compliance standards. However, where distance to the receptor zone is large relative to plume migration and attenuation rate, this approach can be protective of the receptor zone. Selection of a long-duration passive remedy needs to be based on sufficient understanding of contaminant sources, hydrogeology, and contaminant plumes. A strong technical basis, supported by predictive analysis, is recommended to substantiate that contamination is expected to stay within the containment zone during the active remediation and attainment phase of the remedy, and diminish to meet compliance standards within the extended timeframe prior to reaching the receptor zone (e.g., many decades or even centuries). The ESM approach is based on verification of plume behavior and not on detailed plume dynamics. Monitoring is conducted to confirm expected behavior with an emphasis on exposure pathways to verify that plumes remain contained in areas where the protectiveness objectives can be met. ESM should not be adopted if there is significant risk of the plume extending beyond the containment zone. Given the slow movement within the containment zone, less frequent sampling is required relative to approaches used for conventional-scale remediation.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
An Overview of Nanomaterials for Environmental Remediation Applications
The environmental remediation capabilities of nanoparticles were reviewed and evaluated. Nanoparticles (NPs) have been used to remediate various forms of environmental contamination. Various materials, morphologies, and conditions are required to remediate different contaminants. Nanoparticles may have benefits and/or limitations compared with traditional remediation methods. New techniques are being applied to mitigate the limitations of NPs. Nanomaterials are a promising technology for the environmental remediation. NPs have been used for the remediation of aqueous and atmospheric contaminants. Nanoparticles have been used to sequester contaminants toxic to human and environmental health. Various materials, morphologies, and conditions are necessary for the remediation of different contaminants. The remediation of heavy metals is of significant concern. Contaminants may be remediated by means of sorption or reduction. The remediation capability of nanoparticles is promising due to their high surface area and reactivity. Reaction kinetics are, therefore, notably fast. These characteristics make NPs attractive for environmental remediation. Various NPs have been used as sequestering agents for environmental contaminants. NPs have been used to remediate heavy metals as well as organic contaminants. Technical Objectives: Assess viability of nanoparticles (NPs) for environmental remediation; Review benefits and limitations of NPs; Design future experiments to test remediation capabilities of NPs. Future Plans: Create NP filters for remediation - Grow Au NPs on Stainless Steel Wool: Stainless steel wool has many defects and crevices allowing the Au NPs to grow on the surface; Stainless steel wool will not react with the heavy metal contaminants tested; NPs are embedded, so they do not have to be removed from solution. Test sorption capabilities with heavy metal contaminants in aqueous solution. Benefits of Gold NPs: Corrosion/oxidation resistant; Exhibit visible/near IR plasmon resonance; Can be synthesized by solution chemistry: cost efficient and easily scalable. Surfactants: Used to lower surface energy and prevent aggregation; Sodium citrate: anionic surfactant (-); Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB): cationic surfactant (+); Ionic surfactants create charged NPs; Charged NPs can be used to sequester ionic contaminants (eg. heavy metals)
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
GIS-Based Modeling of Contaminated Soil Volumes at Multiple Sites in the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program - 20149
The remediation of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive waste (HTRW) sites produces cost-related risks associated with the estimation of contaminated soil or debris volumes. Historical risk-management techniques include cost contingencies to cover volume uncertainties that affect project budgeting and decision-making. The Buffalo District teamed with project partners to lessen volume uncertainty and reduce project risks at multiple HTRW sites managed under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Historical remedial investigations under FUSRAP commonly identified the presence of radiological material in site media, the associated human health risk, and then areas of remediation. To manage remedial execution and reduce risk, pre-design or remediation-phase sampling essentially 'chased' contamination, which was not conducive to efficient predictive budgeting derived from Feasibility Study (FS) cost analyses. The Buffalo District first optimized their approach to better understand volume uncertainty by utilizing the Argonne National Laboratory's Bayesian Approaches for Adaptive Spatial Sampling (BAASS) software [1]. BAASS processed soft data (e.g., gamma walk-over data) and spatial sampling data to estimate the lateral extent of contaminated soil irrespective of depth (i.e., gross contamination extent) and define areas of contaminant uncertainty. The software performed a binary transformation of contaminant concentrations at all sampling points based upon remedial action goals or a sum of ratios approach (i.e., clean, impacted, or range of impacts in soil). The model produced two-dimensional (horizontal) contaminant probability contours and statistical uncertainty in the sampling coverage and resulting contaminant extents. This method was translated vertically by partitioning the sampling data into depth brackets that produced a stacked representation of contaminant extents and uncertainty in the subsurface (i.e., similar to construction lifts). The results commonly led to a better understanding of project uncertainty and the need for sampling strategies that produce high-confidence soil volumes, which control costs. The BAASS-based delineations were eventually replaced by Empirical Bayesian Kriging (EBK) methods available in ArcGIS Spatial or 3D Analysts [2]. The EBK method calculates contaminant probability zones derived from user-controlled semivariograms of the spatial datasets. The resulting probability zones (e.g., 50% or 80% of contaminant probability) represent the two-dimensional surface delineation of the overall horizontal remedial area, similarly to BAASS. However, unlike BAASS, the vertical sampling data within these probability zones became vertical control points to contour a subterranean surface that connects subsurface points to the land-surface delineations of contamination. The resulting representation of horizontal and vertical impacts within an enclosed envelop (volume) of soil included uncertainty distributions that are used to plan uncertainty-reduction sampling. These data-driven and math-based models of three-dimensional sampling results produced well-bounded remedial volumes for project planning and better uncertainty predictions during project budgeting. The EBK method was applied to several FUSRAP sites managed by the Buffalo District and compared to less rigorously modeled sites previously remediated by the District. The comparison of modeled to actual remediated volumes provide a basis for validating the volume-estimation method. This comparison is important to ensure modeled volumes match physical boundaries of site remediation. FUSRAP sites with denser investigative sampling and lesser volume uncertainty proved useful in remedial planning and contracting. The Buffalo District noted that historical sites with sparser sampling arrays had greater disparity between estimated volumes and final remedial volumes. The benefit achieved over the cost of detailed soil sampling appears positive for FUSRAP projects, especially where impacts vary widely and appear unbounded by investigation-phase sampling. The subsequent Empirical Bayesian Kriging of contamination coupled with vertical contouring for soil estimations reduces uncertainty in soil volumes or indicates where sampling is required to reduce uncertainty, which together optimize remedial planning and budgeting. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗